Watch: Protesters storm Trump Tower over arrest of ‘Hamas promoting' student
A Left-wing protest group has occupied Trump Tower in New York following the attempted deportation of a pro-Palestinian activist.
Mahmoud Khalil was apprehended by immigration authorities last week after spearheading anti-Israel protests as a graduate student at Columbia University in 2024.
Members of Jewish Voice for Peace, which describes itself as the 'largest progressive Jewish anti-Zionist organisation in the world', on Thursday protested inside Trump Tower, which is owned by the president.
Footage shows dozens of activists wearing red shirts outside the Trump Grill on the building's ground floor, chanting: 'Free Mahmoud, free them all.'
Others shouted 'bring Mahmoud home now' and 'fight Nazis, not students,' according to clips circulated on social media.
Many displayed anti-Israel signs and shirts, including the slogans: 'stop arming Israel', 'Jews say no to arming Israel', and 'free Mahmoud, free Palestine'.
Although most appeared to have gathered in the foyer of Trump Tower in Midtown Manhattan, a handful had made their way up the golden escalators to the first floor.
New York Police Department officers are on the scene and threatening to arrest demonstrators if they do not leave, footage shows.
Mr Khalil, who was born in Syria, is thought to be the first person the Trump administration is attempting to deport over 'un-American activity' in anti-Israel protests on college campuses.
The arrest prompted outrage from civil rights groups, who accuse Mr Trump of using the government's immigration powers to clamp down on free speech.
However, his deportation was blocked on Monday by a judge as the court considers a legal challenge brought by his lawyers.
Karoline Leavitt, the White House press secretary, claimed Mr Khalil had distributed leaflets on campus bearing the Hamas logo.
'We have a zero-tolerance policy for siding with terrorists, period,' she told reporters on Monday.
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Why Trump's threat to pull Columbia's accreditation is so ominous
I suspect that even casual followers of the news have heard about the ongoing battles between the government and higher education. First there's House Republicans' plan to increase taxes on university endowments, and now President Donald Trump's administration is threatening Columbia University's accreditation. As a college president, I know what these threats mean, but I've found myself having to explain them to folks who aren't higher ed nerds like me. Accreditation, I tell them, is what people Gen X or older might think of like a Good Housekeeping Seal of Approval, but for colleges and universities, accreditation is not just something that's nice for a university to have; it's something a university needs to have if it expects to offer any kind of financial aid to its students. The vast majority of college students receive some form of financial aid, so even the wealthiest of institutions understand that accreditation is important. That's why it's so ominous that the Trump administration, which claims that Columbia insufficiently handled expressions of antisemitism on its campus, contacted the university's accreditor alleging that the university is no longer eligible to be accredited. According to a statement from the Department of Education, Columbia 'failed to meaningfully protect Jewish students against severe and pervasive harassment on Columbia's campus and consequently denied these students' equal access to educational opportunities to which they are entitled under the law.' Columbia issued a statement that said it is 'deeply committed to combating antisemitism on our campus,' that it's 'aware of the concerns raised by the U.S. Department of Education's Office for Civil Rights today,' and that it has 'addressed those concerns directly' with its accreditor. Prior to the first Trump administration, there were seven regional accreditors that were responsible for assuring that most colleges and universities operate at standards that signify what they do is done well and in order. Each accrediting agency developed a set of standards requiring that an institution, generally in five- to 10-year intervals, conduct a self-study to ensure that it continues to meet them. The institution must then submit a report to its accrediting agency. Then, a team of colleagues reviews the materials, and depending on the agency and its timelines, that team or another visits the campus to certify that what was submitted is accurate and that the institution is in good standing and keeps its 'seal of approval.' During the first Trump administration, the practice of regional accreditors as the primary determinants of accreditation was changed. All accreditors are viewed as national accreditors, including some with more of a niche focus like Christian colleges, that have the same power to certify that an institution is eligible for federal financial aid. This provides several options now for schools to be accredited, and more than 30 accreditors exist today. Accreditation is essentially about continuous improvement through constant assessment. Even the peer review process is designed not to simply determine if the standards are met, but if they are not, to identify weaknesses and provide feedback for improvement to meet those standards. While not meant to be a punitive process, the various agencies do have a series of steps in place to heighten an institution's urgency to address any deficiencies. There are generally levels of sanctions that an institution might receive, from a monitoring report to show progress made on deficiencies, to a public warning, which allows anyone to know what the institution must do to improve, and finally some kind of probationary period in which significant deficiencies must be corrected. While rare, accrediting agencies can cease to recognize an institution for failure to meet the standards set. It would take several years, though, for a school to get to the place where it loses accreditation — and even if accreditation is lost, most agencies have processes in place that allow schools to appeal that decision. There are multiple examples of schools successfully appealing a loss of accreditation and working their way back into good standing. When the Trump administration contacted the Middle States Commission on Higher Education, which accredits Columbia, it simply began a process to review the charges. Different commissions might handle these notices in different ways. Under the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Commission on Colleges, the accrediting agency I'm most familiar with, 'unsolicited information,' such as a letter from the federal government or a local news article covering a negative event, could begin such a review. But accreditation is a process, so even a letter from the administration would not create an immediate negative action as accreditors engage in a thoughtful and deliberate process to verify compliance with the standards. Again, the goal is continuous improvement, not punishment. If a school is out of compliance, the accreditor will take action. But this would occur only after working closely with the institution, giving it a chance to correct course on its own. Columbia, in the short term at least, doesn't appear to be at any risk of not being able to provide its students financial aid. This article was originally published on
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
‘We are not just fighting for Harvard': For alums, this year feels different
In the 45 years since graduating from Harvard University, Laura Hastings has never been to a reunion. 'I've always felt that Harvard didn't need me,' Hastings said. However, like many of her classmates, when she saw the escalating battle between her alma mater and the Trump administration, she realized this year was the moment for her to 'show up.' The alumni day had a record of 9,000 attendees this year, a speaker said. A sea of maroon Harvard regalia coated the Cambridge streets as some men walked around with tophats and suits, and others waved reunion flags. Shrieks bounced off the brick buildings as classmates saw each other and young children in oversized Harvard merch clung to their parents. Read more: Funding cuts, lawsuits, foreign students: The latest on Trump's war with Harvard University The event comes only a few hours after the institution amended one of its lawsuits against the federal government on Thursday evening and asked for a temporary restraining order. Those actions were in response to President Donald Trump's issuance of a proclamation this week declaring that the school's foreign students would not be allowed into the country. Harvard has been a leader in resisting — through multiple lawsuits — the Trump administration as it attempts to cut billions of dollars from the university in addition to research funding. In one of the cuts, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services said it was due to 'continued failure to address anti-Semitic harassment and race discrimination.' 'In the Trump Administration, discrimination will not be tolerated on campus. Federal funds must support institutions that protect all students,' the department said. Hastings said she has had some embarrassment about going to Harvard as an elite institution. 'Elite universities, by their very definition, suggest exclusion,' she said, adding that she had a privileged upbringing. While higher education can be the thing that can help people advance to higher-paying and more prestigious careers, the federal government has tapped into a segment of the population who feels excluded by higher education, said Hastings, who is a professor at Georgia State University. One Harvard alum who spoke with MassLive on Friday traveled across the United States border to come to the reunion, despite his fears of being let in — or out — of the country. MassLive isn't using his name because he isn't a citizen of the United States and fears retaliation from the federal government. 'As a non-citizen and non-[permanent resident] you have no procedural rights at the border, meaning that they could ask to see my phone, my messages, my WhatsApp history, anything that they would take that is politically not congruent with what they want they could use that as a basis to deny me entry,' he said. 'I was worried that that would happen. So I scraped my phone of messages that would indicate a political leaning that was contrary to what the administration would be putting out there,' he said. As Harvard fights against the federal government, alumni are doing the same. Members of Crimson Courage, a community of Harvard alumni whose mission is to stand up for academic freedom, urged alumni to wear stickers of support and sign on to a legal document, also known as an amicus brief, in support of Harvard's second lawsuit against the Trump administration focused on international students. 'It's just absolutely incredible. I've never seen this type of mobilization,' said Evelyn Kim, a Harvard alum and Crimson Courage organizer. Kim said the backing of Crimson Courage is helpful for Harvard to know that their community supports them. 'We are not just fighting for Harvard,' Kim said. 'We are fighting for every higher education institution's right to be able to pursue the research they want to do, teach what they want to teach, admit the students that they want to admit. This isn't just about Harvard, it's about all higher education,' she said. Crimson Courage is aiming to have other campuses create their own chapters to back their institutions in the face of cuts or other actions from the federal government. Lisa Paige, an alum and organizer with Crimson Courage, said the organization has around 300 volunteers and has continued to grow. Hastings, who handed out Crimson Courage stickers on Friday to alums, said that while there is overwhelming support, resistance from alums is also apparent. She said many people said they didn't want to talk about the Trump administration's actions against Harvard — instead wanting to enjoy their reunion. One alum who told her he stopped giving money to Harvard because it has become 'too liberal.' Much of what the Trump administration has critiqued about Harvard has focused on campus antisemitism, race discrimination and a lack of political diversity. All of the alums MassLive spoke with on Friday said they don't believe these explanations are why the federal government is going after Harvard. Hastings, for instance, said she thought Harvard leaned too conservative in its beliefs when she was a student on campus. And, as a Jew, she thinks the claim of antisemitism is ultimately being used as a 'scapegoat' for the administration to go after Harvard. The government going after universities is a 'red flag for a democracy' which could harm freedom of thought and speech, according to Olumide Adebo, a Harvard graduate school alum. At the same time, Adebo, along with many other alumni, has criticisms of how Harvard has reacted since the Trump administration shined a light on Harvard. One is the cancellation of affinity graduations — which was something he enjoyed when he graduated from Harvard. 'Whatever criticisms I can offer to Harvard are fairly similar to what I offer to our society in terms of how we embrace diversity and equity in general,' he said. Adebo pointed to the university not backing former president Claudine Gay, who stepped down in early 2024 after about six months on the job, and defending her against the attacks claiming that she had plagiarized scholarly work. 'That seems to me to be a very short leash for anybody in leadership. Frankly, regardless of the missteps. Especially since she was fully vetted before being hired for the role,' he said. Read more: What a monk, a librarian and a dentist have to do with Harvard's fight with Trump To the alum who is not a U.S. citizen, the debate about the future of higher education, funding between public and private higher education and research funding are all 'welcomed.' There are valid critiques about the 'historical injustices' of who is allowed into an institution like Harvard and who isn't — even if the university has been working to address those issues, the alum said. However, the efforts to dismantle Harvard and higher education by the federal government go beyond what is necessary into something that is dangerous, the alum said. As the senior grant manager at Mass General Brigham, a Harvard affiliate, Mary Anne Fox, said she has seen firsthand the attempts at dismantling her alma mater — and the consequences of that. It has been a 'shock' as the attacks against Harvard have emanated into research which won't just hurt the institution but the international research infrastructure, she said. She said she came today to show her support for the institution. 'Now I'm really proud to be from Harvard,' she said. 'I didn't know people hated Harvard so much in the country,' she said. Fox prominently wore a keffiyeh, a traditional headdress worn by people in the Middle East that has taken on a greater symbol of resistance in the United States in support of Palestinians. She said she wore it on that day because many students at Harvard can't — and there is little the university can do against her in response. 'What are they going to do? Suck the degree back out of my head?' she said. Peter Coccoluto, joined by his wife, said he came on Friday to Harvard for his 70th reunion in part due to the actions taken toward the university. 'I feel we are being besieged by an ignorant man who also has the bad quality of seeking revenge on anyone who crosses his path,' Coccoluto said. 'I am here to support Harvard and to urge them to fight, fight, fight, because we fight not only for Harvard, but for all of the other free institutions of learning, higher learning,' he said. Casey Wenz stood outside the Harvard Yard on Friday morning with a finger brace holding up a wooden sign that read 'Harvard Thank You For Your Courage.' While she doesn't have an affiliation with the university, as a Cambridge resident, she said she wanted to show her gratitude to the university for 'standing up for themselves' and ultimately 'standing up for all of us.' She said she has friends who are international students and work at Harvard and that the federal government's actions against Harvard are hurting the country's economy. 'He's knee-capping innovation. And I think undoing that will take years — possibly decades,' she said. 'We might be losing a week or a month for every day that we lose in the research lab,' she said. What a monk, a librarian and a dentist have to do with Harvard's fight with Trump Judge blocks Trump admin from banning Harvard international students from entering US 'Singling out': Harvard president says Trump admin is retaliating against institution 'Government vendetta': Harvard fights back after Trump blocks its foreign students from US Funding cuts, lawsuits, foreign students: The latest on Trump's war with Harvard University Read the original article on MassLive.
New York Post
33 minutes ago
- New York Post
New Yorkers searched web for ‘Free Palestine' info more than any other state, study finds
New Yorkers scoured the web for information on Palestine-related phrases more than any other state in the US, a new study found. Since the start of the year, the Empire State averaged 8,260 searches per month for phrases including: 'Palestine protests,' 'Free Palestine movement' and 'free Palestine flag' — more than any other place in the country per capita. For every 100,000 people in the state, there were more than 41 searches for the 'free Palestine'-related phrases, the analysis of Google Trends data conducted by Ladah Law found. Advertisement Protesters descended on Times Square in April to call for the release of Columbia student Mahmoud Khalil. James Keivom The most popular phrase in New York, with 3,600 searches, was 'Free Palestine,' followed by 'Palestine protest,' with 1,600 searches. NYC's Columbia University was the epicenter of violent anti-Israel protests last year, with similar ones taking place throughout California and across the country. Advertisement Other Google entries part of the study included, 'free Palestine stickers,' 'free Palestine posters' and 'is Palestine free?' Vermont took second place with nearly 34 searches per 100,000 residents and California followed with just under 32, according to the Las Vegas-based firm. New Yorkers searched online information on Palestine more than any other state. Thaspol – For every 100,000 of California's nearly 40 million residents, there were approximately 12,570 searches for info on the movement, which spread across the nation following Hamas terrorists' deadly Oct. 7, 2023 attacks on Israel and subsequent anti-Israel protests. Advertisement Behind the Green Mountain and Golden states were Massachusetts, Oregon and Connecticut. Arkansas saw the fewest searches related to the conflict, according to the findings.
