Father faked photos of injured baby, grandmother tells court
The grandmother of a five-month-old girl who was hospitalised with serious injuries has told a court that the father of the child faked photographs which he alleges show that the infant sustained bruises while being minded by her.
A 31-year-old man, who cannot be named for legal reasons, is on trial at the Circuit Criminal Court in Cork charged with assaulting his infant daughter.
The trial previously heard that the child had bruises on her face, cheek, stomach, abdomen and right buttock as well as abrasions on her left temporal area, her cheek and her nose when she was examined by doctors at Cork University Hospital (CUH) on 4 January 2021.
Her parents brought her to hospital as she had been vomiting for eight hours.
The grandmother of the child was cross examined today by defence Senior Counsel Ray Boland. Two photographs of the infant which were allegedly taken by her father were entered in to evidence as defence exhibits.
The father of the child claims that the photographs were taken on occasions after the alleged incidents for which he is on trial and during times when the grandmother was taking care of his daughter.
The photographs entered in to the defence exhibit are dated 15 February 2023 and 1 March 2023 respectively.
Mr Boland showed the grandmother the first picture which appeared to be of the child at the centre of the case with a small bruise on one of her thighs. The woman said that the photo was fake and that the child never had that bruise.
The second photograph was of the child with a scratch and a bruise on one of her thighs. The grandmother stated that the child did have a scratch but she insisted there was no bruise.
She said that the bruise was "added in" to the photograph. When asked by Mr Boland if she was claiming that the bruising was photoshopped in she agreed that was the case.
Meanwhile, Dr Rosina McGovern, consultant paediatrician, previously told the trial that when the child was admitted to CUH in January 2021 it was established that she had suffered a subdural haemorrhage, a fractured collar bone, blood on the surface of the brain and tearing of its connective fibres in addition to bruising and abrasions.
Dr McGovern said she believed the injuries constituted serious harm.
Prosecution Senior Counsel Jane Hyland said serious harm is defined in Irish law as "an injury that creates a substantial risk of death or causes serious disfigurement or substantial loss or impairment of mobility of the body or function of a bodily member or organ".
The father of the child has pleaded not guilty to counts of assault causing harm to his infant daughter, assault causing her serious harm and a count of cruelty.
The case will continue next Monday in front of a jury of seven women and five men.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Irish Sun
an hour ago
- The Irish Sun
‘May require medical attention' – Popular baby teething powder urgently recalled amid warning for Irish parents
A POPULAR teething powder has been pulled from the shelves in a huge recall due to the possible presence of glass pieces in the product. The Advertisement 2 Stores across the country are recalling batches of Weleda Baby Teething Powder Credit: FSAI 2 Irish parents have been warned not to use the affected product Credit: Getty Images The Authority issued a Category One For Action call to manufacturers, wholesalers, distributors, caterers and retailers. The 60g pack sizes of the teething powder has a best before date of November, 2026 and the batch code is 231302. The recall has been issued due to a packaging matter. Advertisement READ MORE ON PRODUCT RECALLS Weleda said a potential problem was identified where a packaging process fault may have resulted in the presence of glass fragments. A spokesperson added: "No other batches of Weleda Baby Teething Oral Powder 60g are affected by this recall. "If glass fragments are present in the powder and applied to an infant's gums, they could cause discomfort, pain, or minor injury. "In more serious cases, there is a risk of choking or internal injury, including damage to the gastrointestinal tract, which may require urgent medical attention." Advertisement Most read in Irish News Consumers are advised not to administer the powder from the affected batch to their infant or child. 'Contaminated' cupboard staple recalled over 'life-threatening fungi' hidden inside – children are especially at risk And they are also urged to return the product to the place of purchase for a replacement or refund. Retailers are requested to remove the implicated batch from sale and display recall notices at point-of-sale. Wholesalers/distributors are requested to contact their affected customers and recall the implicated batch and provide a point-of-sale recall notice to their retail customers. Advertisement The FSAI said: "The above batch of Weleda Baby Teething Powder is being recalled due to the possible presence of glass pieces. "Consumers are advised not to administer the implicated batch to infants or URGENT WARNING Separately, an urgent warning has also been issued for Irish parents over the recall of a baby cap. The Advertisement They said that the risk presented by the product is choking, as the button may detach from the garment creating a small part. And the small part may be placed in the mouth and swallowed, causing a young child to choke. The brand is Pepco and the product codes are 871590 and 871591. The style number is 871586, followed by the barcodes 5045731150841 and 5045731150858. Advertisement All sizes are affected, they are 6-12M and 12-36M. There are approximately 568 affected products across the country.
Irish Post
2 hours ago
- Irish Post
Calls for free sunscreen amid rising skin cancer rates in Ireland and Britain
CORK County Council has called for free sunscreen dispensers in schools and public buildings amid rising skin cancer rates. Councillors warn that, without swift action, the number of melanoma cases in Ireland could more than double by 2045. The motion, brought forward by Fine Gael councillor Aileen Browne, draws on data from the National Skin Cancer Prevention Plan 2023–2026. It points to Ireland's unique circumstances due to the high prevalence of fair skin and increased UV exposure, even with typically overcast Irish weather. 'People often assume sunscreen is only necessary in hot climates, but that's a dangerous misconception,' Browne said in a statement. 'UV rays don't take a holiday just because the sun isn't shining. This is not just a seasonal issue; it's a pressing public health concern.' The proposal, which won cross-party backing, suggests setting up sunscreen dispensers in schools, libraries and other public areas. It's modelled on the hand sanitiser stations during the COVID pandemic and is being presented as a cost-effective preventative measure. Treating advanced melanoma can cost the Irish state over €122,000 per case, while prevention and early-stage intervention require a lot less money. 'This is about saving lives and relieving pressure on our already overburdened health system,' she added. Independent councillor Ben Dalton-O'Sullivan referenced the HSE's 2023 pilot project that installed a public sunscreen dispenser at Fountainstown Beach in Cork. He's now calling for that initiative to be rolled out across all coastal areas in the county. For Irish families living in Britain, where melanoma rates are also rising, the council's actions in Cork could be a model to emulate. The NHS doesn't currently offer free sunscreen, even though skin cancer is the most common form of cancer in Britain. According to Cancer Research UK, cases of melanoma have more than doubled since the early 1990s, with Irish communities considered high-risk. Councillors in Cork are now appealing to Health Minister Jennifer Carroll MacNeill to adopt the initiative nationally. 'This is a simple, effective step we can take now,' Browne said. 'The longer we wait, the higher the cost, in lives and in euros.'
Irish Daily Mirror
3 hours ago
- Irish Daily Mirror
Urgent recall for baby teething product over 'possible presence of glass pieces'
An urgent warning has been issued to Irish parents after a popular baby teething product was recalled over safety fears. The Food Safety Authority of Ireland (FSAI) announced this week that a batch of Weleda Baby Teething Powder is being pulled from shelves due to 'the possible presence of glass pieces'. The product helps to calm and soothe swollen, painful red gums for babies and children suffering from the symptoms of teething. However, a specific batch of Weleda Baby Teething Powder is now being recalled due to its potential to cause serious harm if consumed, as it could contain glass fragments. The implicated batch of Weleda Baby Teething Powder has a pack size of 60g, a batch code of 231302, and expiry date of 11/26. Retailers have been requested to remove the implicated batch from sale and display recall notices at point-of-sale. Wholesalers/distributors have also been told to contact their affected customers and recall the implicated batch and provide a point-of-sale recall notice to their retail customers. Parents have also been urged "not to administer the implicated batch to infants or children". The product is being recalled globally, as a similar notice was given to consumers in Australia two weeks ago. According to reports, a glass fragment was found in one bottle which is thought to be the result of a mistake in the packaging process. Meanwhile, a separate recall notice has been issued for a popular baby cap due to choking fears, with hundreds of affected products purchased in Ireland. Poundland UK, which trades as Dealz in the Republic of Ireland, issued a recall of its Pepco Baby Frotte Cap Blue product. Ireland's Competition and Consumer Protection Commission (CCPC) highlighted the recall on its website this week, revealing that a risk of choking has been identified with the product. According to the CCPC, the button on the cap may detach from the garment, resulting in a small part that could easily be placed by a child in their mouth and subsequently swallowed, which could cause the child to choke.
