Judge temporarily halts deportation of University of Wisconsin student after Trump visa cancellation
A federal judge on Tuesday temporarily halted the removal of a University of Wisconsin-Madison student from India whose visa was terminated from the Student and Exchange Visitor Program (SEVIS) database.
Judge William Conley ruled to block the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) from immediately deporting Krish Lal Isserdasani, 21, who claimed his F-1 student visa was wrongfully terminated. He's a senior who expects to graduate in May.
Officials said he failed to maintain his status as a legal resident due to being identified in 'criminal records.'
Isserdasani was arrested on November 22, 2024, after a verbal argument took place outside of a bar, according to legal filings.
'Although Isserdasani was arrested for disorderly conduct, the District Attorney declined to pursue charges after reviewing the case,' his attorneys wrote in court documents.
'As a result, Isserdasani never had to appear in court and believed the matter was completely resolved with no possible immigration consequences. Aside from this encounter, Isserdasani has had no other interactions with law enforcement,' they added.
Isserdani received an April 4 email from the University of Wisconsin-Madison's International Student Services informing him of his visa revocation, which would only authorize him to stay in the U.S. until May 2.
His lawyers said an abrupt exit would hinder his ability to graduate on time and opportunities to gain work experience.
'Isserdasani and his family have reportedly invested approximately $240,000 in his education in the United States, and he stands to lose $17,500 in tuition for the current semester,' they wrote, according to court filings.
'He would also be liable for rental payments for the next four months despite being unable to remain in the country.'
Conley's temporary injunction blocking his removal will remain in place until April 28 when a preliminary injunction hearing will be held.
'Accordingly, plaintiff Isserdasani has shown a substantial, if not overwhelming, likelihood of success on the merits of his claim in Count 2 that DHS violated the APA [Administrative Procedure Act] when summarily terminated his F-1 student status in SEVIS without cause,' Conley wrote.
He added that Isserdasani is likely to show that DHS's termination of his F-1 student status was 'arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with law.'
Isserdani's case is the latest in a series of sweeping removals of foreign students without due process.
The University of Wisconsin said six current students and seven alumni have been impacted by the government's termination of SEVIS records.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
4 hours ago
- The Hill
LA journalists sue Noem over DHS response to unrest amid immigration raids
The Los Angeles Press Club and other journalists are suing Kristi Noem, Department of Homeland Security (DHS) secretary, for using 'Unnecessary and excessive violence to prevent them from exercising their First Amendment rights.' The lawsuit also accuses DHS of violating the Fourth Amendment prohibiting arbitrary arrests, and the Fifth amendment, which demands due process of law. 'Since June 6, at least seven members of our organization have been subject to use of force or suffered a serious press rights violation by DHS officers,' Adam Rose, press rights chair of the Los Angeles Press Club, said in a statement. 'Democracy depends on an informed public. An informed public depends on a press free to do its job without fearing violence by federal agents.' On June 6, protests erupted in Los Angeles while Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) were conducting raids in the garment district rounding up undocumented immigrants. On June 8, President Trump sent in 1,700 National Guardsmen and 700 Marines to help control the protests without California Gov. Gavin Newsom's (D) request or consultation. As protests grew, so did the violence. Some protesters were throwing rocks at law enforcement or burning vehicles. Law enforcement was shooting rubber bullets and using tear gas against protesters. The legal complaint reads, 'DHS agents did not target their assault towards people posing a threat in any way. Rather, they fired their weapons indiscriminately and at every angle in front of them in the direction of the gathered community, hitting people in the head with projectiles and choking them with tear gas. Some agents shot tear gas canisters and rubber bullets directly at people as they did this.' On June 18, Trump sent another 2,000 additional troops to the area. The DHS did not immediately respond to requests for comment. The plaintiffs are arguing that the excessive use of force led to many journalists being unable or fearful of covering the protests, essentially limiting the amount of press coverage. 'What happened in LA isn't just a press crackdown, it's an assault on the rights of all Americans, especially working people,' said Jon Schleuss, president of NewsGuild-CWA in a statement. 'This state-sanctioned violence against journalists is meant to stop the public from learning the truth.' The lawsuit explains how multiple journalists were hurt in their encounters with DHS. Journalist Sean Beckner-Carmitchel was shot in the head with a rubber bullet and a tear gas canister by DHS agents on June 7, the complaint alleges. The same day, Ryanne Mena, who was wearing visible press credentials and working with the Southern California Newsgroup, was shot with a pepper ball and rubber bullet. This lawsuit was accompanied by a temporary restraining order meant to halt DHS' actions in LA by the weekend. The request was denied on Friday.
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
'A good day': Detained U.S. citizen said agents bragged after arresting dozens at Home Depot
A 37-year-old U.S. citizen who was tackled to the ground and arrested after filming federal agents at Home Depot on Thursday said he was held for more than an hour near Dodger Stadium, where agents boasted about how many immigrants they arrested. 'How many bodies did you guys grab today?' he said one agent asked. 'Oh, we grabbed 31,' the other replied. "That was a good day today," the first agent responded. The two high-fived, as he sat on the asphalt under the sun, Job Garcia said. Garcia was released on Friday from a downtown federal detention center. No apparent criminal charges have yet to be filed. He is one of several U.S citizens arrested during enforcement operations in recent days. Department of Homeland Security officials say some have illegally interfered with agents' jobs. In response to questions about why Garcia was arrested and if he'd been charged, a spokesperson for the U.S. attorney's office in L.A. recommended a reporter contact the Department of Homeland Security. DHS and U.S. Customs and Border Protection did not respond to a request for comment. Garcia said he was shaken by what he heard while he was detained. 'They call them 'bodies,' they reduce them to bodies,' he said. "My blood was boiling." Garcia, a photographer and doctoral student Claremont Graduate University, had been picking up a delivery at Home Depot when someone approached the customer desk and said something was unfolding outside. "La migra, La migra," he heard as he walked out. He quickly grabbed his phone and followed agents around the parking lot, telling them they were "f— useless" until he came to a group of them forming a half-circle around a box truck. A Border Patrol agent radioed someone and then slammed his baton against the passenger window, his video shows. Glass shattered. He unlocked the door as people shouted. In the video, a stunned man can be seen texting behind the wheel. He had apparently refused to open his door. It's unclear from the footage what happened next, but Garcia said an agent lunged toward him and pushed him. "My first reaction was to like push his hand off," he recalled. Then, he said, the agent grabbed his left arm, twisted it behind his back and threw his phone. The agent brought him to the ground and three other agents jumped in, Garcia said "Get the f— down sir" and "give me your f— hand. You want it, you got it, sir, you f— got it. You want to go to jail, fine. You got it," an agent can be heard saying in the video. "You wanted it, you got it," the man yelled. An agent handcuffed him so hard "that there was no circulation running to my fingers," Garcia said. Pinned down, Garcia had difficulty breathing. "That moment, I thought I could probably die here," he said. The agent put Garcia's phone back in his pocket. The recording kept running. As Garcia was put into a vehicle, his video captured an agent twice saying: "I've got one back here." "You got one what?" Garcia shot back. "You got one what?" He said an agent told him in broken Spanish to "wait here,' though it could not be heard on the video. "I f— speak English, you f— dumbass," he clearly shouts back. No agent asked if he was an American citizen, he said. Nobody asked for identification. 'They assumed that I was undocumented," he said later in an interview. The video ends after about four minutes, while he is waiting in the van. Read more: Raid at a Home Depot in Hollywood shatters an immigrant refuge Garcia asked an agent to get his wallet from his car, so he could prove he was a U.S. citizen. Another agent retrieved his ID, but he remained handcuffed. They were so tight, his hands began to swell. The agents switched him to handcuffs that looked like shoelaces. They took off around a corner, stopped to shuffle him into another van and sped off down the 101 Freeway. "I smeared my blood in their seat," he said. And he thought, "They're going to remember me." With him in the van was a Mexican man, face downcast, who said his wife was six months pregnant. "My wife told me not to go to work today," the man said. "Something doesn't feel right," he said she told him. "It broke my heart," Garcia said. "I wish he was the one who got away when they were trying to grab me." On what he described as a ramp going into Dodger stadium near Lot K, Garcia was taken out of the car and told to sit on the asphalt as agents shuffled detainees into different vans and processed them for about an hour. A woman ran his background for criminal offenses. It felt surreal and enraging. 'They were trying to build some sort of case," Garcia said. He told The Times he was arrested at 17 for driving without a license. After they transported him, agents later fingerprinted him and tried to interrogate him. The agent said they wanted to "take your side of the story." Garcia declined. He said he overheard an agent tell someone, 'Trump is really working us." While held at a downtown detention facility, he met Adrian Martinez. Martinez, a 20-year-old Walmart worker and also a U.S. citizen, had been arrested on Tuesday while he tried to stop the arrest of a man who cleaned a shopping center in Pico Rivera. The two spoke for about 10 minutes, as Martinez waited to go to court. "You're the Walmart kid, right?" he asked him. Garcia told him what had unfolded outside the Home Depot. "That's exactly what happened to me," he said Martinez told him. "They were bullying this older guy. I didn't like that so I went and confronted them and they put their hands on me and I pushed their hands off.' U.S. Atty. Bill Essayli posted a photo of Martinez on X and said he "was arrested for an allegation of punching a border patrol agent in the face after he attempted to impede their immigration enforcement operation." Martinez was charged in a criminal complaint with conspiracy to impede a federal officer. The complaint makes no reference to a punch, but alleges that Martinez blocked agents' vehicles with his car and then later a trash can. 'A complaint generally contains one charge and does not include the full scope of a defendant's conduct, or the evidence that will be presented at trial," said Ciaran McEvoy, a spokesperson for the U.S. attorney's office in L.A. "Considering this is an active case, we will not be providing further comments outside of court proceedings.' Martinez was released Friday on a $5,000 bond. 'U.S. Attorney Essayli and U.S. Border Patrol Sector Chief Gregory Bovino outrageously alleged that Adrian assaulted a federal agent," Martinez's attorneys said in a statement. "However he has not been charged with an assault charge because he didn't assault anyone, and the evidence of that is clear." Garcia said his cellmate was worried about these protests. He asked, "Don't you think the protesters who are out there destroying property, rioters, is a bad look?" 'Rioting is the language of the unheard," he said, riffing on a quote from the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. Sign up for Essential California for news, features and recommendations from the L.A. Times and beyond in your inbox six days a week. This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Trump using National Guard for deportation work could go into 'uncharted territory'
WASHINGTON – The possibility of the Trump administration sending National Guard troops on immigration raids outside their own state could cause a legal clash between states – and with the federal government. The Pentagon is weighing a request from the Department of Homeland Security to call up 20,000 members of the National Guard under state authority for interior immigration enforcement, which would cost about $3.6 billion per year. These troops, if approved, would be distinct from the 4,000 Guardsmen currently deployed to Los Angeles under presidential orders. Guard troops under state authority are not subject to laws barring the military from directly participating in civilian law enforcement activities. The Trump administration, according to CNN, is assessing whether DHS can send requested National Guard troops sourced from red states – such as from Republican Gov. Greg Abbott's Texas – into blue states like California, where Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom is unlikely to authorize his troops to support DHS/ICE under state orders. Stephen Miller, the White House's deputy chief of staff for domestic policy, has previously floated the idea of such deployments. "You go to the red state governors and you say, 'Give us your National Guard.' We will deputize them as immigration enforcement officers," Miller said in a 2023 podcast interview with conservative activist Charlie Kirk. "If you're going to go into an unfriendly state like Maryland, when then it will just be Virginia doing the arrest in Maryland." Legal experts and former DHS officials who spoke with USA TODAY emphasized the unprecedented nature of such a proposal. John Sandweg, an attorney who served as ICE's acting director and as acting general counsel for DHS, said using the Guard for interior enforcement in unwilling states would 'push the envelope of the idea of the state militia and National Guard." Sandweg said such an arrangement would be 'very consistent with everything we're seeing' from the Trump administration, which relied on an obscure law only used once before (to break a U.S. Postal Service strike in 1970) when Trump overrode Newsom and took control of a significant portion of the California National Guard. The DHS request, if filled, would also radically depart from the Guard's historical role in immigration enforcement, which has been limited to border security under every administration since that of former President George W. Bush. The White House referred USA TODAY to DHS, which did not immediately respond to an inquiry. The Pentagon did not respond to a query from USA TODAY. 'We very much support President Trump's focus on defending the homeland on our southern border, as well as supporting law enforcement officials doing their job in ICE in Los Angeles,' Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said at a June 11 Senate Armed Services Committee hearing. The DHS proposal called for the 20,000 National Guard troops operating under what is known as Title 32 authority. In that situation, the federal government picks up the tab but governors retain command authority. But the request memo, which USA TODAY obtained, specifies that the Guardsmen would then work for ICE through a partnership program known as 287(g). In recent months, the Trump administration has dramatically increased ICE's reach through the 287(g) partnership program by reestablishing its 'task force' model. ICE confirmed receipt of questions from USA TODAY regarding the 287(g) program but did not respond before publication. The 287(g) program, which began in 1996, allows DHS and ICE to delegate immigration enforcement authority to local and state law enforcement agencies, whose officers then receive training from ICE. The state and local authorities are 'deputized to enforce certain aspects of immigration law," according to Texas A&M law professor Huyen Pham. Once qualified, participating personnel from local/state agencies with task force agreements can join up with ICE-led immigration enforcement task forces, according to the agency website. But concerns over racial profiling by partner agencies and relative inefficiency compared with other programs led DHS to terminate all task force agreements during the Obama administration. The Trump administration has rapidly revived the model. Publicly available ICE data shows that between Inauguration Day and June 12, the administration inked 287(g) task force partnerships with 338 new local and state law enforcement agencies. That includes four states where the National Guard's state leader has signed an ICE task force agreement: Texas, Florida, Louisiana (via its parent agency, the Louisiana Military Department) and West Virginia. More: More than 600 local police agencies are partnering with ICE: See if yours is one of them It's unclear what specific roles Guard troops from those states play alongside DHS, though Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis included the Florida National Guard in a list of agencies he thanked for their role in an April series of statewide immigration raids. But whether 287(g) task force participants can operate across state lines is another, legally untested matter. Joe Maher, who was the top career lawyer in DHS from 2011 to 2024, said interstate use of the authority was 'never proposed' during his time with the department. Pham described the idea as 'uncharted territory.' Although Trump during his first administration deployed red state National Guard troops in state-controlled status into Washington, DC, to quell civil unrest in June 2020, without the consent of local officials, many experts believe there are constitutional problems with federal task forces taking state-controlled Guard members into unwilling states. But some, including legal scholars from New York University's Brennan Center, have argued a potential loophole exists unless Congress bans using the National Guard to enforce the law in other states without gubernatorial consent. Citing Alexander Hamilton's writing in the Federalist Papers, Maher said the framers "didn't think of having one state's militia or National Guard ... do law enforcement in another state that does not want that to happen.' One state's adjutant general, who requested anonymity to discuss future operations, said he believes the administration is unlikely to take National Guard troops into unwilling states unless the Insurrection Act is invoked. The Insurrection Act allows the president to use active duty troops – including National Guard members federalized under presidential authority, as 4,000 members of the California National Guard currently are – to directly enforce laws without restriction. At that point, state consent largely wouldn't influence deployment decisions. Trump directed the Pentagon and DHS to study using the act for immigration enforcement in an executive order signed the first day of his second term. Although he has not invoked the Insurrection Act amid the anti-ICE protests or the ongoing deportation push, Trump said he would consider doing so if ongoing unrest worsened. Former Rep. Bill Enyart, D-Illinois, a retired two-star general who led the Illinois National Guard, said using the Insurrection Act for a deportation push would be 'an overreach by the federal government.' Enyart, also an attorney, argued that previous invocations of the law to override governors – such as when President John F. Kennedy federalized the Alabama National Guard to enforce racial integration at the University of Alabama – were 'defending the civil rights' of the states' citizens. 'This is pretty clearly a different situation,' Enyart said. Contributing: Tom Vanden Brook and Francesca Chambers, USA TODAY This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Trump's National Guard immigration enforcement could divide states
