Hoax threat forced AI Delhi-bound flight to return to Phuket
Representational Image
NEW DELHI: 'FU. Bomb all.' This message written on a tissue paper inside the lav of Air India's Phuket-Delhi flight with over 160 people on board triggered a security alert, leading the Airbus A320 to return to origin on Friday.
Phuket International Airport in Thailand said AI 379 returned after the bomb threat was found in the lav. AI sources say a security alert led to the aircraft returning to Phuket.
AI 379 took off from Phuket at 9.15 am and returned there at 11.38 am, as per flight tracing sites. Subsequent checks showed that the threat was hoax and the flight was later cleared to leave for its destination at 4.28 pm (all timings local).
Indian carriers received hoax threats for almost 1,000 flights last year.
Stay informed with the latest
business
news, updates on
bank holidays
and
public holidays
.
AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
39 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Editors pick newsletter Accident Investigation Bureau recovers Blackbox of the Air India aircraft
Twenty-eight hours after the deadly Air India plane crash that killed 241 people on board, the Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) on Thursday recovered the black box that could provide crucial evidence about what caused the fatal occurrence. It was recovered from the wreckage of the aircraft – a part of which had barged into the roof of the BJ Medical College's hostel minutes after it took off from the Ahmedabad airport. The black box encases two critical data recording devices, that is, the Flight Data Recorder (FDR) and the Cockpit Voice Recorder (CVR). The latter records radio transmissions and sounds in the cockpit (such as engine noise or the pilot's voice) whilst the former monitors variables such as airspeed, altitude and direction. The two are considered particularly essential in reconstructing the chain of events that lead to an aircraft accident. Though called a 'black box', the metal case is usually orange, as the brighter colour makes it easier for it to be identified amid debris. The equipment is located at the tail of the aircraft – which happened to be the only part of the plane remaining intact in Thursday's fatal occurrence. The airplane crash in Gujarat's capital Ahmedabad is the first fatal accident of Boeing's Dreamliner family of planes. A team of U.S. National Transport Safety Board and aviation regulator, the Federal Aviation Authority, would assist AAIB in investigating the cause of one of the worst aviation disasters in the past decade. Further, India's aviation safety regulator, the Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) on Thursday issued fresh inspection guidelines for the airline's Boeing 787 Dreamliner fleet, which are powered by GE Aerospace's GEnx engines. The North American engine manufacturer maintained safety was their top priority extending support to the latest actions. The Hindu's Editorial The Hindu's Daily Quiz When will U.S. President Donald Trump's 90-day pause on his 'Liberation Day' tariff hikes end? June 30 July 9 July 1 July 2 To know the answer and to play the full quiz, click here.
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Antwerp court hears Mehul Choksi extradition plea, next hearing in August
An Antwerp court on Friday heard the arguments on Mehul Choksi's extradition to India, with detailed evidence presented by the investigators regarding the fugitive diamantaire's fraudulent activities while his legal team sought his release, according to people familiar with the development. Choksi is accused of siphoning off ₹6,097 crore from the Punjab National Bank and five other similar bank frauds before fleeing from India in January 2018and was arrested by Antwerp police on April 11, based on an extradition request sent by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI). He has already spent two months behind the bar there. On Friday, the court did not give any relief to him and the matter will now be heard in late August. As reported by HT last month, Indian investigators have submitted documentary evidence to the prosecutors in Belgium against Choksi in six bank frauds committed by him between 2018 and 2022 involving amounts totalling nearly ₹13,000 crore and court is already convinced that there is prima facie fear of him fleeing. An officer who didn't want to be named said that 'detailed arguments took place in the court on Friday but the court order was not out till late evening'. India has put forth arguments that Choksi is a habitual offender and jumps extradition proceedings wherever he is found, as seen in the US and Antigua and Barbuda, the officer cited above said. Choksi was tracked by the CBI to Belgium in July last year after which it approached the Belgian government with a formal extradition request. The extradition was sought under Indian Penal Code (IPC) sections – 120 B (criminal conspiracy), 201 (destruction of evidence), 409 (criminal breach of trust), 420 (cheating), 477A (falsification of accounts), and sections 7 and 13 (bribery) of the Prevention of Corruption Act. Besides, CBI also invoked the United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime (UNTOC) and United Nations Convention against Corruption (UNCAC) in its extradition request. The Belgium government examined India's request at various levels and approved initiating action in the matter after it was convinced about the 'dual criminality' clause in the 1901 extradition treaty between two countries. Choksi has evaded the CBI and the Enforcement Directorate (ED) — which is conducting a parallel money laundering probe — since 2018. After fleeing from India in January 2018, he acquired the citizenship of Antigua and Barbuda.
The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
Bombay HC defers Celebi's appeal against Mumbai Airport's contract termination, awaits Delhi HC ruling
The Bombay High Court on Friday (June 13, 2025) has adjourned till July 10, 2025, the hearing of the petition filed by Celebi NAS Airport Services India Pvt Ltd, a Turkish-Indian joint venture providing ground handling services for airlines at various Indian airports, that has challenged the termination of its services by the Mumbai International Airport Limited (MIAL). The firm that has been providing services at various Indian airports, has faced multiple legal battles in Mumbai, Delhi, Gujarat and Chennai. On Friday, a Division Bench of Justices B. P. Colabawalla and Firdosh Pooniwalla was informed that overall, seven airports in India have cancelled the services of the Turkish airlines services firm and its subsidiaries. Representing the Union government, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta submitted to the Bench that the Turkish aviation firm has already filed similar petitions in the Delhi High Court and the Madras High Court seeking relief. 'The Delhi High Court has reserved its order after hearing extensive arguments from both sides. Thus, the Madras High Court has passed an order stating it will await the judgment of the Delhi High Court, since similarly worded arguments are made before Delhi High Court and its findings will have an impact on the issues in all the petitions,' Mr. Mehta told the judges and requested the Bench to consider passing a similar order and defer its proceedings until the Delhi High Court pronounces its verdict. Appearing for Celebi, senior advocate Chetan Kapadia, agreed with the Solicitor General's submission. The Bench considered the request and noted that it will wait for the Delhi High Court's verdict and adjourned the hearing till July 10, 2025. On May 26, 2025, the Bombay High Court restrained MIAL from finalising bids on May 17, to appoint a new agency and replace Çelebi's subsidiary for ground and bridge handling services at Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj International Airport. The High Court said that its order will operate until the matter is heard by a regular Bench after the vacation. Celebi moved the Bombay High Court after the Bureau of Civil Aviation Security (BCAS), under the Ministry of Civil Aviation, revoked its security clearance on the grounds of national security, amid heightened diplomatic tensions between India and Turkey, particularly over Turkey's stand in support of Pakistan during the Operation Sindoor. Celebi has filed three petitions, challenging the Centre's decision to revoke the security clearance and contract termination by the MIAL, terming the termination 'arbitrary' and 'illegal'.
