Northwest Busway Will Transform Auckland's Western Suburbs
Press Release – EMA
The decision today by the NZ Transport Agency to endorse the Northwest Busway investment case is welcome news for West Auckland residents, says EMA's Head of Advocacy, Alan McDonald.
'We've seen the success of the Northern Busway in significantly reducing traffic on the Auckland Harbour Bridge,' he says.
'There is no doubt that the Northwest Busway will have a similarly transformative impact on Auckland's burgeoning north-western suburbs.'
Today's decision follows other significant infrastructure announcements by the government this week, including the preferred corridor for a four-lane connection over the Brynderwyn Hills to Whangārei, as well as the Tauriko four-laning and Takitimu North projects in Tauranga.
'Together, these major roading projects will generate thousands of jobs and provide much needed work for the construction sector.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Otago Daily Times
4 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Slow supermarket competition progress
Reading reports of Grocery Commissioner Pierre van Heerden's concerns last week about the supermarket giants was like hearing the message there is an unexpected item in the bagging area at the self-checkout. Frustrating noise which is all too familiar. Shoppers would have lost track of how many years it is since they read/heard about the unfair tactics employed by the giant supermarkets when dealing with suppliers, the difficulty of small players such as dairies getting access to wholesale goods at reasonable prices, and the question of whether special prices are really what they seem. Those still struggling to pay at the checkout could be forgiven for asking if much has changed since the final report on the market study of the grocery sector from the Commerce Commission more than three years ago. Whatever has occurred in the aftermath of that has not had the trickle-down effect of reducing shoppers' weekly spending or doing enough to alter the behaviour of the three big players, Woolworths, Foodstuffs North Island, and Foodstuffs South Island. Last year the grocery commissioner was scathing about the lack of progress towards improving competition and, as well as a review of the Grocery Supply Code, which was introduced in September 2023, he decided to take another look at the wholesaling behaviour of the giant companies. Mr van Heerden has reported back on both questions. In his draft review of the code, he proposes strengthening it to stop retailers insisting smaller suppliers take on costs and risks best managed by the retailers themselves. This would include not allowing retailers to charge suppliers for stocking shelves or for goods that deteriorate and become unfit for sale while in the supermarkets' control. The commissioner is worried the power imbalance between the two groups "creates a reluctance among suppliers to push back on supermarket demands or behaviour for fear of damaging relationships or losing access to supermarket shelves". Among his proposed changes is prohibiting retailers from retaliating against suppliers who exercise their rights under the code. The type of behaviour he is still grappling with should have been sorted out long before now. Suppliers have been complaining about bullying take-it-or-leave-it deals for years. On the wholesaling question, one of the changes Mr van Heerden wants is for the major supermarkets to expand their wholesale product range and pass promotional funding through to their wholesale customers so other retailers can access lower prices. Again, this is a problem flagged years ago, and we wonder why he is allowing the big three another 12 months to voluntarily sort it out before he moves to seek regulatory change. This year, there has also been much enthusiasm from Economic Growth Minister Nicola Willis about attracting a new major player to provide much-needed competition and ultimately force prices down for shoppers. But it is still difficult not to be sceptical about the chance of her efforts succeeding without some direct intervention by the government which might include such measures as carving off existing brands owned by the giants into separate businesses, splitting wholesale and retail provision of groceries, or other divestment options. If her party was of a mind to head down any sort of interventionist path it would likely have the support of coalition partner New Zealand First, which has railed against the supermarket giants' stranglehold. In its coalition agreement it requires the government to "explore options to strengthen the powers of the Grocery Commissioner, to improve competitiveness, and to address the lack of a third entrant to remove the market power of a duopoly". However, newly minted deputy prime minister and leader of Act New Zealand David Seymour, who voted against the introduction of a grocery commissioner, would be more difficult to persuade. His previously expressed view is that the way to increase competition is to cut back "thickets of regulation" dissuading new entrants, whether in overseas investment, resource management or labour laws. In such a political climate, the sort of change which could push prices down and mean something to the hapless shopper still seems millions of barcode scans away.
Scoop
6 days ago
- Scoop
WorkSafe Changes A Welcome Step Towards Modern, Supportive Regulation
Press Release – EMA The changes – including a new letter of expectations, a restructured funding model, and a legislative rewrite of the regulators core purpose – represent a significant shift in the approach to health and safety regulation in New Zealand. The change in focus for WorkSafe New Zealand is long overdue and should assist employers in keeping workers safer while having fewer concerns about being punished, says the Employers and Manufacturers Association (EMA). The changes – including a new letter of expectations, a restructured funding model, and a legislative rewrite of the regulator's core purpose – represent a significant shift in the approach to health and safety regulation in New Zealand. The EMA has long advocated for a more balanced, collaborative model that fosters partnership and practical support for employers and workers. 'Hello, what can we do to help?' may be the new greeting from a WorkSafe inspector, says EMA Manager of Employment Relations & Safety Paul Jarvie. 'These reforms will help modernise WorkSafe into a regulator that promotes compliance through education rather than fear,' he says. 'This is a welcome and necessary change. For years, businesses – particularly small and medium-sized enterprises – have felt they were being policed rather than supported. 'We've heard consistently from our members that the culture of enforcement-first created a climate of fear and concealment, rather than clarity and cooperation. This meant businesses were reluctant to call in WorkSafe for assistance because they were worried about simply being fined without getting the help or guidance they originally sought to avoid or manage a potential risk in the workplace. 'That feedback has come through strongly from our members for many years and Minister van Velden heard the concerns during her roadshow events with small to medium businesses last year. The EMA has been calling for a shift towards an enabling, advisory-based regulator – and it's pleasing to see the government respond.' The announcement includes a redefinition of WorkSafe's role, with a greater emphasis on early engagement, targeted guidance, and clear, consistent advice. Updating and streamlining more than 50 guidance documents and re-prioritising critical risk areas are among the first steps being taken. 'Cleaning up of WorkSafe advice documents is long overdue and must continue,' Jarvie says. 'Clear expectations, consistent advice, and a shared goal of risk reduction should be the foundation of our health and safety system. New Zealand workplaces are safer when employers and regulators work in partnership.' The EMA also supports the move to involve industries more directly in developing Approved Codes of Practice, with WorkSafe providing guidance and oversight. 'Industry knows its risks best,' says Jarvie. 'Empowering businesses to help shape the standards they work to – with proper regulatory oversight – is a smart, pragmatic approach that will deliver better compliance and ultimately, better outcomes for workers.' The EMA assisted the Minister 's review roadshow and found strong support from our members for these changes. The EMA is actively involved in supporting our members to meet and surpass their health and safety obligations through our comprehensive training programme. The EMA looks forward to continuing to work with the government, WorkSafe, Unions and other key stakeholders to ensure the transition achieves its intended purpose: a modern, fit-for-purpose regulator focused on outcomes, not bureaucracy.
Scoop
6 days ago
- Scoop
WorkSafe Changes A Welcome Step Towards Modern, Supportive Regulation
The change in focus for WorkSafe New Zealand is long overdue and should assist employers in keeping workers safer while having fewer concerns about being punished, says the Employers and Manufacturers Association (EMA). The changes - including a new letter of expectations, a restructured funding model, and a legislative rewrite of the regulator's core purpose - represent a significant shift in the approach to health and safety regulation in New Zealand. The EMA has long advocated for a more balanced, collaborative model that fosters partnership and practical support for employers and workers. 'Hello, what can we do to help?' may be the new greeting from a WorkSafe inspector, says EMA Manager of Employment Relations & Safety Paul Jarvie. "These reforms will help modernise WorkSafe into a regulator that promotes compliance through education rather than fear," he says. "This is a welcome and necessary change. For years, businesses - particularly small and medium-sized enterprises - have felt they were being policed rather than supported. "We've heard consistently from our members that the culture of enforcement-first created a climate of fear and concealment, rather than clarity and cooperation. This meant businesses were reluctant to call in WorkSafe for assistance because they were worried about simply being fined without getting the help or guidance they originally sought to avoid or manage a potential risk in the workplace. "That feedback has come through strongly from our members for many years and Minister van Velden heard the concerns during her roadshow events with small to medium businesses last year. The EMA has been calling for a shift towards an enabling, advisory-based regulator - and it's pleasing to see the government respond." The announcement includes a redefinition of WorkSafe's role, with a greater emphasis on early engagement, targeted guidance, and clear, consistent advice. Updating and streamlining more than 50 guidance documents and re-prioritising critical risk areas are among the first steps being taken. "Cleaning up of WorkSafe advice documents is long overdue and must continue," Jarvie says. "Clear expectations, consistent advice, and a shared goal of risk reduction should be the foundation of our health and safety system. New Zealand workplaces are safer when employers and regulators work in partnership." The EMA also supports the move to involve industries more directly in developing Approved Codes of Practice, with WorkSafe providing guidance and oversight. "Industry knows its risks best," says Jarvie. "Empowering businesses to help shape the standards they work to - with proper regulatory oversight - is a smart, pragmatic approach that will deliver better compliance and ultimately, better outcomes for workers." The EMA assisted the Minister 's review roadshow and found strong support from our members for these changes. The EMA is actively involved in supporting our members to meet and surpass their health and safety obligations through our comprehensive training programme. The EMA looks forward to continuing to work with the government, WorkSafe, Unions and other key stakeholders to ensure the transition achieves its intended purpose: a modern, fit-for-purpose regulator focused on outcomes, not bureaucracy.
