logo
Trump's Attacks Have Helped Heal a Deeply Divided Harvard

Trump's Attacks Have Helped Heal a Deeply Divided Harvard

New York Times28-05-2025

A leading pro-Palestinian student demonstrator led chants for a crowd of hundreds gathered in front of the gates to Harvard Yard on Tuesday evening.
A former Jewish leader on campus who has criticized pro-Palestinian campus activism delivered the first speech.
A professor who is one of Harvard's most prominent critics then joined them to urge people to defend the university.
Harvard in recent years has been the site of bitter acrimony over the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, free speech and the future of American higher education.
But the Trump administration's attack on Harvard has infused the campus with a sense of unity it has lacked over the last year and half, as the university prepares for commencement this week.
'School pride is probably at an all-time high,' said Abdullah Shahid Sial, a sophomore from Pakistan and one of Harvard's two undergraduate student body presidents. He said he had not seen the campus so unified. 'I hope it continues.'
The Department of Homeland Security announced last week that it had barred Harvard from enrolling international students, a move that sent shock waves through higher education. The government has also frozen more than $3 billion in grants and contracts in its battle against the university.
The extraordinary attack has caused many in the Harvard community to set differences aside at what they say is an existential moment for the 388-year-old university.
Wherever one falls on the Middle East conflict, Mr. Sial said, 'everyone is on the side that cracking down on international students will not solve any of those issues.'
The Trump administration has said it is punishing Harvard because it has not done enough to stop antisemitism and has created an environment that is hostile to conservatives.
The campus has banded together because what President Trump is doing 'is completely beyond the pale,' said N. Gregory Mankiw, an influential conservative economist.
Professor Mankiw, who worked in the George W. Bush administration, said he would like more viewpoint diversity on campus but added that he had always felt appreciated and treated 'extremely well' at Harvard.
'Double parking is a problem,' he said. 'But we don't start executing people who double park.'
While some students and faculty members remain critical of Harvard, the rally on Tuesday seemed to capture the prevailing mood on campus. A new group, formed to oppose Trump administration demands, organized the event as a show of support for Harvard's international students.
Jacob M. Miller, who in 2023 served as the student president of Harvard's Hillel chapter, a center for Jewish life on campus, frequently appeared on national television after the 2023 Hamas attack on Israel to say Harvard's administration was not doing enough to combat antisemitism.
At the rally on Tuesday, he said Harvard's Jewish community rejects the Trump administration's narrative that the federal government's actions are intended to protect Jewish students.
'We will not allow our identities to be invoked to undermine institutions of higher education,' Mr. Miller said. 'And we will not allow the administration to wield our identities as a pretextual prop in the political persecution of our peers.'
Nuriel Vera-DeGraff, a junior at Harvard who delivered speeches at a pro-Palestinian encampment on campus last year, introduced Mr. Miller at the Tuesday rally. Afterward, he said in an interview that despite their differences, they could 'still fight the common fight together.'
Mr. Miller said that Mr. Trump's fight with Harvard had pushed 'people to expand their horizons and to create friendships outside of the immediate groups of people with whom they already agree.'
Tim, an admitted student from Ukraine who asked to be identified by his first name for fear of actions by the government, said international students had been encouraged by Harvard's decision to swiftly sue the federal government.
The action signaled that the university would fight for its students, he said in an interview from his home in Ukraine.
The atmosphere of relative unity at Harvard stands in contrast to Columbia University, which capitulated to some demands from the Trump administration. While Harvard also tried to work with the Trump administration, it has been aggressive in rejecting some demands and has now sued the federal government twice.
Last week, Claire Shipman, Columbia's acting president, received a chorus of boos during commencement. Harvard's commencement will be Thursday.
On Tuesday, Harvard's president, Alan M. Garber, addressed undergraduates in the class of 2025 during a speech at the university's annual baccalaureate service. As Dr. Garber took the stage, someone in the crowd of graduating seniors cheered, 'My boy!'
In his remarks, Dr. Garber urged the seniors to defend the values of education as they pursued their professional careers.
'The best way to acknowledge Harvard and what this time has meant to you is to advocate for education,' Dr. Garber said, adding, 'Everything we might achieve — morally, scientifically, technologically and even economically — is grounded in knowledge.'
On Tuesday night, thousands of people attended a webinar put on by Crimson Courage, a group started by Harvard alumni, to support their alma mater and higher education.
Maura Healey, who is the governor of Massachusetts and graduated from Harvard in 1992, said during the call that the university was the fourth biggest employer in the state and contributed more than $6 billion to its economy.
The attacks on international students are 'undercutting our ability to attract the world's talent,' Governor Healey said, adding, 'People are going to take their talents elsewhere.'
The need for faculty and administrators to unite to defend the university has 'taken priority over other divisions among us,' said Vincent Brown, a history professor.
Dr. Brown had recently criticized university actions, including urging leaders to take a stronger posture against the Trump administration when it adopted a conciliatory stance.
Now, he said, 'everybody is united behind President Garber and anybody else who is willing to defend the academic sector against the assault of the Trump administration.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

AMA: Doctors And Patients Hurt By ‘Big Beautiful Bill'
AMA: Doctors And Patients Hurt By ‘Big Beautiful Bill'

Forbes

time14 minutes ago

  • Forbes

AMA: Doctors And Patients Hurt By ‘Big Beautiful Bill'

The American Medical Association says legislation wending its way through the Republican-controlled ... More Congress would 'take us backward' as a country by cutting health benefits for poor and low-income Americans, the group's president said Friday, June 6. In this photo, the US Capitol in Washington, DC, US, on Tuesday, June 3, 2025. Photographer: Eric Lee/Bloomberg The American Medical Association says legislation wending its way through the Republican-controlled Congress would 'take us backward' as a country by cutting health benefits for poor and low-income Americans. Meeting for its annual policy-making House of Delegates this weekend in Chicago, the AMA is rallying physicians to thwart the legislation now before the U.S. Senate. Legislation known as the 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act' that narrowly passed the Republican-controlled U.S. House of Representatives two weeks ago 'would reduce federal Medicaid spending by $793 billion and that the Medicaid provisions would increase the number of uninsured people by 7.8 million,' a KFF analysis shows. 'We have to turn our anger into action,' AMA President Bruce A. Scott, M.D. said in a speech to AMA delegates Friday. 'I know our patience is being tested by this new administration and Congress.' The AMA said it has launched a 'grassroots campaign targeted at the Senate' in hopes of making changes to the legislation. The AMA is the nation's largest physician group with more than 200,000 members. 'The same House bill that brings us closer to finally tying future Medicare payments to the rising costs of running a practice, also takes us backwards by limiting access to care for millions of lower-income Americans,' Scott said. 'Medicare, Medicaid, and the Affordable Care Act are literal lifelines for children and families for whom subsidized health coverage is their only real option. We must do all we can to protect this safety net and continue to educate lawmakers on how best to target waste and fraud in the system without making it tougher for vulnerable populations to access care.' Scott, an otolaryngologist from Kentucky, said the Medicare physician payment system is broken and Congress hasn't addressed – as an increasing number of states have – prior authorization, the process of health insurers reviewing hospital admissions and medications. Prior authorization delays needed treatment and puts patient health in jeopardy, doctors say. 'I'm angry because the dysfunction in health care today goes hand in hand with years of dysfunction in Congress,' Scott added. 'I'm angry because physicians are bearing the brunt of a failed Medicare payment system. And while our pay has been cut by more than 33 percent in 25 years, we see hospitals and even health insurance companies receiving annual pay increases.' Meanwhile, the AMA says cuts to physician payments are pushing more physicians away from private practice and exacerbating the nation's doctor shortage. A recent analysis by AMN Healthcare shows only two in five physicians are now in doctor-owned private practices. And Americans in most U.S. cities face waits of at least one month before they can see certain specialists. 'Congress needs to know there is no 'care' in Medicare if there are no doctors," Scott said.

Immigration Agents Clash Again With Protesters in Los Angeles County
Immigration Agents Clash Again With Protesters in Los Angeles County

New York Times

time20 minutes ago

  • New York Times

Immigration Agents Clash Again With Protesters in Los Angeles County

Protesters and immigration officials clashed again in Los Angeles County on Saturday as agents conducted raids at a Home Depot, local officials said, just a day after dramatic standoffs at similar workplace raids elsewhere in the area. In Paramount, Calif., about 20 miles south of downtown Los Angeles, protesters squared off with federal immigration agents after at least two immigration raids took place on Saturday, including one at the Home Depot and another at a nearby meatpacking facility. Video of the protests showed agents using what appeared to be flash-bang grenades to disperse the protesters. Immigrant rights advocates said that the agents, who were wearing riot gear, had also used some type of tear gas to break up the crowds. José Luis Solache Jr., a state assembly member, said on social media that he was among those who were hit with tear gas. The standoff followed a series of immigration raids that swept through Los Angeles on Friday, which resulted in chaos outside a federal building downtown where people detained in the raids were being processed. The streets swelled with protesters, and buildings and vehicles were vandalized with spray paint. Some people threw objects at federal agents, who then responded with flash-bang grenades. Just on Friday, agents arrested more than 120 people, federal officials said. But processing those arrests were delayed because of the protests. On Saturday, Trump administration officials blasted the city's response to the Friday operations by Immigration and Customs Enforcement, criticizing Los Angeles officials for not helping the federal agents, as well as blaming Democrats for the unrest. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.

Florida immigration law that targets undocumented immigrants who enter state remains blocked
Florida immigration law that targets undocumented immigrants who enter state remains blocked

CBS News

time20 minutes ago

  • CBS News

Florida immigration law that targets undocumented immigrants who enter state remains blocked

A federal appeals court Friday kept on hold a new Florida law targeting undocumented immigrants who enter the state, rejecting arguments by Attorney General James Uthmeier that enforcement should at least temporarily be allowed. U.S. District Judge Kathleen Williams in April issued a preliminary injunction to block the law, which she said was likely preempted by federal immigration authority. Uthmeier appealed the injunction to the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals and asked for a stay of Williams' ruling. Such a stay could have allowed the law to be enforced while the legal battle plays out. But a three-judge panel of the Atlanta-based court Friday rejected the request for a stay. The panel said its decision "does not definitively resolve" whether federal immigration law preempts — essentially takes precedence over — the state law, but it said Uthmeier had not met tests for a stay. "It seems likely — given the federal government's longstanding and distinct interest in the exclusion and admission of aliens, and the (federal) Immigration and Nationality Act's extensive regulation of alien admission — that this principle is satisfied with respect to the field of alien entry into and presence in the United States," said the decision shared by Judges Jill Pryor, Kevin Newsom and Embry Kidd. "Accordingly, the attorney general has not made a 'strong showing' that the district court was wrong to conclude that SB 4-C is likely field preempted." The decision also delved into a contentious issue about whether Williams' preliminary injunction only should apply to Uthmeier and state attorneys or whether it should apply more broadly to law-enforcement officers across the state. Williams ordered it to apply broadly, but Uthmeier has argued it should only apply to him and state attorneys, who are the named defendants in the case. The issue has become so contentious that Williams held a hearing last week about whether she should find Uthmeier in contempt. The appeals court Friday declined to issue a partial stay that would have applied Williams' ruling only to Uthmeier and state attorneys and potentially allowed police to enforce the law. The panel also appeared to take issue with Uthmeier's actions, citing his "seemingly defiant posture vis-à-vis the district court. Again, he may well be right that the district court's order is impermissibly broad. But that does not warrant what seems to have been at least a veiled threat not to obey it." The law, passed during a February special legislative session, created state crimes for undocumented immigrants who enter or re-enter Florida. The Republican-controlled Legislature said the law was aimed at helping carry out President Donald Trump's policies on preventing illegal immigration. But attorneys for the Florida Immigrant Coalition, the Farmworker Association of Florida and two individual plaintiffs filed the challenge in federal court in South Florida, alleging the state law is unconstitutional. In issuing the preliminary injunction, Williams pointed to issues such as the law (SB 4-C) requiring that violators go to jail. She indicated that could conflict with federal immigration authority. "First, it gives state officials authority to prosecute illegal entry or reentry in cases where federal actors may choose not to," the judge wrote. "Even if federal and state officials choose to commence parallel dual prosecutions under both laws, SB 4-C's mandatory detention provision limits federal law enforcement discretion to recommend pre-trial release and obstructs federal courts' ability to conduct proceedings requiring defendants' presence. Relatedly, state officials are free to prosecute a charge under SB 4-C even while a federal immigration proceeding is underway, which may determine that the defendant may remain lawfully present under federal law." In a May 7 motion asking the appeals court for a stay, lawyers in Uthmeier's office disputed that the law improperly infringed on federal immigration authority. "To aid the United States in curbing illegal immigration within the state's borders, SB 4-C criminalizes the entry into Florida of those who have illegally entered the United States," the motion said. "That law tracks federal law to a tee. It also retains federal-law defenses and says nothing of who should be admitted or removed from the country."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store