Australian Catholics welcome ‘approachable' new pope in hope he will pursue peace
Australian Catholics and politicians have embraced the appointment of the new pope, Leo XIV, with many hoping he will continue his predecessor's emphasis on peace and social justice.
Archbishop Timothy Costelloe, the president of the Australian Catholic Bishops Conference, offered Cardinal Robert Francis Prevost – now known as Pope Leo XIV – heartfelt congratulations on behalf of the Roman Catholic church in Australia.
'The Catholic Church in Australia assures Pope Leo XIV of our prayers, loyalty, and joyful anticipation of his spiritual leadership,' he said. 'May his pontificate be marked by peace, unity, and a deepening of the Gospel message throughout the world.'
Costelloe said the new pope had demonstrated his 'approachability and willingness to listen' in his previous roles as the prefect of the dicastery for bishops and as an Augustinian missionary in Peru.
Catholic Social Services Australia, which represents the church's social services providers, said the pope's choice of name had 'profound significance' for Catholic social services. It evoked the legacy of Pope Leo XIII (1878–1903) who articulated the church's commitment to human dignity and social justice in his encyclical Rerum Novrum.
The organisation's executive director, Dr Jerry Nockles, said the pope's election came at a time when the world 'yearns for compassionate leadership grounded in the Gospel values of justice, dignity and solidarity with the vulnerable'.
Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email
'At a time when Australia and indeed the world faces unprecedented social challenges – from growing inequality to escalating violence and social division – Pope Leo's election offers a beacon of hope and a powerful reminder that the Church stands firmly for peace and with those on the margins,' he said.
'His voice will undoubtedly challenge us all to build a more just and peaceful society where every person's dignity is honoured, and peace is actively pursued.'
Brother Mark O'Connor, head of communications for the Catholic archdiocese of Parramatta, told Radio National he had met the new pope, describing him as a 'humble, gentle leader'.
'He's not different from Pope Francis in terms of vision, but maybe in style,' he said. 'He's more low key.'
He said the Leo XIV had been to Australia and was not a fan of Vegemite but did like Tim Tams.
O'Connor said expected the new pope would be 'very effective' in continuing the reform of the church in the vision of Pope Francis.
It was significant that the pope's first words were about peace as well as his choice of name, he said.
'You've got to remember that Pope Leo XIII was the first pope in the modern era who actually stood on the side of the workers and social justice,' he said, 'which was really the beginnings of the church taking a much stronger stance on social justice.'
Sign up to Breaking News Australia
Get the most important news as it breaks
after newsletter promotion
Anthony Albanese offered his heartfelt congratulations to Pope Leo XIV.
'This is a moment of joy and hope for Catholics all over the world,' the prime minister said. 'May God bless Pope Leo XIV and may his papacy advance the cause of peace and justice, in the service of all humanity.'
The health minister, Mark Butler, described the appointment as 'terrific news', saying: 'The billion or so Catholics around the world, the one in four Australians who identify as Catholics, will be overjoyed today after a period of grieving and mourning for the much-loved Pope Francis.'
The Australian Catholic University said it was a time of renewed hope and guidance.
Its chancellor, Martin Daubney, said: 'We share his commitment to strengthening dialogue and the defence of human rights in a world in need of hope and unity.
'We rejoice that His Holiness will continue to build on the legacy of his predecessor, Pope Francis, encouraging unity in the pursuit of a more compassionate world. We join with people around the world in offering our prayers for the Holy Father as he begins the task of leading the Catholic Church.'
In a post to social media, the Australian embassy to the Holy See – which has a clear view of the Sistine Chapel chimney – wrote 'Habemus Papam!' – the Latin for 'We have a new pope'.
The embassy hosted a 'conclave watch' event waiting for the white smoke to emerge.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
What Israelis really think of what's going on in Gaza
In the 20 months since the war in Gaza began, Amit Halevy has been spat at, screamed at, and pelted with rocks and eggs in Israel's streets, all because she was calling for peace."We would sit in silence, just a bunch of women dressed in white, holding signs in Hebrew, Arabic and English saying: 'compassion', 'peace', 'nutritional security'," she told me."We thought: who argues with peace? But these demonstrations would get the same hatred as when we called to Stop the Occupation or Free Gaza. One guy screamed at us during a peace sit-in in Tel Aviv that he wished we would all be raped in Gaza, while we sat in silence holding signs saying 'love'".I first met Amit in the early months of the war. The grandchild of Holocaust survivors, she described to me then how family discussions about what was happening in Gaza left her feeling angry and frustrated. She is convinced that Israel's actions amounted to "Nazification".Now, she says, something in her family is shifting."With my father, I can say things that he couldn't hear before, and it sinks in," she said. "He'll say 'but what about Hamas?' And I say, 'Dad, if 80 kids were killed last night, it doesn't matter – as a human, and specifically as a Jew, you must say this has to stop right now'. And he understands." The number of people in Israel concerned about Gazan suffering has been slowly increasing, but Amit and her friends are still part of a small Israel Democracy Institute (IDI) asked Israelis last month whether the suffering of Gazan civilians should be a factor in their government's decisions on the war. The majority - 67% - said Israel should either ignore it or consider it to a "fairly small extent". Among Jewish Israelis, that rose to more than Israelis, disillusioned after more than a year and a half of fighting, do now want an end to the war – in most cases this is not primarily because of Gaza's suffering, but out of concern for the 54 Israeli hostages who are believed to remain in Hamas captivity (figures can vary), of whom 31 are believed to be dead. 'Wall of denial' The war in Gaza began after Hamas attacked on Israel in October 2023, killing some 1,200 people and taking around 251 others then, at least 54,607 Palestinians have been killed, according to the territory's Hamas-run ministry of health. The UN estimates that more than a quarter of them are Israel broke the latest ceasefire in March, some of Amit's fellow activists have begun holding up posters of children killed and injured in Gaza during their silent demonstrations."We thought we would get a lot of mad, aggressive responses," said one of the organisers, Alma Beck. "But we were surprised when people asked us who these kids are, and what happened to them – genuinely curious and concerned."She believes that many Israelis are not exposed to the human stories of suffering in Gaza."The government and media do everything to shelter Israelis from what is happening in Gaza. There's a wall of denial that's very, very strong," she said."I think this was the first instance of humanising the numbers [of casualties] - giving them a face, giving them a story. And it's hard to look away." The fear and anger that galvanised Israel after the Hamas attacks, papering over divisions and driving support for the military campaign, has given way to exhaustion as the conflict grinds for the conflict was already waning a year ago. Less than a third of Israelis supported fresh military action in Rafah, according to the IDI, while almost two-thirds supported a deal with recently, several polls carried out this year by well-respected organisations have found a majority in favour of a ceasefire deal – with the primary aim of releasing the hostages. Growing disillusionment Posters of the hostages and "Stop The War" slogans were dotted among the rainbow flags at Jerusalem's Pride March in Zitter, there with his boyfriend, is currently serving as a reserve soldier in the Israeli army, but thinks the war is no longer worth it."I don't think we're getting closer to any of the stated goals of the war," he said. "A year ago, stating these opinions openly was very unpopular, especially in the military. But today, people are tired of this war, we hate it, we're done. And if you bring in the hostages, it becomes a much more acceptable opinion."Returning the hostages held by Hamas is by far the biggest reason Israelis give for wanting to end the war. At the main weekly anti-war demonstrations here, Gazans barely figure at all."Empathy for the people who celebrated the massacres of October 7 is very low," Yitzchak says. "They voted for Hamas [in 2006] and haven't really done much to get rid of them since. If we saw mass protests in Gaza, we would have a different conversation."Israel's prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, has continued to insist that his military campaign in Gaza is critical to releasing the remaining hostages. So far, eight living captives have been freed in rescue operations by Israeli forces, while more than 140 have been released through agreements with Hamas. Netanyahu says the military pressure has helped push Hamas into those agreements. But many of those demonstrating outside his office in Jerusalem, or in Tel Aviv's Hostages Square, disagree."We can't bring them back like that," said one protestor, a developmental psychologist called Mayan Eliahu Ifhar. "It's a terrible mistake. The war is killing them."That feeling has been echoed by many hostage families, worried that their relatives will die in captivity as the war grinds on, or be killed in Israeli is also growing disillusionment over whether Mr Netanyahu's other war goal is achievable: the total destruction of Hamas as a military and governing force. 'A political war' After 20 months, exhaustion with the war has reached Israel's armed forces. This is Israel's longest war, and some reservists are on their third or fourth rotation. Some are now refusing to serve - a few because of ethical objections, but many more because of the strain on their health, finances and demands to end the war - from the streets, in military recruitment offices, and even within his own security cabinet – have left Netanyahu of the reason, says Prof Tamar Hermann from the IDI, is that the vast majority of those calling for an end to the war are people who say they would never vote for him. "The majority [of Israelis] see the war as a political war," she said. "If you are for the government, then you are for the government, regardless of what they are doing. And if you are against the government, you are against everything they are doing. It's black and white. And the war has made that worse." Fears of Hamas regrouping To hear what Netanyahu's supporters thought about the war, we went to a rally in support of streets in Jerusalem leading up to the Knesset, Israel's parliament, were a sea of blue and white Israeli flags, and the noise from vast loudspeakers set up along the route was crowd – mostly dressed in accordance with conservative religious rules – surged past buses with reinforced windows, fresh from ferrying groups of settlers from the occupied West Bank. Many young men carried M16 rifles slung over their shoulders.I met Yisrael and his wife near the entrance."We can't end the war [now]," says Yisrael. "It'll end when Hamas is totally defeated and the whole infrastructure is totally taken apart. If you leave it now, they'll rebuild everything and the situation will come back in another three or four years."Like almost all Israelis, he agreed that getting the hostages home was very important – but said there were other considerations too. "There have to be some conditions," he said. "You can't save some people now, and then there's another war in two or three years, a thousand more deaths. That's not going to help anyone."Further into the crowd, another demonstrator, Avigdor Bargil, said the war should stop only "when Hamas is on its knees" – and that Gazans should move to other countries, like Indonesia, France and the UK."It's not their home, they took it," he said, when I asked why Gazans should leave their home. "This is our land – the land God gave us in the Torah." Dreams of annexation This religious justification for seizing Palestinian land has been a regular theme of hard-right nationalist parties in Netanyahu's coalition, since well before the members like finance minister, Bezalel Smotrich, have long pushed for Israel to annex the occupied West Bank – or assert "sovereignty" as he puts it – but the war in Gaza, and the stance taken by US President Donald Trump, have opened up dreams of annexing that territory needs to keep his coalition together, or run the risk of early according to the respected US polling agency, Pew Research Center, the idea of expelling Gazans from their land has the support of a huge majority of Israelis – even secular right-wing voters are starting to turn against the war. But beneath the headlines of opinion polls, divisions over the war still largely fall along political half of right-wing Israelis told an IDI survey last week that the war could still bring back the hostages or destroy Hamas; only 6% of those on the left felt the same. After a brief moment of unity after the Hamas attacks, old political divisions have resurfaced here, as deep as Eliahu Ifhar, the developmental psychologist at the protest in Tel Aviv, says that differences over the war are dividing her from friends, not just from adversaries."When I hear the bombs in Gaza, it tears me apart. But there are people, even my friends, who hear these bombs and say, 'ok they deserve it'. I can't spend time with them. I just can't look them in the eyes." 'It's my home, my country' Amit Halevy, the protestor who described the abuse she received at peace demonstrations, decided several months ago to leave Israel for a while and head to America, to find respite from the daily confrontation with her here too, she has found herself told me how she had been to a pro-Palestinian demo there, and that when she told people she was from Israel, some didn't want to speak to her. "I said I was on their side, and that I go to pro-Palestinian demos in Israel," Amit told me. "One girl asked me stupid questions, like 'do your friends support the genocide?' I support any action that calls to stop what's happening in Gaza, but I can see how full of hate these demos are and it breaks my heart."Accusations of antisemitism have tainted some pro-Palestinian movements in Europe and America, complicating the situation for Israelis like Amit."I don't think anyone can hate Israel as much as I hate it now, because I feel so betrayed by it – and it's my home, it's my country, it's my language, my people, my friends.""What Israel is doing right now is the worst thing, not only for Palestinians, but for Israelis and Jews. It will forever be this horrible stain."
Daily Mail
5 hours ago
- Daily Mail
BREAKING NEWS Long running ABC program Q+A to be axed after 17 years following a painful decline in ratings
Q+A, one of the ABC's flagship current affairs and news programs will not return to air, after taking a break in May. It was scheduled to return in August, but those familiar with the matter, who spoke on the condition of anonymity say it won't return. The ABC is set to announce the decision to discontinue the show later this week. The show has come under fire over the last few years, after churning through different hosts following the departure of Tony Jones, who left in 2019. Q+A has seen several changes in its hosting lineup, first with Hamish Macdonald, David Speers, Virginia Trioli, Stan Grant and most recently Patricia Karvelas taking over as host. The number of episodes was also cut by ABC staff in 2024, going from 40 episodes a year to just 24. Q+A also was shifted from its usual slot of Monday night, to Thursday night, a move that was eventually reversed by the ABC. The show also has seen its ratings collapse in the last 5 years. From a peak 600,000 viewers in 2020, the Q+A crashed to a record low of just above 200,000 viewers across the five major capital cities in April 2021. In August 2023, during the show's 'Garma Special', Q+A received its lowest ratings ever, with fewer than 84,000 metro viewers. Daily Mail Australia's Political Editor Peter Van Onselen said the program would not be missed if it didn't return to ABC's roster in 2024. In an opinion piece for The Australian, Van Onselen said Q&A - hosted by Patricia Karvelas - had received 203,000 views nationally. 'With numbers this woeful coupled with how out of touch with mainstream Australia the program has become, it really needs to be put out of its misery,' he wrote. 'There have been enough failed reboots to justify finally axing it.' The commentator said cracks started to appear after Tony Jones stopped hosting after a decade in the role from 2008 to 2019. 'It wasn't all that long ago that the program was vibrant and interesting, with discussions well led by former host Tony Jones,' Van Onselen wrote. 'I remember appearing on it at the time. Ratings regularly hit the one million mark, which precipitated the discussion about changing its time slot.' Van Onselen lashed the show for not being informative enough and hosting discussions that were 'one-sided, uninteresting and rarely funny'. He claimed it was the ABC's 'stubbornness' that was saving the show from being axed for good but that a replacement would be welcomed.
Daily Mail
6 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Australia's biggest aluminium smelter on verge of collapse putting up to 6000 jobs in jeopardy
Australia's biggest aluminium smelter is in crisis talks with the federal and state governments to continue operating as crippling electricity bills threaten 6,000 jobs. Tomago, which is majority owned by mining giant Rio Tinto, is negotiating on the design of its 2026 to 2029 electricity contract, The Australian Financial Review revealed last week. The Newcastle smelter employs 1,200 people full-time but its possible closure would joepardise the future of another 5,000 workers in the Hunter region, north of Sydney. Australia's key aluminium smelter, which opened in 1983, is now seeking support from the NSW and federal governments to stay afloat as Australia's only manufacturer of long-steel, in Whyalla, is propped up by the South Australian government. The latest development comes a week after Donald Trump doubled tariffs on Australian steel and aluminium to 50 per cent. Sydney radio 2GB broadcaster Ben Fordham suggested taxpayers could be stumping up billions of dollars just to keep Tomago afloat. 'This is not good: Tomago Aluminium, Australia's biggest smelter is on the verge of collapse,' he said on Tuesday. 'Why? Their power bill is too high. They're in emergency talks with state and federal governments asking for billions of dollars just to stay open. And if it shuts, well, we're not just losing a smelter, we're risking 6,000 jobs. 'There are thousands of families, contractors, supplies and regional businesses on the line.' Rio Tinto, which owns 51.55 per cent of Tomago Aluminium Company, in January welcomed Prime Minister Anthony Albanese's Future Made in Australia plan to provide production credits to alumunium manufacturers. Chief executive Kellie Parker also begged for federal government help to pay for sky-high electricity bills. 'The Australian government's commitment shows strong confidence in domestic manufacturing and the nation's position in the global economy,' she said. 'As traditional energy sources for heavy industry become increasingly uncompetitive, today's announcement is a critical piece in helping future-proof the industry. 'Such support is crucial for sustaining and growing regional economies.' The smelter's big shareholder Rio Tinto also flagged a bailout package from the NSW government to keep Tomago operating. 'Rio Tinto also welcomes ... looks forward to working with the New South Wales Government to help secure the future of that operation,' it said in a media release. Tomago, which is majority owned by mining giant Rio Tinto, employs 1,200 people full-time but its possible closure would jeopardise the future of another 5,000 workers in the Hunter region north of Sydney Rio Tinto also owns the Boyne Smelter in central Queensland, which last year received subsidies from the state government to transition to renewable energy. Albanese in January visited the Tomago plant with the Labor member for the then marginal seat of Paterson, Meryl Swanson. 'This is my third visit to Tomago, because this is such an important facility,' he said. 'And essentially it's about people, it's about the jobs that are created here. Up to a thousand direct jobs. 'But when you look at this local community, there's 5,000 jobs depend on this facility just locally. But more importantly than that, it's the tens of thousands of jobs throughout Australia that depend on us being able to make things here.'
