logo
Women in UK ‘still not safe' as mourners gather to remember murdered Zara Aleena

Women in UK ‘still not safe' as mourners gather to remember murdered Zara Aleena

Independenta day ago

Women in Britain are 'still not safe', the aunt of Zara Aleena said as mourners gathered in east London to mark three years since the law graduate's 'preventable' murder.
The 35-year-old was walking home from a night out when she was stalked, assaulted and killed by a sexual predator on 26 June 2022 in Ilford, east London – just minutes from her front door.
The outrage and protests which followed her death, along with her inquest last year, have thrown a harsh spotlight on the failings of institutions to protect women, according to Ms Aleena's aunt Farah Naz.
Ms Aleena's murderer Jordan McSweeney, a known violent offender, had been released from prison nine days before her brutal killing.
On Sunday, Ms Naz led a vigil to honour her beloved niece who 'embodied fairness and justice' and used tell her 'I am going to put things right' in the world.
Health Secretary Wes Streeting, who was Ms Aleena's local MP, and justice minister Alex Davies-Jones both urged the well-wishers to hold the Government accountable on its promises to try and tackle violence against women, including a target to halve violence against women and girls in the next decade.
Ms Naz told the PA news agency her niece 'has become a symbol of what needs to be different, and also of what's possible' adding that for the family 'her legacy isn't just about systems, it's about values: fairness, courage, care for others.'
The vigil included a moment of reflection and a walk from the spot where Ms Aleena was murdered to her home.
Ms Naz said: 'Progress has been made but women are still not safe.
'We hope the vigil offered a space for quiet reflection and also for shared resolve. It's a moment to remember Zara, and also to recognise the depth of the injustice.
'We stand together against the violence and the systems that still enable it. We walk Zara home, and we say: 'no more'.'
The probation system has faced scrutiny and reform, emergency call handling has improved and offender risk tools are being used more effectively since Ms Aleena's murder, the vigil organisers said.
They said survivors are speaking out and being heard but a misogynistic culture still underpins institutions and streets, prevention remains secondary to response and specialist services, especially those led by and for black and minority women, remain underfunded.
Women's safety is still vulnerable to political cycles, plus probation and prison services remain under-resourced and overstretched which may hamper efforts to effectively manage high-risk individuals, they added.
Ms Naz said: 'Zara's legacy is already taking shape through policy shifts, public conversation, and the determination of so many people working for change.'
Ms Naz said 'some things have changed but not enough,' adding: 'The inquest exposed the failures clearly. There's been progress, but real safety for women and girls will take more than policy. It needs a shift in culture, in how institutions work, how women are treated, and how accountability is held.
'We're not there yet – that's why we keep going.'
The jury at Ms Aleena's inquest last year found: 'Zara's death was contributed to by the failure of multiple state agencies to act in accordance to policies and procedures – to share intelligence, accurately assess risk of serious harm, (and) act and plan in response to the risk in a sufficient, timely and coordinated way'.
Evidence to the inquest prompted the coroner Nadia Persaud to issue a prevention of future deaths report warning there is a risk similar killings could occur unless action is taken.
She instructed the Probation Service and Metropolitan Police to improve their services.
Low staffing levels, poor understanding around risk assessment and a 'lack of professional curiosity' within the Probation Service were all listed as matters of concern, as was a lack of 'rigour, detail and independence' of a Met investigation into the case, Ms Persaud concluded.
Mr Streeting told the crowd: 'We have come together to celebrate and recognise a life that was tragically and horrifically cut short and to recognise the damage it has inflicted on our whole community.
'Women and girls who were already afraid to walk our streets are now even more afraid looking at the consequences of what happens when, on a normal night out and on your way home, something so horrific can happen in our neighbourhood.'
Ms Naz was also joined by the relatives of other women who have been murdered – primary school teacher Sabina Nessa and mother-of-three Jan Mustafa.
They too 'campaign for change and stand in remembrance, protest and solidarity,' she said.
All the bereaved relatives hope to meet the Prime Minster next month about their campaign for a new law to force offenders to attend their sentencing hearings.
Ms Davies-Jones said: 'Today, we stand with Zara's family. With her friends. With Farah Naz, who has carried Zara's legacy with extraordinary strength and purpose.
'We stand with the families of Sabina Nessa and Jan Mustafa, who know this pain too deeply. Your grief has become a rallying cry. Your courage has driven real change.'
She added: 'We've set an ambitious target: to halve violence against women and girls in the next decade. We owe it to every woman and girl to see that through. To say – with one voice – enough is enough.
'That means coming together, across Government, across Parliament and across the whole justice system to fundamentally tackle how we approach violence against women.'
McSweeney was handed a life sentence with a minimum term of 38 years at the Old Bailey in December 2022 after admitting sexually assaulting and murdering Ms Aleena.
In November 2023, he won a Court of Appeal bid to reduce the minimum term of his life sentence to 33 years.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Who are the key Labour rebels in the revolt against Starmer's welfare bill?
Who are the key Labour rebels in the revolt against Starmer's welfare bill?

The Guardian

time38 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

Who are the key Labour rebels in the revolt against Starmer's welfare bill?

Keir Starmer's welfare reforms hang by a thread the day before a vote that could define his premiership. The prime minister was almost certainly heading for his first Commons defeat in government before a last-minute deal reached last week between government officials and leading rebels. However, the result remains uncertain, with a series of Labour MPs warning on Monday that they could not back the bill in its current form. Many are angry about the fact that the controversial four-point system to qualify for personal independence payments (Pips) will take effect in November 2026, no matter the outcome of a government review into the system. With ministers still unsure of winning the vote, Labour whips were calling colleagues throughout Monday to gauge support levels. One of the problems for party managers is that opposition is coming from a large and disparate group without one clear leader. But here are six of the Labour figures – inside and outside parliament – whose voices are being listened to particularly closely. MP for Hackney South and Shoreditch As head of the cross-party Treasury select committee, Hillier's parliamentary role is more usually that of impartial inquisitor rather than rabble-rousing rebel. So, her name as the first signatory on last week's wrecking amendment gave the rebellion the momentum it needed to force the government into concessions. It was unsurprising, therefore, that Hillier was one of the small group of MPs who thrashed out a compromise deal last week. Her support for that deal was vital in persuading the government they had done enough to sway other moderates. But her questions in the House of Commons on Monday over the details of the concessions reflected an unease about the details which is shared by many of her colleagues. MP for Oldham East and Saddleworth Along with Hillier, Abrahams, the chair of the work and pensions select committee, helped negotiate the compromise package struck last week. But also like Hillier, her comments in the Commons on Monday suggested she was still unconvinced that they go far enough. 'The [Pip] review should determine both the new process, the new points and the new descriptors,' she said. 'We shouldn't pre-determine it at four points at the moment.' Abrahams is understood to be more hardline in her opposition to the compromise she helped agree than Hillier, and whips will be working hard to talk her round. MP for Sheffield Heeley Having been sacked from the cabinet last November, Haigh has found a new lease of life as unofficial leader of the soft left on the Labour backbenches. Although she has not played the most visible role of the rebels, she has been acting as their unofficial whip, counting MPs' votes and helping to decide the wording of the wrecking amendment. Haigh was thought to have been mollified by the government's concessions last week, but on Monday her allies were criticising the government for the way they had handled the fallout. MP for Penistone and Stocksbridge For the last few weeks, Tidball has remained largely silent on the welfare bill, despite being one of parliament's only visibly physically disabled MPs. Although she had not put her name to the rebel amendment, she played an important role trying to persuade the Treasury to make concessions, culminating in what is reported to have been an angry conversation between her and the chancellor, Rachel Reeves. Tidball broke her silence on Sunday, detailing her objections to the bill in a piece for the Guardian. She made an impassioned contribution to Monday's debate in which she argued: 'Having no public consultation of these plans excludes the voice of disabled people.' However, she has not yet said which way she intends to vote and her final decision will be keenly watched by Labour whips. MP for York Central A persistent thorn in Starmer's side, Maskell has emerged as a softly spoken champion of the left of the party. From winter fuel payments, to overseas aid cuts, to compensation for Waspi women, Maskell has often been one of the government's most eloquent left-wing opponents. Party managers expect the MP for York Central to line up against them on Tuesday. If they persuade her not to, they could peel off a large chunk of the remaining rebels. Mayor of Greater Manchester When Keir Starmer is in trouble, Andy Burnham has a knack of making himself prominent. The Greater Manchester mayor does not have a vote in Tuesday's debate, but his intervention over the weekend, telling MPs not to vote for a '50% U-turn', will have been noticed in Downing Street and on the soft left of the party. Burnham's position was echoed on Monday by his London counterpart, Sadiq Khan, pitting the country's two most powerful Labour politicians outside Westminster against the prime minister.

Nine years for teacher who abused 11 boys at three different leading private schools
Nine years for teacher who abused 11 boys at three different leading private schools

Daily Mail​

time41 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Nine years for teacher who abused 11 boys at three different leading private schools

A former boarding school teacher has been jailed for nine years for the abuse of 11 boys. William Bain preyed on the pupils while working at three different fee-paying schools. The victims included one boy who had gone to Bain for help as he was being bullied. The ex-physics teacher - now 72 - had been due to stand trial at the High Court in Glasgow. But he pleaded guilty yesterday to a total of 11 sex abuse charges. Bain had previously been locked up for six-and-a-half years in 2016 for similar offences against five boys at a school in Dunbartonshire. He was freed in mid-2020. It is believed these latest crimes were reported following publicity of the earlier case. Bain was put back behind bars by judge Lord Young yesterday. The 11 charges spanning between 1978-1999 consisted mainly lewd and libidinous behaviour as well as indecent assault. Bain first abused a 12 year-old boy at a private school in Edinburgh, where he was latterly a house tutor. He struck after ordering him to stay behind for detention. The youngster managed to race out the classroom traumatised. The next boy would often go to Bain for help with his homework. Prosecutor Shanti Maguire told the court: 'It was during these occasions of tutoring that Bain would sexually abuse him.' He ordered the boy to keep quiet about what happened. Revealing the effect on this victim, Miss Maguire said: 'He has spent many years blocking out the memory of the incidents in that he cannot recall all of the details.' By the mid-1980s, Bain had moved to a private school in Aberdeen where he targeted one boy. This pupil was described as 'isolated and homesick' having moved from England. Bain - who was a house master - invited the child to his room and said he would 'look after him' but abused him. Bain's next victims were at the boarding school in Dunbartonshire. One then teenager was molested on three occasions in the physics teacher's laboratory. Mis Maguire said: 'These incidents took place in view of other pupils. Bain acted as if it was mere wrestling. 'However, he believed it was done for other purposes - namely an opportunity for Bain to touch him.' Another boy had been the victim of bullying and had described the school as a 'brutal environment'. He was also preyed upon in Bain's lab as well as in a dark room at a photography club the teacher ran. This boy was further attacked during rugby training sessions and on hill walking trips. A third boy there had also been bullied and was grieving following the recent death of his brother. He was 'drawn' to Bain due to his apparent 'kindly nature'. The ex-Cambridge University graduate groomed the youngster by giving him sweets and taking him to fast food restaurants. Bain initially exposed himself in the camera club dark room. He then assaulted the boy who felt 'trapped'. Other incidents occurred in the physics lab as well as in Bain's private flat in the grounds of the school, which 'a number of pupils' were given access to. It was there another teenager was molested while a film was being shown. A further attack occurred while this boy was using a computer at the flat. One pupil recalled being groped during so-called 'play-fights' at the school. A sixth boy was inappropriately touched - but Bain casually told him 'not to worry'. This victim also spoke of feeling 'uncomfortable' as the teacher stood watching him and others pupils as they showered. Another boy was preyed upon in his bed and while alone with Bain in the private flat. The court heard Bain, of Crieff, Perthshire, had latterly been living with his 99-year-old mother. Brian McConnachie KC, defending, said: 'He tells me, that around the time of the millennium, he accepted that his behaviour had been out of control and he was determined to put an end to it. 'He has given evidence at the Scottish Child Abuse Inquiry. He not only spoke about his own offending, but assisted with evidence of the culture that existed at the schools that he was involved with.' Sentencing, Lord Young said he had read a number of victim impact statements describing the 'terrible legacy' left by Bain's abuse. The judge said the then boys were left feeling 'alone and lost' thinking they would not be believed had they spoke out at the time. Lord Young said: 'These children were entrusted by their parents to the schools. They ought to have been nurtured and educated in a safe environment. 'Instead, it seems that throughout your career as a teacher, you abused this position to pursue your own sexual deviances.' Bain remains on the sex offenders' list. Fiona Kirkby, Procurator Fiscal for High Court Sexual Offences, said: 'William Bain is a prolific offender who repeatedly exploited his position of trust as a teacher to sexually abuse children in his care. 'He has now been held accountable and imprisoned for his depraved actions. This prosecution should send a clear message to those who sexually abuse children and young people, regardless of how much time has passed. 'I would urge anyone affected by similar crimes to report it when they feel ready and able to do so. You will be listened to and supported as we use all the tools available to us in seeking justice.'

UK caps steel imports to stop dumping by foreign producers
UK caps steel imports to stop dumping by foreign producers

Times

timean hour ago

  • Times

UK caps steel imports to stop dumping by foreign producers

The UK is limiting the amount of steel that can be imported from foreign producers in an attempt to ease the collateral damage from President Trump's tariffs on the global industry. After pleas for protectionist help from steelmakers in Britain, Jonathan Reynolds, the business and trade secretary, is reducing the growth in steel imports to a rise of just 0.1 per cent year-on-year, down from 3 per cent. The rules, which come into effect on Tuesday, are designed to deal with the largest single impact of the US steel tariffs — not the effect on Britain's own exports to America, which are relatively small, but the amount of steel that foreign producers can divert to the UK because of Trump's trade barriers. The government said: 'These changes will adjust how much steel countries around the world can send to the UK, protecting British jobs while making sure the UK still has a reliable supply. It reinforces the government's commitment to rebuild Britain's industrial strength and reversing decades of decline.' Reynolds said: 'This government is unapologetic in our support for the UK steel sector — it underpins Britain's industrial strength, our national security, and our status as a global power. 'These measures back our producers and the thousands of families and communities who rely on steel production in the UK. We've taken decisive action to protect the UK market and level the playing field.' The department said the measure would cap certain import levels and tighten country-specific limits to ensure UK steel producers would not be undercut. • Oliver Shah: It's time to stop kicking the steel industry can down the road The decision was welcomed by UK Steel, the trade body. 'The secretary of state has again shown that he is on the side of British industry in following UK Steel's calls to tighten the existing steel safeguards urgently,' Gareth Stace, the director-general, said. 'This swift move is crucial to diminishing the injury caused to domestic steelmakers by steel that is redirected away from the US market after President Trump's steel import tariffs increase. The government has made the right decision in response to a tough trading environment where subsidised imports undermine domestic steel production.' Industry estimates indicate that the global excess capacity in steelmaking will increase to 720 million tonnes a year — well over 100 times the UK's own annual production. Countries in southeast Asia are continuing to expand mostly with energy-intensive, high-carbon-emitting blast furnaces. The UK industry is in a slump. British steelworks produced only 4 million tonnes last year, the lowest levels since the Great Depression before production increased in the re-armament of the 1930s. While steel produced in the UK satisfied only about 35 per cent of the UK's annual demand of 9 to 11 million tonnes, the industry remains a heavy employer in otherwise disadvantaged regions. The sector is reckoned to employ 36,800 people directly and support a further 46,000 jobs around the country in supply chains. Wages at an average of over £39,000 in the industry are nearly a quarter higher than the national median and a third higher in south Wales and Yorkshire and Humberside, where the jobs are concentrated.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store