logo
EXCLUSIVE Chilling home video shows Fred West and his wife Rose smiling as they cycle in the countryside with their children

EXCLUSIVE Chilling home video shows Fred West and his wife Rose smiling as they cycle in the countryside with their children

Daily Mail​25-05-2025

Riding bicycles over hilly tracks, wading through rambling streams and with children excitedly running off in different directions, they look like an ordinary family enjoying a day trip to the countryside.
Yet these are the home videos of Fred and Rose West - Britain's most notorious and sadistic serial killers.
The eerie footage, seen publicly for the first time, features in Netflix 's new three-part documentary which goes behind the scenes to reveal how the depraved couple's horrific crimes were uncovered.
The extraordinary family archive appears alongside chilling police footage of the moments West began giving up the secrets of 25 Cromwell Street in Gloucester.
Over a series of visits, West coldly points out where he has hidden the bodies of the vulnerable young women who were held captive, raped and tortured at the infamous address which would become known as the 'House of Horrors'.
He couldn't look more relaxed with a cigarette in hand. At times he has a smile on his face or is cracking jokes.
It would later emerge that over 20 years the couple murdered at least 12 young women including two of their own children.
Nine were dismembered and buried under the cellar and the garden patio at Cromwell Street by builder West.
West cheated justice after hanging himself while on remand on January 1 1995.
But his voice is heard from beyond the grave in a series of taped police interviews during which he slowly begins to reveal details of his horrific crimes in a chilling matter-of-fact way.
The monster at first claimed Rose knew nothing about the crimes and insisted he was solely responsible.
But the documentary - called Fred and Rose West: A British Horror Story - highlights the dramatic falling out between the couple after Rose snubbed her husband when they appeared in court for the first time four months after the investigation began.
The newly uncovered police interviews show how West's tone strikingly changed as he began to believe he was being betrayed by his twisted partner in crime.
In one taped interview he said in his distinctive West Country accent: 'You know what Rose is doing now? Distancing me and her.
'See, I'm beginning to wonder, did Rose have any love towards me at all? Or was I somebody there to use all the time?
'I was an easy touch - do as I'm told and not interfere.'
Asked by a detective if there was any other person common to the 12 bodies he replied: 'Well, it's obvious there is somebody else.
'The reason I could not tell the truth is because I'm protecting somebody. I can't say it no plainer than that.'
He went on to add: 'If I'm to have any chance in this case at all, I've got to go back and tell the truth. Why should I take the rap?
'Rose broke every promise she made to me but I did none of it on my own.'
Rose too is heard - in secret recordings from bugging devices police placed in the safe house where she was taken with her two oldest children after West was first arrested while police began digging up the garden at Cromwell Street.
In one taped interview, West, speaking with his distinctive West Country accent, lamented how Rose was distancing herself from him
Rose West's voice is also heard in secret recordings made by police bugging devices while she was held in a safe house with her two oldest children during the investigation
She gives little away but at one point, after learning West was beginning to confess, she is heard saying: 'He's telling her everything. It won't make any difference. You'll never get a confession for something I haven't done.'
The voices of the evil killers stand in stark contrast to the sometimes tearful accounts of the victims' loved ones and the police officers and professionals whose lives remain haunted by the couple's crimes.
The probe began as a missing persons case in February 1994. Concerns had been raised over the whereabouts of the couple's daughter Heather.
Heather, who was born in October 1970, was the couple's first child together.
Police were called in after the couple's younger children chillingly began to reveal what had become 'a family joke'.
Detective Constable Russ Williams of Gloucester Police said: 'It was alleged by the children that if they misbehaved, they would end up under the patio like their sister Heather.'
When first interviewed by Detective Constable Hazel Savage, West laughed the claims off and urged police to 'carry on digging'.
But within 24 hours, possibly to deflect officers from discovering other remains, he contacted detectives saying: 'You better take me to the police station. I have killed Heather but you're digging in the wrong place.'
He went on to confess he had lost control then strangled his daughter with a piece of electric flex to 'make sure' she was dead.
West described how he had cut up Heather's body with a kitchen knife.
Outlining the confession his solicitor Howard Ogden said: 'A man is describing murdering and dismembering his daughter.
'It wasn't with floods of tears and distress and anxiety. It was simply a black-and-white set of facts.
'When the tape finished, all of us present in that interview just rose and went to a tiny little tea area, and we just had a group hug.
'Complete strangers, never met one another - silent group hug.'
Harrowing footage later shows West in a seemingly cheerful mood as he used his feet to indicate the spot where his daughter was buried.
Janet Leach was appointed West's 'appropriate adult' over concerns over his ability to understand the proceedings.
Describing the visit she said: 'It was really strange. It was dark. It was raining.
'He was upset about the state of his garden, more so than anything.
'He just sort of kept looking at me and winking as if it was some sort of game.'
When she asked him why he had looked at her like that, West hinted at more horrors.
Describing another part of the garden he replied mischievously: 'Didn't you see that bone sticking out? It's just by the back door.'
In his formal interviews, West continued to insist Heather was the only victim but dropped further hints to Janet, with whom he would confide throughout the investigation.
She would go on to become a key prosecution witness in Rose's trial the following year.
Tragically, the discovery of Heather's remains was only the beginning. It would later emerge Heather was killed in 1987 and was the last of the couple's known victims.
As more bones were uncovered, West admitted to two further killings.
He told how remains discovered under the garden patio belonged to Shirley Robinson, an 18-year-old lodger who was eight months pregnant with West's child when he murder her. She was last seen alive in 1978.
The third victim, who West knew only as 'Shirley's mate', was Alison Chambers, who had lived in a children's home and disappeared aged 16 in 1979.
When their remains were discovered West insisted that was the end of it, telling police: 'You can take it all apart, there ain't nothing else.'
But when police began focusing on the Cromwell Street cellar he told Janet and a legal advisor: 'There's a f****** load more.'
In a hand-written note to detectives he went on to admit to 'an approx further nine killings'.
In another video, West was taken down to the cellar - which had been used as a 'kid's den' as well as a torture chamber - after he had drawn a map for Janet marking the spots where the bodies were buried.
When asked by an officer if there were any more bodies other than those indicated, West replied: ''Yeah. Well, I mean, what's one more?'
By now, a picture was beginning to emerge of how the couple had preyed on vulnerable young girls and women in order to play out their sexual fantasies.
West met Rose in 1969 when she was just 15 and he was 27. Within a month she fell pregnant with Heather.
Rose went on to have eight children - some of whom were believed to be fathered by men she had sex with while working as a prostitute.
After the couple moved to Cromwell Street, there was a constant stream of young girls, some of whom became lodgers while working for the couple as nannies and doing household chores - as well as satisfying West's depraved lust.
A number were runaways while the couple picked up others after trawling around looking for hitchhikers.
Investigators concluded West had adapted the shabby three storey semi-detached property to fulfil 'his sexual pleasure'.
One room on the middle floor which had its own bar was described as looking like 'the reception room of a seedy hotel' - and was used by Rose when she was having sex with clients.
Professor Paul Britton, a forensic psychologist brought in to assist the investigation, told how a flight of stairs led off from the bar area to a bedroom.
Examining police footage the professor continued: 'We go from this room up a flight of stairs to a bedroom area.
'On the other side there is a hole in the wall and out of that hole there are cables coming.
'There are microphones and cameras that are run through into the four-poster bedroom, where films and listening can happen.'
As police began to try to identify victims, West admitted he would not be able to provide much help.
In one interview he said: 'I never actually ever knew their names.
'I didn't want to know their name or make up a name, whatever it was.
'The thing is all these are so mixed up in my mind now, I haven't a clue which is which.
'Yeah, I buried the people, yeah, but I mean it was done quick and a long time ago.'
Challenged by DC Savage about having an 'awful smirk on his face' during the interview, West said: 'Every girl I picked up I didn't put in the basement.'
Asked where he 'put them' he added laughingly: 'I dropped them off where they wanted to go.'
West - described by one expert as 'a cunning man living in a fantasy' said of his victims: 'Each one was their own kinky sex and that's all it was. That's why you probably find it hard, it was their thing they wanted to try, do.'
Describing why he carried out the murders he added: 'It was just this urge at the time when they upset me that I went for them - and the whole fear, and this is something that we've got to get into was, the biggest fear that was in me, was Rose finding out I was messing with other women.'
Professor Britton said: 'Frederick West seems unmoved by the fact that these people are dead. And what we see are the hallmarks of the sadistic sexual psychopath.'
After the horrors off Cromwell Street, police continued to probe missing family members.
West was questioned over the disappearance of his first wife Rena Costello who vanished in 1971 aged 26.
Footage showed how he went on to take officers to the spot where he had buried her in a field near the Herefordshire village of Much Markle where he had grown up.
He later asked officers to return to the scene so he could show them where he buried Ann McFall, a friend of Rena's who had vanished in May 1967 aged 18.
It turned out she was West's first known victim and her remains were found with those of their unborn child.
The final grim discovery were the remains of Charmaine West who disappeared aged eight in 1971.
She was Rena's daughter and her body was discovered under the kitchen foundations at Fred and Rose's former home in Midland Road, Gloucester.
Despite his protestations, investigators established she was murdered by Rose in June 1971 while Fred was in prison serving a sentence for theft of car tyres and a vehicle tax disc.
Rose too was charged with murder and the couple would not meet until they were reunited at Gloucester Magistrates Court on June 30th 1994.
It was clear to onlookers Rose wanted nothing more to do with her husband.
Describing the scene at the time a TV reporter who had covered the hearing said: 'When Fred West was escorted into the dock, he leaned forward and touched her shoulder. She didn't acknowledge this gesture.
'There appeared to be no communication between them, Rosemary steadfastly ignoring him.
'Later, when they were taken down, Fred West again tried to lean over and touch his wife's back. This time the prison officer pushed away his hand.'
Mr Ogden said in the documentary: 'He imagined that she'd be maybe blowing him a kiss and they might mooch along the bench to be closer in the dock - no.'
Rose's lawyer Leo Goatley said: 'The lines were becoming intensely drawn. Fred West's whole situation was falling apart.'
DC Williams said of West's dramatic change of tone after the encounter: 'He's starting now to see that this relationship is deteriorating to the point where it may no longer exist - 'Why am I doing this? Why am I taking all the flak?'.'
After a dramatic trial at Winchester Crown Court in October 1995, Rose was convicted of all 10 murder charges she faced and was jailed for life.
Sentencing Rose, Mr Justice Mantell told her: 'If attention is paid to what I think you will never be released.'
Rose, now 71, is serving her sentence in HM Prison New Hall, West Yorkshire. A year after her trial the house in Cromwell Street was demolished.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Illegal work arrests double in year as police target 'unscrupulous' employers
Illegal work arrests double in year as police target 'unscrupulous' employers

BBC News

timean hour ago

  • BBC News

Illegal work arrests double in year as police target 'unscrupulous' employers

Arrests for illegal work have doubled in a year as police focus on "unscrupulous" employers who exploit undocumented migrants, the government officers arrested more than 6,400 people in the past year in raids at businesses across the UK, data released by the Home Office shows. It said the figure is 51% higher than the previous year. It did not provide numbers as to how many arrests led to charges, convictions or said immigration enforcement officials had "intensified" their work to "tackle those abusing the UK immigration system and exploiting vulnerable people". Officers had visited more than 9,000 businesses - among them restaurants, nail bars and construction sites - to check paperwork and working businesses had often subjected migrants to "squalid conditions and illegal working hours" as well as below-minimum Home Office said there were a range of industries exploiting migrant one case in Surrey, officers arrested nine people at a caravan park who had been working as delivery one one major operation in March, officers arrested 36 people at a building site in Belfast's Titanic Quarter. Some had breached visa conditions while others didn't have working Enforcement director Eddy Montgomery said there were many cases where people travelling to the UK were "sold a lie by smuggling gangs that they will be able to live and work freely in the UK."In reality, they often end up facing squalid living conditions, minimal pay and inhumane working hours," he Angela Eagle, the minister for border security and asylum, said the government would "continue to root out unscrupulous employers and disrupt illegal workers who undermine our border security".The government said it had also returned nearly 30,000 people over the past year who did not have the right to be in the has said it is cracking down on illegal migration, setting out its plans in a White Paper to tighten work visas and those overstaying. It scrapped a special visa for care workers introduced during the pandemic, noting that this had been a pathway exploited by was mixed reaction to the plans, with some business sectors decrying the restrictions on work visas, while some Conservative opponents said the reforms didn't go far enough to stop illegal most recent data shows that approximately 44,000 people have entered the UK illegally in the year to March 2025, more than 80% through small boat journeys.

'He was going to kill me': More strangulation cases recorded by police but many investigations falter
'He was going to kill me': More strangulation cases recorded by police but many investigations falter

Sky News

time2 hours ago

  • Sky News

'He was going to kill me': More strangulation cases recorded by police but many investigations falter

Around 70% of non-fatal strangulation cases in the last year have been dropped due to evidential issues, exclusive data shared with Sky News shows. It is now three years since it became a standalone offence in England and Wales, in a landmark piece of legislation designed to protect domestic abuse victims. Data from the Institute for Addressing Strangulation (IFAS) shows that police are implementing the offence widely - but outcomes for victims are mixed. Warning: This article contains references to domestic abuse and sexual assault 'Sarah' - whose name has been changed to protect her identity - vividly remembers the first time her ex-partner strangled her, one year into their relationship. She said: "He was drunk, and he climbed on top me. He put his hands around my throat, and he pinned me down with the strength of his body." Terrified, she begged him repeatedly to stop, but he carried on. "I remember I just felt really numb and scared, but it was weird, it felt like an out-of-body experience." Afterwards the only words he spoke to her were 'look what you made me do', she said, and then when the ordeal was over, he carried on with his day as if nothing had happened. This was the beginning of a pattern of abuse that continued throughout the rest of their relationship, happening on at least 30 more occasions, Sarah estimated. It became so normalised He strangled her when she was pregnant. He strangled her whether her children were in the house or not. It always happened during sex, though Sarah was only later able to recognise that this was rape after talking to the police, because for her it had become so normalised. And, always, he told Sarah it was her fault - that she had somehow 'made' him do it. She later went on to suffer a miscarriage because of the physical abuse. 'A form of control' "Looking back now I can see it was a form of control. He got off on knowing that he was in control, and he liked seeing me upset," she said. "I thought that he was going to kill me because he used to threaten it to me. It was very, very scary." This fear of death is common among victims of strangulation and is a recognised tool of control and intimidation. A US study found that victims of domestic abuse were seven times more likely to be murdered by their current or former partner if there had been an incident of non-fatal strangulation beforehand. But this form of violence often leaves no obvious external signs of injury, meaning in some cases perpetrators could only be investigated for less serious offences like common assault, which did not reflect the severity of the crime. What are the possible effects on health? The potential health impacts are wide-ranging, including loss of consciousness, voice changes, difficulty in swallowing and breathing, bruising, haemorrhages, headaches, depression, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), miscarriage, risk of suicide, and death (including delayed death). Symptoms can arise weeks or months after the event. It is for these reasons that campaigners fought for the introduction of the standalone offence, which came into effect in June 2022. 'Much work to be done' The IFAS has been monitoring the offence since the legislation was introduced and shared its latest report findings exclusively with Sky News. It said there is still "much work to be done" to better protect victims of strangulation. New figures obtained by IFAS from the Home Office reveal that over 63,000 crimes of non-fatal strangulation or suffocation were recorded by police in England and Wales in the first two years under the legislation. There were 39,360 recorded crimes in 2023/24, on average 66 offences per 100,000 people compared with 50 per 100,000 the year before, an increase of 20%. "Survivors who work with us have recognised time and time again how important it is to be able to see strangulation as a standalone offence and have the opportunity to progress with criminal justice proceedings," Harriet Smailes, co-author of the report, told Sky News. The volume of crimes recorded suggests that the offence is being widely recognised and reported by police - and the number resulting in charges, at 12%, is high compared to some other offences. However, a significant number of investigations result in no further action due to evidential difficulties. This can happen if police or prosecutors do not believe there is enough evidence to proceed, or if the victim does not support the investigation. This was the outcome in three in five investigations overall, including one in five investigations where the victim did support police action. Outcomes were similar in both years of available data. "In around half of cases, there are no external, physical, visible signs of injury. That's not to say that there aren't internal injuries that can't be seen just with the naked eye," said Ms Smailes, who is a research officer at IFAS. "It might be that that visible injury isn't present at the time of evidence capture that might develop over time, or because there's a difference in how individuals show bruising, for example those of different skin tones. That can contribute towards there not being enough perceived evidence to be able to progress with a police case," she said. In some cases where a victim disengages from police proceedings, it may be that they did not feel supported and believed in the process or felt that there were "too many obstacles". On the other hand, not all cases where a victim did not support police action are necessarily negative. "It might be that initial needs have been met in that instance through reporting to the police, for example, initial containment of the risk of that situation, and referrals to specialist health or mental health services," Ms Smailes explained. Police 'determined' to improve Assistant Commissioner Louisa Rolfe is the National Police Chiefs' Council lead for domestic abuse. She told Sky News that securing prosecutions for strangulation is a priority for tackling violence against women and girls, and a key part of national Domestic Abuse Matters training. "For us to do well in prosecutions, we need to understand how perpetrators operate, how they use this is a sinister way of controlling their victims. And we also know that many victims are frightened to pursue prosecution," she said. Investigators not only have to secure detailed evidence rapidly but also present the best possible case so that prosecutors and juries understand how an abuser is operating, she said. "That can be a challenging job, for a police service that's under pressure, trying to deal with a myriad of priorities. I know many investigators are passionate about getting this right." "We know we're up against it when it comes to securing convictions, but we're determined to improve," she added. Fewer than half were convicted Separate research by IFAS has found that in the first year under the new legislation, only around half of the number of offences charged by police were prosecuted, and less than half of those secured a conviction. Overall, 47% of the 1,437 prosecutions of non-fatal strangulation and suffocation offences in the year to June 2023 resulted in conviction, based on data from the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) from all courts in England and Wales. There are several potential reasons that a prosecution may be unsuccessful, including evidential difficulties or a victim withdrawing from the process. The accused may also have been convicted of a separate offence, but not for the strangulation. Without more detailed data, it is hard to determine to what extent each is contributing to the low conviction rate. Reflecting on the figures, head of policy and public affairs at domestic abuse support charity Refuge, Ellie Butt, told Sky News that victims often face "huge pressure" from perpetrators to drop out of the criminal justice process. "When compounded with lengthy court delays and insufficient support, many survivors are forced to withdraw from the process. Police and prosecutors should be working to build cases that can be taken forward even when a survivor can no longer continue," she said. The Crown Prosecution Service highlighted to Sky News that the number of new prosecution proceedings has been consistently increasing, particularly domestic abuse-related strangulation offences. In the latest quarter, 2,000 cases reached their first hearing at magistrates' court. Kate Brown, the CPS national lead for domestic abuse, said: "Three years on, we have continued to bring more charges quarter on quarter, with over 2,000 seen in court in the past three months. "This standalone offence has shone a light on those who seek to use these violent acts to exert power over another person and harm them. We are determined to continue bringing abusers to justice for victims." A gendered crime The new data from IFAS reinforces that strangulation is a gendered crime. Around 80% of victims whose gender was recorded by police were female, while 88% of suspects were male. The data also shows that while people from all ages are impacted, most victims are younger, with three in five aged 34 or under. The age profile of suspects was slightly higher, with three in five suspects aged between 25 and 44. 'I want to say it's not your fault' Sarah's case ended in evidential difficulties. Though her case was reported before 2022, when strangulation became a specific offence, she said she did provide substantial physical evidence to the police and she feels "let down" by the justice system. She said she has been diagnosed with PTSD, anxiety and other health issues. "I live with it every day. It can be a song that comes on the radio or a sign or somebody's name and it would just bring everything back to me to that point, that moment," she said. "I want to say it's not your fault. Nobody has the right to control you, nobody has the right to abuse you, rape you, strangle you. "I would urge anyone to speak out and if you feel like you haven't been heard and your voice has not been listened to, speak out again."

Five members of same family jailed for 17 years over £136,000 fake armed robbery plot at Post Office
Five members of same family jailed for 17 years over £136,000 fake armed robbery plot at Post Office

Daily Mail​

time3 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

Five members of same family jailed for 17 years over £136,000 fake armed robbery plot at Post Office

Five members of the same family have been jailed for their involvement in a plot to conceal over £130,000 stolen from a Post Office in a staged armed robbery. Taxi driver Rajvinder Kahlon, 43, pretended to be an armed robber as part of the plot at the branch in Hounslow, west London. Kahlon, of Great West Road, Hounslow, was sentenced to four-and-a-half years' imprisonment at Isleworth Crown Court on Friday after being convicted of conspiracy to pervert the course of justice, conspiracy to steal from the Post Office, and conspiracy to money launder. Metropolitan Police officers had responded to reports on April 1 last year of an armed robbery at the Post Office within a convenience store in Brabazon Road, Hounslow. Two women working at the branch, sub-postmistress Sunaver Dhillon, 68, and Ramandeep Dhillon, 40, both of Lyne Road, Virginia Water, lied to officers that they had been threatened by a man with a pistol who stole £50,000, as well as the branch's CCTV system. The court heard that money from a safe and a CCTV hard disc had already been removed by Kahlon's cousin Sukhvir Dhillon, the husband of Ramandeep Dhillon and son of Sunaver Dhillon, before the staged robbery. Police analysis of Kahlon's phone showed he was in regular contact with Sukhvir Dhillon, 38, the court heard. Her Honour Judge Lindsey Rose said of the family's fake robbery: 'It meant many resources were deployed to the Post Office when they could have been deployed elsewhere where they may have saved others, all because of your greed and conniving in pretending this was an armed robbery.' Kahlon was initially arrested and appeared at Isleworth Crown Court charged with the armed robbery of Ramandeep Dhillon and Sunaver Dhillon before the inside job was revealed. Kahlon indicated at a pre-trial review that he was willing to plead guilty to the bogus charge before the prosecution requested he was not arraigned. Sentencing Kahlon, Judge Rose said: 'You were the fall guy for this, the robber who failed at his role. 'You were even willing to enter a guilty plea that would have seen you serve a sentence of years' imprisonment for a crime you didn't commit.' The judge said Kahlon was 'hoping to be paid handsomely by Sukhvir Dhillon' for keeping quiet, adding that the family's lies were 'maintained over the investigation and prosecution of Mr Kahlon'. Detectives from the Met's Flying Squad identified Kahlon from CCTV, tracking him to a nearby car which was registered to him. Kahlon's DNA was also found on a metal fence that he cut himself on as he fled the scene. Elroy Claxton, mitigating for Kahlon, said his client became involved in the plot because of 'an overpowering of his mind by brotherly love'. He added that Kahlon was 'remorseful' and denied ever having a firearm in his possession or transferring money over borders. An audit by the Post Office found that the actual amount of money missing from the store was around £136,000 - none of the money was ever recovered. The court heard that some of the stolen money may have been sent to India and Canada while they travelled to those countries. Sentencing the family, the judge said: 'You carefully planned a false robbery at a time when you knew the maximum amount of money would be at the Post Office. 'You lied and lied again to try to get away with this.' Judge Rose said the Dhillon family's expenditure and lifestyle far exceeded their income. The judge told them: 'You enjoyed multiple expensive cars, holidays and houses - including a very large house in Virginia Water that enjoyed an expensive renovation.' Sukhvir Dhillon, of Lyne Road, Virginia Water, was sentenced to five years' imprisonment for his part in the conspiracy after being found guilty of the same charges as Kahlon at Isleworth Crown Court on March 27. Sentencing Sukhvir Dhillon, Judge Rose said: 'You were the person that was the lead of this offence, you planned what would happen, organised it and put everyone in place.' Sunaver Dhillon, mother of Sukhvir Dhillon, was sentenced to three years and one months' imprisonment for her part in the conspiracy after being found guilty of the same charges as Kahlon. Sentencing her, Judge Rose said: 'You went to work to give an air of authenticity to this crime, making sure the safe was open and using your role as sub-postmistress to make sure the maximum amount could be taken.' Ramandeep Dhillon, the wife of Sukhvir Dhillon, was sentenced to two years and five months' imprisonment for the same charges. Sentencing her, Judge Rose said: 'You were no doubt brought in for your acting abilities, happy to play your part in acting scared and upset by this fake robbery. You even lied about there being a gun.' Another family member, Mandeep Gill, 45, was sentenced to two years and four months' imprisonment, after being found guilty of conspiracy to pervert the course of justice and conspiracy to money launder. Gill was not brought into the conspiracy until after the false police report was made, with prosecutor Richard Reynolds adding that her role was 'lesser than the others'. Mr Reynolds said the conspiracy was a 'particularly cynical plan' in light of the Post Office Horizon controversy, adding that it came at a time when 'public awareness and concern around the Horizon scandal was at its absolute peak'. A Post Office spokesperson said: 'We want to publicly thank the Metropolitan Police for its very thorough investigation into this staged armed robbery which was solved using CCTV footage, DNA evidence and other data to identify those involved with this crime.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store