Michelle Chen's camp: Please give her some space
20 Feb - Michelle Chen's camp has recently released their own statement following the actress' joint statement of divorce with her ex-husband Chen Xiao.
On 18 February, her studio related that there have been a large number of false rumours on the Internet about the divorce, which have affected Michelle's reputation.
The company stated, "We hope that everyone will give the parties space, and everything is subject to the official announcement."
They also said that "family members are the most important people to both parties" and that "any unwarranted speculation and harm to family members are unforgivable".
The studio also thanked the outside world for their concern towards Michelle and hope that they will give her time and space to focus on her work and life.
"Please pay more attention to the actor's work and not unwarranted speculation about her personal life," they added.
(Photo Source: Michelle IG, SINA)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
17 Pictures That Scrambled My Thoughts So Thoroughly I'm Taking The Rest Of The Day Off
Hello again, and welcome to our roundup of the most confusing photos we found on Reddit this week. Check out last week's if you missed it — and let's get right into it! this door just open up to the other side of the wall? Nope! The shape of the wall angles in, giving that illusion if you are standing in the right spot. one has me confused beyond belief. What is going on? After looking through the comments, I'm still perplexed. Here is what u/Jump_Like_A_Willys said: "Is it not what it looks like — a chicken in a bin filled with water and with a cardboard cover with a hole for the chicken to poke up through? That seems to be what it is, but I have no idea why this is. Although maybe there's no water, and that's just a line in the bin? Maybe?" Tell us what you think in the comments! spider is not holding this lid up with one single leg, but why does it look like it is? This bug-viewing device is actually heavier on one side, so it rests at an angle. type of animal is in this photo? Not an alligator! It's actually a lizard on a ledge that is close to the camera, so it looks way bigger than it actually is. Related: 23 Cute, Happy, And Wholesome Posts I Saw On The Internet This Week That You Absolutely Need To See these are not mini IUDs floating in the sky. What are they? They are turbines are in the water, and the person who took the pic was above, in an airplane. the lower half of this person's body backwards? Nope! Their head is turning to their left side. is only one cat here. Why is there a paw coming out of its head? It is scratching itself, and that is its hind leg! this mirror shattered or just dirty? Just really dirty! If you zoom in, you can see a ton of dirt/debris on it. Related: 40 Really, Really, Really, Really, Really, Really, Really, Really, Really, Really, Really, Really, Really, Really, Really, Really Creepy Wikipedia Pages any guesses about this one? The person who posted the pic explained: "Went to use the bathroom in the dark at 3:00 a.m. only to discover our German Shep/Husky rescue dog had eaten a hole in the wall overnight. I guess it's better than eating the whole wall? Vet says he's okay, but no more walls as a snack." —u/Yo_WhoNeeds2Know the arms going on in this screenshot from an episode of Friends. What looks like a random fourth arm is actually Jennifer Aniston's left arm just propped up on top of the couch. this trash can lid floating? No magical trash can here. The lid is just sitting on top of the bushes. anyone share what is so confusing about this photo? Stitch's arms look like they are her chest! this a battery-operated kid car or a real one? It is a real one! It just looks tiny from where the person who took the pic is standing. is not fried chicken! What is it? The cutest little cinnamon-colored pups. this toddler have play wings and a matching skirt on? No, a bird is flying right behind her, which I am sure the smart people already knew. That isn't what I think it it?! Thankfully, no. The person's kneecap just has a strange resemblance to something phallic. lastly, how about this double take, huh?! The child is sitting on someone's lap, and their dress is resting at an angle that makes the adult's leg look like the child is exposed. Which one of these photos stumped you the most? Let us know in the comments! Also in Internet Finds: Lawyers Are Sharing Their Juiciest "Can You Believe It?!" Stories From The Courtroom, And They're As Surprising As You'd Expect Also in Internet Finds: People Are Sharing "The Most Believable Conspiracy Theories," And Now I'm Questioning Everything I Thought I Knew Also in Internet Finds: 51 People Who Quickly Discovered Why Their Hilariously Clueless Partner Was Single Before Meeting Them
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Camilla Araujo Explains Why She Offered Bonnie Blue A $2 Million Deal
OnlyFans star Camilla Araujo recently shocked the internet by offering fellow content creator Bonnie Blue a $2 million deal. However, this wasn't just any offer. It came with a very specific condition aimed at ending what Araujo sees as damaging behavior. Araujo's multimillion-dollar proposal follows another adult content star, Sophie Rain's criticism of Blue's OnlyFans usage. Araujo stirred controversy after posting on X that she would 'personally send Bonnie Blue 2 million dollars if she comes on my podcast and officially puts an end to her insane sex stunts.' The post accompanied a link to an article featuring fellow creator Sophie Rain's harsh criticism of Bonnie Blue. Blue has made headlines with her provocative antics, including her claim of attempting to sleep with over 1,000 men in one day. Araujo's offer seemed like a direct challenge to that narrative, sparking widespread discussion online. 'This isn't about shaming Bonnie, it's about drawing a line,' Araujo later told The Blast. 'There's a difference between owning your sexuality and turning it into a bloody circus. What she's doing isn't just embarrassing herself, it's dragging the rest of us down with her.' When asked why she made such a bold offer, Araujo made her intentions clear. 'I offered her $2 million because I'm serious,' she said. 'If she wants to be seen as more than a headline or a meme, that is ending up on the front page of every tabloid in America, this is her chance.' She continued, 'Come on my podcast. Speak for yourself. End the stunts. Let's have a real conversation.' The social media reaction was immediate. While some applauded Araujo's boldness, others mocked the offer or accused her of hypocrisy. Still, Araujo stood by her words. Facing backlash, Araujo didn't hesitate to defend her position and differentiate her brand from Blue's. 'People can call me a hypocrite or whatever, but I've built my brand on being smart, strategic, and still respecting myself,' she said. 'I'm not out here trying to break Guinness World Records with my sex life.' She stressed that the real issue wasn't just personal but about protecting the future of content creators. 'What Bonnie is doing might get clicks, but it hurts the rest of us trying to build sustainable careers. That's why this matters,' Araujo concluded. As of now, Bonnie Blue has not responded to the offer. Camilla Araujo's comments came after another OnlyFans creator, Sophie Rain, strongly criticized Bonnie Blue, accusing her of turning the platform into a 'clown show' that undermines its original purpose. In a statement to The Blast, Rain said, 'It's no longer women empowerment. It's shock value, and she's making a joke out of all of us.' She referenced Blue's viral stunts, such as mock weddings and staged arrests, as publicity tactics that damage the platform's credibility. 'We built this space to take control of our bodies and make money on our terms, not to fake pregnancies, marriages, and throw cake at people in public,' she added. Rain emphasized the toll this behavior takes on serious creators. She said, 'Brands don't take us seriously anymore. Media doesn't take us seriously. I'm tired of having to explain that not all of us are doing circus acts for clicks.' She concluded by defending the many women earning a living professionally through OnlyFans. Before Camilla Araujo and Sophie Rain's criticism of Blue, she was banned from the platform permanently following a string of shocking "extreme challenges" that violated the platform's rules. Known for outrageous behavior, Blue, real name Tia Billinger, reportedly earned up to $800,000 monthly before the ban. A source told The Sun UK, 'Bonnie has taken things way too far… Her page has officially been pulled.' OnlyFans confirmed the removal, stating that such content breaches their Terms of Service. Recent stunts include a fake arrest and a controversial "petting zoo" event, where Blue said she would be 'naked and tied up in a glass box' for public interaction. These actions sparked intense backlash and accusations of promoting harmful behavior, ultimately leading to her removal and growing industry concern.
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
Justin Baldoni to ‘March Forward' With Blake Lively Legal Battle After $400 Million Defamation Suit Thrown Out: Facts Are ‘on Our Side'
Justin Baldoni plans to keep at his legal battle with 'It Ends With Us' co-star Blake Lively after a judge dismissed his $400 million defamation lawsuit against her and her husband, Ryan Reynolds. 'Ms. Lively and her team's predictable declaration of victory is false, so let us be clear about the latest ruling,' Baldoni's lawyer Bryan Freedman said in a statement to Variety. 'While the court dismissed the defamation related claims, the court has invited us to amend four out of the seven claims against Ms. Lively, which will showcase additional evidence and refined allegations. This case is about false accusations of sexual harassment and retaliation and a nonexistent smear campaign, which Ms. Lively's own team conveniently describes as 'untraceable' because they cannot prove what never happened.' More from Variety Judge Throws Out Justin Baldoni's $400 Million Defamation Suit Against Blake Lively Judge Rules Blake Lively's Emotional Distress Claims Against Justin Baldoni Are Officially Dead Blake Lively Abandons Claims Against Justin Baldoni of Infliction of Emotional Distress Freedman's statement continued, 'Most importantly, Ms. Lively's own claims are no truer today than they were yesterday, and with the facts on our side, we march forward with the same confidence that we had when Ms. Lively and her cohorts initiated this battle and look forward to her forthcoming deposition, which I will be taking. We are grateful for the organic show of support from the public and for the dedication of the Internet sleuth community who continue to cover the case with discernment and integrity.' On Monday, a judge tossed out the entire lawsuit filed by Baldoni that accused Lively and Reynolds of extortion and other claims. Judge Lewis J. Liman, who found that Lively's accusations of sexual harassment were legally protected and therefore immune from suit, allowed Baldoni to amend and refile a couple of allegations regarding interference with contracts. Baldoni's lawsuit against The New York Times, which Baldoni claimed had conspired with Lively and Reynolds to destroy his career with false allegations, was also dismissed. 'As we have said from day one, this '$400 million' lawsuit was a sham, and the court saw right through it,' Lively's lawyers said on June 9 after the dismissal. 'We look forward to the next round, which is seeking attorneys' fees, treble damages and punitive damages against Baldoni […] and the other Wayfarer Parties who perpetrated this abusive litigation.' Lively has sued Baldoni in federal court for sexual harassment and retaliation, alleging the director and producers of 'It Ends With Us' launched a smear campaign against her after she complained about the conditions on the film's set. A trial on Lively's complaint against Baldoni and his company, Wayfarer Studios, has been set for March 2026. Best of Variety 'Harry Potter' TV Show Cast Guide: Who's Who in Hogwarts? 25 Hollywood Legends Who Deserve an Honorary Oscar New Movies Out Now in Theaters: What to See This Week
