&w=3840&q=100)
As US strikes Iran, a look at American bases & assets that are now vulnerable to potential retaliation
As the US strikes Iran's three crucial nuclear facilities, here's a snapshot of information on bases and assets that are now vulnerable to Iranian retaliation. read more
US President Donald Trump delivers an address to the nation accompanied by US Vice President JD Vance, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth, at the White House in Washington, D.C., on June 21, following US strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities. Reuters
The United States has officially dragged itself into the ongoing Israel-Iran conflict, with President Donald Trump announcing that the US has successfully struck three Iranian nuclear facilities. The sites involved in the American attack were Fordow, Natanz, and Esfahan.
'All planes are now outside of Iran air airspace. A full payload of BOMBS was dropped on the primary site, Fordow. All planes are safely on their way home. Congratulations to our great American Warriors. There is no other military in the World that could have done this. NOW IS THE TIME FOR PEACE! Thank you for your attention to this matter," Trump announced on TruthSocial after the completion of the operation.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
While the attack garnered words of wrath from Iran, the prospect of Iranian retaliation has become extremely high. It is pertinent to note that the United States has several bases and military assets in the Middle East that might be vulnerable to Iranian retaliation. Apart from this, Iran could also hit US embassies in nearby countries such as Iraq, the United Arab Emirates or even Israel, making the conflict spill over to wider West Asia.
Here's a look at American infrastructure that is now vulnerable to Iranian attack:
Military bases
The following is a list of US military bases in West Asia that Iran could target in retaliation.
Al Udeid Air Base: The American military base is situated in Qatar and is known to be the largest US military base in the Middle East.
US Navy Fifth Fleet: The headquarters of the fleet is in Bahrain, and the area is a critical station for the US in the Persian Gulf.
Al Asad Air Base: It was the same US base in Iraq which was targeted by Iran in 2020 following the killing of Quds Force leader Qasem Soleimani in a US air strike. The installation houses thousands of American troops and is seen as the site of the largest US deployment in the country.
Harir Air Base: The base is situated in Erbil, Iraq and has also faced drone attacks from Iranian proxy groups.
Al Tanf Garrison: It is located in Southern Syria near the border with Iraq and Jordan. An Iranian-backed militia attack on the Tower 22 outpost, just 12 miles south of Al Tanf, killed three US service members in January 2024.
Ali al-Salem Air Base: The air base is situated in Kuwait and is about 20 miles from the Iraqi border, and houses members of the Air Force's 386th Air Expeditionary Wing
Al Dhafra Air Base: The base is located in the United Arab Emirates, and the installation is home to the Air Force's 380th Air Expeditionary Wing. It operates F-22 Raptor fighter jets and several kinds of surveillance planes and drones to keep track of what is happening in the region.
The Strait of Hormuz: Iran's 'Trump Card'
Apart from this, Iran could also hit the United States by closing the Strait of Hormuz, a critical potential chokehold where about 25 per cent of the world's oil consumption and roughly a third of the world's liquefied natural gas flows. It is pertinent to note that there are about 40,000 active-duty US troops stationed in the Middle East and on ships in the region, a US official told The New York Post earlier this month.
Meanwhile, on Wednesday, US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth stressed that the Pentagon is now prioritising the safety of American troops in the region. However, he has been an ardent supporter of the US actions in Iran.
'We have maximum force protection in the region at all times being maintained,' Hegseth noted during his testimony before the Senate Armed Services Committee. In light of this, the Pentagon boss authorised the voluntary exit of all US military dependents from locations across the Middle East.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
20 minutes ago
- Mint
Israel-Iran conflict effect? India ramps up crude oil imports from Russia, US in June 2025
India has increased its crude oil purchases from Russia and the United States in June 2025, as the import volumes from the two nations exceed the combined volumes from Middle Eastern suppliers amid the market volatility due to the Israel-Iran conflict, reported the news agency PTI. India's primary suppliers for crude oil in the Middle East are nations like Saudi Arabia and Iraq. This comes amid US President Donald Trump's announcement that America had carried out coordinated airstrikes targeting three nuclear facilities in Iran. Indian refiners are expected to import 2 million to 2.2 million barrels of crude oil per day in June 2025, marking the highest level of russian oil imports in the last two years, according to the agency report citing Kpler data. The crude oil imports from Russia were at 1.96 million barrels per day in May 2025. This expected hike in volumes is also set to beat the total volumes bought from Gulf nations like Iraq, Saudi Arabia, the UAE and Kuwait, as per the report. On the crude imports on the US front, Indian refiners' crude oil imports from the United States' also jumped to 4,39,000 barrels per day in June 2025, compared to their 2,80,000 barrels per day levels in the previous month. The data report also showed how the full-month projects from crude oil imports from the Middle East into India stood at 2 million barrels per day, lower than the May 2025 levels, according to the agency report. India started importing cheaper oil from Russia soon after the Russia-Ukraine war in February 2022 due to the higher discounted rates post the economic sanctions from the United States. India buys nearly 5.1 million barrels of crude oil, which is then refined to be converted into fossil fuels like petrol and diesel However, so far in the Israel-Iran conflict, there have been no crude oil supply cuts or disruptions in the oil trade, which can potentially drive up oil prices around the world. 'While supplies remain unaffected so far, vessel activity suggests a decline in crude loadings from the Middle East in the coming days,' Sumit Ritolia, Lead Research Analyst, Refining & Modeling at Kpler, told the news agency. 'Shipowners are hesitant to send empty tankers (ballasters) into the Gulf, with the number of such vessels dropping from 69 to just 40, and (Middle East and Gulf) MEG-bound signals from the Gulf of Oman halving,' he said. The global situation of uncertainty caused by the raging Israel-Iran war now risks Tehran retaliating by closing the Strait of Hormuz. The Strait of Hormuz is a strategically important trade passage for global crude oil as the strait links the Gulf of Oman, the Arabian Sea, and the Persian Gulf. According to multiple media reports, the Strait of Hormuz handles nearly a quarter of the world's oil trade. Hence, any potential move to close the passage will result in the escalation of the already raging war. Experts cited in media reports indicate that if there is an oil supply disruption, crude prices can jump to $400 per barrel. 'Yet, Kpler analysis assigns a very low probability to a full blockade, citing strong disincentives for Iran,' Ritolia told the news agency. The route serves as a major route for world oil and LNG export transit, and agency reports show that India imports nearly 40 per cent of all its crude oil and nearly 50 per cent of its gas imports from the Strait of Hormuz, which links to many Gulf nations. The Kpler data cited in the agency report also estimates that in case any disruption happens, it will result in 24 to 48 hours of isolation before major nations like the US step in to counter the retaliation. Meanwhile, the agency also highlighted that Russian oil imports are detached from Hormuz and are imported via the Suez Canal, Cape of Good Hope, or the Pacific Ocean. 'If conflict deepens or there is any short-term disruption in Hormuz, Russian barrels will rise in share, offering both physical availability and pricing relief. India may pivot harder toward the US, Nigeria, Angola, and Brazil, albeit at higher freight costs,' said the expert cited in the agency report. As of 19 June 2025, Russian crude oil accounted for 35 per cent of India's total crude imports. The Indian refiners are watching the geopolitical landscape and are likely to adjust procurement strategies to prioritise energy security, supply stability, and commercial viability if risks in the Middle East escalate, according to the agency report.
Time of India
21 minutes ago
- Time of India
PM Modi Speaks With Iranian President After U.S. Bombs Nuclear Sites In Iran
Prime Minister Narendra Modi held a phone conversation with Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian following the U.S. strikes on Iran's nuclear sites. PM Modi said they "discussed the current situation in detail" and expressed deep concern over the recent escalations in the Middle East. Emphasizing India's commitment to peace, Modi reiterated the urgent need for "immediate de-escalation, dialogue and diplomacy" as the only viable path forward. In a post on X, the Prime Minister also called for the "early restoration of regional peace, security and stability," amid growing fears of wider conflict following the U.S. entry into the Israel-Iran conflict.#modi #iran #middleeastcrisis #iranescalation #straitofhormuz #oileconomy #war #iranisraelwar #usa #israel #indiainternational #middleeast #iranisrael #israeliran #diplomacyfirst #regionalstability #foreignpolicy #geopolitics #explained #crudeoil #gdpimpact #news #breakingnews #toi #toibharat Read More
Time of India
21 minutes ago
- Time of India
Middle-East conflict: Chinese state media slams US strikes on Iran; says American bombs may not have been enough to destroy Iran's nukes
China's state media has condemned the United States' airstrikes on Iran's nuclear sites, calling them a reckless escalation that pushes the region 'further toward the abyss'. The experts also said that America's bunker-buster bombs used in the strikes may not be sufficient to destroy Iran's deep hidden nuclear secrets. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The US military launched attacks on Iran's Fordo, Isfahan and Natanz nuclear facilities, early Sunday morning. US President Donald Trump said the military had carried out a 'very successful' attack on three nuclear sites. Media reports stated that B-2 stealth bombers were involved in the operation. While Beijing has not officially responded to the airstrikes, a flash editorial published in the state-run China Daily described the US action as a flagrant violation of international law. It warned that such unilateralism undermines the rules-based international order and sets a dangerous 'might-makes-right' precedent, PTI quoted. The editorial added that 'the strikes have only served to push the situation further toward the abyss'. Chinese experts also expressed doubts over the effectiveness of the operation, especially in fully destroying Iran's underground facilities. Fordo's nuclear facility is buried nearly 100 metres underground, making it hard to destroy with just one or two strikes, even with bunker-buster bombs, said Li Zixin, assistant research fellow at the China Institute of International Studies, in an interview with the state-run Global Times. Military affairs expert Zhang Junshe shared a similar opinion. He said the first wave of US strikes may not have been sufficient to destroy Iran's underground nuclear facilities. For instance, the Fordo site sits 90 metres beneath solid rock, making it extremely hard to penetrate. Although Israel views it as a key target, it lacks the capability to carry out an effective strike. Zhang explained that the US uses B-2 bombers armed with 30,000-pound GBU-57 bunker busters, which are believed to be able to penetrate only about 65 metres. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now He said that, in theory, two bombs used one after the other might be required—but this approach has never been publicly tested, so it's unclear how effective the first strike would actually be. Referring to the Iranian official's assertion to the BBC that Iran 'didn't suffer a major blow because the materials had already been taken out,' Zhang said, 'This further demonstrates the difficulty for the US military to completely destroy Iran's nuclear materials.' 'B-2 strategic bombers, armed with bunker-busting weapons, are far more powerful than the bombs and missiles carried by Israel's F-15, F-16, and F-35 fighter jets,' he added. 'Therefore, the damage inflicted by the US is undoubtedly far greater than what Israel could achieve. Against this backdrop, whether Iran's nuclear facilities can be preserved remains uncertain.' Li Zixin noted that this may not be the end of US action. 'In the coming days, the US may further escalate its attacks on key Iranian facilities,' he said. At the same time, he added, neither side wants the situation to spiral out of control. Therefore, US strikes are likely to remain limited in scope, focusing primarily on specific nuclear sites rather than launching large-scale attacks on Iran's other infrastructure.
