logo
‘Trump's hateful agenda': Australia's university sector accuses US administration of ‘blatant interference'

‘Trump's hateful agenda': Australia's university sector accuses US administration of ‘blatant interference'

The Guardian14-03-2025

The Trump administration has been accused of 'blatant foreign interference' in Australia's universities after researchers who receive US funding were asked to confirm they aligned with American interests, including only recognising two genders.
The questionnaire, sent to university researchers over the past fortnight, seeks a response within 48 hours to more than 30 questions to support 'program determinations', according to a copy of the questionnaire seen by Guardian Australia. The questions relate to the priorities of the Trump government, including whether the organisation receives funding from China, whether there are DEI elements, and whether the project is taking 'appropriate measures' to defend against gender ideology in line with Trump's executive order on gender.
The questionnaires were distributed by various federal agencies on behalf of an executive memo from the office of the president, requiring them to identify all funding was consistent with 'policies and requirements'.
Separately, six sandstone universities represented by the Group of Eight have already had research grants suspended or terminated in line with changes introduced by the Trump administration, according to the Go8. Researchers were notified shortly after the US election that the projects, which spanned a range of topics from agriculture to foreign aid and diversity and equity, had been cancelled under higher education cuts, pending a review.
The chief executive of the Go8, Vicki Thomson, said the body was 'extremely concerned' about the implications of the Trump administration's policy, particularly for health and medical research and defence collaboration.
'Go8 universities are deeply engaged in collaborative activities with the US, especially through our defence initiatives and the Aukus alliance,' she said.
'For every one of our members, the US is the largest research partner by far.'
Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email
The Go8 has sought Australian government intervention and last week wrote to the chair of the US House Committee on Science, Space and Technology, Brian Babin, for guidance and an extension of time to respond to the requirements.
The questionnaire seeks to confirm university projects don't work with 'any party that espouses anti-American beliefs', or whether they have received 'ANY funding from the PRC', including Confucius Institutes and Chinese state or non-state actors.
It also asks whether research is a 'no DEI project' or a 'climate or 'environmental justice' project', as well as ensuring it takes 'appropriate measures to protect women and to defend against gender ideology' and combats 'Christian prosecution'.
Universities and colleges across the US have been grappling with cuts to research under the Trump administration and the tying of its DEI agenda to funding, prompting thousands of scientists to rally across the US and EU last week.
In February, the education department sent a letter to universities instructing that any consideration of race in 'all … aspects of student, academic, and campus life' was illegal. The administration has also proposed limiting curricula on gender.
Donald Trump's federal congressional budget is also proposing billions of dollars in federal funding cuts across higher education, including capping all 'indirect funding' from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) at 15%.
The US is the largest international research partner for Australia, with the two nations sharing nearly 1,000 formal collaborations. It is also Australia's top international research collaborator and biggest global collaborator in cancer research, with the National Cancer Institute awarding 211 grants to projects with Australian collaborators from 2013-2023.
The Go8 received about US$161.6m in grants from the NIH between 2020 and 2024.
The National Tertiary Education Union (NTEU) has urged the federal government to intervene and reach out to the Trump administration on behalf of universities.
Sign up to Breaking News Australia
Get the most important news as it breaks
after newsletter promotion
Its national president, Dr Alison Barnes, said the Australian government must guarantee researchers would be protected from 'blatant foreign interference'.
'Donald Trump's hateful agenda is racist, transphobic and misogynistic. The idea of research funding being tied to any of those values is sickening,' she said.
'Allowing Trump to dictate the terms of research will have devastating impacts on research including life-saving vaccines, critical social sciences and climate solutions that could save the planet – just to name a few.'
This week, the US administration cancelled 33 research grants investigating vaccine hesitancy and was conducting a review of mRNA vaccine projects.
The NTEU Queer Unionists in Tertiary Education national convener, Amy Sargeant, said Trump was 'disgracefully attacking' LGBTQ+ people.
'Trying to force research to comply with transphobia is disgusting, and the Australian government must unwaveringly stand up against this fascist foreign intervention,' she said.
The CEO of Universities Australia, Luke Sheehy, said Australia's international partnerships were 'critical' for tackling global challenges.
'We will … work closely with the government to ensure our universities can keep doing world-class research,' he said.
The shadow minister for education, Sarah Henderson, said higher education played an important role in combating foreign interference in the face of 'increasing threats from others who want to do us harm'.
'The Albanese government should provide clear guidance to universities on how to navigate these matters in line with Australia's values and national interests,' she said.
The education minister, Jason Clare, was approached for comment.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Fan climbs netting at Wrigley Field to retrieve Sal Frelick's bat
Fan climbs netting at Wrigley Field to retrieve Sal Frelick's bat

The Independent

time19 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Fan climbs netting at Wrigley Field to retrieve Sal Frelick's bat

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging. At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story. The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it. Your support makes all the difference.

US joining Israeli strikes would cause hell, Iranian minister tells BBC
US joining Israeli strikes would cause hell, Iranian minister tells BBC

BBC News

time25 minutes ago

  • BBC News

US joining Israeli strikes would cause hell, Iranian minister tells BBC

The US joining Israeli strikes would cause "hell for the whole region", Iran's deputy foreign minister has told the Khatibzadeh said this is "not America's war" and if US President Donald Trump does get involved, he will always be remembered as "a president who entered a war he doesn't belong in".He said US involvement would turn the conflict into a "quagmire", continue aggression and delay an end to the "brutal atrocities". His comments came after the Soroka hospital in southern Israel was hit during an Iranian missile attack. Iranian state media reported that the strike targeted a military site next to the hospital, and not the facility itself. Israel's Ministry of Health said 71 people were injured during the attack on the Soroka Medical Centre. Meanwhile, Israel's military said it had targeted Iran's nuclear sites including the "inactive" Arak heavy water reactor and Natanz has not given an update on casualties in Iran from Israeli latest attacks come at a critical time. On Thursday, the White House said Trump would decide whether or not the US gets directly involved in the conflict within the next two to the BBC, Khatibzadeh insisted that "of course, diplomacy is the first option", but said but while bombardment continues "we cannot start any negotiation".He repeatedly called Iran's attacks on Israel "self defence under Article 51 of the UN Charter" and said "we were in the middle of diplomacy" when in a major escalation of the conflict on 13 June, Israel launched attacks on Iranian nuclear sites, killing several top generals and nuclear deputy foreign minister called the conflict "unprovoked" and "unnecessary". Responding to Trump's repeated comments that the conflict could have been avoided if Iran had accepted a nuclear deal, Khatibzadeh said they were negotiating until Israel "sabotaged" discussions by launching attacks Iran. "We were planning to have the sixth round of nuclear talks in Muscat, and we were actually on the verge of reaching an agreement," he said. "President Trump knows better than anybody else that we were on the verge of reaching an agreement." He also criticised Trump's "confusing and contradictory" social media posts and interviews, which he said indicated "that Americans have been aware and have participated" in the conflict. US special envoy Steve Witkoff and Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi have reportedly spoken on the phone several times since Friday, in a bid to find a diplomatic end to the crisis, Reuters reported. According to three diplomats who spoke to the news agency and asked not to be identified due to the sensitivity of the matter, Araqchi said Tehran would not return to negotiations unless Israel stopped the attacks. Israel has alleged Iran has recently "taken steps to weaponise" its enriched uranium stockpile, which can be used for power plants or nuclear bombs. Iran has always claimed that its nuclear programme is entirely Friday, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) - the UN's nuclear watchdog - said Iran had amassed enough uranium enriched up to 60% purity - a short technical step away from weapons grade, or 90% - to potentially make nuclear bombs."This is nonsense," Khatibzadeh said in response. "You cannot start a war based on speculation or intention."If we wanted to have a nuclear bomb, we would have had it way before."Iran has never developed any programme for nuclear weaponisation of peaceful nuclear activities. Bottom line." IAEA chief Rafael Grossi said that nuclear facilities "must never be attacked, regardless of the context or circumstances, as it could harm both people and the environment". Khatibzadeh also discussed potential diplomatic channels after a G7 summit in Canada. He said: "What we are hearing from Europeans is that they would like to get back to diplomacy at a ministerial level"."They are going to have a meeting in Geneva and we are very much happy that finally they have to come and talk at the table about the issues at hand."

Dubya Dubya II: Democrats see echoes of Bush Iraq War push in Trump's Iran nukes rhetoric
Dubya Dubya II: Democrats see echoes of Bush Iraq War push in Trump's Iran nukes rhetoric

The Independent

time29 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Dubya Dubya II: Democrats see echoes of Bush Iraq War push in Trump's Iran nukes rhetoric

While Republicans largely fall in line behind President Donald Trump as he disregards experts and prepares for the United States to take on a larger role in Israel's war with Iran, using the pretense of nuclear weapons being built, Democrats are seeing flashbacks of the Iraq War. On Thursday, the White House said that the president would make his decision on whether to strike Iran in the next two weeks. This comes as the president has directly contradicted Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard on whether Iran is actively building a nuclear weapon. That raised alarms for Sen. Mark Warner (D-Va.), the vice chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee. 'If this president wants to completely ignore the intelligence community, we are playing in dangerous ground, and this is exactly the way we got ourselves into Iraq,' he told The Independent on Thursday. The parallels are quite stark. In 2002, in the wake of the 9/11 terrorist attacks, President George W. Bush insisted that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction. At the time, the Bush administration maintained that Iraq posed an existential threat, with Secretary of State Colin Powell making the case in a presentation before the United Nations. After the United States invaded Iraq, it found little evidence of any weapons of mass destruction. Now, Warner's Democratic colleague from Virginia, Sen. Tim Kaine, has introduced a war powers resolution that would trigger debate and a vote for any military action against Iran. 'No one in Congress should on a matter of war, just say, let the President do what they want,' he told The Independent. 'The president can engage in self defense without an authorization, but the notion that we're being asked to join a bombing campaign in Iran is clearly offensive. I think it was. It's a horrible idea, but if my colleagues think it's a good idea, I think they should introduce war authorization.' Only six senators who voted against the Iraq War — either as members of the House of Representatives or as senators — remain in the Senate. 'We've discovered, particularly Middle East, it's easier to break things hard to put them together,' said Sen. Jack Reed, the top Democrat on the Senate Armed Services Committee. 'So, and we've seen operations like the invasion of Iraq under George W. Bush, which for the first few weeks looked like it was brilliant. Nothing happened. And four years later, we were wondering, what are we doing here and how do we get out?' By contrast, 14 senators in either capacity voted for the Iraq War. Senate Majority Leader John Thune voted for it as a member of the House and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, then in his first term in the Senate, voted for it. In addition, Schumer is considered a hawk on Israel and Iran, having opposed the 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, the agreement brokered by the Obama administration and US allies to curb Iran's nuclear ambitions. The number of senators who remember the mistakes of Iraq continues to dwindle. Sen. Dick Durbin of Illinois, the Senate minority whip who voted against it, is retiring at the end of next year. Sen. Adam Schiff of California, a veteran congressman who became a senator last year, voted for the war as a member of the House. One of the opponents of the Iraq war who remains is Sen. Ron Wyden of Oregon, who sits on the Senate Intelligence Committee. Wyden voted against Gabbard's confirmation, but still criticized Trump. 'This wouldn't be the first time where Donald Trump has done an about face on foreign policy,' Wyden told The Independent. Sen. Bernie Sanders, the independent from Vermont who voted against the war as a congressman, who had his own resolution, joined onto Kaine's resolution. But even Democrats who came to Congress afterward, particularly those shaped by the War on Terror, want to rein in the president. Sen. Elissa Slotkin, a freshman from Michigan, joined the CIA after the September 11 attacks partly because she lived in New York on the day of the attack. Slotkin led a war powers resolution after Trump launched a strike that killed top Iranian military official Qasem Soleimani. She said she is looking at Kaine's language. 'I think Congress, ever since the Iraq War, has been scared to exercise their oversight role in war and Democrats and Republicans,' she told The Independent. 'So I've been pretty consistent that we need to get back to that.' By contrast, so far, few Republicans save for Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky have raised reservations about war with Iran. Paul's father, former congressman Ron Paul, voted against the War in Iraq. Below is a list of Senators who voted for and against the War in Iraq who remain in Congress. Yes as Senators: Yes in the House: Adam Schiff (D-CA) John Boozman (R-AR) Lindsey Graham (R-SC) John Thune (R-SD) Roger Wicker (R-MS) Jerry Moran (R-KS) Ed Markey (D-MA) Shelly Capito (R-WV) Senators who voted No: Dick Durbin (D-IL) Patty Murray (D-WA) Jack Reed (D-RI) Ron Wyden (D-OR) Democrats who voted No as House members: Bernie Sanders (I-VT) Tammy Baldwin (D-WI)

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store