logo
Cameras on NYC street sweepers may soon nab alternate side parking scofflaws

Cameras on NYC street sweepers may soon nab alternate side parking scofflaws

Yahoo29-05-2025

Serial street-sweeper scofflaws, beware. You could soon be on camera.
The City Council Wednesday voted to give its consent to a proposed state law that would enable street sweepers to automatically issue alternate-side parking tickets to any vehicle slotted alongside the wrong curb.
'This is a common-sense bill that will make our streets demonstrably cleaner,' Council Member Lincoln Restler (D – Brooklyn), who sponsored the bill, said in a statement. 'We're talking about cracking down on the worst offenders to ultimately facilitate greater compliance, which means fewer rats and better quality of life for all New Yorkers.'
The Council voted 41 to 8 to pass the legislation.
The bill is a so-called 'Home Rule message,' meaning it merely indicates the City's intention to cooperate with a state law that's yet to pass.
The state bill — known as S1891 in the senate, and A4523 in the assembly — has yet to get out of committee in either house.
If passed, the law would allow the city to mount cameras on the Department of Sanitation's fleet of street-sweepers to photograph and automatically ticket any vehicles parked along the curb during cleaning hours.
The automated tickets would be capped at $50, and be subject to an additional $25 late fee.
'Just as bus cameras protect transit riders, broom cameras will safeguard public health and urban dignity,' said state Sen. Robert Jackson (D – Manhattan). 'This isn't about punishment—it's about progress.'
The law would also allow photographs taken by the sweeper-mounted cameras to be provided to law enforcement in response to a warrant.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Who is Colombian Sen. Miguel Uribe Turbay who was shot during a campaign rally in Bogota?
Who is Colombian Sen. Miguel Uribe Turbay who was shot during a campaign rally in Bogota?

Yahoo

time29 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Who is Colombian Sen. Miguel Uribe Turbay who was shot during a campaign rally in Bogota?

Conservative Colombian Sen. Miguel Uribe Turbay was shot and seriously injured during a campaign rally in the capital, Bogota. The brazen attack captured on video shook a nation that decades ago regularly saw kidnappings and killings of politicians and high profile people. Uribe Turbay, 39, who has announced he intends to run for president next year, was in serious condition following surgery Sunday, a day after the shooting, and doctors said he was going through 'critical hours.' Here's what to know about the conservative politician: A conservative presidential hopeful A member of the right-wing Democratic Center party, Uribe Turbay launched his presidential bid in March. He has become a prominent opposition voice against the government of President Gustavo Petro, the first leftist politician to become the leader of Colombia. Petro cannot seek reelection in 2026. Uribe Turbay, whose family had also suffered political violence, launched his presidential bid in March. In October last year, he had posted a video on social media announcing his intention to run, choosing the mountains of Copacabana in the department of Antioquia as a backdrop. The country will hold a presidential election on May 31, 2026. 'A place with deep meaning for me,' he said in the video. 'It was here that my mother was kidnapped by Pablo Escobar and was killed when I was about to turn five.' His mother, journalist Diana Turbay, was abducted by the Medellin Cartel and killed in 1991, one of Colombia's most violent periods. The attack on Uribe Turbay on Saturday shocked the nation and revived memories of an era when political violence affected Colombian public life. A life as part of a politically well-known family Uribe Turbay entered politics early, being elected to Bogota's City Council at age 25 in 2012. In 2016, he was appointed the city's secretary of government by then-Mayor Enrique Peñalosa. In 2022, he became senator after being invited to run by former President Álvaro Uribe Vélez, no relation. Uribe Turbay was born into a prominent political family. He is the grandson of former President Julio César Turbay Ayala, who served from 1978 to 1982, and the paternal grandson of Rodrigo Uribe Echavarría, a former director of the Liberal Party. He was not considered a front-runner in next year's race, according to recent polls, and was still facing competition within his political coalition. In his pre-campaign messaging, Uribe Turbay focused heavily on security, seeking to inspire investments and promote economic stability. 'Reserved prognosis' The senator is going through what authorities have described as 'critical hours' after undergoing surgery at a private clinic in Bogotá. 'He survived the procedure; these are critical moments and hours for his survival,' said Bogotá Mayor Carlos Galán early Sunday after receiving information from the medical staff at the Fundación Santa Fe clinic. 'His condition is extremely serious and the prognosis is reserved,' the clinic added hours later in a new medical report. Police arrested a 15-year-old boy for the shooting who they considered the perpetrator. Authorities have not disclosed a motive. Colombia's Ombudsman's Office condemned the attack, saying the country 'cannot allow a return to dark times when violence sought to silence ideas, candidacies or political leadership.' ___ Follow AP's coverage of Latin America and the Caribbean at

Sacramento LGBT Center considers reducing services as it faces funding cuts
Sacramento LGBT Center considers reducing services as it faces funding cuts

Yahoo

time29 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Sacramento LGBT Center considers reducing services as it faces funding cuts

The Sacramento LGBT Community Center warned that hundreds of youth, many at risk of homelessness or in crisis, could lose access to life-saving mental health counseling and gender-affirming care if the City Council fails to approve additional funding. A $500,000 loss for the center from a terminated federal grant has already affected youth and adult mental health services, said Executive Director David Heitstuman. 'We do have another $1.2 million in federal funding that could be at risk depending on federal action,' Heitstuman said. 'So, we are in a very challenging position as an organization that's sort of at the top of the target list for the administration, which makes this funding even more vital.' The center provides counseling, drop-in respite care, and community resource navigation under its mental health program. Additionally, the center holds Coming Out, Golden Grounds LGBTQ Elders, Transgender, and Twenty-Somethings support groups. Jon Garcia, director of youth and family programs, spoke at the May 20 City Council meeting and estimated that the center serves about 400 youth aged 14-24, who predominantly reside in the city of Sacramento. Of these 400, 20% identify as African American, 12% identify as Latinx, 42% are homeless or at risk of being homeless, and 17% have had prior foster care experience. At the center, 33% of recent mental health clients required emergency intervention for suicidal ideation or attempts, 84% of whom were youth, Garcia said. The center has requested $1.5 million from the City Council, through the city's Measure L to address this growing need. At the May 20 meeting, representatives from the center recommended the adoption of a scenario to provide $417,000 in funding. The council will vote on the funding Tuesday. During the meeting, Rene Kausin, youth development project manager for the city's Department of Youth, Parks and Community Enrichment, explained that the awards were funded by taxes on cannabis operations to child and youth services. The funds were then guided by an investment plan adopted by the city last September to support youth and youth violence prevention programming to nonprofits and public entities. Organizations that qualify must apply for the grants through a competitive process. The grants range from $25,000 to $500,000, pulled from a pool of $17.9 million. When asked about the implications if the center were unable to receive the grant, Heitstuman said that cuts would have to be made. 'It means that we're going to continue to have a big deficit in our region for LGBTQ-affirming services, particularly dire for low-income folks, who don't have access to be able to pay for an affirming provider,' Heitstuman said. 'And if we aren't able to secure funding to continue this program, it's going to mean that we're going to have to make service reductions.' Heitstuman is optimistic, though, that the council will approve the funding or create their own allocation plan to support the center. 'It's really, really hard to replace hundreds of thousands or millions of dollars in grant funds with $20 donations,' Heitstuman said. 'With all the economic uncertainty and the lack of availability of funding at the federal and state level, we really do need to see local officials step up and support our business.'

Richland Council, leave trans student policy to the schools
Richland Council, leave trans student policy to the schools

Yahoo

time29 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Richland Council, leave trans student policy to the schools

The May 6 Richland City Council meeting included discussion of whether the mayor should sign a letter about trans participation in school sports. Although the City Council has absolutely no authority over education policies, they felt that addressing a matter outside the sway of city government was worthy of extended public comment and pontificating from the mayor. Whether one agrees or disagrees with the letter is immaterial; signing it is not good governance. Good governance is about competence, not ideology. Sitting on their platform expressing personal opinions about issues other than those directly impacted by their actions is simply an effort to impose values on our community. This is not a council member's job, and it is not a privilege of their job. But the Richland City Council is not alone; the Kennewick and Pasco councils have also wasted time and energy discussing and signing the letter. I am shocked at how easily our local officials can be manipulated. Watching them so eagerly jump to engage in useless performative governing over a 'dog-whistle' issue outside their control is disappointing and embarrassing. Council members, stick to your job. Marie Noorani, Richland First of all, a huge thank you to Jeff Morrow for acknowledging our Tri-Cities high school golfers. These athletes work so hard, and they love the recognition from the Tri-City Herald! We personally have printed off articles as a keepsake for both of our kids in past years. I noticed Joel Martinez with Chiawana was mentioned in the article, but Beyora King and Moira Laird with Chiawana were not mentioned. Like Joel Martinez, Moira and Beyora also qualified as individuals for the state tournament in DuPont, with Moira Laird shooting an 89 on day one, which qualified her for day two, where she shot a 91. After factoring in all of the tied scores, this placed Moira in a two-way tie for 21st in a field of 116 golfers across the state. Both of these Chiawana Lady Riverhawks have had outstanding seasons, with Beyora King (a senior) making the MCC All-Conference First Team, and Moira Laird (a junior) making MCC All-Conference Second Team. These golfers definitely deserve to be acknowledged along with their peers. Thank you for your time, and thank you again for acknowledging student-athletes. Ashley Laird, Pasco According to Morning Joe analyst Steve Rattner, the 'Big Beautiful Bill' passed by House Republicans will deliver a 3.7% increase in after-tax dollars to the top 10%. The average bottom 10% American will lose $800 because the tax relief is so small and the loss of safety net benefits so large. The 60% in the middle won't feel much difference either way. The cuts to Medicaid and food stamps in the bill are historically large, but it still would increase the deficit by $3.8 trillion. Rattner also says that if the 2017 tax cuts were allowed to expire only on those Americans making over $500,000 annually, it would save $1.1 trillion over 10 years. That would be enough to pay for the Medicaid and food stamps that the 'BBB' cuts. The GOP pretends that tax cuts that exclude the very wealthy are liberal extremism though. The bill was hastily passed in the wee hours without the normal process of evaluation. Rep. Dan Newhouse voted yes and claims to be proud of it, but really? The hot mess will next be considered by the Senate where even the Republicans reportedly think it stinks, but nobody's betting on their integrity. Greg Carl, Richland I was hopeful but not naïve about Rep. Dan Newhouse. But it still hurt when he lied outright to us about not cutting Medicaid. That was a lie. What made it worse than lying was that he exulted and reveled in the lie. He was untruthful with us before, but in a typical misleading way. This was not that. His trumpeting of the lie as something good and great made it so much worse and mean-spirited than anything before. That hurt. His vote was cruel but also wasteful. This budget bill does not reduce the deficit but gives more money to rich Americans by removing an estimated 9 million poorer Americans from insurance. Apparently, in Republican land, this is to be trumpeted as a great accomplishment. Cruelty and incompetence are celebrated. Poorer Americans are kicked to the curb, richer Americans are undertaxed and the deficit grows. To Newhouse, this is great news. In Republican-speak, the deficit is reduced and waste, fraud and abuse are addressed. None of which is true. But Republicans today, and now Newhouse, do not deal in truth. They deal in falsehoods, lies and cruelty. Never again, Newhouse. And shame on you. I am done with you. Chuck Henager, Kennewick

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store