Banu Mushtaq's fight for Muslim women's rights wins International Booker
03:30
Banu Mushtaq: International Booker Prize winner
BENGALURU: A trailblazing writer and activist from Hassan district in Karnataka,
Banu Mushtaq
is a multifaceted personality who has left her imprint across journalism, law, politics and women's rights activism.
But it is her powerful storytelling rooted in resistance, gender justice and social reform that has now earned global recognition.
Mushtaq is a prominent voice of the
Bandaya Sahitya
(rebel literature) movement, which challenged patriarchal and feudal structures through its sharp and socially conscious writing in the 1980s and 1990s. As the state convener of the Bandaya Sahitya Sanghatane, she authored six influential short story collections that expanded the boundaries of
Kannada literature
.
A fearless advocate for women's rights within the Muslim community, Mushtaq was among the earliest voices to demand the right for women to offer namaz in mosques — decades before the hijab debate made national headlines. Her campaign in the 1990s invited a fatwa and social boycott, but she stood firm.
"I was only making a point that even in Islamic countries like Saudi Arabia, women are allowed to pray alongside men," she said in an interview.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Trade Bitcoin & Ethereum – No Wallet Needed!
IC Markets
Start Now
Undo
"But my argument earned the wrath of the community. It led to mental distress. I recovered only because of the support of family and solace I drew from my writing."
Before entering law and politics, Mushtaq began her career in journalism with Lankesh Patrike, where her first report exposed a fatwa against a Muslim girl in Bijapur for watching a movie. She took up the cause, sparking what became known as the Najma Bagi controversy.
She denounces the triple talaq system as un-Islamic and continues to push for internal reform within the community. "Change must come from within," she insists, "free from external political influence."
Her acclaimed short story Kari Nagaragalu (Black Cobras), featured in her award-winning collection Heart Lamp, was adapted into a national award-winning film 'Hasina' by director Girish Kasaravalli.
"I have read many stories by Banu Mushtaq. They are all rich with literary value and powerful in expressing the anguish of oppressed women in the Muslim community," said Kasaravalli. "I'm surprised she hasn't won recognition in the Kannada literary field so far. The International Booker Prize may serve as an eye opener for those who ignored her."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
26 minutes ago
- Time of India
Naming your child in the UAE? This law says you can't choose just any name
In the UAE, naming your child comes with legal boundaries, Wadeema's Law bans names that insult dignity or defy cultural and religious norms/ Image: Stock (Pexels) Federal Law No. 3 of 2016 – known as Wadeema's Law – outlines what names are legally acceptable for children born in the UAE. A recent viral social media post has brought fresh attention to a lesser-known but important law in the UAE: naming regulations for newborns under Federal Law No. 3 of 2016, widely known as Wadeema's Law. This law, introduced in memory of Wadeema, a child whose tragic death sparked national outrage, was enacted to protect children's rights across all areas of life in the UAE. Among its many provisions is a clear guideline on how children may be named at birth. The law behind naming: What article 8 says According to Article 8 of Wadeema's Law, 'A child has the right from birth to a name that does not imply humiliation or insult to their dignity and is not contrary to religious beliefs or social customs.' This means parents in the UAE are legally prohibited from giving a child a name that could be deemed: Offensive Insulting to the child's dignity In conflict with religious values Inappropriate in the context of local culture or customs The law does not list banned names explicitly, but the language makes it clear: the choice of a name must align with social respect, cultural norms, and religious sensitivity. Additional rights under Wadeema's Law The law contains several other critical rights that cover a child's identity and legal status in the UAE. These include: Article 7: Every child has the right to life and personal safety, and the state guarantees the child's growth, development, and care in accordance with the law. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Buy Brass Idols - Handmade Brass Statues for Home & Gifting Luxeartisanship Buy Now Undo Article 9: A child must be registered immediately after birth in the official births register in line with the applicable legal system. Article 10: A child has the right to acquire a nationality, according to the laws in force within the UAE. Article 11: Every child has the right to legal parentage and family affiliation. The child must be affiliated with their lawful parents under prevailing national laws. In addition, both parents or the child's legal guardian are required to obtain all necessary legal documents related to the child's birth, identity, and nationality. This includes: Birth certificate Nationality papers Any other state-issued identification documents Why it matters While naming a child might seem like a personal choice, the UAE government sees it as part of the child's fundamental dignity and legal identity. By regulating names, Wadeema's Law ensures that no child is burdened with a name that could affect their self-worth, cultural belonging, or legal standing. This renewed public attention serves as a timely reminder to parents and guardians to be fully aware of their legal responsibilities, not just in caring for a child, but in safeguarding their identity from day one.
Time of India
40 minutes ago
- Time of India
NIH scientists go public to criticize Trump's deep cuts in public health research
Cardboard tombstones symbolizing canceled research grants at the NIH Visitors Center in Bethesda (AP) WASHINGTON: In his confirmation hearings to lead the National Institutes of Health, Jay Bhattacharya pledged his openness to views that might conflict with his own. "Dissent, he said, "is the very essence of science. " That commitment is being put to the test. On Monday, scores of scientists at the agency sent their Trump-appointed leader a letter titled the Bethesda Declaration, a frontal challenge to "policies that undermine the NIH mission, waste public resources, and harm the health of Americans and people across the globe." It says: "We dissent." In a capital where insiders often insist on anonymity to say such things publicly, more than 90 NIH researchers, program directors, branch chiefs and scientific review officers put their signatures on the letter - and their careers on the line. Confronting a 'culture of fear' They went public in the face of a "culture of fear and suppression" they say President Donald Trump 's administration has spread through the federal civil service. "We are compelled to speak up when our leadership prioritizes political momentum over human safety and faithful stewardship of public resources," the declaration says. Named for the agency's headquarters location in Maryland, the Bethesda Declaration details upheaval in the world's premier public health research institution over the course of mere months. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 5 Books Warren Buffett Wants You to Read In 2025 Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo It addresses the abrupt termination of 2,100 research grants valued at more than $12 billion and some of the human costs that have resulted, such as cutting off medication regimens to participants in clinical trials or leaving them with unmonitored device implants. In one case, an NIH-supported study of multi-drug-resistant tuberculosis in Haiti had to be stopped, ceasing antibiotic treatment mid-course for patients. In a number of cases, trials that were mostly completed were rendered useless without the money to finish and analyze the work, the letter says. "Ending a $5 million research study when it is 80% complete does not save $1 million," it says, "it wastes $4 million." The mask comes off The four-page letter, addressed to Bhattacharya but also sent to Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and members of Congress who oversee the NIH, was endorsed by 250 anonymous employees of the agency besides the 92 who signed. Jenna Norton, who oversees health disparity research at the agency's National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, recently appeared at a forum by Sen. Angela Alsobrooks, D-Md., to talk about what's happening at the NIH. At the event, she masked to conceal her identity. Now the mask is off. She was a lead organizer of the declaration. "I want people to know how bad things are at NIH," Norton told The Associated Press. The signers said they modeled their indictment after Bhattacharya's own Great Barrington Declaration of October 2020, when he was a professor at Stanford University Medical School. His declaration drew together likeminded infectious disease epidemiologists and public health scientists who dissented from what they saw as excessive COVID-19 lockdown policies and felt ostracized by the larger public health community that pushed those policies, including the NIH. "He is proud of his statement, and we are proud of ours," said Sarah Kobrin, a branch chief at the NIH's National Cancer Institute who signed the Bethesda Declaration. Cancer research is sidelined As chief of the Health Systems and Interventions Research Branch, Kobrin provides scientific oversight of researchers across the country who've been funded by the cancer institute or want to be. But sudden cuts in personnel and money have shifted her work from improving cancer care research to what she sees as minimizing its destruction. "So much of it is gone - my work," she said. The 21-year NIH veteran said she signed because "I don't want to be a collaborator" in the political manipulation of biomedical science. Ian Morgan, a postdoctoral fellow with the National Institute of General Medical Sciences, also signed the declaration. "We have a saying in basic science," he said. "You go and become a physician if you want to treat thousands of patients. You go and become a researcher if you want to save billions of patients. "We are doing the research that is going to go and create the cures of the future," he added. But that won't happen, he said, if Trump's Republican administration prevails with its searing cuts to grants. The NIH employees interviewed by the AP emphasized they were speaking for themselves and not for their institutes or the NIH. Dissenters range across the breadth of NIH Employees from all 27 NIH institutes and centers gave their support to the declaration. Most who signed are intimately involved with evaluating and overseeing extramural research grants. The letter asserts that "NIH trials are being halted without regard to participant safety" and that the agency is shirking commitments to trial participants who "braved personal risk to give the incredible gift of biological samples, understanding that their generosity would fuel scientific discovery and improve health." The Trump administration has gone at public health research on several fronts, both directly, as part of its broad effort to root out diversity, equity and inclusion values throughout the bureaucracy, and as part of its drive to starve some universities of federal money. A blunt ax swings This has forced "indiscriminate grant terminations, payment freezes for ongoing research, and blanket holds on awards regardless of the quality, progress, or impact of the science," the declaration says. Some NIH employees have previously come forward in televised protests to air grievances, and many walked out of Bhattacharya's town hall with staff. The declaration is the first cohesive effort to register agency-wide dismay with the NIH's direction. A Signal group became the place for participants to sort through NIH chatter on Reddit, discern rumor from reality and offer mutual support. The declaration took shape in that group and as word spread neighbor to neighbor in NIH offices. The dissenters remind Bhattacharya in their letter of his oft-stated ethic that academic freedom must be a lynchpin in science. With that in place, he said in a statement in April, "NIH scientists can be certain they are afforded the ability to engage in open, academic discourse as part of their official duties and in their personal capacities without risk of official interference, professional disadvantage or workplace retaliation." Now it will be seen whether that's enough to protect those NIH employees challenging the Trump administration and him. "There's a book I read to my kids, and it talks about how you can't be brave if you're not scared," said Norton, who has three young children. "I am so scared about doing this, but I am trying to be brave for my kids because it's only going to get harder to speak up. "Maybe I'm putting my kids at risk by doing this," she added. "And I'm doing it anyway because I couldn't live with myself otherwise."
Time of India
42 minutes ago
- Time of India
Did Elon Musk confirm he 'took' Stephen Miller's wife Katie Miller? Viral screenshot shot down
A viral screenshot claimed Elon Musk posted about taking Stephen Miller's wife and then deleted it. A screenshot went viral on X showing that Elon Musk replied to a post of White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller. "We will take back America," Stephen Miller wrote. The viral screenshot claimed Elon Musk reposted it and wrote: Just like I took your wife. The wife in question is Katie Miller, the former spokesperson of the Department of Government Efficiency, who stepped down from her White House role to work full time for Elon Musk. The kerfuffle between Donald Trump and Elon Musk put the husband and wife in a fix, as the husband is one of the most trusted aides of Donald Trump and the wife works for Elon Musk. Before Trump-Musk's fallout, the Musk-Miller fight was the hot gossip from the White House as rumors had it that Katie Miller left her husband for Elon Musk. In the aftermath of the Musk-Trump fallout, Elon Musk unfollowed Stephen Miller on X. While the text of the viral post 'Just like I took your wife' seemed fake, what complicated things was that Elon Musk deleted many a post in the last few days -- especially the slanderous ones including the one in which he accused Donald Trump of being involved with sex-offender pedophile Jeffrey Epstein who died by suicide in 2019. This fake screenshot of Elon Musk confirming that he took Stephen Miller's wife Katie Miller went viral Social media users started asking Grok, Elon Musk's AI, whether the screenshot was real and whether Elon Musk indeed made the post and deleted it. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Secure Your Child's Future with Strong English Fluency Planet Spark Learn More Undo Grok said it's possible that Elon Musk indeed posted it and deleted it. Elon Musk had to intervene and deny that he never posted it. "No, it's fake ffs 🤦♂️ I never posted this," Elon Musk posted making this also his first comment about the throuple controversy. Elon follows Stephen Miller back, Katie supports husband In a major development, Elon Musk has started following Stephen Miller on X, and Katie Miller also showed support for the husband as ABC journalist Terry Moran called him a 'world-class hater'. Terry Moran was suspended by the network while Katie took a strong stand for her husband and called for Moran's immediate firing.
