SC agrees to hear plea challenging proposal to hold NEET-PG in 2 shifts
NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Monday agreed to hear soon a plea challenging the decision of the National Board of Examination to conduct the NEET-PG in two shifts. A vacation bench, comprising Chief Justice BR Gavai and Justice Augustine George Masih, took note of the submissions of the lawyer and said the plea would be taken for hearing in a day or two.
The National Eligibility-cum-Entrance Test for Postgraduate courses (NEET-PG), 2025, will be conducted on June 15 in two shifts on a computer-based platform. Its results will be declared by July 15.
Petitioner Aditi, who goes by one name, and others claimed that conducting the exam in two shifts has the potential for unfairness due to varying difficulty levels between the shifts. The petition sought a direction from the SC to the NBE to conduct the exam in a single shift to maintain 'just, fair, reasonable and equitable' grounds of competition for all the candidates.
On May 5, the top court had sought a response from the NBE, National Medical Council and the ministry of health and family welfare on the plea.
In another plea, the SC on May 22 pronounced a verdict issuing directions to stop seat-blocking in NEET-PG counselling and publish raw scores, answer keys, and normalisation formulae of the exam.
The top court ordered the counselling authorities of private and deemed universities to implement a nationally synchronised counselling calendar to align all-India quota and prevent seat blocking systems. It also mandated pre-counselling fee disclosure by all private and deemed universities, detailing tuition and hostel fees, caution deposit, and miscellaneous charges.
It directed the counselling authorities to enforce strict penalties for seat blocking, including forfeiture of security deposit, disqualification of repeat offenders from future NEET-PG exams, and blacklisting of complicit colleges.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NDTV
25 minutes ago
- NDTV
Muzaffarpur Rape Accused Surrenders After 'Bulldozer Action' Against Home, Eatery In Bihar
Patna: In a dramatic turn of events in the Muzaffarpur Dalit girl case, the main accused, Mukesh Kumar Rai, surrendered before the police after the district administration demolished his house and eatery (dhaba) on Thursday. The bulldozer action came in the wake of widespread public outrage over the death of an 11-year-old Dalit girl, who was sexually assaulted and later died after she was allegedly denied urgent medical care. Responding to public anger and political condemnation, Bihar Deputy Chief Minister Vijay Kumar Sinha had earlier announced strict action against the accused during his visit to the victim's house on Thursday. After a few hours, a bulldozer action was executed. Under the leadership of Rural SP Vidyasagar and SDM West Shreya Shri, a heavy police contingent arrived at Mukesh Rai's residence and dhaba, located in the jurisdiction of the Turki police station area. The property was confiscated, and a bulldozer razed both structures. Fearing further consequences , Mukesh Rai surrendered to the police shortly after the demolition began. The district police confirmed that legal proceedings are underway, and a charge sheet will be filed promptly. On May 26, an 11-year-old Dalit girl was sexually assaulted in a village under Kudhni police station. Post-assault, the child was brought to SKMCH, Muzaffarpur, but received negligent treatment and was referred to PMCH, Patna. At PMCH, she was not allotted a bed, was left in an ambulance for four hours, and later succumbed to her injuries. Following the incident, protests erupted across Bihar, with leaders from the Congress, RJD, and Jan Suraj Party demanding accountability and action. Opposition parties condemned the law and order breakdown and healthcare negligence, holding the government responsible for the girl's death. Protesters claimed that timely medical intervention could have saved her life. In response, the government suspended the SKMCH superintendent, removed a deputy superintendent of PMCH, and suspended three police officials, though critics say these actions were superficial and delayed. The brutal nature of the crime, combined with administrative failure and caste-based insensitivity, has triggered state-wide outrage. Citizens, activists, and rights organizations are demanding speedy trial and conviction under the POCSO and SC/ST Atrocities Act. This incident has become a flashpoint in Bihar politics and raised serious questions about the state's healthcare system, police responsiveness, and caste-based injustices. The bulldozer action has set a precedent, but the public now awaits judicial justice for the minor victim.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
an hour ago
- Business Standard
Smog, Yamuna pollution biggest environment issues in Delhi: SC judge
Supreme Court judge Justice Sanjay Karol on Thursday said smog and Yamuna River pollution were the biggest environmental issues in the national capital. The judge was speaking at the Society of Indian Law Firms (SILF) Climate Change Conference and Awards 2025 when he emphasised on environmental protection. Each citizen, he said, was responsible to protect the environment and the onus wasn't just on the judiciary, the executive and the legislature. "We have to make sure that the environment, be it in any form, has to be protected. I would also say this, that over the years we have developed certain principles, and the public trust doctrine is one such doctrine which we must always keep in mind," Justice Karol said. He continued, "But I would say this, if you were to see our report card in the last 75 years, or since the 1980s, what have we done? Have we done enough to protect the environment? My view is that a lot needs to be done, at all levels. And I would borrow an expression, that the solution to the problem now is grassroots solutions to an international problem. The way forward, according to me, is that we as individuals have to take up the causes pertaining to the environment." Environmental issues could not be left to the courts for passing of verdicts, the legislature for making relevant laws or the executive for implementing them, he added. "Each one of us, as responsible citizens, has to understand, become aware of, and ensure that we protect the environment for posterity." He highlighted the two major issues -- air pollution and a polluted Yamuna -- Delhi has been grappling with required attention. "I don't know how many of you have travelled in the metro, or how many of you have gone beyond the Lutyens. But if you go to Noida or Trans-Yamuna, you would see what Yamuna really is. These are the two biggest challenges," Justice Karol said. He outlined judiciary's "zealous" role in protecting the environment. "The reason is very clear. And it is that Mother Earth is not ours. We are there for her and we are there not only for her but also for posterity, for future generations, not only in India, but the world over," the judge said.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
2 hours ago
- Business Standard
Trump's travel ban on a dozen countries set to take effect on Monday
President Donald Trump is resurrecting the travel ban policy from his first term, signing a proclamation Wednesday night preventing people from a dozen countries from entering the United States. The countries include Afghanistan, Burma, Chad, Republic of the Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen. In addition to the ban, which takes effect at 12:01 a.m. Monday, there will be heightened restrictions on visitors from Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela. I must act to protect the national security and national interest of the United States and its people, Trump said in his proclamation. The list results from a January 20 executive order Trump issued requiring the departments of State and Homeland Security and the Director of National Intelligence to compile a report on hostile attitudes toward the U.S. and whether entry from certain countries represented a national security risk. During his first term, Trump issued an executive order in January 2017 banning travel to the U.S. by citizens of seven predominantly Muslim countries Iraq, Syria, Iran, Sudan, Libya, Somalia and Yemen. It was one of the most chaotic and confusing moments of his young presidency. Travellers from those nations were either barred from getting on their flights to the US or detained at U.S. airports after they landed. They included students and faculty as well as businesspeople, tourists and people visiting friends and family. The order, often referred to as the Muslim ban or the travel ban, was retooled amid legal challenges, until a version was upheld by the Supreme Court in 2018. The ban affected various categories of travellers and immigrants from Iran, Somalia, Yemen, Syria and Libya, plus North Koreans and some Venezuelan government officials and their families. Trump and others have defended the initial ban on national security grounds, arguing it was aimed at protecting the country and not founded on anti-Muslim bias. However, the president had called for an explicit ban on Muslims during his first campaign for the White House.
