logo
These are the 5 phone features I think are overrated

These are the 5 phone features I think are overrated

Joe Maring / Android Authority
Flagship smartphones are the best that a manufacturer has to offer, with these devices including premium hardware and innovative features. While some brands seem to be resting on their laurels, others continue to provide consumers with inventive updates that draw more loyal fans.
But not all features are created equal — and some are definitely more about selling products than providing a good user experience. Having spent years testing out different devices from a variety of brands, I've decided that the following features are mostly overrated…
What flagship smartphone feature do you think is the most overrated?
0 votes
100MP+ camera lenses.
NaN %
Generative AI features.
NaN %
More than 12GB of RAM.
NaN %
8K video recording.
NaN %
4K displays.
NaN %
Other (specify in the comments).
NaN %
1. 100MP+ lenses
Megan Ellis / Android Authority
I used to make the mistake of thinking that a higher resolution usually resulted in a better camera experience. However, the era of smartphone cameras featuring 100MP or higher resolution lenses (including some camera lenses with 200MP) and my experience using them has thoroughly debunked this notion.
While some of the best camera phones feature these high resolution lenses, there's a lot more that determines a photo's quality than simply the raw megapixel value. HDR support, light sensitivity, optical zoom, and sensor size all contribute to the quality of a photo. Then there's the post-processing that smartphones apply to these images.
There's a lot more that determines a photo's quality than simply the raw megapixel value.
I've found that high resolution lenses have improved over the years, but many companies slap these onto their flagship smartphones as a marketing gimmick. My own S23 Ultra features a 200MP lens — and I rarely ever switch to this resolution.
This is mainly due to the trade-offs that come with these lenses. For example, when I switch to the 200MP lens on my smartphone, I can no longer zoom into the subject. You could argue that a higher resolution lens allows you to crop to zoom into the subject of the photo. But I've often found strange artifacts in the image when cropping to zoom. I also find that images I take with high resolution lenses are less saturated and lack as much contrast, leading to a duller photo overall.
The reality is that most of us use the default shooting mode on our smartphones. So I'd take a capable 50MP lens with a good sensor and zoom capabilities over the super high resolution lenses that I seldom use on smartphones. It's one of the reasons the Samsung S25 Edge is unappealing for me — limited to only two lenses, Samsung opted for a 200MP lens and a 12MP lens. There is also no telephoto camera.
2. Generative AI
Megan Ellis / Android Authority
AI is essential when it comes to smartphone features — algorithms power image processing, hardware optimization, and other important software features. But the recent wave of generative AI features are mostly unhelpful in my opinion and I've rarely come across people who use them.
As a result, I mostly avoid generative AI features on my smartphone. The features are usually unhelpful at best and inaccurate at worst.
There was the occasional instance where I was excited to try out a generative AI feature. For example, I looked forward to trying out Samsung AI's Interpreter. But the tool proved underwhelming due to its limited support for languages I use. When I tried to see if it could correctly detect what I was saying in Mandarin by using simple phrases, the translations were inaccurate.
Generative AI also comes with privacy trade-offs, but some models allow you to use on-device AI. Though you should note that by opting for this privacy setting, you actually lose out on other AI features. For example, Samsung doesn't allow me to use the AI feature that summarizes transcripts from voice recordings without turning off the option to only process data on my device.
3. More than 12GB of RAM
Robert Triggs / Android Authority
Many brands have started to push past 12GB of RAM, with many flagships now including 16GB or even 24GB of RAM.
For me, 12GB has been a good balance for me when it comes to most tasks such as gaming and multi-tasking. In fact, I'd argue that for most people, 8GB of RAM is more than enough and that 12GB is mostly for those doing performance-heavy tasks such as video editing. Past this amount, it feels like brands are just increasing RAM for the sake of it. Other times, brands inflate their actual RAM allocation by counting virtual RAM as part of it.
12GB has been a good balance when it comes to most tasks such as gaming and multi-tasking.
The exception is when the device is being used for many generative AI tasks. But since I don't use generative AI on my phone, I find more than 12GB of RAM to be a bit of an overkill. It's one overrated feature that is mostly implemented for another overrated feature.
If you enjoy using the latest AI features, you should make sure your next smartphone has a lot of RAM. However, there's no guarantee that your current smartphone will receive AI features in post-release updates, even if it has enough RAM and a good processor. After all, One UI 7 is missing many features for Galaxy S23 owners.
4. 8K video recording
Megan Ellis / Android Authority
8K video recording has been around for some time on flagship smartphones, but it's one of those features that I've rarely seen people use due to its drawbacks. Smartphones that offer 8K video recording usually cap the video's framerate at 30fps, which drastically reduces the quality of the viewing experience.
There's also the fact that most of us use displays that don't support an 8K resolution — reducing the overall appetite for this type of content. That said, there may be benefits to downsampling an 8K video to 4K, but that is a niche use case and most people who are very serious about video quality would likely opt for a standalone camera rather than their smartphone.
I don't even really use 4K video recording on my smartphones.
I don't even really use 4K video recording on my smartphones, even though they both support up to 60fps. This is mostly to save space, as I don't want a simple video of my cat taking up hundreds of megabytes or several gigabytes on my phone.
What I would like to see when it comes to video recording on my next flagship smartphone is the ability to shoot video in challenging lighting environments, as this is an area where my videos always fall short.
5. 4K screens
Robert Triggs / Android Authority
I don't even bother with a 4K screen for my PC or my laptop, so 4K on a smartphone screen is definitely overkill in my opinion. However, this hasn't stopped some manufacturers creating smartphones with this resolution.
With most flagship smartphone displays measuring between 6 and 6.9-inches, there isn't much room to let a 4K resolution screen show its sharpness in all its glory. While my S23 Ultra supports a 1440p resolution, I actually use it set to 1080p to increase battery life.
This isn't a common flagship feature, but it is one that has appeared over the years — specifically on Sony phones like the Sony Xperia 1 V. But it seems like even Sony has realized that this isn't the hardware specification most flagship users are looking for, with the newer Sony Xperia 1 VI and Xperia 1 VII both including lower resolution displays.
I'd much rather that smartphone manufacturers improve displays through HDR support, higher refresh rates, and improved pixel density. Though, with foldable smartphones, especially trifold smartphones, featuring bigger displays; we may see a return to more companies opting for higher resolutions.
While I'm sure some people will disagree that a certain feature I find overrated is essential to them, I'd rather have brands focus on real improvements over marketing gimmicks. One area I would like to see some significant improvement in is durability, especially with displays being so expensive to replace nowadays.
Many brands could also improve their battery technology and longevity. In fact, I'd love to see faster charging on Samsung's high-end phones.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Caraway has HR, 4 RBIs to help Oregon St. beat USC 14-1, stay alive at Corvallis Regional
Caraway has HR, 4 RBIs to help Oregon St. beat USC 14-1, stay alive at Corvallis Regional

Yahoo

time14 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Caraway has HR, 4 RBIs to help Oregon St. beat USC 14-1, stay alive at Corvallis Regional

CORVALLIS, Ore. (AP) — Trent Caraway had a double, a home run, and four RBIs, Gavin Turley also hit a homer and Oregon State beat Southern California 14-1 at the Corvallis Regional on Sunday night. Oregon State (44-13-1) can win its second consecutive regional title with another win over the Trojans on Monday. Advertisement The Beavers — who lost 6-4 to Saint Mary's Friday, then won games Saturday against TCU and earlier Sunday against Saint Mary's, avenging their opening-round loss by beating the Gaels 20-3 — have won three consecutive elimination games. Oregon State starter Wyatt Queen gave up back-to-back singles to lead off the fifth, walked Ethan Hedges to load the bases and struck out Bryce Grudzielanek before Kellan Oakes came on and struck out Adrian Lopez looking and then got Abbrie Covarrubias swinging to end the threat. Oakes (3-0) had four strikeouts in 1 2/3 innings before before Zach Kmatz struck out seven across three scoreless innings for his first save of the season. Wilson Weber and Caraway led off the second with back-to-back singles before a sacrifice bunt by AJ Singer moved both runners into scoring position. Weber scored on a bunt single by Canon Reeder, who was thrown out at second on a bunt by Dallas Macias, who reached on a fielder's choice to drive in Caraway. Tyce Peteron — who finished with four hits — had an RBI single up the middle Macias scored on a sacrifice bunt by Easton Talt to make it 4-0. Maximo Martinez had an RBI single in the second for USC (37-22). Advertisement Brayden Dowd led off the first with a single but was thrown out at home when Hedges followed with a double. Dowd appeared to be shaken up after a collision at the plate and left the game in the second inning. ___ AP college sports:

Royals Turn Heads With Decision on No. 1 Prospect
Royals Turn Heads With Decision on No. 1 Prospect

Yahoo

time18 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Royals Turn Heads With Decision on No. 1 Prospect

Royals Turn Heads With Decision on No. 1 Prospect originally appeared on Athlon Sports. In a move that has electrified Kansas City, the Royals are calling up their top prospect, Jac Caglianone, as reported by ESPN's Jeff Passan on Sunday night. Advertisement The 22-year-old slugger, drafted sixth overall in 2024, has been tearing through the minors, boasting a .322/.389/.593 slash line with 15 home runs and 56 RBIs across 50 games between Double-A and Triple-A. Caglianone, a former two-way star at the University of Florida, has transitioned into a full-time hitter, splitting time between first base and right field. Royals fans, desperate for outfield power after a lackluster season, are buzzing with excitement as Caglianone prepares to make his MLB debut against the Cardinals and Yankees. Kansas City Royals first round draft pick Jac Caglianone poses with his mother Johanne Caglianone for photos on the fieldDenny Medley-Imagn Images "The kid has all the potential in the world," wrote one fan. Advertisement "Dude is a stud and is going to be a major asset to the Royals for years to come," wrote another. "Born superstar," said one user. "That's exciting news! Jac Caglianone is going to bring some serious power to the Royals lineup," said another user. "Damn Jac gonna rake for the Royals," chimed in another. Despite concerns over his high two-strike chase rate, the Royals believe his raw power and improved plate discipline—evidenced by more walks than strikeouts in spring training—make him ready for the big leagues. The 6-foot-5, 250-pound phenom's arrival signals a new era for Kansas City, a team looking to build on its 2024 postseason appearance. With Caglianone's bat in the lineup, the Royals are poised to make a serious statement in the AL Central. Related: Florida Beats Out Three SEC Rivals For Elite OL Recruit This story was originally reported by Athlon Sports on Jun 2, 2025, where it first appeared.

Taylor Swift got what she wanted. So what do 'Taylor's Versions' mean now?
Taylor Swift got what she wanted. So what do 'Taylor's Versions' mean now?

Yahoo

time19 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Taylor Swift got what she wanted. So what do 'Taylor's Versions' mean now?

I have been to some very loud concerts. Nothing compares to what I witnessed at SoFi Stadium in Los Angeles on Aug. 9, 2023, when I attended Taylor Swift's Eras Tour. 'Here we are on the last night of the U.S. leg of the Eras Tour, in the eighth month of the year on the ninth day of the month,' Swift told the 70,000-plus people in the audience near the end of the 3½-hour show. '... There's something that I've been planning for a really, really, really, ridiculously, embarrassingly long time. And I think instead of just telling you about it, I think I'll just sort of show you.' The screaming during Swift's speech — her emphasis on the numbers eight and nine could only mean one thing — was just a warmup for the deafening roar when the enormous screen behind her transformed into the cover art for '1989 (Taylor's Version).' The surprise reveal of Swift's fourth rerecorded album, an effort she started in 2019 after her devastation that her master recordings of her first six albums were sold to music manager Scooter Braun, sent the crowd into such a frenzy that my ears still hurt when I think about it. That was the last rerecording announcement that Swift made until Friday morning, when the superstar dropped the bombshell that after the years-long battle, she finally was able to buy back her masters and now owns her entire music catalogue. The purchase, which Swift called her 'greatest dream come true,' immediately made global headlines, from every corner of social media to midday cable news. ('Now it's all going to be Taylor's version,' said CNBC reporter Bertha Coombs, to which anchor Kelly Evans replied, 'All is well with the world.') The most ecstatic people were in her fandom, the famously loyal Swifties who ensured that all of the 'Taylor's Version' albums ('Fearless' and 'Red' in 2021, 'Speak Now' and '1989' in 2023) debuted at No. 1 on the Billboard 200 chart. Swift embarked on this project to gain control of her music and as a way to devalue her original recordings so they wouldn't be worth as much to Braun, who Swift claimed bullied her for years. (In 2020, he sold her masters to private equity firm Shamrock Capital.) Until Friday, the most die-hard fans called those songs the 'stolen versions' and refused to listen to them, even if they preferred the originals to the updated tracks. Swift's announcement, however, also prompted some criticism on social media and beyond from people who looked back on the 'Taylor's Version' endeavor and called it a 'scam,' or mocked fans who spent money on the rerecords when Swift — whose net worth reached a reported $1.6 billion last year — turned around and bought back the masters anyway. Swift's statement implied that she won't be releasing the highly anticipated 'Reputation (Taylor's Version)' and that there's no timeline for her rerecorded self-titled debut album. There's no doubt that Swifties have had an extreme reaction to this project: the internet-consuming countdown to every rerelease day; the intense speculation about when Swift was dropping 'Rep TV,' including the widespread theory that she would reveal the date at last week's American Music Awards (nope); the literal tears of joy after Friday's announcement. But as I thought about it, I went back to that eardrum-piercing night in Los Angeles and what Swift said during her speech before she revealed the album, as she talked about how she was 'pleasantly surprised' by how much fans had supported her rerecording quest. 'That was something that I expected to be just a 'me' thing, just a personal thing,' Swift said. '... The way that you have embraced that, the way that you have celebrated that — you really decided that it was your fight too, and that you were 100 percent behind me. And if I cared about it, you cared about it. I will never stop thanking you for that.' Setting aside the idea that Swift could actually be surprised that her listeners cared about her actions (in 2014, iTunes Canada accidentally uploaded eight seconds of static labeled as a Taylor Swift song and it immediately rocketed to No. 1), her speech got to the core of why Swifties connected so deeply to the rerecords. The foundation of Swift's legacy as a once-in-a-generation pop star is the inimitable relationship she has with her fan base, building on the personal nature of her music that has enthralled listeners for nearly 20 years. Swift's back-and-forth with her fans dates back to her country music days as a teenager in Nashville, when she spent hours chatting on MySpace and stayed at venues until every autograph was signed. She bought listeners Christmas presents and showed up at their houses and left comments on their Instagram photos, and she jumped out of the car to meet them if she saw them wearing one of her tour T-shirts on the street. Swift has never charged for meet-and-greets at her concerts. She hosted backstage after-parties and had 'secret sessions' for early album previews at her home. She referred to her fans as friends, and emphasized that they are all equally important participants in her musical journey. But as Swift has become a global celebrity, the relationship with her fans had to change. Her fan base has grown at an astonishing and unmanageable rate, and for both logistical and safety reasons, Swift hasn't hosted meet-and-greets since 2018. Although she posts the occasional reaction on TikTok, she's rarely active on social media. When I interview Swifties, they often say that they understand why she had to pull back on letting everyday people into her life, but that they still wish they could talk to Taylor like they did in the old days. In a way, the rerecords allowed the less accessible Swift to communicate with her fans once again. She incentivized the purchase by including 'from the vault' songs that she left off the albums the first time, which provided new details for the Swifties who meticulously track her life story, and shed insight into how she thought about her career and legacy. On the rerecorded 'Fearless,' she paid homage to her country music roots as she tapped Keith Urban and Maren Morris to sing with her on two vault tracks. The new 'Red' included the 10-minute version of 'All Too Well,' with unreleased lyrics that fans had been clamoring for for almost a decade. With the 'Speak Now' rerelease looming, she assured one concert crowd that she didn't need anyone defending her online — presumably a preventative measure for people to leave John Mayer alone about 'Dear John,' the album's scathing ballad. The updated '1989' included vault songs with even more vulnerable lyrics about a breakup. All of her actions surrounding the rereleases, including the letters she included with each album that explained her choices in making the record, proved the most important thing for Swifties: that she was still listening to them. A few years ago, I wrote about how the hunt for hints and Easter eggs in Swift's work (something she has always encouraged) had exploded over time. One fan told me, 'She's aware of the game, so if we play the game, it feels like we're all doing something together.' That sums up why the practice only increased through the rerecords. During the Los Angeles announcement, for example, people in the stadium also lost their minds when Swift appeared onstage in a blue costume. Because '1989' is associated with the color blue, they (correctly) assumed a 'Taylor's Version' announcement was coming that night. This doesn't make sense to anyone outside the fan base, but that's the point. In her letter about her masters on Friday, Swift noted that the success of the Eras Tour (which grossed more than $2 billion) allowed her to make this purchase — but so did the support from her fans. And that underscores what Swift has told them all along and what the Swifties believe: that Taylor and the fans always have been, and always will be, in this together.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store