'Google was wrong to...': Europe court advisor on $4.74 billion Android fine
Google
has faced a significant setback in its multi-year legal battle against the European Union's (EU) antitrust authorities, as a top legal adviser to the EU's highest court has backed a 4.124 billion euros ($4.74 billion) fine. Juliane Kokott, an advocate general at the European Union's Court of Justice in Luxembourg, recommended that judges uphold the penalty against the search giant for its contractual obligations on device manufacturers using its Android operating system.
According to a report by news agency Reuters, Kokott advised the court to confirm the reduced fine set by the lower tribunal. Judges, who usually follow four out of five such non-binding opinions, will rule in the coming months.
She asserts that Google was wrong to challenge the fine, stating that for years, the company held a dominant position across several Android ecosystem markets, which allowed it to unfairly benefit by ensuring users utilized its services, particularly Google Search.
Google expresses disappointment with the opinion
In response, a Google spokesperson expressed disappointment with the opinion, arguing that if it were to be fully adopted by the Court, it "would discourage investment in open platforms and ultimately harm Android users, partners and app developers."
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Memperdagangkan CFD Emas dengan salah satu spread terendah?
IC Markets
Mendaftar
Undo
"Android has created more choice for everyone and supports thousands of successful businesses in Europe and around the world," a Google spokesperson was quoted as saying.
The dispute dates back to 2018 when the European Commission initially levied a record 4.34 billion euros fine against Google. The Commission alleged that Google had unfairly leveraged its digital dominance by imposing conditions on Android device manufacturers and network operators, effectively ensuring that search traffic from Android devices was directed to Google's own search engine.
Google first appealed this decision at the EU's General Court, where judges largely upheld the Commission's findings but reduced the original penalty to 4.12 billion euros in 2022. Google subsequently appealed this reduced fine to the Court of Justice.
AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
32 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
EU investigating Musk's X corporate structure after xAI deal
The European Union said on Thursday it was seeking more information from Elon Musk's X about changes to its corporate structure, months after the social media platform was bought by xAI in a $33 billion deal. "We are following closely changes in the corporate structure of X, as we would changes in any other designated platform," a spokesperson for the European Commission, the EU's executive arm, said. However, the spokesperson did not confirm an earlier report from Bloomberg News that said regulators were evaluating potential fines on X under the Digital Services Act. Before its summer recess in August, the regulator could announce a fine on X for alleged infractions under the DSA, though delays are possible, Bloomberg reported. Representatives for xAI and X did not immediately respond to Reuters requests for comment. Any firm found in breach of the DSA faces a fine worth up to 6% of its global turnover, and repeat offenders may be banned from operating in Europe altogether. Earlier this month, X highlighted a disclaimer to its blue checkmark in an attempt to head off a possible hefty fine from EU antitrust regulators. The Commission issued preliminary findings under the DSA in July last year that X violated rules on deceptive design, especially by turning the blue checkmark into a paid verification, assigning false credibility to users. X had disagreed with the assessment. The EU had announced a probe into X's alleged breaches of the DSA in December 2023.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
39 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Tesla joins Austin's self-driving race with launch of Robotaxi service
Austin is known for live music, Texas' premier public university and being home to tech companies. It is also becoming a laboratory for autonomous vehicles. Driverless Waymo taxis, owned by Google's parent company, regularly drop off diners at Austin's famous barbecue joints. Box-shaped, four-wheeled robots operated by Avride, a start-up working with Uber Eats, deliver Thai takeout to customers downtown. Zoox, owned by Amazon, and Volkswagen are separately testing autonomous taxis here. Tesla, the electric car company based in Austin, recently joined the party, rolling out self-driving Model Ys ahead of a taxi service that is expected to begin offering rides as soon as Sunday. The vehicles, which the company calls Robotaxis, are part of an audacious effort by Elon Musk, Tesla's chief executive, to leap ahead of Waymo, which dominates a nascent business that someday could be worth tens of billions of dollars and perhaps much more. But the busy streets of Austin show that Tesla will face significant competition and other challenges. It will have to engage in painstaking experimentation to perfect its technology, which some autonomous-driving experts have criticised for having fewer safeguards than those operated by Waymo and other companies. Also, Tesla is starting from behind. Waymo has been driving paying passengers for years in Phoenix, San Francisco and Los Angeles, and started its commercial service in Austin in March in partnership with Uber. Waymo said on Wednesday that it was applying for a permit from New York City to offer rides with a person behind the wheel. A change in state law would be required for fully autonomous rides. A small fleet of Tesla Robotaxis will begin carrying passengers in Austin on June 22, Musk said on X last week but added the company may delay the start of the service. But analysts expect the cars will be available only to company employees or invited guests. The service will probably not be available to the general public for several months, analysts said. Tesla is adapting its most advanced driver assistance software, already offered as an option on the cars it sells, to operate without human intervention. If this approach works, the company could quickly roll out driverless taxis around the world. Musk has said a software update could allow hundreds of thousands or even millions of existing Teslas to operate as autonomous taxis, making cheap driverless rides ubiquitous. But the approach Tesla is taking is unusual. Waymo and other companies working to offer self-driving taxi services have been developing their technologies for years, painstakingly mapping streets and training their software to avoid hitting pedestrians, cyclists, garbage trucks, fire engines and all manner of other things found on public roads. 'FSD is an immature system,' said Matthew Wansley, a professor at Cardozo School of Law in New York, referring to what Tesla calls its Full Self-Driving (Supervised) software. Tesla did not respond to a request for comment. Another challenge for Tesla is that its self-driving system is under investigation by federal officials. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration is looking into whether Tesla's technology was responsible for crashes in conditions where the road was obscured by fog, dust, bright light or darkness. One crash led to the death of a pedestrian.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
39 minutes ago
- Business Standard
PM Modi's 'make in India' strikes emotional chord with the consumers
Prime Minister Narendra Modi's 'make-in-India' programme seems to have struck an emotional chord with Indian consumers. A survey conducted by McKinsey says that as much as 68 per cent of the respondents feel that in the second quarter (Q2) of 2025, they would purchase a product made by 'locally-owned companies,' catapulting India to the top among 18 countries. This trend is also three percentage points higher compared to the previous quarter (Q1) of 2025. But the nationalistic spirit is not limited to only India. In China — which is involved in an aggressive trade battle with the US over high tariffs — consumers seem to be moving back towards local goods. The survey shows that 58 per cent of the respondents in China want to buy local products in Q2 of 2025. This has gone up sharply by 7 per cent over the previous quarter. In the US, with President Donald Trump's aggressive calls for 'make in USA' or 'Making America Great Again', 52 per cent of the respondents in the country want to buy local products in Q2 of 2025. It is up by four percentage points compared to Q1. In Canada, Trump's call to convert the country into a US state led to the boycott of American products there. This explains again the 8 percentage points increase in Canadian respondents (hitting 61 per cent) in Q2. They said they would buy more local products over the previous quarter. The research was based on quizzing 25,998 consumers across 18 countries between April 26 and May 5, and included Gen Z customers as part of the McKinsey ConsumerWise Sentiment Survey of Q2, 2025. What is also interesting is that Gen Z consumers in India seem to have the highest propensity to 'splurge' on buying products and services compared to other age groups (like millennials, generation X and baby boomers) according to the survey. Asked a question on products and services they would like to spend money on and if they plan to 'splurge' in the next three months, over 80 per cent in India answered in the positive, again. This puts India at the top of the pecking order. It is ahead of countries like the UAE (over 75 per cent said yes), China (75 per cent ), Saudi Arabia, Canada, European Union countries, Brazil, Japan, Australia, US, Mexico and South Korea. Not only that, as much as 38 per cent of the Gen Z respondents in India said they use the 'buy now pay later' services to make purchases. This helps them in splurging despite not having enough money. Gen Zs have been identified as those born between 1996 and 2010, the first generation which has grown up in a digital world and reached adolescence during the pandemic. What the survey brings to the fore is that among overall consumers, while there is worry about rising prices, a larger proportion of them plan to keep splurging. Even here, India tops the list — while 40 per cent of consumers say that they are concerned about rising prices, only 31 per cent of them intend to splurge. The rest intend not to.
