logo
Trump and Conservatives Lead Attack on Clean Water

Trump and Conservatives Lead Attack on Clean Water

Yahoo06-04-2025

President Donald Trump, Republicans, and conservatives at the Supreme Court are escalating a decades-long assault on clean water protections. Through deregulations and cuts at the Environmental Protection Agency, Supreme Court rulings, executive orders, and bills in Congress, conservatives are systematically eroding rules that have successfully granted Americans clean water.
These changes fit into a wider attack on environmental protections by the Trump administration that serve to benefit major polluters and industry. Reduced protections for clean water will affect all Americans, but particularly in low-income communities, communities of color, and rural communities.
'It's a callous disregard for how these actions impact people and their access to safe water,' Mary Grant, Public Water for All Campaign Director at the nonprofit Food and Water Watch, tells Rolling Stone.
In March, EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin said he will look to significantly reduce a significant portion of the waterways, such as wetlands, rivers, and streams, that are protected under the Clean Water Act, a 1972 law that regulates the discharge of pollutants in water. A memo from the EPA emphasized that it would be minimizing the water covered by the Clean Water Act and enforcing their interpretation of a 2023 Supreme Court ruling, Sackett v. Environmental Protection Agency. The Sackett decision found that millions of acres of wetlands — more than half — are not protected by the law, meaning that a permit is no longer needed to dump pollutants or destroy wetlands by filling them.
'This is to simply follow the rule of law,' Zeldin said. 'We're not looking for this to be a pingpong anymore. What we're looking for is to simply follow the guidance of Sackett.'
'There's a pretty basic attack against the Clean Water Act by industry and the Trump administration, and it's been going on for years,' Drew Caputo, vice president of litigation for lands, wildlife, and oceans at the nonprofit Earthjustice, tells Rolling Stone. 'It was a feature of the first Trump administration, and they made really clear already that they're going to try and attack clean water protections in an aggressive way.'
The definition of waters covered by the Clean Water Act has grown and shrunk for years. In 2015, President Barack Obama issued a regulation that clarified two previous Supreme Court rulings, establishing that the EPA has authority over smaller bodies of water like streams and wetlands. Then, in 2019, Trump repealed the measure. In 2022, President Joe Biden's EPA reversed Trump's move, going back to the rules that preceded Obama. In 2023, the Supreme Court issued the Sackett ruling that led Biden to weaken protections for wetlands. And in March, the Supreme Court ruled on a case about San Francisco dumping sewage into the Pacific Ocean that further weakened the Clean Water Act.
'That the Trump EPA is saying it wants to go back to the drawing board again' by revisiting the law's scope 'indicates to me that they're only going to interpret the already restrictive decision even more restrictively and try to exclude more waters from federal jurisdiction,' Emily Miller, staff attorney at advocacy group Food and Water Watch, tells Rolling Stone.
The Clean Water Act is 'the most successful environmental law in America,' Caputo says. 'So we're in a situation where efforts to weaken clean water protections are not only terrible public policy, because all Americans need and deserve clean water, it's also a situation where we would be snatching defeat from the jaws of victory by weakening protections for clean water.'
Sackett involved an Idaho couple, Chantell and Michael Sackett, who were building a home on a vacant lot that included wetlands protected by the EPA. Despite not having the necessary permit, the couple, who ran an excavation company, dumped gravel into the wetlands so they could build on it. The EPA toldthe Sacketts to undo the damage and stop construction. In response, the Sacketts sued. The Supreme Court decided that waters that did not have a 'continuous surface connection' to major lakes and rivers were not subject to the Clean Water Act, leaving many wetlands, which may have underground connections to major lakes and rivers, unprotected.
Wetlands are important because they create clean water by filtering pollutants and they can absorb flood water. Many endangered and threatened species rely on wetlands for their habitats. The EPA estimated that more than 60 percent of wetlands lost protections under Sackett.
The Sacketts were represented by the conservative Pacific Legal Foundation, which Earthjustice calls 'a pro-industry group that seeks to dismantle key environmental protections.'
The Clean Water Act 'drives industry crazy,' Caputo says. 'It's agribusiness, it's property developers, it's the oil and gas guys. A whole suite of industry is really hostile to protections for wetlands.'
The law requires that someone obtain a permit before discharging a pollutant from a pipe, tunnel, or other 'discrete conveyance' into water.
'That's become the cost of doing business and industry doesn't like the cost,' Caputo adds.
Zeldin argued in a statement last month that the Biden administration's previous definition of waters covered under the Clean Water Act 'placed unfair burdens on the American people' and added costs for businesses. He claimed the Trump EPA will 'protect America's water resources consistent with the law of the land while empowering American farmers, landowners, entrepreneurs, and families.'
Conservative lawmakers have similarly framed the Trump administration's water deregulation as benefiting everyday people. Rep. Doug LaMalfa (R-Calif.) said in response to the EPA's changes that Biden and Barack Obama's policies had caused issues for farmers and ranchers.
'It's not every mud puddle that they should regulate,' he said. 'If you can float a rubber duck in it for a half-hour after the rain, that does not mean this is something they can regulate.'
Zippy Duvall, president of the lobbying group the American Farm Bureau Federation, also praised the Trump EPA's move. 'I'm a farmer and I need a rule that's on one page, that is sitting on the dash of my truck right next to my devotional book, and if I have a question about a ravine on my farm, I can pick that one page up, read it, and interpret it myself,' Duvall said.
But the EPA's water moves serve to benefit industry above all, experts say.
'There is little ambiguity in EPA's announcement,' Mark Sabath, senior attorney at the nonprofit Southern Environmental Law Center, said in a statement. 'We hear no concern for the health of people who depend on clean drinking water, or the safety of communities that rely on wetlands to slow flooding. Further weakening federal clean water protections may be what large polluters and wealthy developers want, but it is not what everyday people want — either in the South or throughout the nation.'
Caputo says there are still some ways to fight back.
'If you're somebody like me who wants to protect those wetlands, there are really two ways to do it,' he says. 'One is to have Congress pass a law that reinstates the protections for those 50 million acres. The other is to have individual states do that at the state level. So in the wake of the Sackett decision, we are pursuing both courses of action.'
The Supreme Court's conservative supermajority further attacked the Clean Water Act in March when it decided a case about San Francisco dumping sewage into the Pacific Ocean. As a result, the EPA's ability to stipulate certain basic requirements as part of permits was limited.
'It's a decision that I think showcases the Supreme Court's open hostility towards clean water protections, and what it does is it makes it harder for EPA and state regulators to protect water quality if the Clean Water Act requires, because it takes away an important tool that regulators have routinely used in the past to achieve water quality protection,' says Miller, of Food and Water Watch.
The case looked at the level of authority that the EPA and state regulators have to make polluters follow the rules. Before the ruling, the EPA would put restrictions in permits called end-result requirements — or provisions that generally 'prohibit pollution discharges that violate water quality standards,' according to Miller.
These provisions were meant to serve as a backstop to make sure that their rules are followed. The Supreme Court ruled that these end-result requirements are beyond the EPA's authority. As such, the EPA and state regulators must now issue more specific conditions for each permit, which takes time and money.
'In practice, I see this decision as making it a lot more difficult and time consuming and expensive for regulators to issue protective water pollution permits, and it may unfortunately lead to weaker water pollution permitting overall,' Miller says.
As was the case in Sackett, industry backed the polluter, San Francisco.
'It is unusual that one of the most liberal cities in the country would bring a lawsuit all the way to the Supreme Court that essentially weakens a really important environmental law,' Miller says. 'And you might not be surprised to know that they were supported in their challenge by a number of industry lobby groups that represented fossil fuels and mining and industrial agriculture interests, because this decision and this type of weakening of EPA power benefits those polluters immensely.'
The Supreme Court's decisions favor 'industrial polluter interests and works to the disadvantage of the American public that relies on water for drinking, for recreation, for all sorts of things that are now at risk,' Miller adds.
Meanwhile, the EPA's broader deregulation agenda threatens clean water protections as well. More than 30 actions that the EPA announced affect water pollution, air pollution, and climate emissions from fossil fuel plants. Trump also issued an executive order that said for every rule an agency issues, it must repeal 10 rules.
One such handout to the fossil fuel industry: The EPA is looking to change rules concerning wastewater created as a byproduct of oil and gas extraction. The agency will consider expanding circumstances where this wastewater can be used and discharged.
'EPA is playing a central role delivering on President Trump's energy agenda,' Zeldin said in a statement. 'EPA will revise wastewater regulations from the 1970s that do not reflect modern capability to treat and reuse water for good. As a result, we will lower production costs for oil and gas extraction to boost American energy while increasing water supplies and protecting water quality.'
Trump's Office of Management and Budget separately withdrew a proposed EPA rule to set limits on the discharge of PFAS forever chemicals in wastewater. The administration did so based on Trump's executive order on Day One freezing all regulations in progress pending review.
Trump and Elon Musk, the billionaire leading Trump's so-called Department of Government Efficiency, also want to make major cuts to the EPA's budget and workforce. These cuts would threaten Clean Water and Drinking Water State Revolving Funds, which provide major funding for local water infrastructure.
'I think a lot of industries view the EPA as just being in the way of what they want to do,' Caputo says. 'And so there's a bit of a right-wing fantasy playing out right now, which is to get rid of this agency whose sole job it is to deliver clean water and clean air to people, and to get them out of industry's way.'
But, he adds, 'the laws are still on the books.'
And in Congress, House Speaker Mike Johnson's recent stopgap spending law includes cuts to a program that helps communities have access to clean water. Its cuts to the U.S. Department of Agriculture include the Rural Water and Waste Disposal assistance program, which provides funding to rural communities for 'clean and reliable drinking water systems, sanitary sewage disposal, sanitary solid waste disposal, and storm water drainage,' according to the USDA.
At the USDA, a leaked memo published by More Perfect Union showed that the Agricultural Research Service has banned many words and phrases from agreements and contracts — including 'environmental justice,' 'climate,' and 'safe drinking water.'
'The Trump administration has tried to turn the term 'environmental justice' into a bad word that shall not be spoken, but the people that will be overwhelmingly and disproportionately burdened by these types of decisions are frontline communities,' Miller says.
The EPA moved to close its Environmental Justice Offices in March. These offices worked on pollution in poor communities and communities of color.
'Industry and industrial polluters tend to concentrate in particular areas, usually low income communities of color or rural, isolated areas that don't really have the political power to fight them off. And so you know, decisions that let industrial polluters run wild will be felt in those communities. And simply removing the words environmental justice from the website, and you know, getting rid of the Environmental Justice Office and the EPA is not going to change that reality. It's just going to hide it,' Miller adds.
Republican lawmakers also want to repeal the Lead Out of Water rule, which Biden issued last October and 'was a massive victory in protecting public health against this neurotoxin, which is especially dangerous for children,' according to Food and Water Watch. The rule required that lead pipes in drinking systems be replaced within 10 years. Rep. Gary Palmer (R-Ala.) introduced the repeal legislation in January.
This kind of change will have lasting consequences.
'We are very worried that if Congress repeals lead and copper rule improvements… we'll never be able to mandate removal of all these toxic lead service lines ever again,' Grant says.
If this wide variety of actions in the White House, in Congress, at the EPA, at the Supreme Court, and elsewhere seems overwhelming, that's on purpose, Grant adds.
She says Trump and Republicans are deliberately 'flooding the zone, doing a lot all at once to kind of hamstring opposition,' explaining: 'It's hard to keep track of, it overwhelms media attention, it's hard to know where to focus. This massive influx of all these executive orders so fast, all these actions so fast, is intentional, and it's designed to prevent people from falling into question every illegal action that's taken, every harmful action that's taken.'
'This agenda to deregulate, this agenda to gut the federal government, to dismantle the federal government, eliminate core functions of our government, remove these protections,' Grant says, 'it's just an ideology, and they're acting on it without without care for how it impacts people, for how it impacts our access to safe water… Everyone needs access to safe water, and it's harming communities across the country.'
More from Rolling Stone
Anti-Trump Protesters Assemble in Every State and Cities Worldwide
How Trump's CDC Purge Will Affect Reproductive Health: 'Women Will Die'
This Scientist Wants Us to Combat the Climate Crisis by Thinking Like a Woman
Best of Rolling Stone
The Useful Idiots New Guide to the Most Stoned Moments of the 2020 Presidential Campaign
Anatomy of a Fake News Scandal
The Radical Crusade of Mike Pence

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Mayor Bass, regional mayors call for end to ICE raids in Southern California: "Our communities are not battlegrounds"
Mayor Bass, regional mayors call for end to ICE raids in Southern California: "Our communities are not battlegrounds"

CBS News

time17 minutes ago

  • CBS News

Mayor Bass, regional mayors call for end to ICE raids in Southern California: "Our communities are not battlegrounds"

After days of violent and destructive protests in Los Angeles, fueled by an increase in immigration enforcement operations, Mayor Karen Bass and other regional mayors called for an end to Immigration and Customs Enforcement raids. At a news conference Wednesday morning, Bass said the unrest in a portion of Los Angeles started last Friday after immigration operations were carried out in several parts of Southern California. Bass told reporters that LA and surrounding cities were "peaceful" before the raids. Mayor Karen Bass called on the Trump administration to end the immigration enforcement operations taking place across the Southern California region. KCAL News She explained that the raids have caused fear in immigrant communities, and accused President Trump of worsening the situation when he ordered the deployment of National Guard and U.S. Marine troops. She called for an end to ICE raids and the federalization of troops. "When you start deploying federalized troops on the heels of these raids, it is a drastic and chaotic escalation and completely unnecessary," Bass said. Mr. Trump posted on his Truth Social platform, claiming that his decision to deploy troops to LA saved the city from burning to the ground. "The great people of Los Angeles are very lucky that I made the decision to go in and help!!!," he wrote. Her speech came a day after she implemented a curfew in a portion of downtown LA after five consecutive nights of demonstrations, which have escalated to clashes between protesters and law enforcement officers, as well as hundreds of arrests. Since the start of the protests, parts of downtown LA have been covered in graffiti, businesses have been looted and public property has been vandalized. TOPSHOT - A car burns as a demonstrator waves a Mexican national flag during a protest following federal immigration operations, in the Compton neighborhood of Los Angeles, California on June 7, 2025. RINGO CHIU/AFP via Getty Images During an interview Wednesday morning on CBS Los Angeles, Bass explained that the curfew will be extended until it is necessary to ensure public safety. The curfew currently runs for one square mile in the downtown area from the 5 Freeway to the 110 Freeway and from the 10 Freeway to where the 110 Freeway and 5 Freeway merge from 8 p.m. to 6 a.m. Bass has also taken to social media to share how the raids are affecting the city. In a post on X, she wrote, "Angelenos are trying to live their lives—going to work, caring for their families—while facing the constant threat of sudden immigration crackdowns." Other mayors from across Southern California joined Bass, calling for an end to the ICE raids. The Mayor of Huntington Park, Arturo Flores, a U.S. Marine Corps combat veteran, told reporters that the military neighborhoods. "The deployment of Marines on our U.S. soil is an alarming escalation that undermines the values of democracy," Flores said. "Our communities are not battle grounds." Flores said the ICE raids being carried out in his community and others across the region are a form of intimidation that traumatizes hardworking residents. He said fear-based tactics are being used to target immigrant communities. The Mayor of Paramount, Peggy Lemons, added that residents are choosing not to leave their homes or send their children to school out of fear that ICE will take them away. "For many in our city, this has been the most devastating time in recent memory," Lemons said. She said immigrants, who play such an important role in the makeup of the region, should not have to live in constant fear.

State Department orders departure of nonessential staff from Baghdad embassy
State Department orders departure of nonessential staff from Baghdad embassy

Yahoo

time19 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

State Department orders departure of nonessential staff from Baghdad embassy

The State Department is ordering the departure of all nonessential staff from its embassy in Baghdad due to concern over increased security risks in the region, according to two State Department officials familiar with the matter. "President Trump is committed to keeping Americans safe, both at home and abroad. In keeping with that commitment, we are constantly assessing the appropriate personnel posture at all our embassies," one of the officials said. "Based on our latest analysis, we decided to reduce our Mission in Iraq." The embassy already has a very limited number of nonessential employees, so the order is not expected to impact many individuals. Under the current plan, one official said the U.S. military would not be involved in transporting the nonessential personnel out of the country, but that those plans could change if the situation on the ground calls for it. Another U.S. official said that Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has authorized the voluntary departure of military dependents from locations across the Middle East as tensions ratchet up between Israel and Iran. -ABC News' Luis Martinez and Anne Flaherty contributed to this report. State Department orders departure of nonessential staff from Baghdad embassy originally appeared on

Entire Fulbright Scholarship board quits, citing Trump admin actions
Entire Fulbright Scholarship board quits, citing Trump admin actions

Yahoo

time19 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Entire Fulbright Scholarship board quits, citing Trump admin actions

All members of the Fulbright Foreign Scholarship Board announced their resignation on Wednesday, releasing a statement accusing President Donald Trump's administration of political interference in the prestigious exchange program. The 12-member board alleged the Trump administration "usurped the authority of the Board" by denying Fulbright awards to "a substantial number of individuals" who were selected for the 2025-2026 academic year. The board also alleged the administration is currently "subjecting" an additional 1,200 international Fulbright recipients to "an unauthorized review process and could reject more." "We believe these actions not only contradict the statute but are antithetical to the Fulbright mission and the values, including free speech and academic freedom, that Congress specified in the statute," the board said in its statement. MORE: State Department delivers crushing news to Fulbright scholar hopefuls in Afghanistan The board oversees the Fulbright Foreign Student Program, which offers international graduate students, young professionals and artists the opportunity to study and conduct research in the United States. The government-funded, non-partisan program -- which was established by Congress in 1942 under then-President Harry Truman's administration -- operates in more than 160 countries worldwide, providing scholarships to approximately 4,000 foreign students annually. In the joint letter on Wednesday, the board said the awards that were overridden by the administration were concentrated in biology, engineering, architecture, agriculture, crop sciences, animal sciences, biochemistry, medical sciences, music and history. MORE: State Dept. suggests Afghan Fulbright hopefuls seek other options as program stalls The board claimed it has raised "legal issues and our strong objections with" senior Trump administration officials "on multiple occasions," including in writing, but says the concerns have not been acknowledged. In a statement to statement to ABC News after the board announced its resignation, a senior State Department official called the decision "a political stunt attempting to undermine President Trump." "It's ridiculous to believe that these members would continue to have final say over the application process, especially when it comes to determining academic suitability and alignment with President Trump's Executive Orders." the official said. The board, however, said in its statement that the decision was not one "we take lightly," woth the board calling on Congress, the courts and future Fulbright Boards to "prevent the administration's efforts to degrade, dismantle, or even eliminate one of our nation's most respected and valuable programs." "Injecting politics and ideological mandates into the Fulbright program violates the letter and spirit of the law that Congress so wisely established nearly eight decades ago," the board concluded in its statement. Entire Fulbright Scholarship board quits, citing Trump admin actions originally appeared on

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store