Pollution Of Drain Network Results In Fine And Community Work
A Waikato farm manager has been convicted, fined $5000 and sentenced to 140 hours' community work for the unlawful discharge of dairy effluent into a drain network in May 2024.
Hamilton District Court Judge Melinda Dickey released her judgement on 13 May 2025, convicting Vernon Paul Madeley on a charge filed under the Resource Management Act by Waikato Regional Council.
In May 2024, council officers responded to a complaint about dairy effluent in the rural drainage system near Turua, on the Hauraki Plains. Officers inspected a farm where they found an effluent irrigator had stalled causing effluent to flow into a nearby drain. This drain was part of a network designed to discharge into the Waihou River, north of the Turua township.
Inquiries established that the travelling irrigator had come to the end of its run and had been left to irrigate in the same location for up to a week. The defendant stated he was aware the irrigator had come to the end of its run but had simply not got around to shifting it in that week.
In sentencing, Judge Dickey said: 'I find the defendant was highly careless because he knew there was an issue and did nothing to address it. The fix was simple – the irrigator needed to be moved in a timely manner and was not.'
Patrick Lynch, Waikato Regional Council's Regional Compliance Manager, said: 'This is a well set up dairy farm where money has been invested in upgrading effluent infrastructure over recent years. This case highlights the fact that good infrastructure must also be well managed throughout the season to avoid causing environmental harm.'
'We encourage all farmers to have documented Effluent Management Plans for their farm effluent systems and to ensure all employees and contractors working on their farms are aware of their responsibilities.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Otago Daily Times
2 days ago
- Otago Daily Times
Company fined $12k for large wastewater spill
By Keiller MacDuff of RNZ The company responsible for a wastewater spill that killed thousands of fish in a Canterbury creek has been convicted and fined $12,000. Fibreboard manufacturers Daiken New Zealand had pleaded guilty to the charge late last year, which carried a maximum penalty of $600,000. The company is wholly owned by major Japanese multinational conglomerate Daiken Corporation but is not associated with air conditioner manufacturer Daikin Industries. The charge - brought by the Canterbury Regional Council under the Resource Management Act - was of discharging of a contaminant onto or into land in a manner that resulted in the contaminant entering water, after wastewater spilled from the medium density fibreboard (MDF) factory into Saltwater Creek, a tributary of the Rakahuri/Ashley River. The spill, which happened overnight on 31 August 2023, saw wastewater contaminated by substances used in the MDF refining processes, including paraffin, urea, formaldehyde, resin, bacteria, and surfactants, as well as a small amount of treated human waste. The court heard the spill was caused by a failure in piping waste from one part of Daiken's wastewater system to another. Daiken's wastewater system was made up of an oxidation pond, an aerated pond, storage lagoons and a partially suspended lagoon (PSL), which is about 30 metres from Saltwater Creek. Recently installed Venturi manual pumps operated continuously to keep the PSL at a constant level. When a Daiken employee noticed the outlet tube of first of the new pumps was vibrating, he fixed a custom-made brace to it. But when two other pumps were installed shortly before the spill, their tubes were left unsecured. One of the tubes broke overnight, resulting in about 1500-1700 m3 of wastewater spilling onto land and into Saltwater Creek. Lawyers representing Daiken said the employee who secured the pipe on the first tube was away when the other two were installed. In his absence, the company's mechanical co-ordinator contracted another company to install pump supports, and another to attend to the commissioning of the pumps. Neither installed braces. A senior representative of one of the companies told his counterpart at Daiken he was happy with the installation, and not concerned with "a little bit of movement". On the basis of that advice, and after organising for another contractor to complete the bracing the next day, Daiken's co-ordinator left the pumps running overnight. The judge described the person involved as a reliable senior employee with about 50 years experience, and classed the incident as a "one off lapse of judgement". Regional council officers at the scene after the spill recorded the creek as a "very turbid light brown" with a "strong odour of MDT effluent". Council reports and subsequent scientific analysis found the discharge resulted in "a severe and rapid drop in dissolved oxygen concentrations", with the decline in water quality persisting through most downstream river reaches for at least ten hours, and likely extended to the estuary - even with dilution - resulting in at least four to 10 hours of "severe and extensive degradation of water quality", Judge Hassan said. "Thousands of aquatic fauna would have perished, including likely the total downstream populations of some taxa including inanga, brown trout and bully" mostly by suffocation, with those left alive suffering "acute stress". Saltwater Creek is made up of a myriad of spring fed channels, and provided habitat for several threatened and endangered species, including the kana kana or pouched lamprey, long and short fin eels, inanga (whitebait), blue gill and giant bullies. Whitebait spawn in the river margins and wetlands of Saltwater Creek between autumn and winter, and surveys prior to the discharge identified declines in kākahi - fresh water mussels - which have a threat status of at risk. Other species included common smelt and black flounder. Te Aka Aka/Ashley estuary is classified as an area of significant natural value in the Regional Coastal Environmental Plan, and as an wetland of ecological and representative importance by the Department of Conservation, Judge Hassan said. The discharge coincided with the opening of the annual white-bait season. Anglers and whitebaiters were told to avoid the area, landowners and water users were warned of the risk to stock, and Te Whatu Ora was notified. The regional council's lawyers suggested a starting point of $130,000, while the company's legal counsel suggested a conviction and discharge would be appropriate, and, if not, a starting point of $130,000 was supported by precedent. On Wednesday, Judge Hassan convicted the company, and fined them $12,000. Judge Hassan found Daiken's offending to have caused a temporary severe environmental consequence, with experts predicting it would have taken 12 months for the ecology to recover, as well as cultural harm and harm to the wider community. Daiken had a commendable history of "responsible local environmental stewardship," the judge said, noting a wetland restoration project on the company's land in conjunction with the Waimakariri Biodiversity Trust. Judge Hassan said he considered the nature of the environment affected, the extent of harm inflicted, deliberateness and attitudinal factors, and found Daiken's culpability to be low. Through a restorative justice process, Daiken committed to pay $15,000 to Waimakariri Biodiversity Trust, and $15,000 to the Sefton Saltwater Creek Catchment Group, and agreed to contribute at least $20,000 towards consultants to carry out assessments and baseline exploratory work across the wider catchment. The company also proactively engaged with Te Runanga o Ngāi Tahu and Te Ngāi Tuahuriri, committing to work together on enhancing the health of the creek, including providing regularly monitoring and improvement updates, Judge Hassan said. The terms of these payments were set out in an enforcement order, which requires Daiken make the payments by specified dates. After adopted a starting fine in the range in the order of $80,000, Judge Hassan discounted it for Daiken's guilty plea, good character and remorse, then accounted for the other financial commitments, resulting in the final fine of $12,000. The Rangiora company is wholly owned by Japan's Daiken Corporation, which made 210 billion yen (NZ$2 billion) in revenue and 3.9 billion yen (NZ$45m) in profit in the 2023/2024 financial year. Daiken New Zealand's revenue over the same period was NZ$185.5 million, and its profit after tax was $19.9m. Environment Canterbury compliance manager Jennifer Rochford said the fine was lower than the council expected, but it respected the decision of the court.
1News
4 days ago
- 1News
Waikato share milker fined $40,000 for polluting waterway
A Waikato share milker has been slapped with a $40,000 fine and 140 hours of community work after the council accused him of having dairy effluent repeatedly flow from a family farm into a waterway near Te Awamutu. Daniel Warren Lund appeared in the Hamilton District Court facing five charges under the Resource Management Act, according to the Waikato Regional Council. A spokesperson said compliance officers found effluent storage ponds overflowing into the tributary of the Puniu River on two separate occasions during inspections in 2022. "On another occasion, they found effluent ponding and runoff from an irrigator. An abatement notice that had been served on Mr Lund was also being breached." The council reported that in her decision, Judge Melinda Dickey described the defendant as "highly careless" with "insufficient attention paid to the infrastructure and management of effluent disposal". ADVERTISEMENT She further stated that the operation of the system left much to be desired. Regional compliance manager Patrick Lynch said the "farm effluent ponds were inadequate and posed a real risk to the environment." "Mr Lund displayed a lack of understanding of managing effluent effectively and safely on the property," he said in a media release. "Moving into the wetter and busier time of the year for farmers, this prosecution is a timely reminder to all farmers that there needs to be adequate effluent infrastructure and good effluent management systems on every farm."
RNZ News
4 days ago
- RNZ News
Waikato share milker convicted, fined $40,000 for allowing farm effluent into Puniu river
Council officer sampling from an effluent storage pond. Photo: Supplied A Waikato share milker has been convicted, fined $40,000 and sentenced to 140 hours community work after allowing farm effluent to enter a nearby branch of the Puniu River, near Te Awamutu. Daniel Lund manages a family farm at Pokuru near Te Awamutu. In July and August 2022, council compliance officers conducted three inspections of the farm effluent system. During two inspections they found effluent storage ponds overflowing into a tributary of the Puniu River. On another occasion they found effluent ponding and runoff from an irrigator. A previous abatement notice that had been served on Lund was also being breached. Lund appeared last week before Judge Melinda Dickey in the Hamilton District Court facing five charges under the Resource Management Act because of a prosecution taken by Waikato Regional Council. In summing up her decision, Judge Dickey said she found Lund to be highly careless. "There appears to have been insufficient attention paid to the infrastructure and management of effluent disposal." Judge Dickey found the operation of the system left much to be desired. Waikato Regional compliance manager Patrick Lynch said the farm effluent ponds were inadequate and posed a real risk to the environment. "Mr Lund displayed a lack of understanding of managing effluent effectively and safely on the property," Lynch said. "Moving into the wetter and busier time of the year for farmers, this prosecution is a timely reminder to all farmers that there needs to be adequate effluent infrastructure and good effluent management systems on every farm." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
