Australia's defence minister urges greater military openness from China
SINGAPORE, May 31 (Reuters) - Australian Defence Minister Richard Marles on Saturday urged greater transparency from China over its military modernisation and deployments as Pacific nations brace for a more assertive Chinese presence.
Speaking to Reuters on the sidelines of the Shangri-La Dialogue defence meeting in Singapore, Marles said that while China remains an important strategic partner to Australia, more open communication between the two nations is key for a "productive" relationship.
"When you look at the growth in the Chinese military that has happened without a strategic reassurance, or a strategic transparency....we would like to have a greater transparency in what China is seeking to do in not only its build up, but in the exercises that it undertakes," said Marles.
"We want to have the most productive relationship with China that we can have ... we hope that in the context of that productive relationship, we can see greater transparency and greater communication between our two countries in respect of our defence."
Both Australia and New Zealand raised concerns in February after three Chinese warships conducted unprecedented live-fire drills in the Tasman Sea.
Both nations complained of late notice over the drills by China, which led to the diversion of 49 commercial flights.
Marles said that while the drills were in accordance with international law, China should have been less disruptive.
He also said Australia was able to closely scrutinise the Chinese task-force.
"It's fair to say that this was done in a bigger way than they have done before, but equally, that was meant from our point of view, by a much greater degree of surveillance than we've ever done," he said.
"From the moment that Chinese warships came within the vicinity of Australia, they were being tailed and tracked by Australian assets ... we were very clear about what exercises China was undertaking and what capability they were seeking to exercise and to build."
Chinese officials have signalled that more such exercises could be expected as it was routine naval activity in international waters. Defence analysts say the exercises underscore Beijing's ambition to develop a global navy that will be able to project power into the region more frequently.
Australia has in recent times pledged to boost its missile defence capability amid China's nuclear weapons buildup and its blue-water naval expansion, as the country targets to increase its defence spending from roughly 2% of GDP currently to 2.4% by the early 2030s.
The nation is scheduled to pay the United States $2 billion by the end of 2025 to assist its submarine shipyards, in order to buy three Virginia-class nuclear-powered submarines starting in 2032 - its biggest ever defence project.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
28 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Is the cost-of-living crisis over? Victoria's new treasurer is optimistic, but housing remains a battleground
Victoria's new treasurer, Jaclyn Symes, is confident cost-of-living pressures will ease by the next election – and that voters will be less concerned about the state's soaring debt once they see the completed projects it has helped fund. In an exclusive interview with Guardian Australia after handing down her first budget in May, Symes also signalled openness to reforming stamp duty. But she hit back at industry groups like the Property Council, calling on them to move beyond criticising current policies and offer solutions: 'Saying, 'Don't do this,' that doesn't particularly help me. I have a policy brain, I like to find problems and fix them.' The upper house leader made history in becoming Victoria's first female treasurer after she was handpicked by the premier, Jacinta Allan, to take over from retiring Tim Pallas in December. Symes inherited a mountain of debt, and the recent budget forecasts it to climb even higher, to $194bn in 2028-29. That's up from just $21.8bn before Labor took office in 2014, after years of rapid public sector growth, major infrastructure spending, the pandemic and subsequent credit rating downgrades. Symes's first budget was sold as a turning point, delivering a $600m operating surplus and a slight drop in net debt relative to the state's economy. It also included unexpected federal windfalls, which Symes defended using to ease cost-of-living pressures – pointing to $18m for food relief as one of her proudest budget items. 'People have asked, 'Couldn't you have had a higher surplus?' Sure. But it wouldn't have felt very good knowing we're not supporting some of those services that people doing it really tough are relying on,' Symes says. Looking ahead to 2026 – the year of the next state election – Symes is optimistic that the cost-of-living crisis that has engulfed Australia will have eased. She says interest rates are coming down, housing supply is growing and, for the first time in years, wages are forecast to outpace inflation. Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email 'All the signs are there. But if we go too early and abandon the people that are still struggling, then I wouldn't feel very proud about that,' she says. She hopes that people will soon be 'feeling more confident and not worrying about the cost of every meal that's going on the table'. 'That's what you want for all Victorians, but that's not the case right now'. Symes also believes that state debt won't dominate the election debate, and that voters will instead be grateful for the infrastructure it's funded, including the Metro Tunnel and West Gate Tunnel, both set to open this year after huge cost overruns. Symes points to Sydney's $21.6bn Metro, which also ran billions over budget but is now popular with voters: 'The day it opened, people were like, 'Oh, actually, this is a worthwhile investment.'' The budget also brought pain for some, with 1,200 public sector jobs set to go, with the treasurer warning more job losses are likely once the government receives the recommendations of a review, a move Symes defends as tough but necessary. 'Do I want people to lose their jobs? No. But I also have a responsibility as treasurer to make sure that we are being cost-effective,' she says. Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion At parliament last week, it became clear housing will be a key battleground at the next election. While the premier pledged to get 'millennials into homes' through planning reform and an extension of stamp duty concessions for new apartments, units and townhouses, the opposition announced a revived 2022 policy to abolish stamp duty for first home buyers on properties worth up to $1m. The shadow treasurer, James Newbury, says it would give 'young Victorians the final leg up they need', but Symes is sceptical, questioning both the opposition's costings and the policy's failure to increase housing supply. Stamp duty remains a huge revenue source for the state – forecast to bring in $11bn in 2028-29. But it's loathed by homebuyers and economists. The Grattan Institute's Brendan Coates calls it 'the worst tax in Australia', as it locks people into their homes, discourages downsizing and acts as a 'tax on divorce' – as separating couples will both have to go on to pay it. Many economists have long called for it to be replaced with a broad-based land tax. Asked if she would consider such a move, Symes leaves the door open: 'I'm always open to having discussions about tax reform. I've got the finances to manage so I can't make reckless announcements.' Last week, Symes addressed a post-budget Property Council breakfast, where she faced a tough crowd. Before she took the stage, Lendlease's Adam Williams warned that property taxes would soon make up 47% of the state's total tax revenue. In the Q&A segment, a member of the crowd said tax on foreign investment was 'killing' developers. Symes tried a joke: 'Let's have a show of hands – what's the worst tax? What's your favourite tax?' It fell flat. Newbury called her 'tone deaf' and 'out of touch' and criticised her for previously describing the role of treasurer as 'fun'. But Symes says she's not fazed by criticism, and that she's been underestimated before: told she couldn't be agriculture minister because she wore wedges to a farm and dismissed as attorney general for 'giggling like a schoolgirl'. 'The commentary that actually affects me more than anything else is the young women, particularly high school girls, who say, 'We have a female treasurer. That's so cool.''
The Guardian
28 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Kathy has terminal cancer and cares for her son with a profound disability. At a crisis point, his NDIS funding ran out
Next to the bed Steven Rieger spends most his life in is a framed print that says: 'This is my happy place.' For him, it is – his small room on the eastern outskirts of Melbourne is covered in Collingwood paraphernalia and basked in warm light. Steven, 37, needs round-the-clock care. He lives with cerebral palsy, is nonverbal and suffers from seizures – natural light can trigger them so he spends almost all of his time in his room. His parents are both in their 70s – his father Rodger has had several strokes and is partly deaf. His mother, Kathy, who has cared for him most of his life, is dying – her breast cancer has metastasised, spreading to her bones and brain. In March, the family lost their national disability insurance scheme (NDIS) funding, and Steven's paid carers felt obliged to work for free – the family could not cope by themselves. They had been overspending on their plan, but the family say they were underfunded for their care needs. When the money ran out they panicked. Steven's sister Kylie started a GoFundMe and Kathy rang their local member of parliament, Julian Hill. They have now been put on a plan that provides 10 hours of care a day, but they need more. 'It was almost three weeks where there was no funding,' Kathy says. 'The carers that do look after Steven were nice enough to still come in here, but they weren't getting paid. They were doing their normal shifts but without pay.' Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email Advocates say participants have become collateral damage as the NDIS goes through massive changes, with many plans expiring and reviews dragging on. They say crucial funding is not getting where it needs to go. In January, Kathy had started preparing everything for the annual review of Steven's plan. As she was getting sicker she knew they needed to be funded for 15 hours of care a day. 'It was very stressful for me,' she says. 'I was getting things organised … and hoping the funding wouldn't run out, but it did. 'We started calling NDIS a few weeks before this funding was going to run out, and they said it wouldn't run out. They said they would escalate [the case] every time.' The family say they now owe around $15,000 to carers for the three weeks of work. Twice a day, Steven is lifted into a chair and fed through a drip. El Gibbs, CEO of the Disability Advocates Network Australia, says the NDIS is delaying plan renewals for so long, people run out of personal funds. 'We had a meeting a few weeks ago, and all our members reported a 50% or more increase in their waiting list for help with AAT [administrative appeals tribunal] appeals, where people with disability and their families are fighting for the support that they need,' Gibbs says. Under the changes, NDIS plans are meant to automatically continue if the review has not taken place yet. Because the Riegers were asking to increase Steven's care hours, their plan ran out. The last quarterly reports show an increase in participants taking their review decision to the AAT, with the number of new cases as a proportion of active participants increasing from 0.66% in the March 2023 quarter to 1.05% in the March 2025 quarter. Gibbs says the delays mean people in crisis are falling through the cracks, as is the case for the Riegers – Steven's funding running out while Kathy is dying worsens the family's situation. Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion 'Our disability support system has to be able to meet them where they are,' Gibbs says. 'If a family goes through a crisis, and informal supports aren't there any more then, of course, the NDIS needs to step in and do it quickly and make sure a terrible situation isn't made harder.' Gibbs says vulnerable families should not be accruing debt to get the right care and the massive reforms to the NDIS need to be more clearly communicated. 'At the moment, the changes are often rushed and harsh, and the communication about them isn't clear to people with disability, to families, to support coordinators,' she says. 'So it is really hard for everyone to understand what is happening and to have a clear pathway about what comes next.' A spokesperson for the National Disability Insurance Agency said its priority was 'ensuring every participant, like Steven, has access to the disability-related supports they require'. 'The agency continues to work with Steven and his parents regarding his future needs. 'When a participant's circumstances change a request for an early plan reassessment can be requested. The agency cannot make decisions to change a participant's plan without being provided appropriate evidence.' Jenny McAllister, the minister for the NDIS, was contacted for comment. An occupational therapist report to possibly increase Steven's care to 15 hours a day is set for three weeks' time, but Kathy is struggling. 'I physically can't care for Steven any more,' she says. 'With extremely high needs like Steven's, there shouldn't be a review in their plan. They're not going to get better. There's no change. 'They're not going to wake up one day and go, 'Oh, hi Mum, I'm all good. I'm going to work now.''
The Guardian
38 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Australian high-speed rail has barely left the station – some experts say a new US project shows a better way
Progress has been slow on the proposed high-speed rail line between Sydney and Newcastle since the establishment of the High Speed Rail Authority (HSRA) in 2023, and the federal government is yet to commit to building the megaproject. But some experts say there may be a cheaper and easier way to do it, pointing to a US example of what can be achieved. The Newcastle-Sydney high-speed rail line is estimated to cost at least $30bn and take well over a decade to build. The HSRA has spent its infancy developing yet another business case, starting with Sydney-Newcastle, to ultimately form part of a Melbourne-Brisbane line in the second half of this century. Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email Geotechnical drilling has begun to determine how to tackle the mammoth task of traversing the Hawkesbury River with services that can reach a top speed of 320km/h. Meanwhile, Infrastructure Australia is evaluating its business case and will shortly make a recommendation. By contrast, a longer line linking the eastern outskirts of Los Angeles with Las Vegas at similar speeds is being built for a fraction of the cost and time. The private-led Brightline West represents an approach that is in many ways the polar opposite of how Labor is pursuing the technology in Australia, experts say. With construction estimates soaring, experts are now questioning if Australia is letting perfect be the enemy of good and risking a cost blowout that would crush the chance of the line ever being built. The HSRA plans to establish a service between central Sydney and Newcastle's Broadmeadow, running end-to-end in an hour, with a stop at Gosford. The journey on the existing Newcastle-Sydney line takes about 2.5 hours, almost half an hour longer than an express service achieved in the mid-20th century. The HSRA chief executive, Tim Parker, wants to build dedicated dual tracks so that high-speed trains won't have to interact with slower trains, a contrasting approach to how high-speed rail expanded in most countries. Spain's high-speed train, for example, shares sections of track with slower services. While it must slow down in certain sections, this philosophy presents an opportunity to roll out fast train technology in stages and more cheaply. Not only is building a dedicated line more expensive, the Sydney-Newcastle corridor will require an engineering feat to construct what would be the world's longest rail tunnel to allow trains to cross the Hawkesbury River without compromising speed. 'They've picked a starting stretch that is the hardest and most expensive part of the entire east coast,' says Garry Glazebrook, an associate professor at the University of Technology Sydney. The business case has not yet been made public, but the price tag is expected to be eye-watering. Modelling for the New South Wales government's 2019 plan to build a line without federal help reportedly predicted it would cost about $30bn and take 12 years to build just the first stage from Gosford through the Hawkesbury to a station at Sydney Olympic Park – a cheaper option than Central. The costs proved too great. The then Perrottet government abandoned the plan at the end of 2022. Brightline West broke ground in April 2024. Despite covering a 315km point-to-point distance – nearly three times as long as Newcastle-Sydney – construction is expected to be completed swiftly, with services for the 2hr 10min trip to be operating in time for the 2028 Los Angeles Olympics. The project's most up-to-date budget is US$12.5bn (about A$19.5bn), already overrun from a 2020 estimate of US$8bn, but still a fraction of the cost of the Australian proposal. Brightline West – owned by Fortress Investment Group – is funded by a mix of equity, private finance, federal government grants and California and Nevada state-issued tax-exempt bonds for private ventures in the public interest. It is entirely unrelated to the California state government's plan for an LA-San Francisco line, which has been held up as an example of disastrous infrastructure projects in the US. Approved in 2008, no track has yet been laid and cost estimates have more than tripled to US$128bn. Donald Trump has vowed to block federal funds previously promised to the LA-San Francisco project, but administration officials appear satisfied with Biden-era commitments to the Brightline model. Those costs and timeframe may appear ambitious, but Brightline has already established a Miami-Orlando line that reaches 200km/h – just shy of the high-speed definition. The first section, between Miami and West Palm Beach, broke ground in 2014 and was in service by 2018. Brightline West's impressive price tag and timeframe are only achievable through several compromises. Most of the line will initially run along a single track with passing loops , reducing speed accordingly. It will also share its corridor with the Interstate 15 Highway. The track will be built down the I-15's median strip, with trains travelling alongside road traffic, similar to a number of existing rail lines in Perth. This delivers serious savings. Building just one track is cheaper, and land acquisition and permissions are streamlined. Perhaps the greatest compromise is that Brightline West will terminate in Rancho Cucamonga, on the eastern outskirts of LA. While avoiding costly construction in built-up urban areas, passengers will need to connect to existing, slower rail to make the 67km journey to Union station in the heart of the city's downtown. Building anything in Australia is expensive, and rail even more so. Alon Levy is the co-lead of the transportation and land use program at New York University's Marron Institute, and researches why construction costs differ between countries. He believes Newcastle-Sydney already has unnecessary costs baked in thanks to overly prescriptive demands from government. 'It's a foolish requirement this early on to not share any tracks with commuter lines,' Levy says. 'You leave less space for the experts to find cheaper workarounds and drive innovation.' Australia's rail industry is another problem, Levy believes. Australian governments rely heavily on consultants for infrastructure planning, a symptom of the hollowing out of departments of expertise. 'This problem is common in Anglosphere governments,' Levy says. They bring in outside consultants who work on one thing then disband and the expertise vanishes.' Levy believes an Australian government – either the commonwealth or NSW – should establish a 'public sector consultant unit' for rail expertise, which it can then provide to other states to work on their projects at cost, a model successfully proven in France and Italy. The profit motive of companies such as Brightline can also bring down costs by pushing the limits of what is possible. 'They go out to the market and challenge their suppliers … to push the technical limits, so trains can move through difficult stretches and save the company from spending billions moving dirt around,' one rail source who requested anonymity says. 'But in Australia, governments want already proven technology, they want a safer bet that is future-proofed, and that often means being overengineered and double the cost necessary. It's always got to be the gold standard.' Rail unions also increase construction and operating costs. 'Unions have enormous say, it's just the way we work in Australia,' Glazebrook says. Union pressure is broadly seen as having pushed NSW to build new metro tracks for driverless trains with a private operator. A separate rail source, unable to be named due to their work, said the new metro extension under Sydney harbour could not have been built had it been subject to existing Sydney Trains union agreements, due to the line's gradient. Herein lies a catch-22, Glazebrook says. By adopting the proven European approach – staged building using existing tracks already subject to union agreements – construction and operation are beholden to stringent standards that increase the cost and timeframes of projects. Building dedicated tracks is a way to bypass such pressures and can allow for the automation of driving and fewer staffing requirements, saving money on operations once the line is running. But construction costs will soar. 'You throw everything together and you get a real bloody mess,' Glazebrook says. Experts are now questioning if Newcastle-Sydney is the smartest place to start. Glazebrook still backs the proposal put by his group, Fastrack Australia, for the HSRA to begin by upgrading the Sydney-Canberra line in stages to high-speed capability. Its easier terrain makes it lower-hanging fruit, even if trains don't run along the Federal Highway's median strip. Others say Canberra-Sydney more closely resembles the value proposition of Brightline West – the potential to capture market share where air or car trips have dominated. Taxpayers currently foot the huge travel bill of bureaucrats and politicians flying between Canberra and Sydney. The existing train service takes about four and a half hours – a 90-minute high-speed alternative could attract that business to rail instead. The existing Newcastle-Sydney service – ticketed at $11 – takes only an hour and a half longer than the proposed high-speed trip. While local rail experts are not proposing to copy Brightline's model exactly, most agree there are attitudes worth adopting to avoid Australia's high-speed rail ambition being shelved. 'We don't want to let perfect be the enemy of the good,' Glazebrook says.
