Natural History Museum to display rare dog-sized dinosaur
A labrador-sized dinosaur was wrongly categorised when it was found and is actually a new species, scientists have discovered.Its new name is Enigmacursor - meaning puzzling runner - and it lived about 150 million years ago, running around the feet of famous giants like the Stegosaurus.It was originally classified as a Nanosaurus but scientists now conclude it is a different animal.On Thursday it will become the first new dinosaur to go on display at the Natural History Museum (NHM) in London since 2014.
BBC News went behind the scenes to see the dinosaur before it will be revealed to the public.The discovery promises to shed light on the evolutionary history that saw early small dinosaurs become very large and "bizarre" animals, according to Professor Paul Barrett, a palaeontologist at the museum.When we visit, the designer of a special glass display case for the Enigmacursor is making last-minute checks.The dinosaur's new home is a balcony in the museum's impressive Earth Hall. Below it is Steph the Stegosaurus who also lived in the Morrison Formation in the Western United States.Enigmacursor is tiny by comparison. At 64 cm tall and 180 cm long it is about the height of a labrador, but with much bigger feet and a tail that was "probably longer than the rest of the dinosaur," says Professor Susanna Maidment.
"It also had a relatively small head, so it was probably not the brightest," she adds, adding that it was probably a teenager when it died.With the fossilised remains of its bones in their hands, conservators Lu Allington-Jones and Kieran Miles expertly assemble the skeleton on to a metal frame."I don't want to damage it at this stage before its revealed to everybody," says Ms Allington-Jones, head of conservation.
"Here you can see the solid dense hips showing you it was a fast-running dinosaur. But the front arms are much smaller and off the ground - perhaps it used them to shovel plants in its mouth with hands," says Mr Miles.It was clues in the bones that led scientists at NHM to conclude the creature was a new species."When we're trying to identify if something is a new species, we're looking for small differences with all of the other closely-related dinosaurs. The leg bones are really important in this one," says Prof Maidment, holding the right hind limb of the Enigmacursor.When the dinosaur was donated to the museum it was named Nanosaurus, like many other small dinosaurs named since the 1870s.But the scientists suspected that categorisation was false.To find out more, they travelled to the United States with scans of the skeleton and detailed photographs to see the original Nanosaurus that is considered the archtype specimen."But it didn't have any bones. It's just a rock with some impressions of bone in it. It could be any number of dinosaurs," Professor Maidment said.
In contrast, the NHM's specimen was a sophisticated and near-to-complete skeleton with unique features including its leg bones.Untangling this mystery around the names and categorisation is essential, the palaeontologists say."It's absolutely foundational to our work to understand how many species we actually have. If we've got that wrong, everything else falls apart," says Prof Maidment.The scientists have now formally erased the whole category of Nanosaurus. They believe that other small dinosaur specimens from this period are probably also distinct species.The discovery should help the scientists understand the diversity of dinosaurs in the Late Jurassic period.Smaller dinosaurs are "very close to the origins of the large groups of dinosaurs that become much more prominent later on," says Prof Barrett."Specimens like this help fill in some of those gaps in our knowledge, showing us how those changes occur gradually over time," he adds.Looking at these early creatures helps them identify "the pressures that finally led to the evolution of their more bizarre, gigantic descendants," says Prof Barrett.
The scientists are excited to have such a rare complete skeleton of a small dinosaur.Traditionally, big dinosaur bones have been the biggest prize, so there has been less interest in digging out smaller fossils."When you're looking for those very big dinosaurs, sometimes it's easy to overlook the smaller ones living alongside them. But now I hope people will keep their eyes close to the ground looking for these little ones," says Prof Barrett.The findings about Enigmacursor mollyborthwickae are published in the journal Royal Society Open Science.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Study finds nightmares TRIPLE the risk of dying early - are you in danger?
A new study suggests that nightmare sufferers could be three times more likely to die a decade earlier than the average person. Weekly nightmares were also found to be a stronger indicator of an early death than smoking, obesity, poor diet, and little physical activity. Children and adults with frequent nightmares also showed faster biological ageing, which accounted for approximately 40 per cent of the explanation for the increased risk of early death. Even monthly nightmares were linked to faster ageing and increased mortality, compared to those who rarely or never have them. Scientists behind the study, from Imperial College London, said the link is likely due to the harmful effect of disrupted sleep and nightmare-induced stress on our body's cells. Dr Abidemi Otaiku, a brain science research fellow at Imperial College London (ICL), who led the team, said: 'This stress reaction can be even more intense than anything we experience while awake. 'Our sleeping brains cannot distinguish dreams from reality. 'That's why nightmares often wake us up sweating, gasping for breath, and with our hearts pounding—because our fight-or-flight response has been triggered.' He added: 'Nightmares lead to prolonged elevations of cortisol, a stress hormone closely linked to faster cellular ageing. 'They also disrupt sleep quality and duration which impairs the body's ability to repair itself and restore cells throughout the night.' Otaiku shared 'simple measures' the public can take to prevent nightmares in the first place. He said: 'Avoiding scary movies, maintaining good sleep hygiene, managing stress, and seeking treatment for anxiety or depression can be effective.' The expert also recommended a special type of psychological treatment called image rehearsal therapy. This involves re-writing and rehearsing a nightmare into a less frightening version and can be done from your own home. However, those suffering from frequent night terrors that affect their quality of life may benefit from seeing a sleep specialist. In particular, he suggested trying another type of talking therapy for insomnia sufferers called CBT-I, which has been shown in studies to reduce nightmares and slow the ageing of brain cells. The technique aims to help people with insomnia address underlying thoughts and behaviours that contribute to their sleep problems. Recent studies have shown a lack of sleep increases the risk of heart disease, obesity, and death by 83 per cent, 82, per cent, and 40 per cent, respectively. However, the researchers from Imperial and the Dementia Research Institute in London are the first to show that nightmare frequency is an indicator of an early death. The team analyzed data from 2,429 children aged eight to ten and 183,012 adults aged 26 to 86 over a period of 19 years. Nightmare frequency in adults was self-reported at the start of the study, with participants monitored for up to 19 years. Childrens' nightmare frequency was reported by their parents at the beginning of the study. The team's findings were presented at the European Academy Of Neurology (EAN) Congress 2025, on June 23. The researchers revealed that those who reported an average of one nightmare a week, over the course of a decade, were three times more likely to die before the age of 70 compared to those who do not experience night terrors. The new findings follow a recent study that revealed daytime napping was linked to a higher risk of early death. The discovery was made by researchers who tracked the sleep habits of more than 86,000 healthy middle-aged adults. They found that those who regularly napped - particularly in the early afternoon -were more likely to die prematurely than those who did not. The study, presented at the SLEEP 2025 conference, found the risk of death rose by up to 20 per cent among frequent nappers. Experts said daytime sleepiness may be a warning sign of disrupted or poor-quality night-time rest, and could point to underlying health problems such as sleep disorders, dementia, or heart failure. Professor James Rowley, from Rush University Medical Center in Chicago, who was not involved in the research, said the findings should influence how doctors ask patients about sleep. Speaking to Medscape Medical News, he said: 'The major take-home message is that if a doctor asks about a patient's sleep habits, they should also be asking about napping. 'In other words, doctors should be asking their patients, "do you nap in the day?"'
The Independent
4 hours ago
- The Independent
Dinosaur the size of a Labrador discovered in US after misclassification
A new dog-sized dinosaur species, Enigmacursor, has been identified after its fossils were initially miscategorised. Believed to have lived approximately 150 million years ago, Enigmacursor was a herbivore roughly the size of a Labrador with long legs for escaping predators. The fossils, discovered between 2021 and 2022 in the western United States, were bought by the Natural History Museum from a commercial dealer. Palaeontologists realised the near-complete skeleton was not a Nanosaurus, as originally labelled, leading to its reclassification as a distinct species, Enigmacursor, meaning "mysterious runner." This discovery offers hope for correctly identifying hundreds of other small dinosaur bones previously misclassified and highlights the need to re-evaluate historical assumptions in palaeontology.
The Independent
4 hours ago
- The Independent
Chance discovery of 365-million-year-old fossil reveals new species
In 2015, two members of the Blue Beach Fossil Museum in Nova Scotia found a long, curved fossil jaw, bristling with teeth. Sonja Wood, the museum's owner, and Chris Mansky, the museum's curator, found the fossil in a creek after Wood had a hunch. The fossil they found belonged to a fish that had died 350 million years ago, its bony husk spanning nearly a metre on the lake bed. The large fish had lived in waters thick with rival fish, including giants several times its size. It had hooked teeth at the tip of its long jaw that it would use to trap elusive prey and fangs at the back to pierce it and break it down to eat. For the last eight years, I have been part of a team under the lead of palaeontologist Jason Anderson, who has spent decades researching the Blue Beach area of Nova Scotia, northwest of Halifax, in collaboration with Mansky and other colleagues. Much of this work has been on the tetrapods — the group that includes the first vertebrates to move to land and all their descendants — but my research focuses on what Blue Beach fossils can tell us about how the modern vertebrate world formed. Birth of the modern vertebrate world The modern vertebrate world is defined by the dominance of three groups: the cartilaginous fishes or chondrichthyans (including sharks, rays and chimaeras), the lobe-finned fishes or sarcopterygians (including tetrapods and rare lungfishes and coelacanths), and the ray-finned fishes or actinopterygians (including everything from sturgeon to tuna). Only a few jawless fish round out the picture. This basic grouping has remained remarkably consistent, at least for the last 350 million years. Before then, the vertebrate world was a lot more crowded. In the ancient vertebrate world, during the Silurian Period (443.7-419.2 MA) for example, the ancestors of modern vertebrates swam alongside spiny pseudo-sharks (acanthodians), fishy sarcopterygians, placoderms and jawless fishes with bony shells. Armoured jawless fishes had dwindled by the Late Devonian Period (419.2-358.9 MA), but the rest were still diverse. Actinopterygians were still restricted to a few species with similar body shapes. By the immediately succeeding early Carboniferous times, everything had changed. The placoderms were gone, the number of species of fishy sarcopterygians and acanthodians had cratered, and actinopterygians and chondrichthyans were flourishing in their place. The modern vertebrate world was born. A sea change Blue Beach has helped build our understanding of how this happened. Studies describing its tetrapods and actinopterygians have showed the persistence of Devonian-style forms in the Carboniferous Period. Whereas the abrupt end-Devonian decline of the placoderms, acanthodians and fishy sarcopterygians can be explained by a mass extinction, it now appears that multiple types of actinopterygians and tetrapods survived to be preserved at Blue Beach. This makes a big difference to the overall story: Devonian-style tetrapods and actinopterygians survive and contribute to the evolution of these groups into the Carboniferous Period. But significant questions remain for palaeontologists. One point of debate revolves around how actinopterygians diversified as the modern vertebrate world was born — whether they explored new ways of feeding or swimming first. The Blue Beach fossil was actinopterygian, and we wondered what it could tell us about this issue. Comparison was difficult. Two actinopterygians with long jaws and large fangs were known from the preceding Devonian Period (Austelliscus ferox and Tegeolepis clarki), but the newly found jaw had more extreme curvature and the arrangement of its teeth. Its largest fangs are at the back of its jaw, but the largest fangs of Austelliscus and Tegeolepis are at the front. These differences were significant enough that we created a new genus and species: Sphyragnathus tyche. And, in view of the debate on actinopterygian diversification, we made a prediction: that the differences in anatomy between Sphyragnathus and Devonian actinopterygians represented different adaptations for feeding. Front fangs To test this prediction, we compared Sphyragnathus, Austelliscus and Tegeolepis to living actinopterygians. In modern actinopterygians, the difference in anatomy reflects a difference in function: front-fangs capture prey with their front teeth and grip it with their back teeth, but back-fangs use their back teeth. Since we couldn't observe the fossil fish in action, we analysed the stress their teeth would experience if we applied force. The back teeth of Sphyragnathus handled force with low stress, making them suited for a role in piercing prey, but the back teeth of Austelliscus and Tegeolepis turned low forces into significantly higher stress, making them best suited for gripping. We concluded that Sphyragnathus was the earliest actinopterygian adapted for breaking down prey by piercing, which also matches the broader predictions of the feeding-first hypothesis. Substantial work remains — only the jaw of Sphyragnathus is preserved, so the 'locomotion-first' hypothesis was untested. But this represents the challenge and promise of palaeontology: get enough tantalising glimpses into the past and you can begin to unfold a history. As for the actinopterygians, current research indicates that they first diversified in the Devonian Period and shifted into new roles when the modern vertebrate world was born. Conrad Daniel Mackenzie Wilson is a PhD candidate in Earth Sciences at Carleton University.
