&w=3840&q=100)
Did Modi's fact-check force Trump to make U-turn on India-Pakistan ceasefire credit?
Since May 10 — when India and Pakistan announced a ceasefire in hostilities — Donald Trump has on 14 different occasions claimed that he helped broker peace between the two nuclear-armed nations. However, in a press interaction on Wednesday, the US president changed his tune, crediting the countries' leaders for showing restraint. The reversal comes a day after PM Narendra Modi fact-checked the American president, saying India 'has never accepted mediation, does not accept it, and will never accept it' read more
Trump for the first time in weeks, didn't take the credit for stopping the military conflict between India and Pakistan. File image/Reuters
It's not often one witnesses Donald Trump making a U-turn on his statements. But on Wednesday (June 18), the US president shifted his tone and admitted that it was India and Pakistan that decided to end hostilities in May.
On Wednesday, Trump speaking to reporters in the Oval Office after hosting a lunch for Pakistan's Army chief General Asim Munir said he was 'so happy that two smart people… decided not to keep going with that war. That could have been a nuclear war. Those are two nuclear powers, big ones, big, big nuclear powers, and they decided that'.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
This is quite a reversal from the past where the US president has taken credit for the de-escalation between India and Pakistan — Trump has boasted at least 14 times that he had brokered the peace. In some instances, he claimed that he had used trade with the US as a tool to get the two countries to hold fire.
But how did we get there? Was it PM Modi's fact-check that led to Trump's change in stance or was it Munir's lunch?
Trump's change of heart
After weeks of loudly boasting of brokering peace between nuclear rivals India and Pakistan , Trump did a 180, crediting the two countries' leaders directly for ending the hostilities.
In remarks to the media following his lunch with Pakistan's Army Chief General Asim Munir, Trump praised Prime Minister Narendra Modi and General Munir as 'very smart people', adding that they chose not to turn the conflict into a 'nuclear war'.
'They were both here, but I was with Modi a few weeks ago. He was here actually, but now we speak to him. And I'm so happy that two smart people, plus you know, people on their staff too, but two smart people, two very smart people decided not to keep going with that war. That could have been a nuclear war. Those are two nuclear powers, big ones, big, big nuclear powers, and they decided that,' Trump was quoted as saying.
This is the first time in weeks when Trump did not take credit for stopping the military conflict between India and Pakistan. In fact, since May 10 — the day India and Pakistan stopped firing at each other — the US president has claimed at least 14 times that he had brokered the peace. On multiple occasions, Trump has said that he 'helped settle' the tension between the two neighbouring countries and claimed America would do a 'lot of trade' with them if they stopped the conflict.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Earlier, speaking at the White House's Oval Office during a meeting with South African President Cyril Ramaphosa, Trump had said, 'If you take a look at what we just did with Pakistan and India. We settled that whole, and I think I settled it through trade.'
Settled India, Pakistan issue with 'trade', says US President Donald Trump, pointing out that 'we are doing a big deal with India, Pakistan'; points,' Pakistan has great leader, & Modi is my friend' pic.twitter.com/X6NQ71sTCm — Sidhant Sibal (@sidhant) May 21, 2025
Prior to this, while on his way back from his Saudi Arabia visit, Trump had said on board Air Force One, 'I didn't like what was happening. And you know, they're two very strongly nuclear countries, with very, very powerful amounts of nuclear, too, serious stuff…
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
'And I did a good job. (Secretary of State) Marco (Rubio) did a good job, and (Vice President) JD (Vance) did a good job. We sort of were a team. And we, I think, convinced them to let's have peace and let's go and make trade deals. If we can make trade deals, we like that much better than nuclear weapons. And that was a great thing.'
He also told a crowd of US military personnel in Qatar, 'I don't wanna say I did but I sure as hell helped settle the problem between Pakistan and India last week, which was getting more and more hostile and all of a sudden you'll start seeing missiles of a different type and we got it settled. I hope I don't walk out of here and two days later find out that it is not settled, but I think it is settled.'
While addressing a crowd of U.S. military personnel in Qatar, US President Donald Trump reiterated his mediation efforts between India and Pakistan. He said:
"I don't wanna say I did but I sure as hell helped settle the problem between Pakistan and India last week, which was… pic.twitter.com/DcwwZtDHRO — Press Trust of India (@PTI_News) May 15, 2025
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Modi disputes Trump's version of events
Interestingly, Trump's reversal comes hours after he asserted that he 'stopped the war' between India and Pakistan. This claim came despite the fact that Prime Minister Narendra Modi held a telephonic conversation with the US president and told him that India has never accepted mediation, does not accept it, and will never do so in the future.
India's Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri revealing details about the phone call, which was held on Tuesday night, said that Modi clarified India's position to Trump. 'PM Modi clearly told President Trump that during this entire incident, at no time, at any level, were there any talks on issues like India-US trade deal or mediation between India and Pakistan through America,' said Misri. 'PM Modi stressed that India has never accepted mediation, does not accept it, and will never accept it.'
POTUS @realDonaldTrump called PM @narendramodi.
🎥 Listen to Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri's statement on the telephone conversation. pic.twitter.com/7TcZHDzXDd — Randhir Jaiswal (@MEAIndia) June 18, 2025
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Furthermore, Misri in his remarks said that PM Modi also reiterated the statement, 'Goli ka jawab gole se' to the US president. The official added that US president also invited Modi to stop over in the US. However, due to prior engagements, PM Modi had to decline the offer.
Lunch with Pakistan's Munir
Some observers also note that Trump's change in stance coincides with his lunch with Munir and believe that meeting with the Pakistani general may also have had something to do with Trump's change in stance.
When asked the purpose of meeting with Munir, Trump said, 'Reason I had him here was I wanted to thank him for not going into the war and ending it.'
The US president further added that he was honoured to meet Munir and the two had discussed Iran, which he said Pakistan knew better than most. 'They (Pakistani leadership) know Iran very well, better than most. They're not happy about anything. It's not that they're bad with Israel. They know them both actually, but they probably, maybe, they know Iran better, but they see what's going on and he agreed with me,' he told reporters.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
The White House also confirmed that the meeting was held in recognition of Munir's remarks lauding Trump's role in halting a potential escalation between the two nuclear-armed neighbours.
Reasons for Trump doubling down on India-Pak claims
But why is it that Trump until Wednesday continued to boast of his role in brokering peace between India and Pakistan?
Most Trump analysts believe that it's part of a larger pattern with John Bolton, Trump's former national security advisor, telling ANI, 'It's nothing personal to India. This is Donald Trump, who takes credit for everything.
'It's typical of Trump because he would jump in before everyone else could take credit. It may be irritating, probably is irritating to many people, but it's nothing against India, it's just Trump being Trump.'
It's also an attempt by the US president to reassert his image of a peacemaker. While campaigning for the US presidential elections in 2024, Trump had vowed to immediately stop the Ukraine and Russia war once he won. However, that promise remains unfulfilled. Furthermore, the Israel-Hamas war still rages on and he hasn't been able to stop it.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Some also note that Trump's claims were his way of expressing his displeasure with India. As the Economic Times wrote that Trump may have view India's rebuttals as a personal affront rather than a routine diplomatic clarification. This may have bruised his ego, propelling him to restate the claim ever more publicly and forcefully.
With inputs from agencies
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
9 minutes ago
- Time of India
Who is Ghazala Hashmi? Indian-American wins lieutenant governor nomination; Democrat to contest Virginia race
Source- Instagram Senator Ghazala Hashmi made history on Wednesday by winning the Democratic nomination for lieutenant governor of Virginia. She is now the first Muslim and the first Indian-American ever nominated for a statewide office in Virginia. Hashmi defeated five Democratic candidates, including former Richmond Mayor Levar Stoney, clinching the nomination by a razor-thin margin of less than one percentage point. She will now face Republican John Reid in November. Reid is the first openly gay man nominated by a major party for statewide office in Virginia. With Hashmi joining gubernatorial nominee Rep. Abigail Spanberger and attorney general candidate Jay Jones, Democrats have now completed their statewide ticket. The general election could be historic in multiple ways, including the possibility of Virginia electing its first woman governor. Who is Ghazala Hashmi? Hashmi is the first Muslim woman and first South Asian American elected to Virginia's state Senate. She was born in India and moved to the US at age 4, settling in Georgia with her family. Hashmi holds a PhD in American literature and spent most of her professional life as a professor. She taught at the University of Richmond and later at Reynolds Community College before entering politics. In 2019, she entered the Virginia Senate by defeating Republican Glen Sturtevant in a closely watched race. She was re-elected in 2023. In the Senate, she championed reproductive rights. One of her key bills aimed to protect Virginians' access to contraception. The bill passed both chambers but was vetoed by Governor Glenn Youngkin.
India Today
14 minutes ago
- India Today
As Trump hosts Pak's Asim Munir, Internet dishes out memes with a Bollywood twist
The internet exploded with Bollywood-style memes and jokes after US President Donald Trump hosted Pakistan's military chief, General Asim Munir, for lunch at the White House on rare meeting came after Munir's call for Trump to be nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize. According to White House spokesperson Anna Kelly, Munir credited Trump with defusing what could have escalated into a nuclear conflict between India and Pakistan during their brief military standoff in social media users had a field day, flooding X with hilarious memes using popular Hindi film clips and scenes to poke fun at the unlikely camaraderie between Trump and Munir. Take a look at the memes and jokes here:Asim Munir in White Moana (@ladynationalist) June 18, 2025advertisementDonald Trump with Asim Munir in White House Jo Kar (@i_am_gustakh) June 18, 2025Donald Trump and Asim Munir's exclusive video from the White House Raja Babu (@GaurangBhardwa1) June 18, 2025Asim Munir in @ maithun (@Being_Humor) June 18, 2025Asim Munir in White House Gagan (@1no_aalsi_) June 18, 2025Asim Munir is having lunch at the White House rozgar_CA (@Memeswalaladka) June 18, 2025When Asim Munir asked for a loan,Trump: Sachya (@sachya2002) June 18, 2025Donald Trump after meeting Asim Munir : (@gentleman07_) June 18, 2025First visuals from Trump and Asim Munir's lunch emerge Meme Farmer (@craziestlazy) June 18, 2025The White House confirmed that the meeting was held in recognition of Munir's remarks applauding Trump's role in halting a potential escalation between India and four-day conflict between India and Pakistan in early May was sparked by the April 22 Pahalgam terror attack, in which 26 people - most of them tourists - were in response, launched retaliatory strikes on nine terror camps in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK) as part of Operation Sindoor. Pakistan countered with unprovoked attacks targeting civilian areas and military infrastructure, all of which were thwarted by India's air defence systems.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
14 minutes ago
- First Post
As Maga camp rejoices, 10 things that transgenders lost in US court against Trump
US Supreme Court on Wednesday upheld a Tennessee state law banning gender-affirming care for minors. While Maga rejoices in the ruling here are 10 ways the judgment affects trans people in the United States read more The US Supreme Court on Wednesday upheld a Tennessee state law banning gender-affirming care for minors, which activists argued was a devastating loss for transgener rights in the country. The apex American court gave its ruling in the United States v Skrmetti, which was filed last year by three families of trans children and a provider of gender-affirming care.. During the oral arguments last year, the plaintiffs, as well as the US government, then helmed by Joe Biden, argued that Tennessee's law constituted sex-based discrimination and thus violated the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment. As per the state law, someone assigned female at birth could not be prescribed testosterone, but someone assigned male at birth could receive those drugs. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Meanwhile, Tennessee stated that the ban is necessary to protect children from what it termed 'experimental' medical treatment. During the Wednesday arguments, Conservative judges at the Supreme Court sided with Tennessee law. All six of the Supreme Court's conservative justices went on to uphold the law, although several also wrote their own concurring opinions. Amid the majority, Chief Justice John Roberts emphasised that the ruling was primarily based on the justices' finding that the law did not violate the equal protection clause, rather than on an ideological opposition to trans rights. 'This case carries with it the weight of fierce scientific and policy debates about the safety, efficacy and propriety of medical treatments in an evolving field. The voices in these debates raise sincere concerns; the implications for all are profound,' Roberts wrote in his opinion. 'We leave questions regarding its policy to the people, their elected representatives, and the democratic process," he added. Activists argued that the ruling can turn out to be a major blow to trangender rights in the United States. What transgender people lost against Trump Expert and medical advice ignored: The Supreme Court upheld Tennessee's ban on gender-affirming care (puberty blockers, hormones, surgeries) despite overwhelming evidence from major medical groups such as the American Academy of Paediatrics, which cites decades of research showing these treatments reduce gender dysphoria and suicide risks. Health crisis for trans youth: Denying access to medically recommended care risks worsening mental health outcomes, including higher rates of depression, anxiety, and suicide attempts. Delayed treatments may also lead to irreversible physical changes (e.g., puberty progression) that exacerbate psychological distress. Societal stigma amplified: The ruling reinforces systemic discrimination, emboldening anti-trans policies in education, sports, and public spaces. Families may face social ostracisation, while advocacy groups warn of rising hate crimes and eroded community trust. Economic burden on families: Families in ban states may incur relocation costs to access care elsewhere. Health systems in supportive states could face strain, while bans may deter businesses and skilled workers from operating in restrictive regions, impacting local economies. Legal patchwork creates inequality: Over 20 states can now enforce bans, creating a fragmented system where care access depends on geography. This exacerbates socioeconomic disparities, as low-income families lack the resources to travel for treatments. Workforce and productivity loss: Untreated mental health issues among trans youth could reduce future workforce participation and productivity. States may face higher long-term healthcare costs from emergency mental health interventions. Trump's broader anti-trans agenda gets a boost: The ruling aligns with Trump-era policies restricting transgender military service, sports participation, and federal healthcare funding, framing trans rights as a cultural wedge issue despite scientific consensus. Medical community backlash: Doctors and hospitals in ban-states risk legal penalties for providing care, leading to clinician shortages in gender-affirming fields and reduced quality of care for all patients. Global repercussions: The decision may inspire similar bans worldwide, undermining global human rights efforts and international LGBTQ+ health collaborations. Youth autonomy undermined: The ruling dismisses trans youths' agency over their bodies, perpetuating societal narratives that marginalise their identities and limit their future opportunities in education and employment.
