Tell us: what questions do you have about the impacts of smartphones on children?
A quarter of three- and four-year-olds in the UK now own a smartphone, but the impact of that is still being understood. From endless scrolling to constant notifications, smartphones expose children not just to their friends and classmates, but to a world of advertising, influencers, and algorithms. But how is all of this shaping how children see themselves, relate to others, and develop emotionally?
In a video series on our It's Complicated Youtube channel, we're speaking to experts to explore how smartphones might be affecting children's mental health, attention, self-esteem and relationships. Are social apps making kids more anxious? What happens when children are targeted by ads that shape their sense of identity from a young age? What do we know, and what don't we yet understand, about growing up in a world where you're always online?
We want to hear from you. What have you always wondered about children and smartphones? Whether you're a parent, teacher, or just someone curious about the long-term effects, fill out the form below to share your questions. Your experiences could help shape the episode and might even feature in the show.
You can tell us what you would like to know about the impacts of smartphones by filling in the form below.
Please include as much detail as possible.
Please note, the maximum file size is 5.7 MB.
Your contact details are helpful so we can contact you for more information. They will only be seen by the Guardian.
Your contact details are helpful so we can contact you for more information. They will only be seen by the Guardian.
If you include other people's names please ask them first.
If you're having trouble using the form click here. Read terms of service here and privacy policy here.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
20 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Manchester Museum asks visitors if Egyptian woman's body should be taken off display
One of Europe's leading museums is asking visitors if it should continue to display the body of an ancient Egyptian woman 200 years after it was brought to the UK by cotton merchants, as it 'decolonises' some of its most famous exhibits. Manchester Museum, which in May was named 2025's European museum of the year, is running a consultation on the future of Asru, a woman who lived in Thebes, the ancient city in the location of modern-day Luxor, 2,700 years ago. A plaque at the museum asks: 'Should we continue to display the body of Asru?', inviting visitors to submit answers in a postbox underneath. It adds: 'Asru's mummified body was unwrapped at the Manchester Natural History Society in April 1825. She has regularly been on display for the two centuries since. In that time, we have also changed as a museum and are thinking more about how we care for people.' The story of Asru's body is one of several that show how the development of the UK museum sector benefited from colonialism and transatlantic slavery, at a time when the ethics of displaying human bodies and spoils from imperial expansion are being questioned. In March a report by MPs from the all-party parliamentary group for Afrikan reparations called for bans on selling ancestral remains and publicly displaying them without consent. Asru's finely decorated wooden coffin reveals a few biographical details. An affluent woman who was about 60 when she died, her father was called Pa-Kush, which means 'the Kushite', a Black man from modern-day Sudan. Pa-Kush worked as a scribe, a high-status role, when Egypt had Kushite pharaohs. Asru's name means 'her arm is against them'. In the 19th century, Asru's sarcophagus was acquired by Robert and William Garnett, the sons of a former trader in enslaved African people, who had followed him into the cotton industry, research by one of the museum's curators, Campbell Price, found. The Garnetts donated Asru's body to the Manchester Natural History Society, the forerunner to Manchester Museum. Alongside the Asru consultation, the museum has launched its Decolonise! Trail , named after the initiative in arts and culture that is being used to challenge stereotypical perspectives linked to empire and colonialism. The trail links displays of items from Africa and Asia, subverting traditional 'Eurocentric' narratives about them through artworks newly displayed alongside them. It is supported by a booklet that asks questions such as 'Should a desire for knowledge override the wishes of ancient cultures?', 'Do you know where the minerals in your technology come from?' and 'What is climate justice?'. Sign up to The Long Wave Nesrine Malik and Jason Okundaye deliver your weekly dose of Black life and culture from around the world after newsletter promotion Next to African spearheads – items that the booklet describes as having 'reinforced reductive and inaccurate ideas about African people' – is an LGBTQ+ comic strip story by the Congolese artist Edher Numbi. A mural by the British artists the Singh twins in the museum's south Asia gallery examines the link between enslavement and India's colonisation. It features a 1928 quote from the then UK home secretary, William Joynson-Hicks, who, speaking of India as a major export market for 'Lancashire cotton goods', said: 'We did not conquer India for the benefit of the Indians … We conquered India as an outlet for the goods of Britain. We conquered India by the sword, and by the sword we shall hold it.' Chloe Cousins, Manchester Museum's social justice manager, who created the trail, said: 'The trail is new but the concept of decolonising isn't new to Manchester Museum at all. Telling more accurate and nuanced accounts of the history of the collections is one of the ways we can care for the people and communities whose belongings, stories and histories are held here.'
BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
WW2 tomato truck bombing 'blackest day' in Guernsey history
The World War Two bombing of tomato trucks in St Peter Port harbour has been described by a local historian as the "blackest day" in Guernsey history. Thirty-four people were killed and 33 were injured when German planes bombed the trucks after mistaking them for troop vehicles on 28 June air raid on St Peter Port heralded the beginning of the German occupation of the island, which lasted for five Simon Hamon said it was important to remember the "tragic day", and the impact it had on island families, 85 years after the event. "It really was Guernsey's blackest day in its history, and certainly that in the occupation," said Mr Hamon. "Everybody had their vehicles loaded high with tomatoes, and to keep the sun off them they used to cover them with tarpaulins."German planes had been coming over in the days in advance and had seen these trucks and mistakenly identified them as troop-carrying trucks that were unloading supplies and men, unaware of the tomato export at the time." 'Bullets whizzing through' A total of nine German Heinkel HE-111 bombers started bombing targets within the harbour area at about 18:45 BST."People decided to dive underneath the vehicles in a hope of saving themselves, but of course with bombs and bullets whizzing through it didn't really help them very much," said Mr Hamon."There were 33 people altogether that are classed as dying there."There were over 50 that had extensive critical injuries, which were treated, and managed to survive." 'Losing a father' Mr Hamon said the true number of people injured has not been recorded as people with minor injuries "treated themselves"."It was a tragic day really, with one family losing a father and two sons, and the youngest of the sons I think was 14," he said.A service was held at St Peter Port harbour on Saturday evening to remember the people who were lost in the bombing. "Although they weren't combatants, they weren't fighting anybody, they were probably the first islanders to have been killed in World War Two," said Mr Hamon."We should remember that, and we shouldn't lose sight of war and the effects of war on us and wider populations."The bombing occurred just two days before the occupation of the island by German forces."
BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
Upset over fears popular Cornwall camping spot could be shut
People from the Rame Peninsula are "gutted" a popular camping spot might be closed over safety comes after Plymouth and Cornwall councils have decided not to renew a licence allowing people to use the historic Sandway Campsite, close to the villages of Kingsand and Cawsand, according to the Local Democracy Reporting Service.A petition has been launched by Katy Mabin calling for Cornwall Council to "work actively" to preserve the campsite and avoid issuing eviction councils said they asked campers last year to "vacate the land immediately due to the risks of immediate danger/death" from flooding and landslips, and they were concerned about people camping there. Ms Mabin said: "Losing this beloved site would erase nearly a century of community history and tradition - a detrimental blow not just to camping enthusiasts, but to the very fabric of Kingsand's identity."Kate Ewert, who represents the Rame Peninsula on Cornwall Council, challenged the authorities to do a new report into safety said no-one was staying at the site after notices went up this year telling them to set up bell tents on the beach in the 1930s, which have since been replaced by Beach is owned and managed by Cornwall Council and Plymouth City Council and they granted a 15-year lease from 2009 to the Sandway Campsite Association for holiday use only. 'Insufficient escape route' A 2013 Cornwall Council report identified risks about the stability of the cliff and there were several landslides leading up to March a joint statement, the councils said there were concerns that there is "no sufficient" escape route for campers and the Environment Agency had also highlighted safety risks."If the tide rises high enough and sweeps over the tents, then the beach could well become flooded and the occupants would be trapped. "That risk would be even greater if flooding happened overnight whilst the occupants were asleep," the councils councils said they asked campers last year to "vacate the land immediately due to the risks of immediate danger/death" because of the risks of flooding and landslips" and were concerned about people camping there. Ewert said notices had been put up asking people to leave, but no-one was camping said: "I am gutted about the state of affairs at Sandway. "Cornwall Council's planning committee granted permission last year after campers argued they did not use the site during the spring tide or when there was a risk from storm called for a new report to update the findings of the 2013 said five more planning consents were issued and campers were able to use the land in the intervening 11 said: "I asked for a new full study to be completed."It seems a geological expert reviewed the report and referred back to the 2013 report and said the land is unstable and that's that."The Rame Peninsula has come to the fore recently after being featured in the book The Salt Path and its accompanying movie.
