'What's the point of reciprocity then?': GOP Sen Kennedy corners Lutnick over Trump's tariff policy
During a fiery moment at the U.S. Senate Appropriations Committee hearing, Republican Senator John Kennedy grilled Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick over the logic of U.S. tariff policy. When Kennedy asked if the U.S. would drop its tariffs should Vietnam do the same, Lutnick flatly replied, 'Absolutely not. That'd be the silliest thing we could do.' Kennedy fired back, questioning the very basis of reciprocal trade policy: 'Then what's the point of reciprocity?' The tense exchange highlighted deep GOP scepticism over the Trump administration's trade stance and drew attention to widening divisions over tariff strategy and economic fairness in global markets.
Show more
Show less
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
39 minutes ago
- Time of India
Elon Musk backs JD Vance — and Trump's not happy: Michael Wolff says the President is paranoid
Elon Musk backs JD Vance — and Trump's not happy: Michael Wolff says the President is paranoid: The story of Elon Musk backing JD Vance has taken a serious turn — and President Donald Trump isn't pleased. According to veteran political author Michael Wolff, the President is growing paranoid, even suspicious, of his own Vice President. With Trump currently in the White House and Vance just one heartbeat away, this isn't just political gossip — it's a sign of real tension at the top. Why is Trump worried about Elon Musk supporting his own VP, JD Vance? In a report published by Raw Story, journalist Michael Wolff revealed that President Trump is becoming increasingly anxious about Elon Musk's influence — and the way it's shaping JD Vance's political identity. Elon Musk, the billionaire CEO of Tesla and X (formerly Twitter), has reportedly suggested that Vance would make a better president than Trump himself. In private, Musk has allegedly encouraged key donors and Silicon Valley insiders to look to Vance as a long-term successor. That idea, according to Wolff, has deeply unsettled Trump. Even though Vance is his running mate and now serves as Vice President of the United States, Trump is said to see him as 'too close to Musk' and a potential rival rather than a loyal partner. Is Trump's fear of being replaced by Vance real or just political paranoia? Wolff says the fear is real — and growing. 'He's always been paranoid, but this is different,' Wolff told Raw Story. 'Trump sees Musk's money, his power on social media, and the way he talks about Vance — and he's starting to think there's a plot.' Live Events Wolff claims Trump is even considering 'loyalty tests' for his vice president, privately questioning whether Vance is more committed to the MAGA movement or to Musk's vision of tech-backed nationalism. The timing matters here. We're deep into 2025, with Trump now in his second term, and Vance being groomed by many on the right as the future of the Republican Party. That kind of speculation — especially when amplified by Musk — is enough to trigger Trump's deep political insecurities. How has JD Vance responded to Trump's growing suspicion? Vice President JD Vance has publicly downplayed the rift, but his words reveal the pressure he's under. In a recent interview, Vance said, 'I'm the vice president to President Trump. My loyalties are always going to be with the president.' He also called Musk's recent comments a 'huge mistake' that stirred up unnecessary division. Vance has spent the past year carefully balancing his loyalty to Trump with his appeal to younger conservatives and Silicon Valley influencers. That balancing act has worked — until now. As Musk continues to throw subtle shade at Trump and hint at a post-Trump GOP, Vance is increasingly caught in the middle. Behind closed doors, some Republican insiders say Vance is being advised to 'stay in his lane' — not to appear too ambitious, not to align too closely with Musk, and definitely not to outshine the president. But that's easier said than done when Musk has nearly 200 million followers on X and regularly fuels speculation about Vance's future. What role did the Epstein post play in escalating the drama? Things really boiled over when Musk posted — and then deleted — a message on X hinting that Trump's name might be found in Jeffrey Epstein's court records. No evidence was provided, and Musk has since gone silent on the matter. But the damage was done. Wolff said this was the moment that sent Trump over the edge. 'That was a silver bullet. Even if there's nothing there, just the suggestion of it reactivates all of Trump's worst fears.' The deleted post was widely screenshotted and shared across social media, giving critics of Trump a new narrative — and giving Musk's feud with the president a deeply personal edge.
Economic Times
an hour ago
- Economic Times
2024 US Presidential election is under scrutiny as lawsuit claims discrepancies in Rockland County, New York
A lawsuit challenging the 2024 US Presidential election accuracy, filed by SMART Legislation, highlights alleged voting discrepancies in Rockland County, New York. The lawsuit seeks a hand recount of ballots in presidential and Senate races, with a hearing scheduled for September 22. Statistical anomalies and sworn affidavits questioning the results have fueled the legal challenge. A formal complaint alleged that more voters submitted sworn affidavits claiming they voted for independent U.S. Senate candidate Diane Sare than were recorded and certified by the Rockland County Board of Elections, raising questions about the official results. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads What does the lawsuit state? Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads A legal case challenging the accuracy of the 2024 US Presidential election is gaining traction. The lawsuit was filed by SMART Legislation , the advocacy arm of SMART Elections, a nonpartisan watchdog organization and it focuses on alleged voting discrepancies in Rockland County, New York, reports NewsWeek. The lawsuit is seeking a full, hand recount of ballots cast in the presidential and U.S. Senate races in Rockland County. A hearing has been scheduled for September the results of the US elections were declared in November last year, a shift towards the Republican was seen across the country – even in the deeply Democratic stronghold of New York May, New York Supreme Court Judge Rachel Tanguay ruled in open court that the allegations were serious enough to warrant the discovery process. The lawsuit could raise questions and debate about the 2024 US Presidential election but it won't change the result as Congress has certified the results declaring President Donald Trump as the lawsuit comes at time when unconfirmed reports claimed that voting machines were secretly altered before ballots were cast during elections in November. According to the Dissent in Bloom Substack, Pro V&V—a federally accredited testing laboratory that approved "significant" changes to ES&S voting machines used in over 40% of U.S. counties—"vanished from public view" following the Friesdat, the founder and executive director of SMART Legislation, said in a statement: "There is clear evidence that the Senate results are incorrect, and there are statistical indications that the presidential results are highly unlikely."If the results are incorrect, it is a violation of the constitutional rights of each person who voted in the 2024 Rockland County general election. The best way to determine if the results are correct is to examine the paper ballots in a full public, transparent hand recount of all presidential and Senate ballots in Rockland County. We believe it's vitally important, especially in the current environment, to be absolutely confident about the results of the election."A formal complaint alleged that more voters submitted sworn affidavits claiming they voted for independent U.S. Senate candidate Diane Sare than were recorded and certified by the Rockland County Board of Elections, raising questions about the official results. The complaint also points to several statistical anomalies in the presidential election returns, including districts where hundreds of voters selected Democratic Senate candidate Kirsten Gillibrand, yet not a single vote was recorded for Democratic presidential candidate and former Vice President Kamala Bonamente, a professor of physics and astronomy at the University of Alabama in Huntsville and the author of the Statistics and Analysis of Scientific Data, said in a paper that the 2024 presidential election results were statistically highly unlikely in four of the five towns in Rockland County when compared with 2020 Bonamente said in a paper on the voting data from Rockland County: "These data would require extreme sociological or political causes for their explanation, and would benefit from further assurances as to their fidelity."Costas Panagopoulos, a professor of political science at Northeastern University, told Newsweek: "Statistical irregularities in elections should always be investigated, but the sources of such inconsistencies, which can include error or miscalculation, are not always nefarious. Still, scrutinizing election results can strengthen confidence in elections. Mistakes can happen."In this case, the drop-off inconsistencies could reflect the idiosyncratic nature of the 2024 presidential election cycle. Alone, statistical comparisons to previous cycles cannot provide definitive proof of wrongdoing."In any case, it does not appear that any of these inconsistencies would be sufficient to change the outcomes of any of the elections in question in New York state. That does not mean they should not be scrutinized, and any errors, if verified, should be corrected for the historical record. But there is not necessarily any need to invalidate any of these elections in these jurisdictions."
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
AstraZeneca, BioNTech, GSK, Sanofi, Moderna, Novavax, Pfizer share prices: Why are vaccine stocks down?
Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads FAQs Shares of global vaccine makers were muted on Tuesday as investors and analysts took a "wait and watch" approach after U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. fired all members of an expert vaccine panel late on Monday. Shares of AstraZeneca and BioNTech were marginally up, while those of GSK and Sanofi declined 1 per cent and 0.2 per cent, respectively. U.S. vaccine maker Moderna fell slightly in premarket trading, while Novavax and Pfizer traded marginally higher, as per a said that while the unprecedented dismissals of all members of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) represented a risk for vaccine manufacturers, investors would wait to see any impact on the companies, Reuters he was appointed as U.S. health secretary, Kennedy, a vaccine skeptic, has made several changes to reshape the regulation of vaccines, food and medicine. However, firing members of the ACIP remains his most far-reaching move analysts expressed concerns that the new committee members, who have not been named, might be more sympathetic to Kennedy's views on vaccines, an idea shared by scientific experts and the makeup of a reconstituted ACIP is to be determined, "new members will likely be sympathetic to at least some of RFK's beliefs regarding alleged dangers of vaccines", Leerink analyst Daina Graybosch said in a said that the move could negatively impact approved vaccine recommendations and increase the burden of evidence and costs for future vaccine decision came less than three weeks before the next panel meeting set for June 25 to June 27 and is slated to discuss recommendations for who should receive vaccines for diseases like respiratory syncytial is unclear when Kennedy will announce the new members, who the agency said are under consideration, or whether the agenda will follow the meeting description posted on the Federal Register on Monday.A1. Shares of AstraZeneca and BioNTech were marginally up, while those of GSK and Sanofi declined 1 per cent and 0.2 per cent, respectively. U.S. vaccine maker Moderna fell slightly in premarket trading, while Novavax and Pfizer traded marginally higher, as per a report.A2. US Health Secretary is Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
