logo
Warning over environmental ‘vapocalypse' despite ban on disposable versions

Warning over environmental ‘vapocalypse' despite ban on disposable versions

The waste crisis driven by disposable vapes could continue after a ban comes into force as cheap new models flood the market, campaigners have warned.
Shops and online retailers will be prohibited from selling single-use vapes from Sunday.
The crackdown aims to curb their use among young people and reduce the litter and environmental impact.
Disposable vapes are non-refillable, unable to be recharged, and are often thrown away with general waste in black bins or littered rather than being recycled.
Green campaigners say vape producers have been developing new styles that are cheap but meet reusable criteria, meaning they essentially circumvent the ban.
Material Focus, which advocates for circular economies, said increasingly popular 'big puff' vapes are cheaper per inhalation than disposable devices.
The group also highlighted pod-based styles, some of which are rechargeable and refillable but remain cheap enough for consumers to have little incentive to reuse them.
In many cases the products have a similar look, feel and price to disposable models, the campaigners said.
Scott Butler, executive director of Material Focus, said: 'Without quick and extensive action, the threat of a 'vapocalypse' remains and new big puff and pod vape models are already contributing to an environmental nightmare.'
He added that vape company design teams have been 'working their socks off to get new legal models on to the market' while the regulatory work was being carried out.
'To most users of these vapes, and shopkeepers even, they may not notice any difference in the old disposable vapes versus the new re-useable ones,' he said.
Mr Butler said that while the ban will take some of the most environmentally wasteful products off the market, the UK may need more flexible legislation to tackle challenges around new models and waste.
Hazel Cheeseman, chief executive of Action on Smoking and Health, said the incoming regulation on its own 'may be insufficient'.
'(The) Government cannot expect leopards to change their spots,' she said.
'If they want a vaping market with products that have minimal impact on the environment, do not appeal to teens and are safe and effective to help adult smokers quit, then further regulations are needed.'
Asked on Friday whether the legislation would be enough to stop vape producers flooding the market with similar products, nature minister Mary Creagh said: 'Well let's bring in the ban first. That's what I would say.'
Ms Creagh said the tobacco and vapes Bill currently progressing through Parliament will look at further restrictions on vape sales and use, as she spoke to the PA news agency ahead of a visit to Sweeop Kuusakoski's vape processing facility in Sittingbourne, Kent.
'I'm confident that my colleagues in the Department of Health will not hesitate to use those powers should what we're doing this weekend not achieve the goals,' she said.
'But I'm confident that it is already sparking a conversation among young people … getting them to ask the questions, getting them to understand that there's no such place as 'away' and that these are really difficult to recycle.'
She added that most big puff vapes on the market do not have replaceable coils so they are within the scope of the ban.
The Government is considering further ways to drive up levels of separately collected electrical waste including vapes as part of reforms to waste electrical and electronic equipment regulations.
Under current rules, vape producers already have a legal responsibility to finance their collection for recycling.
Vapes contain valuable and critical materials such as lithium and copper that are regularly binned in household waste.
If littered, they can also cause fires and other damaging or toxic impacts on the environment as well as wildlife.
To help drive up recycling rates, Material Focus is calling for retailers to make more collection points available as well as the launch of a major communications campaign to drive public awareness about recycling the devices.
Mr Butler said: 'The majority of vapers are either unaware of where to recycle their vapes or don't have a good experience of recycling them.'
John Dunne, director general of the UK Vaping Industry Association (UKVIA), said: 'This needs joined-up action from across the waste chain and more effort needs to be done to provide consumers with disposal points at the point of use and not just point of sale.'
He said that while the UKVIA works to educate consumers on sustainable vape use and recycling initiatives 'more needs to be done'.
'We would encourage the Government to launch a national consumer education which includes responsible disposal of vapes, why vaping is much less harmful than smoking, and warning of the dangers of buying non-compliant products from the black market or other irregular sellers.'
Claire Shrewsbury, director of insights and innovation at the Wrap charity, said single-use vapes have been a 'huge environmental issue'.
'This ban will help remove disposable vapes while giving people a reusable option,' she added.
'And with businesses which sell vapes legally obliged to provide recycling collections, awareness of this remains limited and needs to be better communicated.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Keir Starmer facing scrutiny over failure to establish new ethics watchdog
Keir Starmer facing scrutiny over failure to establish new ethics watchdog

The Guardian

timea day ago

  • The Guardian

Keir Starmer facing scrutiny over failure to establish new ethics watchdog

No 10 is facing scrutiny over its failure to bring in a new ethics watchdog almost a year after the election, as a new inquiry was launched to examine the seeming lack of progress. Amid signs the plans have been kicked into the long grass, parliament's public administration committee said it was launching an inquiry to push the government on what has happened to its ethics commitments. It was one of Keir Starmer's flagship manifesto pledges that the new Labour government would 'establish a new independent Ethics and Integrity Commission, with its own independent chair, to ensure probity in government'. The party promised to 'restore confidence in government and ensure ministers are held to the highest standards', and enforce restrictions on ministers lobbying for companies they used to regulate, with meaningful sanctions for those breaching the rules. However, there was no blueprint for a commission ready to go when Starmer formed the government last year. It has barely been mentioned by ministers since last July. He published a new ministerial code last year, allowing the independent adviser on ministerial standards to start his own investigations into misconduct without requiring permission from the prime minister. But the standards regime is otherwise largely unchanged, with no updates either to the Advisory Committee on Business Appointments (Acoba), which is now without a permanent chair after the departure of Eric Pickles. Its interim chair until December is an HR executive from the banking and energy sectors. Government sources insisted that work was ongoing on the ethics and integrity commission, but also suggested that voters care more about tough outcomes in relation to misconduct than they do about the process of setting up new bodies. Insiders also pointed to the fact that Starmer has pushed out two ministers who failed to uphold high enough standards under the current rules. Tulip Siddiq resigned in January as a Treasury minister after accepting the government was being harmed by the furore over her close ties to her aunt, the ousted prime minister of Bangladesh now accused of corruption. She denies wrongdoing. In November, Louise Haigh, the transport secretary, was told to resign by No 10 for a possible breach of the ministerial code, after she did not declare her spent conviction for fraud to the government when she became a cabinet minister. Since April, the government has twice avoided the question about setting up its ethics and integrity commission when asked about it in parliament. Pressed on what progress had been made, one Cabinet Office minister, Abena Oppong-Asare, said: 'We are restoring confidence in government and the highest standards in public life and have already taken steps to improve probity and transparency, including through issuing a new ministerial code which highlights the importance of the principles of public life, by strengthening the terms of reference for the independent adviser, and by introducing a new monthly register of gifts and hospitality.' Georgia Gould, another Cabinet Office minister, said the government was improving standards in public life and was 'committed to establishing the right structures to do so' – without specifically mentioning the new commission. Simon Hoare, a former minister under Rishi Sunak's Conservative government, said: 'Significant commitments have been made to overhaul the ethics regime but we are yet to see much evidence of progress from the Cabinet Office. An upstanding government and good ministers should not fear, but welcome, a strong, rigorous and independent ethics and propriety regime. 'This inquiry will allow us to push the government on its commitments, ensuring changes are properly stress-tested and scrutinised by parliament.' The committee said it will be 'aiming to understand what progress has been made' on the independent ethics commission. It will look at how trust in government and its officials can be restored and ensured in light of concerns around lobbying and ministerial conduct. It will also study how enforcing high standards could positively affect the public's trust in government and the wider political system in the UK. It will also look at how effective the existing propriety and ethics structures have proved to be, with critics having long said the landscape is far too fragmented with multiple different bodies responsible for policing different parts of politics from the parliamentary commissioners on standards, to the Independent Complaints and Grievance Scheme to the Electoral Commission, the adviser on ministerial standards and Acoba. The Cabinet Office has been approached for comment.

Douglas Ross reignites spat with Presiding Officer after being booted out of Scottish Parliament
Douglas Ross reignites spat with Presiding Officer after being booted out of Scottish Parliament

Daily Record

timea day ago

  • Daily Record

Douglas Ross reignites spat with Presiding Officer after being booted out of Scottish Parliament

The former Scottish Conservatives leader said he had been denied a meeting with Alison Johnstone following a row. Douglas Ross has reignited a spat with Holyrood's Presiding Officer after he was last week booted out of Parliament for heckling. The former Scottish Conservatives leader returned to the debating chamber today after he was temporarily excluded by Alison Johnstone for breaking strict rules on when MSPs can make interventions. ‌ The row led to the Tories accusing the Presiding Officer of being "blatantly biased" against Unionist politicians. ‌ But Johnstone insisted today she always acted "in a neutral manner". In tense scenes, Ross stood up to say he had since requested a meeting with the Presiding Officer to discuss last week's events. The MSP had been asked to leave the weekly session of First Minister's Questions after he could be heard heckling John Swinney. A spokesman for the Parliament later said Ross had been given repeated warnings over his conduct in the chamber. Questioning Johnstone from the floor today, the Tory politician said: "Following your decision to remove me from the chamber last Thursday, I have made several requests to meet with you to discuss this. So far you have refused all requests.' The Presiding Officer then said Ross' contribution was "not a point of order" and asked him to sit down. ‌ The Conservative MSP immediately raised another point of order, saying that under parliament's rules 'you must act in a neutral manner'. After the pair talked over each other, Johnstone insisted: 'I have acted in a neutral manner. I have addressed the point of order on Thursday. 'I am not continuing to have a dialogue about when I am meeting you in the chamber.' ‌ She went on to say she had not specifically received a request to meet with Mr Ross, stating: 'I treat all members equally.' The Presiding Officer rebuffed further attempts from Ross to raise points of order, saying she had to move on to other business. First Minister John Swinney said last week Johnstone has a difficult job and 'always acts impartially' in upholding the Parliament's rules. ‌ But the Tories warned they would be 'seeking discussions to reiterate that the Presiding Officer should not show blatant bias'. Ross last week told reporters he represented many farmers who were left frustrated by the First Minister ducking questions. 'This is an issue that is extremely important to those individuals who are in that sector and their families and their communities, therefore they deserve to hear those answers,' he said. ‌ 'But for a member to be expelled from the chamber with no warning at all, I think may be unprecedented.' He added: "There have been concerns outwith this building about how [Johnstone] treats Conservative MSPs compared to government ministers, Green MSPs for example,' he said. 'And since this happened, I've had senior members from other parties saying that Alison Johnstone risks losing support within the chamber for her actions.' The former Tory leader said Holyrood was 'not a library'. He continued: "There is going to be some discussion from the benches around the respective party spokespeople. That is what people watch politics for."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store