Unholy workplace row brewing in state's Catholic schools
A messy workplace dispute is brewing between teachers at Victoria's Catholic schools and their employers, with the educators' union threatening Fair Work action to enable its members to take industrial action.
A militant mood among the state's government school teachers has spread to the 30,000 educators at Victorian Catholic schools, whose wages lag behind their interstate counterparts by up to $10,000 a year.
The vast majority of Catholic teachers surveyed by the union said they were ready to walk off the job for better pay and conditions, raising the prospect of school strikes.
But a sector-wide strike by Catholic teachers is not a current option because the 30,000 educators are employed by 33 separate church-linked entities, ranging in size from the giant Diocese of Melbourne to single-site employers.
Even before wage talks get officially under way, the teachers' union and the Victorian Catholic Education Authority disagree sharply about the framework for negotiations.
Loading
Despite terms and conditions being uniform across the sector, the complex structure means that the Catholic teachers are not regarded under the Fair Work Act as a single workforce and are denied the right to strike.
This is different to the 52,000 teachers in Victoria's government schools, whose pay is broadly on par with their Catholic counterparts and whose union, the Australian Education Union, is warning that members could walk off the job as they pursue a pay claim that might worth up to 14 per cent in the first year.
The Independent Education Union says the Victorian Catholic Education Authority – the Catholic schools' employers umbrella group – could consent to a 'single entity' bargaining process, granting the teachers the same industrial rights as their government school counterparts. But the authority, uniquely among the states and territories, has refused.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News AU
an hour ago
- Sky News AU
Victorian Labor government to spend $81 million on economic and policy advice
Victoria Shadow Treasurer James Newbury discusses the prediction of the Victorian Labor government to spend $81 million in the current budget on economic and policy advice. 'The government is hiring an executive on $220,000 a day,' Mr Newbury told Sky News host Steve Price. 'For $81 million, I don't think we're getting very good advice because the government doesn't seem to be getting any better. 'What's this $81 million going towards?'
Sky News AU
8 hours ago
- Sky News AU
‘Whitlam-esque': Zoe McKenzie blasts Labor's divisive tax hike on super accounts, slams Tasmanian opposition for triggering early election
Victorian Liberal MP Zoe McKenzie has lambasted Labor for continuing to advance its plan to hike taxes on superannuation accounts and impose levies on unrealised gains whilst hammering the Tasmanian opposition for sending punters to a winter election. Labor's plan to raise taxes on superannuation accounts over $3 million to 30 per cent and to target unrealised capital gains has sent shockwaves throughout the political and business arena, with financial doyens accusing the government of discarding decades of precedent. The Coalition was previously in talks with the Albanese government to revise certain elements of the legislation, chiefly the concept of taxing unrealised gains, however shadow Treasurer Ted O'Brien officially confirmed on Thursday the LNP would oppose the bill. Yet, former Reserve Bank board members Donald McGauchie and Roger Corbett, in addition to a litany of major Liberal Party donors, have pressed the Coalition to remain at the negotiating table and to secure what it deems crucial exemptions for illiquid assets including farms and small businesses. Ms McKenzie, an outspoken moderate who holds one of the Liberal's last outer-suburban seats, railed against the policy, but did not address if the Coalition would resume talks with Labor to modify the legislation. 'I think this is a terrible piece of policy and a terrible precedent for the future, Labor is effectively saying that they will tax money in your pocket, and you do not yet have this money,' she told Sky News on Saturday. The Member for Flinders echoed criticism from industry magnates in relation to the controversial concept of taxing unrealised gains, stating, 'you may have it in the future, you may not have it in the future, but you will be taxed on it'. 'You may incur a loss in the figure, and you won't get that tax back and that's the principle that we must fight here, because once it's started, it could go anywhere,' indicating that the tax could be extended to a range of other assets including real estate and stocks. 'This is a devilish tax and should be fought by the Coalition parties most stridently, this government is very good at speaking liberal-light in terms of their economic narrative, but it is utterly Whitlam-esque in terms of its impact on the Australian economy'. While the Coalition has vowed to fight the legislation, the bill is expected to pass both houses of parliament unopposed, with the Greens joining with Labor in the Senate despite lobbying for the policy to be levied on those with super accounts over $2 million. 'The point is they're going after money no one yet has, these are paper profits, these are family businesses, these are farms held in super funds that people may well have to liquidate just to pass a putative profit that may not exist when finally realised in years to come," Ms McKenzie said. 'They will need the Greens support in the Senate and as you know, the Greens are pushing to lower that threshold from three million to two million. So, it gives the Australian people a very clear indication of what might happen when Labor and the Greens run the show for the next three years'. The shadow assistant minister then turned her attention to the ongoing political chaos in Tasmania. Liberal Premier Jeremy Rockliff lost a no-confidence motion in parliament on Thursday, with the speaker casting the deciding vote, resulting in the state heading to it's second election in as little as 14 months. Ms McKenzie savaged Tasmanian Labor leader Dean Winter for sending the state to a snap winter poll and argued the opposition parties had collectively torpedoed a popularly elected government. 'I think the Tasmanian people would be very disappointed with what's happened this week, basically holding an elected government hostage, so it looks like they will be going back to a mid-winter election. We've all done them and they're horrendous," she said. 'I'm sure the people of Tasmania will not be grateful for being dragged back to the polls so soon after a federal election and indeed just 14 months after a state election." Tasmanians will have to wait until next Tuesday to find out when they will return to the polls, with the parliament scrambling to draft emergency legislation to fund government services of which are due to be tabled on the same day. Independent MPs including Craig Garland have called on the beleaguered Premier to resign, with Mr Rockliff guaranteeing he would not sell off state-owned assets to pay down debt if he won the election, of which served as a key factor in sparking the political row.
Sydney Morning Herald
16 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
The 85 times Melbourne home sellers wanted more money than they told you
At least 85 Melbourne home sellers set their reserve price higher than the top of the advertised price range on their properties in 2024 – sometimes hundreds of thousands of dollars more, analysis of auctions attended or contacted by this masthead in a year-long auction tracking project shows. The practice is not illegal, but experts say it causes frustration and mistrust among buyers and discredits the real estate industry. Analysis shows it is routine even in a weak housing market and more than two years after the Victorian government launched a $3.8 million taskforce to crack down on underquoting. It can also leave buyers paying for building and pest inspections for homes they never had a chance of buying. Agents in Victoria must list properties for sale with a single price or a quoted price range, which must be based on their estimated selling price for the home or what they know the seller is willing to accept for a property. In an auction, the amount a seller will accept is known as a reserve price. It is common for sellers to decide on a reserve on auction day. If an agent knows the reserve during the sale campaign, they must not advertise the home with a guide lower than that price. The analysis tracked 337 auctions over the course of 2024, often seven to eight a week, chosen because they were likely to be interesting and competitive. Price guide, vendor expectations and sale price were recorded. Although property sale prices are public on settlement, there is no public database of reserve prices, which leaves it to agents to choose whether to disclose this. The biggest gap between a price guide and a reserve at an auction recorded by this masthead was $460,000 for a prestige Toorak sale. In Avondale Heights, a vendor's reserve was $165,000 above the top of the guide and another in Doncaster East was $100,000 over.
