Labour has wiped out Thatcher's legacy
The Thatcherite dream finally died this month. Margaret Thatcher's 11 years in office had a long afterlife, perhaps longer than that of any prime minister other than Clement Attlee.
She reimagined both her own party and indeed that of her Labour opponents. There would have been no Blairite interregnum in the socialist party's relentless 'egalitarianism before all else' philosophy without her. Even more significantly, Mrs Thatcher transformed British society – at least for a while.
But 35 years after leaving Downing Street for the last time, Thatcherism has finally expired. The Iron Lady's legacy has not managed to survive the vicissitudes of Keir Starmer's Government. With the renationalisation of South Western Railway as the next step towards the full state ownership of Britain's railways, that moment has come to an end.
Rail privatisation, only enacted in 1993 when John Major was prime minister and implemented amid the last gasps of 18 years of Tory rule, was a late flowering of the valiant attempt to roll back the frontiers of the state. Its implementation was bodged and the infrastructure soon fell back into public ownership in 2002.
The privatisation programme started slowly in Mrs Thatcher's first term with various sell-offs, most notably the flotation of 51pc of British Aerospace in 1981. It really took off and grabbed the public imagination with the float of British Telecom in 1984. Millions of people on ordinary incomes caught the bug for investing in shares and these sales were hugely oversubscribed.
Privatisation was not just an attempt to inject dynamism into the British economy, although it undoubtedly achieved this.
Thatcherism has been denounced by the Left as an attempt to transform the very ethos of the UK, to dismantle the collectivist assumptions that had taken hold since the Second World War. They pillory Mrs Thatcher for declaring that there is no such thing as society (she never said it) and that we owe our fellow citizens nothing in terms of social solidarity (she did not believe that either). The Left are wrong in this caricature, but they are right to say that Thatcherism was an attempt to fundamentally change our country's character. And privatisation – alongside council house sales – was a cornerstone of this mission.
At the 1985 Tory party conference Mrs Thatcher declared that she hoped a day would come 'where owning shares is as common as having a car'. She saw that by spreading the benefits of ownership, both of people's homes but also of the country's assets, Britain could become an entrepreneurial society; a country where bosses and workers saw themselves as in conflict could become one where all strived for affluence.
In short, Mrs Thatcher hoped Britain would have an American future, where the accumulation of wealth was seen as a virtue, not a sin.
She believed that once people have a proprietorial stake in the country – be that via owning their council house or possessing a few hundred shares in BP or British Steel – old class antagonisms would over time wither away.
The Left saw these privatisations as a bribe; just as council house sales were discounted, shares were deliberately underpriced so the public could make a quick buck. And they are right in this analysis, but it was not an electoral bung but rather a strategy to change public attitudes.
Perhaps the apotheosis of this was the 1986 'Tell Sid' advertising campaign for the sale of British Gas. Its message was unapologetic: these flotations are for everyone. And it worked, those owning shares directly rose from around three million people in 1979, or around 7pc of adults, to over 12 million, or nearly a quarter of adults, when Mrs Thatcher left office.
This was further augmented by the big demutualisations of the late 1990s – Abbey National in 1989, Northern Rock in 1997 and Standard Life in 2006.
This trend has reversed. The proportion of UK-listed shares directly owned by UK-resident individuals was 10.8pc at the end of 2022, down from 12pc just two years earlier.
Today 57.7pc of UK shares by value are owned by overseas investors, a record high. If you go back to the 1960s, those figures are reversed with 54pc of shares owned by British individuals. This had fallen to 28pc by 1981. Mrs Thatcher did not reverse the overall trend in a declining percentage of the stock market being directly owned by individuals, but did vastly increase the number of people owning those shares.
The long-term decline is not an entirely negative one. The days when the well-off would buy, say, £10,000 of Marks & Spencer shares and then hold them for 40 years are gone. And that is not a bad thing; pooled investment funds are clearly a far wiser and less risky route for investment for most people than simply buying individual blue chip stocks and holding them for the long term.
Additionally, it is inevitable as so many of the privatised and demutualised companies have been taken over, bought by private equity or are no longer with us for other reasons.
But more broadly, the agenda of popular capitalism has been reversed. The decline has been long and gradual, but has been vastly accelerated by Starmer's Government. One of its early actions in office was to hugely cut the discount that council tenants receive on buying their home. In London the maximum discount was reduced in November from £136,400 to £16,000.
Mrs Thatcher's 1980s dream of making Britain more laissez-faire and more American in attitude is now sadly dead. Labour has deliberately extinguished it.
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Times
an hour ago
- New York Times
Crystal Palace Transfer DealSheet: Summer window latest, key targets and likely exits
Crystal Palace will enter the summer looking to prepare and build a squad for the Europa League next season and seeking to atone for errors made this year. Manager Oliver Glasner repeatedly referenced the late arrival of players, both returning from international competitions but also transfers, as a factor behind the club's worst start to a Premier League season, before it was turned round into an FA Cup-winning campaign in which they achieved their highest Premier League points total. Advertisement He will look to have additions earlier than last year and Palace will have to improve their strength in depth to account for the extra fixtures. They have several key players who will likely be in demand and decisions will have to made on whether to sell and how much they can realistically expect to command for those talents. Those decisions will heavily influence what happens this summer. This is up in the air after the departure of former sporting director Dougie Freedman in March, with Palace having considered replacements and a possible restructuring of their recruitment department. Chairman Steve Parish will be at the head of decisions, setting the budget and having the final call on the strategy. Freedman's assistant, Ben Stevens, who has been with the club since 2015 — originally as head of performance analysis before stepping up alongside Freedman last July — has stepped in to partly fill the void. Iain Moody, who has worked as a consultant at the club for several years and who worked closely alongside Freedman, albeit more in the negotiation process for new and existing players rather than identifying new talent, will also provide some sense of consistency. Freedman built a team working behind him that remains in place and will continue. Freedman will inevitably be consulted to some extent as well, despite his new role in Saudi Arabia. This depends on outgoings. The initial plan is to sign a goalkeeper as back-up to Dean Henderson. There has been a desperate need to sign another left wing-back to provide cover and competition for Tyrick Mitchell. There is no obvious cover for the 25-year-old. Should Marc Guehi, who has only a year left on his contract, leave this summer, Palace will look to sign two centre-backs. Chadi Riad, originally seen as a possible successor, should return in the early part of the season from rupturing his ACL. Advertisement Regardless of whether Eberechi Eze is sold, they will look to bring in another No 10, with Matheus Franca having struggled to make an impact and Romain Esse inexperienced. They could add a second No 10 if a club meets Eze's release clause, but they will also target a centre-midfielder. Cheick Doucoure is expected to be available for pre-season after his meniscus injury, and adding another midfielder would provide Palace with cover and depth. There is hope Jean-Philippe Mateta will stay, given he has two years remaining on his contract, but if he does depart another striker would be a necessity, with only Eddie Nketiah available. Glasner's preference is for players who can come in and make an impact quickly, or adapt with relative ease over a short period of time. He pushed last summer for the signings of Maxence Lacroix and Daichi Kamada, both of whom he had worked with at Wolfsburg and Eintracht Frankfurt, respectively. Glasner wants a squad that is quick to acclimatise to each other and to the hefty physical demands of his system. That does not automatically discount young players, and he is not against promoting youth — Justin Devenny's progress this season is testament to that, even if he was a player bought from Scottish side Airdrieonians — but his priority is for more experienced players. Palace are primarily looking for younger players who have the potential to improve but already have some experience. Southampton midfielder Mateus Fernandes would fit that profile, having been linked with Palace. The Chelsea midfielder Andrey Santos has also been mentioned and, at 21 with almost 100 professional appearances, would suit Palace. But that would be a difficult deal to do with Chelsea keen to keep him having impressed on loan with Strasbourg. They are targeting centre-backs in Italy and Spain, while they have built excellent contacts in France. Odsonne Edouard has failed to make any impact on loan with Leicester City and is not seen as a player who can make a significant contribution. He will move on if they can find a suitor who is prepared to meet the striker's wage demands. He has only a year remaining so would not command a high fee. The 23-year-old midfielder Naouirou Ahamada is not in the club's long-term plans. A rare tick in the miss column for Freedman, Ahamada was loaned to Ligue 1 side Rennes and played only six times. Advertisement Forward Jesurun Rak-Sakyi, 22, scored seven times across 37 appearances on loan with Sheffield United this season, but is not viewed by Glasner as a player who could be a core part of his squad. They originally sought a fee around the £20million that Ipswich Town paid Chelsea for Omari Hutchinson, but that seems a stretch. They could sell Guehi if he continues to show no inclination to sign a new deal. Given the rigours of seven extra games next season, it seems unlikely anyone will be loaned out. Devenny might have been a possibility, but he has done well enough to be kept as part of the first-team squad. Palace might have looked to loan out Franca to ensure sufficient minutes, but he too may now be required in the first team given their extended campaign. Some of the Under-21 side will be loaned out. Hindolo Mustapha has interest, as does Asher Agbinone, who spent time with Gillingham this season. There have been conversations with clubs and the background work has been ongoing for months, but nothing is imminent. It is likely the bulk of their transfer activity will come in the middle to end part of the main transfer window. Parish, however, told reporters after the FA Cup semi-final win over Aston Villa that they would try to 'have a better pre-season (and) not make some of the mistakes we made again'. While he did not explicitly reference the four deadline day arrivals as a mistake, it is a reasonable deduction to make given how much it affected their preparations. Palace have no concerns over their PSR position and their budget will be sufficient to strengthen. If they can offload fringe players, it will be boosted further, while if any of their key players leave it will be for a hefty fee, allowing them to reinvest that money. (Top photos: Getty Images)


Bloomberg
an hour ago
- Bloomberg
UK Eyes Greater Nuclear Role in Europe Amid Doubts About US
The UK envisages taking an enhanced role in NATO's nuclear deterrence amid doubts surrounding the US commitment to the alliance, as Prime Minister Keir Starmer pledges to make Britain 'war-ready' to counter Russian aggression in Europe. The government is exploring new capabilities such as fighter jets able to fire nuclear weapons as part of plans to boost Britain's nuclear contribution to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, according to a person familiar with the matter who requested anonymity discussing sensitive matters of national security.


Bloomberg
an hour ago
- Bloomberg
Why Keir Starmer Is Fighting Off Sexism Complaints
As he tells it, the first time Keir Starmer spoke to his wife of 18 years, Victoria, he was so rude that she exclaimed, 'Who the f*** does he think he is?' Fortunately for the UK prime minister, she gave him a second chance and agreed to go on a date. Some female politicians these days say they've encountered similar treatment from Starmer — but are less forgiving. A perception has emerged since Starmer's Labour Party was elected last July of a leader and his court who, at best, fail to pay regard to the optics of a white man talking down to women in his orbit, and at worst, open themselves to charges of misogyny. In private, many women Labour MPs lament what they describe as a boys' club around the prime minister.