New Chief Executive For Pharmac
Pharmac's Board has appointed a new Chief Executive to lead the organisation.
Canadian Natalie McMurtry will join Pharmac on Monday 15 September after an extensive recruitment search within New Zealand and overseas.
Board Chair Paula Bennett says Ms McMurtry brings significant front-line and health leadership experience to the Pharmac role.
'The level of interest in this role and the calibre of applicants was really high but in the end the Board was impressed by Natalie McMurtry's depth of strategic and operational experience, intelligence, people focus and empathetic approach.
'This is exactly what Pharmac needs as a more transparent, inclusive and outward-focused organisation.'
Natalie McMurtry is currently the Chief Transition Officer responsible for launching a new Acute Care Agency in Alberta, Canada. Prior to that she was the Assistant Deputy Minister for Pharmaceutical and Supplementary Health Benefits with the Alberta Government. She began her career as a paediatric critical care pharmacist at the Stollery Children's Hospital in Edmonton and has since held a variety of strategic and operational roles across the health system. She holds a Bachelor of Science degree in pharmacy from Dalhousie University and an MBA in Innovation Leadership.
She says she is looking forward to joining Pharmac.
'I am honoured and excited to be joining the Pharmac team at such a pivotal time. I'm deeply grateful for the opportunity to contribute to an organisation that plays such a vital role in the health and wellbeing of New Zealanders.'
Ms McMurtry will replace Acting Chief Executive Brendan Boyle, who was appointed for a fixed term while recruitment was underway to fill the vacancy left by former Chief Executive Sarah Fitt. Paula Bennett thanked Brendan Boyle for his work in the interim.
'We have been very fortunate to have his extensive public sector experience available to lay strong foundations for the new Chief Executive.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
5 hours ago
- Scoop
MPs Caught Swearing As David Seymour Faces Questions On Regulatory Reviews
Minister for Regulation, David Seymour, has denied regulatory reviews carried out by the ministry have been for anyone's political benefit, in a tense select committee hearing at Parliament in which two Labour MPs had to apologise for swearing. Seymour appeared before the Finance and Expenditure Committee as part of Scrutiny Week, to face questions on the budget for the Ministry of Regulation. So far, the ministry has carried out reviews into the early childhood education, agricultural and horticultural products, and hairdressing sectors. A fourth review into telecommunications has also been announced. Labour MP Duncan Webb questioned Seymour over whether he or the ACT Party had any connections to donors or lobbyists in those sectors, who would stand to benefit from the reviews. "There's a real concern that it looks like there's an appearance of regulatory reviews being chosen to benefit parties connected politically," Webb said. "How can we have confidence that the decisions are not politically influenced, and are made entirely on the basis of where [the] best wins and values for New Zealanders are." Seymour accused Webb of being improper with his questioning. "The idea that we decided to do a review of the early childhood sector because someone may or may not, I'm not even sure, have donated to the ACT Party a long time ago is frankly fatuous," he said. "My main interaction with the dairy industry is probably through a flat white." Ministry chief executive Gráinne Moss said the review into agricultural and horticultural products was suggested by the ministry itself, to the minister. Webb said the minister should have no part to play in deciding what sectors to review. 'For f***'s sake' - MPs caught swearing The session got off to a tense start, after Labour's Deborah Russell was heard saying "for f***'s sake" during Seymour's opening remarks. National's Ryan Hamilton raised it as a point of order. While committee chair Cameron Brewer was fine to carry on, Seymour made Russell repeat herself. She then withdrew her comment and apologised. Later on, Webb accused Seymour of "making s*** up" regarding the ministry's work on flour dust standards. Seymour also bristled at Labour MP Megan Woods interrupting Moss while she gave an answer, and threatened that ACT would release a video of the Labour MPs' behaviour. After the hearing, Seymour said he was "astonished" by the swearing. "The amount of swearing from Labour MPs, I've never seen that before. Clearly, they're very angry about something, but they were just a rabble. Their various accusations were completely untrue. And really, you have to wonder if these guys are taking it seriously."
Otago Daily Times
5 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Health figures improve, more work to do: minister
More cancer patients are receiving their first treatment within 31 days, more children are getting immunised, and more patients are being admitted, discharged, or transferred from an emergency department within six hours. But the proportions of patients waiting longer than four months to see a specialist or receive elective treatment have slightly increased. Health New Zealand has released its latest quarterly update on the government's health targets, for Q3 2024-25. The government has set health targets focused on cutting down wait times, increasing childhood immunisations, and faster cancer treatments by 2030. The targets, set in 2024, include: 90% of patients to receive cancer treatment within 31 days of the decision to treat (milestone of 86% in 2024-25) 95% of children immunised at 24 months of age (milestone of 84% in 2024-25) 95% of patients to be admitted, discharged, or transferred from an emergency department within six hours (milestone of 74% in 2024-25) 95% of patients waiting less than four months for a first specialist assessment (milestone of 62% in 2024-25) 95% of patients waiting less than four months for elective treatment (milestone of 63% in 2024-25) The latest update shows: 84.6% of patients receiving cancer treatment 31 days of the decision to treat (up from 83% in Q3 2023-24) 79.3% of children immunised at 24 months of age (up from 76.9% in Q3 2023-24) 74.2% of patients admitted, discharged, or transferred from an emergency department within six hours (up from 70.1% in Q3 2023-24) 58.2% of patients waiting less than four months for a first specialist assessment (down from 59.2% in Q3 2023-24) 57.3% of patients waiting less than four months for elective treatment (down from 59.3% in Q3 2023-24) Health Minister Simeon Brown said there was still more work to do, but it was a step in the right direction. "Restoring performance and accountability takes time, and we remain focused on continuing to deliver improvements," he said. Brown acknowledged the percentage of patients waiting longer for elective procedures and first specialist assessments had increased, but said the number of patients waiting had dropped by 1891 between January and March 2025. "In the last quarter alone, more than 48,000 elective procedures and 167,000 first specialist assessments were completed. That's thousands of New Zealanders getting back to work, returning to everyday life, and regaining their quality of life," he said. Some patients have been able to access the Elective Boost policy, which sees Health New Zealand partner up with private hospitals to expand surgical capacity for procedures like hip and knee replacements, cataract surgeries, hernia repairs, tonsillectomies, and ear operations. More than 9500 procedures have been delivered as part of the policy, with Brown saying the majority were those who had been waiting longer than four months. The government recently announced plans to bake the health targets into legislation, requiring all health strategies to give effect to them. Law and order targets well ahead of schedule The government's law and order targets are well ahead of schedule, with one achieved and the other nearing completion. Quarterly data for the three months to February showed the number of adults experiencing violent crime fell below the target of 165,000 people or fewer, to 157,144. It marks achievement of the goal of a reduction of 20,000 people being victim of an assault, robbery, or sexual assault offence. The other law and order target of reducing youth offending by 15% was also on track, with the number of offenders - 942 - closing in on the target of 900 or fewer, and accounting for a 13% decrease. Both targets had a deadline for completion by 2030. Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith said the government had "wasted no time overhauling a culture of excuses left behind by the last administration", saying there was more work to do but the results were a sign the government was headed in the right direction. "We've provided police and the courts with extra tools to go after gangs, brought back a revised three strikes sentencing regime, restored real consequences for crime by limiting sentence discounts, and scrapped Section 27 reports. We do, however, expect the data to remain volatile, and there's still more work to do to continue driving these numbers down." Children's Minister Karen Chhour said the government had trialled "bold new responses to this long-standing issue" of youth offending, including data-driven regional responses. "We continue to want better for, and from, these young people. This is a strong start, but we're committed to sustained and meaningful success for our communities," she said. Reporting from the Herald shows Ministry of Justice advice suggests the drop in violent crime over the past year reflects a return to trends seen between 2018 and 2022.
Scoop
6 hours ago
- Scoop
Please Explain! The Proponents Of The Retrospective Law Change Need To Front Up
Those responsible for pushing a retrospective law change that could wipe out the rights of tens of thousands of New Zealanders must now front up to provide a formal 'please- explain'. That's the call from Scott Russell, the lawyer leading the Banking Class Action against ANZ and ASB, who has formally written to Cameron Brewer, MP as Chair of Parliament's Finance and Expenditure Committee urging him to call key decision-makers and proponents of the Credit Contracts and Consumer Finance Amendment Bill to publicly explain the rationale for this extraordinary intervention. The Committee has the power to compel individuals to appear and a more clear-cut case for using that power would be hard to imagine. 'The Government is rewriting the law half-way through an active legal case to benefit two powerful Australian-owned banks – and no one seems to be taking responsibility for making the decision,' said Russell. 'Hon Scott Simpson, Commerce Minister says the banks didn't ask for it. The banks haven't commented. MBIE won't release the documents. And the public is being asked to accept it all on blind trust. Enough. It's time for answers.' Russell's submission urges the Select Committee to summon the following to 'Please Explain': The Chair and Chief Executives of ANZ and ASB to explain their role in the process; Senior MBIE officials to justify the sudden shift to retrospective legislation following private meetings with the banks; The Reserve Bank to provide any evidence backing claims that the law change is needed to protect financial stability. 'If their rationale is sound, let's hear it. Because right now, no one has offered a credible explanation for why a law change ruled out during the public consultation stage was suddenly resurrected behind closed doors – and timed perfectly to potentially limit the liability of two banks in a live court case.' The Government has refused to release unredacted versions of the Regulatory Impact Statement and delayed key OIA responses until after the public submission period closes on 23 June. The Ombudsman is now investigating. 'The Select Committee process cannot be allowed to rubber-stamp a law change that overrides consumer rights and undermines public trust – especially when those responsible won't even show up to explain it,' Russell said. 'If this is in the public interest, let the public hear why.'
