Scottish Government warned someone could be killed by 'menacing gulls'
The Scottish Government has been urged to intervene in the 'extremely serious' issue of 'menacing gulls' in Scotland amid warnings that someone could be killed.
Tory MSP Douglas Ross led a Holyrood debate about the 'dangerous seagull menace' in the north of Scotland on Thursday, right before Parliament broke up for summer recess.
He warned that Scots risk losing their lives over the 'growing problem' of 'nuisance' gulls, and he called on the Scottish Government take urgent action.
'Some people do smirk when you say you're going to be debating in Parliament about the issue of gulls, but this is an extremely serious issue,' Ross said.
He reiterated extreme examples of seagull attacks and aggression in coastal communities like Elgin, Nairn, Inverness, and more.
In Hopeman, Ross said a retired couple are afraid to leave their own home because they are 'continually dive-bombed' by gulls every time they go down their street.
In another case, he said an elderly Moray woman fell outside her house as a result of a gull attack, broke her leg, went to hospital, came back out of hospital, and was attacked again.
Tory MSP Rachael Hamilton called for a nationwide summit to tackle the issue as she warned that Scots are being left 'scared, attacked and traumatised'.
The Ettrick, Roxburgh and Berwickshire MSP said 'aggressive' seagulls had attacked seven children in one month last year in Eyemouth, with one girl 'left with gashes to her scalp and blood running down her face'.
Finlay Carson, Tory MSP for Galloway and West Dumfries, said in his own constituency, the local council is 'spending upwards of £85,000 a year trying to manage gulls'.
'That money would be far better spent if the licensing system actually worked,' he said.
'When non-lethal methods fail, communities are left without any viable options. The result is growing frustration, rising costs, and a real risk to public safety.'
Agriculture minister Jim Fairlie reiterated that he's already promised to hold a seagull summit in Inverness, where MSPs will examine all the issues raised to try to solve the problem.
'This is something we have to deal with,' Fairlie said.
'We have a joint responsibility to figure out how we are creating environments for these birds to thrive in our communities and manage that going forward.
'The figures I've seen show large increases in the numbers of urban gulls, but absolute crashing numbers in their natural environment. We've got to stop feeding them, stop creating nesting spaces, and find ways to displace them to go back to their natural habitat.'
Labour MSP Rhoda Grant (Highlands and Islands) also emphasised a need for balance.
'I think we need to be clear, the birds are not acting maliciously,' Grant said.
'They are looking for food and trying to protect their young.
'It may be the case that [gull populations are in decline] in their normal habitat, but it doesn't feel like that's the case in urban areas where the danger they cause to the public is increasing.'
SNP MSP Christine Grahame (Midlothian South, Tweeddale and Lauderdale) also defended the 'clever and adaptable gull'.
Grahame said words like 'mugging and menace' are 'not appropriate to demonise an animal simply looking for food'.
STV News is now on WhatsApp
Get all the latest news from around the country
Follow STV News
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
22 minutes ago
- BBC News
PM 'agrees' benefit changes deal with Labour rebels
The government is expected to announce a deal shortly with Labour rebels on its planned benefits changes. Multiple sources tell the BBC existing claimants of the Personal Independence Payment (Pip) will continue to receive what they currently get, as will recipients of the health element of Universal Credit. It is also expected that the support to help people into employment will be fast forwarded so it happens concessions amount to a massive climbdown from the government, which was staring at the prospect of defeat if it failed to accommodate the demands of over 100 of its backbenchers. Sign up for our Politics Essential newsletter to keep up with the inner workings of Westminster and beyond.
Glasgow Times
an hour ago
- Glasgow Times
Calls for Scotland-wide seagull summit amid warnings someone could be killed
Former Scottish Tory leader Douglas Ross, who called a debate on the issue at Holyrood, warned that Scots risk losing their lives over the 'growing problem' of 'nuisance' gulls. Fellow Tory Rachael Hamilton said a nationwide summit must be held to tackle the issue as she warned that Scots are being left 'scared, attacked and traumatised'. Agriculture minister Jim Fairlie had already promised to hold a seagull summit in the north of Scotland but Ms Hamilton, who represents the south of Scotland, said a summit for the whole country is needed. The Ettrick, Roxburgh and Berwickshire MSP said 'aggressive' seagulls had attacked seven children in one month last year in Eyemouth, with one girl 'left with gashes to her scalp and blood running down her face'. Tory MSP Rachael Hamilton called for a summit to crack down on gull attacks (Andrew Milligan/PA) She called for action on the 'growing nuisance', which she said posed a health and safety risk to residents. Despite rising complaints from locals, though, she said NatureScot's licensing system to control the birds was bureaucratic and failing to solve the issue. 'I think we need a summit,' she said. 'I don't think we just need a summit in Moray, we need a summit across Scotland.' Ms Hamilton said the debate was 'important' as she criticised what she said was a lack of action from the Scottish Government. She told MSPs: 'Absolutely nothing is getting done. I don't believe the Government are listening to us because the issue continues in my constituency in Eyemouth. 'Aggressive seagull behaviour continues to cause a real concern amongst businesses, amongst tourists, amongst everybody that has anything to do along the harbour. 'And it is not just a seasonal nuisance. It is a serious, growing health risk. It's a safety risk, particularly for children and elderly residents.' She said one business owner had described the situation as 'people being scared, attacked and traumatised'. NatureScot and the SNP have ignored this problem for far too long. I'm bringing forward a debate in Parliament today to demand action to control the menace of gulls in our communities. — Douglas Ross MSP (@Douglas4Moray) June 26, 2025 MSPs debated the issue on Thursday, the last day of Parliament before the summer recess. Opening the debate, Mr Ross said people often 'smirk' when hearing that the Scottish Parliament is debating the problems around gulls – but he said it was an 'extremely serious issue'. The Highlands and Islands MSP said constituents have told him they are worried about leaving their homes for fear of being 'divebombed', while others have suffered mental health issues thanks to a lack of sleep caused by noisy gulls. One resident, he said, is spending £2,000 a year to remove nests from her home. 'People should not have to keep living in fear of being divebombed by these menaces on a daily basis, and are crying out for action,' he said. He accused NatureScot of having a conflict of interest as the body responsible for both the licensing to control birds and to conserve them. He went on: 'The behaviour of the SNP's quango NatureScot confirms they have lost the plot. They have told people to protect themselves with umbrellas and even suggested dogs as a deterrent. 'The time has come to break up NatureScot. There is a clear conflict of interest in the fact they are responsible for considering licences to control gulls but are also responsible for protecting bird numbers. 'If the minister cannot see that is a problem, then he is divorced from reality. 'The strength of the cross-party support in my debate today should be all the SNP Government need to finally act before we see someone killed due to being attacked by a gull.' Jim Fairlie said the issue of gulls is 'deadly serious' (Fraser Bremner/Scottish Daily Mail/PA) Jim Fairlie, the minister for agriculture, said while people often 'chuckle and laugh' about the issue of gulls, he warned it was 'deadly serious'. But he told MSPs that he could not intervene on NatureScot to change the licensing system because it would leave the Government open to judicial review. He urged people to stop feeding the birds, which he said was the primary reason for the issue. The birds have been an increasingly common site in urban areas as they leave their natural habitat in search of food. He said: 'We have to work out what it is that is causing the issue in the first place. 'We are feeding them – it is quite simple. We are creating habitat, and we are creating feeding stations which are allowing gulls to inhabit our space, and that is now quite clearly coming into conflict.' He added: 'We have got to try and limit food waste and public littering. We have got to take away these feeding opportunities.' SNP MSP Christine Grahame warned against 'demonising' gulls (Andrew Milligan/PA) SNP MSP Christine Grahame warned against 'demonising' gulls, which she described as 'clever, adaptable' animals. 'Language such as 'mugging', 'menace' can be applied to us, our fellow counterparts,' she said, 'but it is not appropriate to demonise an animal simply looking for food. 'Anthropomorphising is tempting but not helpful.' A NatureScot spokesperson said: 'We understand gulls can sometimes cause problems in our towns and cities. 'At the same time, gull populations are facing serious declines. NatureScot has a duty to balance health and safety concerns with gull conservation. 'Over the last five years we have supported many individuals, businesses and communities to better manage gulls without the need to kill the birds or destroy their nests. 'As a result, the number of licence applications to destroy nests and eggs and kill chicks has reduced, from 2,633 in 2023 to 1,601 in 2024.' The spokesperson said in the longer term, Scots will 'need to find ways to live with gulls and other wildlife'. They added: 'We will continue to work with local authorities to ensure that collaborative gull management plans are put in place for future years, with a focus on effective preventative measures, deterrents, changes to behaviour and guidance.'
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
‘Never Here' Keir's lack of face-time whips up biggest rebellion of his career
MPs and their staff gathered on the House of Commons terrace on Thursday, brought together by cheap drinks, a splendid view of the Thames and a desire to shake off the drama of the week in Westminster. Sir Keir Starmer, facing the biggest rebellion of his premiership, was nowhere to be seen. 'You don't see him on the terrace,' a minister said, reflecting a frustration among Labour MPs that so-called 'face time' with the Prime Minister has been seriously lacking since his election win last July. 'A lot of the MPs elected last year don't know him, they haven't met him, and they don't have a pre-existing relationship with him,' they said. 'That means they don't really have loyalty to him. He and his allies haven't reached out to build those relationships.' Downing Street's obvious shortcomings in 'party management' were laid bare this week, when more than 120 Labour MPs signed an amendment that would kill off Sir Keir's welfare reforms. Sources said No 10 staff were taken aback by the scale of the revolt, which threatens to force a government defeat on Tuesday. It would be an embarrassing and troubling moment for Sir Keir, who has a majority of 156 seats and believed, until recently, that he did not need to spend time in Parliament hobnobbing with his colleagues. Data show that he has voted just seven times in Parliament since last July – missing a vital opportunity to spend time in the division lobbies, talking to Labour MPs and hearing their concerns. In their first year in office, the previous four Tory prime ministers each voted at least 22 times. Sir Tony Blair and Gordon Brown, Sir Keir's Labour predecessors, voted 13 times and 41 times in their first year, respectively. This week's welfare rebels say they are just as angry about the lack of care from Downing Street as they are about the Government's policy – to reduce the number of people who can claim disability and sickness benefits. The frustration with Sir Keir's lack of engagement is making the rebellion even worse. 'He's a fundamentally unsociable person,' said one MP who plans to vote against the Government's bill next week. 'It wouldn't take a lot, even just a text now and then, to know that he cared.' Defenders of Sir Keir say he has had an extraordinarily hectic first year in government, managing a long list of foreign trips that have seen him dubbed 'never here Keir'. Those visits have paid dividends in the form of three trade deals, a leadership role in the 'coalition of the willing' and a friendship with Donald Trump. But critics in the party say that Sir Keir must remember that his position in No10 is based on support among Labour MPs, not foreign leaders. 'It's been noticed and there's a lot of resentment in the party towards Keir, in that people don't feel seen, loved and heard,' said one Labour MP. Veterans of party management in the Commons say that the prime minister's personal touch is crucial in maintaining a happy party – and winning votes. Bob Blackman, the chairman of the Conservative Party's 1922 Committee of backbench MPs, said that the most important thing is for the prime minister to be available to backbenchers when they vote. 'Starmer has only voted seven times in the last year,' he said. 'When you're in the lobbies, you get the chance to say, 'Can I have a quick word, PM?', and you catch up. 'That's one of the ways that the PM can glad-hand people and let them let off some steam. 'If you're not in the Commons and the tearoom making yourself visible and available to backbenchers, then they feel estranged from the PM and get terribly frustrated.' Mr Blackman served as the committee's executive secretary from 2012 to 2024, overseeing dozens of rebellions against Theresa May, Boris Johnson and Liz Truss from Tory MPs. He said that when the anger was rising among MPs, he would advise the chief whip that 'the PM needs to go into the tearoom after PMQs and have a bite to eat and a cup of tea'. 'That's quite important in the whole scheme of things, and to my knowledge Starmer doesn't do that at all,' he said. Among Labour MPs, some of the blame has been placed on Claire Reynolds, Sir Keir's political secretary, who is in charge of maintaining good relations with backbenchers. They point out that some Labour MPs have never even met the prime minister – a sign that she has not been doing her job properly. Neil Duncan-Jordan, one of the Labour backbenchers to have signalled their opposition to the Government's benefit cuts, was asked by BBC Radio 5 Live's Matt Chorley if he had ever had any contact with Sir Keir. 'Never had a conversation with him' 'No,' he said. 'I think there's a handful of us. Obviously I've been in the chamber when he's been in, answering questions and so on and so forth, but I've never actually had a conversation with him.' Sir Anthony Seldon, the political historian, said a hands-off approach to Parliament was becoming an increasingly common phenomenon among British prime ministers. 'The trend is for prime ministers to do it less and less, and it is because the job has become more demanding, because Parliament is no longer the theatre that it was,' he said. He said the modern prime minister's time is taken up with 'overseas duties and dealing with the media', making Parliament more 'marginal' to Downing Street. But he warned: 'At the end of the day, prime ministers don't fall because they lose the support of The Telegraph or the BBC, or GB News. They fall because they lose support of Parliament.' One notable exception to that rule is Sir Keir's political hero, Sir Tony, who stood down after 10 years in power to make way for Mr Brown. Sir Tony also had little interest in attending parliamentary debates and votes, and told MPs that at the end of his last Prime Minister's Questions in June 2007. 'I have never pretended to be a great House of Commons man, but I pay the House the greatest compliment I can by saying that, from first to last, I never stopped fearing it,' he said.
