Zelenskyy announces "tangible progress" on deployment of security contingent by partners
President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has announced "tangible progress" and shared initial details regarding the potential deployment of a security contingent by international partners to provide security guarantees for Ukraine.
Source: Zelenskyy on Telegram; Ukraine's Defence Minister Rustem Umierov
Quote from Zelenskyy: "A meeting of our military with our partners' chiefs of defence staff: Admiral Antony Radakin from the UK and General Thierry Burkhard from France. We are making efforts to ensure security in Ukraine and reliable security guarantees.
There is tangible progress and the first details on how the security contingent of partners can be deployed.
I am grateful to all the countries that help us and the UK and France for their leadership. It is this kind of joint work when everyone is focused on a strong result, that helps to bring a reliable and lasting peace to Ukraine."
More details: Meanwhile, Umierov reported on "in-depth consultations on security guarantees for Ukraine and the future architecture of peace in Europe" with French and UK defence staff representatives.
Quote from Umierov: "The main topic was the involvement of partners in ensuring Ukraine's security arrangements after the end of hostilities.
We discussed preparations and the state of operational planning to be able to promptly implement and execute the plans of the Willing Coalition in case of cessation of hostilities."
Background:
On Friday 4 April, the chiefs of staff of the French and UK militaries visited Kyiv for meetings with senior Ukrainian officials.
On Saturday, the French General Staff confirmed that during their visit, the chiefs of staff discussed the Ukrainian army's needs and objectives with Kyiv, focusing on providing long-term support for its recovery and development.
Support Ukrainska Pravda on Patreon!
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Israel Boards Gaza Aid Flotilla Carrying Greta Thunberg
Greta Thunberg speaking alongside other crew members Rima Hassan (right) and Thiago Avila (left) before the Madleen ship departed from Italy on June 1. Credit - Fabrizio Villa - Getty Images Israeli forces have intercepted a Gaza-bound aid ship off the country's coast and detained its crew, including activist Greta Thunberg. The vessel, organized by the Freedom Flotilla Coalition (FFC), was transporting humanitarian supplies including rice, flour, and baby formula. It has a crew of 12, including French Member of the European Parliament, Rima Hassan. FFC said the boat was stopped and boarded by the Israeli military in international waters just after 3am local time on Monday, June 9. The organization was established in 2010 and describes itself as a 'grassroots solidarity movement' working to end the Israeli blockade of Gaza through non-violent action. Before the Israel-Hamas war, Israel still maintained control over what goods entered Gaza, as well as water and electricity supplies in the strip. This began after Hamas gained control over the strip in 2007. The organization's human rights attorney, Huwaida Arraf, said its seizure 'violates international law and defies the ICJ's binding orders requiring unimpeded humanitarian access to Gaza.' The organization shared footage appearing to show Israeli personnel intercepting the boat. In the video, the crew have their hands raised, and a person is heard saying 'everyone, phones need to go, in the water.' Israel has dismissed the vessel as a 'selfie yacht' and said the 'tiny amount' of aid aboard would be distributed in Gaza. In a post on X, the government said the ship was being escorted to an Israeli port and that its crew would be returned safely to their home countries. It added that 1,200 aid trucks have entered Gaza over the last weeks, and that the U.S. and Israel-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) had distributed 11 million meals in the territory since it began operations on May 26. The GHF has faced sharp criticism from the United Nations and other aid organizations, who have accused it of 'weaponizing aid'. Concerns over its operations have intensified following multiple fatal shootings of Palestinians near distribution hubs. Read more: How Closures at Food Distribution Hubs Are Impacting Gazans Here's what we know about the ship and the status of its crew. The ship, named after Gaza's first and only fisherwoman according to FFC, was launched from Sicily, Italy on June 1. The ship was carrying aid to Gaza, estimated to not be much more than a truck's-worth, but FFC said that the mission was to raise awareness of the humanitarian situation in Gaza. This campaign comes a month after another FFC ship, named 'Conscience' was struck by drones and set on fire as a result of the attack while sailing in international waters. The 12-person crew included Swedish activist Greta Thunberg, who said as the ship departed: 'The world cannot be silent bystanders, every single one of us has a moral obligation to do everything we can to fight for a free Palestine.' Other passengers included: Rima Hassan, a French politician. Thiago Avila, who leads FFC Brazil and is on the organization's Steering Committee. Baptiste André, Omar Faiad, Pascal Maurieras, Yanis Mhamdi, and Reva Viard, all French nationals. Mhamdi is a journalist for Blast; Faiad is a journalist with Al Jazeera. Yasemin Acar, an activist from Germany. Şuayb Ordu, an activist from Turkey. Sergio Toribio, an activist from Spain. Marco Van Rennes, an activist from the Netherlands. In a statement posted Monday, the Israeli Foreign Ministry confirmed that it had intercepted the 'selfie yacht' and that the 'celebrities' on board would be returned to their home countries. The Ministry also published a video of the crew being handed water and sandwiches, saying they were safe and unharmed. Defense Minister Israel Katz said he had instructed the IDF to show the crew a video of events on October 7 2023, when Hamas militants killed more than 1,200 people and took another 250 hostage. The government is yet to comment on allegations that the seizure of the ship breaks international law. A government spokesperson has been approached for comment. French Foreign Minister Jean-Noel Barrot has said that France has offered to assist in facilitating the 'swift return' of the French nationals onboard the ship. In a press briefing Monday, a spokesperson for British Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer said that the U.K. government urged the situation to be resolved 'safely with restraint, in line with international humanitarian law'. Special Rapporteur to the United Nations, Francesca Albanese said: 'As the Madleen was reportedly intercepted and seized by Israeli forces in international waters, the UK gov must urgently seek full clarification and secure the immediate release of the vessel & its crew.' In a post on social media, Albanese continued: 'The Madleen must be allowed to continue its lawful humanitarian mission to Gaza.' Amnesty International said that Israel's interception of the ship ignores its "legal obligations towards civilians in the occupied Gaza Strip.' 'As the occupying power Israel has an international obligation to ensure civilians in Gaza have sufficient and safe access to food, medicine, and other supplies indispensable to their survival,' the human rights organisation said. Contact us at letters@
Newsweek
37 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Russia Won't End Ukraine War Until NATO 'Pulls Out' of Baltics: Moscow
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The Ukraine war won't end until NATO withdraws troops from the Baltics, a top Russian official has warned. Sergei Ryabkov, Russia's deputy foreign minister responsible for U.S. relations, nonproliferation and arms control, made the remarks in an interview with state-run news agency Tass. Newsweek has reached out to the Kremlin and NATO for comment by email. Why It Matters Ryabkov's comments mark a shift in the Kremlin's position. He suggested that the conflict's roots lie not only in Ukraine itself but in NATO's eastward expansion. According to Ryabkov, the withdrawal of NATO forces from the Baltics would help bring an end to the war. What To Know NATO maintains a strong military presence in the Baltic States, with multinational battle groups and brigades stationed in Bulgaria, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Romania and Slovakia. The military alliance bolstered its presence in the region in the wake of Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine. It said in an update on June 6 that the eight battle groups "demonstrate the strength of the trans-Atlantic bond and the Alliance's solidarity, determination and ability to respond to any aggression." Also, Sweden and Finland have switched from being neutral to joining NATO since the invasion. The Kremlin had said Ukraine must abandon its ambitions to join NATO as a condition for ending the war, but Ryabkov appeared to signal to Tass that the alliance must withdraw completely from the Baltics as well. In the article titled "Deputy Foreign Minister Ryabkov: It is impossible to resolve the conflict until NATO pulls out," the official argued that resolving the conflict in Ukraine requires addressing what he described as the root causes. "The American side requires practical steps aimed at eliminating the root causes of the fundamental contradictions between us in the area of security. "Among these causes, NATO expansion is in the foreground. Without resolving this fundamental and most acute problem for us, it is simply impossible to resolve the current conflict in the Euro-Atlantic region." Ryabkov suggested NATO's eastward expansion was central to the war. "Given the nature and genesis of the Ukrainian crisis, provoked by the previous U.S. authorities and the West as a whole, this conflict naturally acts, well, if you like, as a test, a trial, which checks the seriousness of Washington's intentions to straighten out our relations," he said. Last month, three Russian sources with knowledge of Washington-led negotiations told Reuters that Putin's conditions for ending the Ukraine war include a written pledge from Western leaders to halt NATO's eastward expansion. What People Are Saying A senior Russian source with knowledge of top-level Kremlin thinking told Reuters in an article published on May 28: "Putin is ready to make peace but not at any price." A second source told Reuters: "Putin has toughened his position." Sergei Ryabkov, Russia's deputy foreign minister, told Tass: "Trump's return to the White House, declaring his commitment to a political and diplomatic settlement of the Ukrainian crisis, has become a reason for cautious optimism in terms of a potential normalization of relations with the United States, but also in a broader sense. "It was in this vein that the presidents of Russia and the United States held four telephone conversations. Our side expressed gratitude for the United States' support in resuming direct negotiations between Russia and Ukraine, interrupted by the Ukrainian side in 2022. "But Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin also confirmed the basic principle of the need to eliminate the root causes of the conflict within the framework of political and diplomatic efforts. Otherwise, long-term peace cannot be ensured, and in concrete terms, it is necessary to exclude any opportunity for the Ukrainian Armed Forces to take advantage of the pause for a respite and regroup their forces." What Happens Next Moscow and Kyiv will continue to launch strikes on each other's territory, with the war in Ukraine showing few signs of a peace deal in the near future.
Yahoo
41 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Key to Russia's potential defeat lies in its economy
As the war in Ukraine grinds on, attention remains fixed on the battlefield. But Russia's most vulnerable flank is not in the trenches — it's in the treasury. The West, and especially the United States, holds economic levers that could push Vladimir Putin toward serious negotiations or even collapse his ability to sustain the war altogether. Recent developments signal a shift in Washington's posture. Military aid to Ukraine has resumed, and a landmark U.S.-Ukraine resource agreement was signed on April 30. More significantly, senators — led by Republican Lindsey Graham — are advocating sanctions that would impose 500% tariffs on Russian oil and commodity exports. Moscow has reacted with alarm, calling this initiative a 'counteroffensive from the American deep state.' It's no bluff. The Kremlin is right to be worried. What truly threatens Putin's war machine is energy revenue — or rather, the loss of it. The Russian economy is deeply dependent on oil and gas exports, with the 2025 federal budget based on an oil price of $70 per barrel. But Russian Urals crude is now priced around $60, and could fall further. Saudi Arabia, frustrated by non-compliance within OPEC+, is allowing oil prices to drop, potentially triggering a price war. Riyadh has openly stated it can withstand a prolonged period of low prices — a veiled threat aimed at Moscow and other OPEC+ defectors. Read also: Exclusive: Russia's ballistic missile production up at least 66% over past year, according to Ukrainian intel figures The effects are already visible. Russia has slashed its oil revenue forecast for 2025 by 24%, with the Finance Ministry predicting a drop from 11 trillion to 8.3 trillion rubles. The country's oil production could decline by up to 50% by 2030, largely because newer reserves are technically difficult and capital-intensive to extract. That's why Moscow is quietly seeking Western — specifically U.S. — expertise to develop these fields. A coordinated, firm sanctions regime from Washington and Brussels could shut that door completely. Simultaneously, the U.S. and Saudi Arabia are deepening their energy partnership, particularly in liquefied natural gas (LNG). Saudi Aramco has reportedly signed memoranda of understanding with American LNG exporters like NextDecade and Sempra. The latter already holds a major supply contract with Poland's Orlen, and the U.S. is now poised to become a key alternative gas supplier to Central and Eastern Europe. These investments will expand global LNG capacity and bring prices closer to the U.S. Henry Hub benchmark — lowering Europe's dependence on Russian gas. Poland and Ukraine are moving to capitalize on this trend. Warsaw has announced plans for a second floating LNG terminal, which could eventually supply Slovakia and Hungary — two nations historically reliant on Russian gas. Ukraine, meanwhile, is gaining investor interest now that the U.S. has committed to a joint Reconstruction and Investment Fund, funded through future resource extraction projects. For the first time since the full-scale invasion began, Western business sees a path forward in Ukraine's energy sector. The implications for Russia are grave. Military spending has ballooned to 6.3% of GDP — its highest level since the Cold War — while the budget deficit continues to rise. To fund its war, the Kremlin is raiding reserves, raising taxes, and cutting social programs. Absent war spending, Russia might already be in recession. The regime increasingly relies on military conflict to justify domestic hardship and consolidate power. Read also: Inside Russia, calls for peace come with conditions — and Kremlin talking points But the geopolitical landscape is shifting. The combination of low oil prices, expanding LNG competition, and targeted U.S. sanctions could inflict sustained economic damage on Russia without risking American or European lives. Energy diplomacy, not just weaponry, could determine the outcome of this war. The next steps are critical. The White House must maintain pressure — not just by providing Ukraine with military aid, but by deepening its energy cooperation with allies and enforcing robust sanctions. The message to Moscow should be clear: the price of continuing the war will be economic asphyxiation. If the United States can coordinate its economic tools with allies in Europe and the Middle East, Russia may find itself unable to afford the very war it insists on waging. Submit an Opinion Editor's Note: The opinions expressed in the op-ed section are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Kyiv Independent. We've been working hard to bring you independent, locally-sourced news from Ukraine. Consider supporting the Kyiv Independent.
