Vaniya Agrawal, Indian-origin techie, disrupts Microsoft event over Gaza again
Vaniya Agrawal, an Indian-American infamous for disrupting Microsoft events in protest against the tech giant's contracts with the Israeli government, once again interrupted proceedings – this time at the Microsoft Build 2025 conference in Seattle. She was joined by another former employee, Hossam Nasr, in continuing her demonstration.
The high-profile AI security session was abruptly interrupted on day three of the conference during a keynote led by Neta Haiby, Microsoft's Head of AI Security, and Sarah Bird, Head of Responsible AI. Agrawal and Nasr entered the venue and loudly accused the company of complicity in the ongoing war in Gaza, demanding that Microsoft sever its ties with the Israeli military.
The protest marked the third consecutive day of disruptions at the Build 2025 event. On May19, a Microsoft employee interrupted CEO Satya Nadella's keynote speech, criticising the company's relationship with Israel. The following day, a Palestinian tech professional disrupted a session led by Jay Parikh, Executive Vice President of Microsoft CoreAI, urging the company to 'cut ties' with Israel during his Azure AI presentation.
This latest disruption is not the first time Vaniya Agrawal has protested at a Microsoft event.
In April, Agrawal -- then an engineer in Microsoft's AI division -- confronted the company's current and former CEOs, Satya Nadella, Steve Ballmer, and Bill Gates, at its headquarters in Washington. She accused them of using Microsoft's technology to support what she described as "genocide in the Gaza Strip".
Following the confrontation, Agrawal submitted a strongly worded resignation letter, announcing her final day would be 11 April, just days after the incident. In her letter, she wrote that she could no longer work for a company that, in her view, sided with oppressors rather than standing in solidarity with the oppressed.
Agrawal also criticised Microsoft's reported $133 million contract with Israel's Ministry of Defence, claiming that the company's AI and Azure cloud services were directly enabling military actions against Palestinians.
'Microsoft cloud and AI make the Israeli military more lethal and destructive in Gaza,' she wrote in a company-wide email shortly after confronting the CEO on stage.
Agrawal had joined Microsoft in September 2023 after more than three years at Amazon and had been working in the AI division.
Following the April protest, Microsoft dismissed two employees — including Agrawal — who had disrupted the company's 50th anniversary event. The company described their actions as 'hostile, unprovoked, and highly inappropriate'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
14 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
After Harvard and Columbia, Trump admin continues to target over 60 universities
As the Trump administration continues its crackdown on US universities and colleges, the president has signed a ban on foreign student visas for Harvard University. Donald Trump has signed into a place a six month ban on foreign student visas for Harvard University amid its row. Furthermore, the Trump admin has also targeted Columbia University and threatened to strip the fellow Ivy league college of its accreditation. ALSO READ | Trump suspends entry of international students studying at Harvard These efforts come as part of the Trump administration's crackdown on DEI-related initiatives across universities and its response to the pro-Palestinian protests that swept US campuses last year. With Harvard and Columbia in the spotlight, the US Education Department has opened over 104 investigations against universities and colleges across the 50 states. As per a report by Education Week, the Department of Education has opened at least 104 investigations against universities, school districts and colleges as of June 3. Of this, 70 have been against higher education systems such as Harvard, Columbia, Brown University and more. These 70 names also include the various out-of-state branches of universities. As per the Education Week report, 52 universities have been targeted for the DEI-initiatives, which Trump alleges promotes admissions based on race. The remaining have been targeted for their role in the 2024 pro-Palestinian protests. Universities and colleges across the US have been targeted for several reasons stated by the Trump administration such as antisemitism, race based programming, services for students with disabilities and disclosure of foreign contracts and gifts. Universities have also been targeted for their policies for transgender students, which as per the Trump administration, goes against the president's executive order which declaring only two genders. Universities such as Harvard, Columbia, Brown, Cornell, Northwestern, Pennsylvania and Princeton are among the list of higher education systems targeted by the Trump administration. (Based on notices issued by the US Education Department)
Mint
22 minutes ago
- Mint
Google to expand engineering workforce by 2026 amid AI investments: CEO Sundar Pichai
Alphabet Inc.'s Chief Executive Sundar Pichai has said that Google will continue to expand its engineering team through at least 2026, even as the company deepens its focus on artificial intelligence (AI). Speaking at the Bloomberg Tech conference in San Francisco, Pichai noted that while AI is changing the nature of work, human talent remains central to Google's operations. The tech giant's approach contrasts with moves by other major firms such as Microsoft, which has made significant job cuts this year. These layoffs have been attributed in part to the steep costs of staying competitive in the rapidly evolving AI landscape. Google itself has also carried out workforce reductions in recent years, aiming to reallocate resources more efficiently. Pichai said engineering hires would continue, arguing that increasing the number of engineers enables the company to take advantage of more opportunities. 'I expect we will grow from our current engineering base even into next year, because it allows us to do more with the opportunity space,' he said during a conversation with Bloomberg journalist Emily Chang. He added that AI tools are already helping engineers become more efficient by reducing repetitive tasks. While supportive of AI's potential, Pichai acknowledged the current limitations of the technology. He pointed out that although AI has demonstrated strength in areas like coding, it is still prone to making elementary errors. When asked about the prospect of achieving artificial general intelligence (AGI), he responded cautiously: 'So are we currently on an absolute path to AGI? I don't think anyone can say for sure.' Pichai also addressed growing concern among publishers over Google's AI-generated answers in search results, which many argue are reducing web traffic to original sources. He insisted that Google remains committed to supporting the wider internet ecosystem. 'We took a long time testing AI Overviews and prioritised approaches which resulted in high quality traffic out. I'm confident that many years from now that's how Google will work,' he said. Pichai has led the company since 2015, succeeding co-founder Larry Page. Asked who might be CEO when Google reaches its 50th anniversary, he joked that the person in charge will likely have a powerful AI assistant. Elsewhere at the same conference, Meta Platforms Inc.'s Chief Technology Officer Andrew Bosworth highlighted a shift in Silicon Valley's approach to defence-related work. Meta recently partnered with Anduril Industries Inc., a defence technology firm, to develop AI-powered military equipment, including an augmented and virtual reality helmet. 'There's a much stronger patriotic underpinning than I think people give Silicon Valley credit for,' Bosworth said, signalling a broader cultural change in attitudes toward working with the military. Executives from firms including Anduril and Perplexity AI are expected to continue the conversation on AI and defence at the conference on Thursday. (With inputs from Bloomberg)
Time of India
24 minutes ago
- Time of India
Harvard vs. Trump round two: US blocks foreign students over national security concerns
Trump blocks foreign students from entering Harvard over security concerns In a sweeping proclamation issued Wednesday evening, Trump barred the entry of foreign students under Harvard-hosted student and exchange visitor visas, citing national security concerns. The order, effective immediately, suspends new admissions under the F, M, and J visa categories, halting the arrival of students who were set to begin their academic journeys at Harvard. The proclamation also places current international students and researchers at the university under review, directing the U.S. Department of State to consider revoking existing visas on a case-by-case basis. The suspension is set to last for six months, with the possibility of an extension. The move comes on the heels of the Department of Homeland Security's earlier, failed attempt to decertify Harvard's ability to enrol international students — a decision that was blocked by a federal court after the university sued. Trump's proclamation appears to be a legal workaround, invoking presidential authority under Sections 212(f) and 215(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act — the same basis used for the travel bans upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court during his first term. A Policy with Far-Reaching Impact Harvard currently hosts more than 10,000 international students and scholars. The ban disrupts not just their mobility, but also their education, research, and career trajectories. While current students may remain temporarily, their visa status is now subject to review under the banner of "national interest." Unlike previous broad travel bans that targeted specific countries, this order is unique in singling out one academic institution. It accuses Harvard of failing to report disciplinary and criminal information regarding international students — despite the university stating that no such convictions exist for the past two years. The administration's rationale includes a mix of national security concerns, allegations of ties to the Chinese government, and accusations that Harvard has hosted individuals affiliated with the Chinese military. In a supporting fact sheet, the administration pointed to over $150 million in foreign funding since 2020, rising campus crime rates, and support for diversity and inclusion policies as further justification. Shifting Sentiments Among Global Students This proclamation has introduced fresh instability for students who once saw American education as a sure investment in their futures. Many who had secured admission to Harvard are now left in limbo, unable to enter the U.S. and uncertain whether they'll be able to pursue their degrees at all. The ban is likely to accelerate a trend already in motion — international students exploring alternative destinations such as Germany, Ireland, Australia, and Asian countries, where policies have remained relatively stable and welcoming. Institutions in those regions may now benefit from an outflow of highly qualified students deterred by U.S. restrictions. For generations, the United States has been the top destination for international students seeking academic excellence, innovation, and global opportunities. From Ivy League campuses to cutting-edge research labs, American institutions have drawn the best minds from across the world. But the latest move by the U.S. President Donald Trump has cast a shadow over that reputation. With rising visa restrictions and unpredictable policy shifts, many are questioning whether the U.S. remains a reliable choice for higher education. Beyond Harvard: A Larger Pattern? While the immediate order targets Harvard, it raises concerns that similar actions could extend to other American universities, especially those receiving significant foreign funding or engaged in global partnerships. The precedent set by targeting a specific institution based on political grievances introduces a degree of unpredictability previously unseen in U.S. higher education policy. International students — once seen as cultural ambassadors and economic contributors — now face a climate where geopolitical narratives can redefine their eligibility overnight. Even institutions with strong global reputations are no longer immune from federal scrutiny or political backlash. The Long-Term Cost to U.S. Education International students are integral to American universities, contributing billions of dollars annually to the economy, diversifying campuses, and driving innovation in STEM and business fields. Policies that restrict their participation may erode the global standing of U.S. education, damage institutional competitiveness, and discourage future applicants. As the world watches Harvard's next legal move — and the outcome of any new court challenges — many students are quietly shifting their aspirations elsewhere. In an increasingly uncertain environment, academic excellence alone may no longer be enough to outweigh the risks of studying in the United States. Ready to navigate global policies? Secure your overseas future. Get expert guidance now!
