logo
Barry Diller who shared box with Elon Musk at the US Open says: If people saw him in box today, they will throw

Barry Diller who shared box with Elon Musk at the US Open says: If people saw him in box today, they will throw

Time of India20-05-2025

Expedia Group chairman
Barry Diller
has commented on what he sees as a shift in public sentiment towards
Tesla
CEO
Elon Musk
. Speaking on Monday's episode of the "On with Kara Swisher" podcast, Diller recalled witnessing Musk's popularity firsthand at the 2024 US Open. However, Diller noted that less than a year later, public mood around Musk appears to have changed significantly. "If today he was in that box, they'd throw tomatoes at him," Diller said during the podcast.
Public mood on Elon Musk has flipped: Barry Diller
The duo sat in the same luxury box to watch the US Open men's singles final match in September last year where Musk, Diller said, received enthusiastic reception from the crowd.
"A third of the faces in that audience were looking at him and not at this champ game that was taking place," he said. The 83-year-old was 'amazed' to see people gathering to take pictures and ask for Musk's signature during a break in the game.
Eight months later, Diller said a public appearance like that wouldn't unfold the same way it did in 2024. 'If today he was in that box, they'd throw tomatoes at him," Diller said, adding 'It's only September to May. I've never seen anything as swift as that.'
Elon Musk's ties with Trump stirs backlash
Elon Musk emerged as a significant figure in the US election, with his influence seen as helping pave the way for Donald Trump's win. He was appointed to lead the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) – the taskforce set up to cut government spending. However, his growing influence in the
Trump administration
has had a noticeable impact on the perception of his companies, especially Tesla. His increasingly public ties to Trump and right-wing politics have sparked backlash from key Tesla stakeholders, including consumers, investors, and advertisers. So much so that the electric vehicle maker's stock dropped nearly 40% this year before a resurgence last Friday.
The company also faced calls for boycotts and criticism from progressive consumers. Musk's personal brand has become so entangled with Tesla's that his political rhetoric — including anti-DEI (Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion) statements and attacks on media — is being viewed as representative of the company itself.
When Tesla Bull Ross Gerber called for Musk's exit
Things got to a point when Tesla Bull Ross Gerber called for his exit from the company, stating that 'the company's reputation has just been destroyed by Elon Musk'. During an interview with Larry Kudlow, Musk admitted he was managing multiple businesses 'with great difficulty'. In the interview, he was seen almost 'choking' while talking about Tesla struggles.
It was eventually during the company's Q1 results, Musk said that he will significantly reduce his time at DOGE in May. He then said 'Starting next month, May, my time allocation to DOGE will drop significantly'.
AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump-Musk breakup: There's a Trump tweet for every Musk move; a love-hate story in 280 characters
Trump-Musk breakup: There's a Trump tweet for every Musk move; a love-hate story in 280 characters

Time of India

time34 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Trump-Musk breakup: There's a Trump tweet for every Musk move; a love-hate story in 280 characters

In the grand arena of American politics, few relationships have been as electrifying—or as perplexing—as that of Elon Musk and Donald Trump. Their bond, forged in the fires of Twitter (now X), has been a whirlwind of endorsements, criticisms, and the occasional meme-worthy moment. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now But if there's one thing we've learned, it's that there's a Trump tweet for every Musk move—and vice versa. The reinstatement tango It all began in November 2022, when Elon Musk, in his infinite wisdom, decided that the world needed more Trump tweets. So, he conducted a poll on X, asking the masses if they wanted to reinstate the former president's account. The result? A narrow "yes" vote of 51.8%. Musk declared, "The people have spoken," and just like that, Trump's digital megaphone was back online . But the real kicker came when Trump returned to the platform with a post that could only be described as cinematic: his mugshot. The caption? "ELECTION INTERFERENCE! NEVER SURRENDER!" Musk, ever the enthusiast, responded with a succinct "Next-level" . Because nothing says "I'm in this for the long haul" like a mugshot and a retweet. The Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE): A match made in bureaucratic heaven Fast forward to late 2024. Trump, ever the innovator, announced the creation of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), with none other than Elon Musk at the helm. The goal? To cut $2 trillion from the federal budget. Musk, ever the cost-cutter, was all in . However, as with all things Musk, the execution was... let's say, ambitious. Under his leadership, the department enacted sweeping layoffs, cut thousands of contracts, and slashed grants. The result? A fiscal policy that left many scratching their heads and wondering if Mars was looking more appealing by the day . The "Big, Beautiful Bill" fallout But the honeymoon didn't last. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now In June 2025, Musk launched a full-throated campaign against Trump's signature spending bill, the "One Big Beautiful Bill." Describing it as a "disgusting abomination," Musk urged Americans to pressure lawmakers to reject it with the rallying cry "KILL the BILL" . Trump's response? Silence. Well, almost. He reposted a previous positive tweet from Musk on Truth Social and refrained from his usual combative retorts . Perhaps he was too busy planning his next rally—or maybe he was just giving Musk the space to shine in his own unique way. The meme that keeps on giving Through all the policy shifts, budget cuts, and political maneuvering, one thing has remained constant: the memes. Whether it's Musk's "Return of the King" post celebrating Trump's comeback or Trump's own cryptic tweets, the internet has been treated to a never-ending stream of content that blurs the line between politics and performance art . In the end, the relationship between Elon Musk and Donald Trump is a testament to the unpredictable nature of modern politics. It's a saga filled with unexpected alliances, dramatic reversals, and a plethora of tweets that keep us all guessing. So, the next time you find yourself scrolling through X, remember: there's a Trump tweet for every Musk move—and vice versa.

‘Wise words': Elon Musk takes direct jab at Donald Trump over his ‘big beautiful bill', shares President's 2013 X post
‘Wise words': Elon Musk takes direct jab at Donald Trump over his ‘big beautiful bill', shares President's 2013 X post

Mint

time34 minutes ago

  • Mint

‘Wise words': Elon Musk takes direct jab at Donald Trump over his ‘big beautiful bill', shares President's 2013 X post

Elon Musk on Thursday took a direct jab at US President Donald Trump over his 'Big Beautiful Bill' – his most pointed attack at the Republican leader after the Tesla CEO exited his government role. Resharing a old X post of Trump, which he posted in 2013, Musk said, 'Wise words'. 'I cannot believe the Republicans are extending the debt ceiling—I am a Republican & I am embarrassed,' the US President said in one of his old posts on X. (This is a developing story. Check back for updates)

US Supreme Court sides with straight woman in discrimination case — DEI backlash incoming?
US Supreme Court sides with straight woman in discrimination case — DEI backlash incoming?

Mint

time35 minutes ago

  • Mint

US Supreme Court sides with straight woman in discrimination case — DEI backlash incoming?

A unanimous Supreme Court made it easier Thursday to bring lawsuits over so-called reverse discrimination, siding with an Ohio woman who claims she didn't get a job and then was demoted because she is straight. The justices' decision affects lawsuits in 20 states and the District of Columbia where, until now, courts had set a higher bar when members of a majority group, including those who are white and heterosexual, sue for discrimination under federal law. Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson wrote for the court that federal civil rights law draws no distinction between members of majority and minority groups. 'By establishing the same protections for every 'individual' — without regard to that individual's membership in a minority or majority group — Congress left no room for courts to impose special requirements on majority-group plaintiffs alone,' Jackson wrote. The court ruled in an appeal from Marlean Ames, who has worked for the Ohio Department of Youth Services for more than 20 years. Though he joined Jackson's opinion, Justice Clarence Thomas noted in a separate opinion that some of the country's 'largest and most prestigious employers have overtly discriminated against those they deem members of so-called majority groups.' Thomas, joined by Justice Neil Gorsuch, cited a brief filed by America First Legal, a conservative group founded by Trump aide Stephen Miller, to assert that "American employers have long been 'obsessed' with 'diversity, equity, and inclusion' initiatives and affirmative action plans." Two years ago, the court's conservative majority outlawed consideration of race in university admissions. Since taking office in January, President Donald Trump has ordered an end to DEI policies in the federal government and has sought to end government support for DEI programs elsewhere. Some of the new administration's anti-DEI initiatives have been temporarily blocked in federal court. Jackson's opinion makes no mention of DEI. Instead, she focused on Ames' contention that she was passed over for a promotion and then demoted because she is heterosexual. Both the job she sought and the one she had held were given to LGBTQ people. Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 bars sex discrimination in the workplace. A trial court and the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled against Ames. The 6th circuit is among the courts that had required an additional requirement for people like Ames, showing 'background circumstances' that might include that LGBTQ people made the decisions affecting Ames or statistical evidence of a pattern of discrimination against members of the majority group. The appeals court noted that Ames didn't provide any such circumstances. But Jackson wrote that 'this additional 'background circumstances' requirement is not consistent with Title VII's text or our case law construing the statute.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store