logo
Appeals court allows Trump to keep National Guard in Los Angeles

Appeals court allows Trump to keep National Guard in Los Angeles

Irish Times17 hours ago

A US appeals court on Thursday allowed president
Donald Trump
to maintain his deployment of National Guard troops in
Los Angeles
amid protests over stepped-up immigration enforcement, temporarily pausing a lower court ruling that blocked the mobilisation.
The Ninth US circuit court of appeals' decision does not mean that the court will ultimately agree with Mr Trump, but it does leave command of the National Guard with the president for now.
Earlier on Thursday, San Francisco-based US district judge Charles Breyer found that Mr Trump's deployment of the National Guard was unlawful. Mr Breyer's 36-page ruling had ordered the National Guard to return to the control of California governor Gavin Newsom, who had brought the case.
It was a short-lived victory for Mr Newsom, as judge Breyer's order was paused about two and a half hours later.
READ MORE
Asked for a comment, Mr Newsom's press office referred to the governor's statement after the initial ruling, and noted that the appeals court put a temporary pause on the ruling but did not reverse it.
'I'm confident, on the basis of the review of the 36 pages – absolutely it will stand,' Mr Newsom said of the district judge's order.
The three-judge appeals court panel consisted of two judges appointed by Mr Trump in his first term and one judge who was appointed by Democratic president Joe Biden. The panel said it would hold a hearing on Tuesday to consider the merits of judge Breyer's order.
The court's action, called an administrative stay, gives the appeals judges additional time to consider the Trump administration's request to block judge Breyer's order while litigation in the case continues.
Mr Trump summoned the National Guard on Saturday in response to protests that had broken out over immigration raids, then on Monday ordered the US Marines to support the National Guard.
A battalion of 700 US Marines is expected to arrive on Friday, marking an extraordinary use of military forces to support civilian police operations within the United States.
The troops have stood guard at a federal detention centre in downtown Los Angeles where many of the protests have taken place in a show of solidarity for immigrants detained inside. The protests so far have been mostly peaceful, punctuated by incidents of violence, and restricted to a few city blocks.
The National Guard had also accompanied Immigration and Customs Enforcement (Ice) agents on operations to detain immigrants.
In his ruling, judge Breyer wrote that the presence of the troops in the city was itself inflaming tensions with protesters – a contention made by Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass, among others – and depriving the state of the ability to use the National Guard for other purposes.
Ms Bass on Thursday called on Ice officers to stand down from the intensified series of raids that led to the protests, saying the local economy could be harmed as immigrants stayed home from work and school for fear of being snatched off the streets.
'The peace that we need to have happen needs to begin in Washington, and we need to stop the raids,' Ms Bass told a press conference as supporters flanking her broke out in a chant of 'Stop the raids'.
'Peace begins with Ice leaving Los Angeles,' said Bass, who has imposed a night-time curfew more than 2.5 sq km of downtown Los Angeles.
Ms Bass spoke after department of homeland securitysSecretary Kristi Noem said she would 'liberate' Los Angeles at a press conference that was dramatically interrupted when federal agents dragged Democratic US senator Alex Padilla out of the room, forced him to the ground and handcuffed him.
The court battle and press conference scuffle underscored the political polarisation generated by Mr Trump's hardline approach to immigration enforcement and expansive use of presidential power.
Mr Trump is carrying out a campaign promise to deport immigrants, employing forceful tactics consistent with the norm-breaking political style that got him elected twice.
Democrats have said the use of military force was unnecessary and an example of Mr Trump's authoritarianism.
Americans are divided over Mr Trump's decision to activate the military. A Reuters/Ipsos poll showed 48 per cent of respondents agreed with a statement that the president should 'deploy the military to bring order to the streets' when protests turned violent, while 41 per cent disagreed.
Between the rulings, Mr Newsom said the National Guard would be redeployed to its previous tasks, including border security, preparing for wildfires and countering drug smuggling.
But the Trump administration immediately appealed the judge's order, calling judge Breyer's ruling 'an extraordinary intrusion on the President's constitutional authority as Commander in Chief.'
Mr Trump justified the deployment of troops by characterising the protests in Los Angeles as a 'rebellion,' but judge Breyer said in his temporary restraining order that the protests fell far short of that legal standard.
'The Court is troubled by the implication inherent in Defendants' argument that protest against the federal government, a core civil liberty protected by the First Amendment, can justify a finding of rebellion,' judge Breyer wrote.
Mr Trump has said if he had not ordered in the National Guard the city would be in flames. – Reuters

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Israel attacks Iran's nuclear sites and kills top military leaders
Israel attacks Iran's nuclear sites and kills top military leaders

Irish Daily Mirror

time6 hours ago

  • Irish Daily Mirror

Israel attacks Iran's nuclear sites and kills top military leaders

Israel launched a blistering attack on the heart of Iran's nuclear and military structure on Friday, deploying warplanes and drones smuggled into the country to target key facilities and kill top generals and scientists. It said the barrage was necessary before its adversary got any closer to building an atomic weapon. The operation raised the potential for all-out war between the countries and propelled the region, already on edge, into even greater upheaval. Iran quickly retaliated, sending a swarm of drones at Israel as Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei warned of 'severe punishment'. Iran had been censured by the UN's atomic watchdog a day earlier for not complying with obligations meant to prevent it from developing a nuclear weapon. Israel had long threatened such a strike, and successive US administrations had sought to prevent it, fearing it would ignite a wider conflict across the Middle East and possibly be ineffective at destroying Iran's dispersed and hardened nuclear programme. But a confluence of developments triggered by Hamas' October 7, 2023, attack and the election in the US of President Donald Trump created the conditions that allowed Israel to finally follow through on its threats. Also on Friday, Israel claimed it had struck an Iranian nuclear site in Isfahan. Iran did not immediately acknowledge the attack. The facility in Isfahan, some 350 kilometres (215 miles) south-east of Tehran, employs thousands of nuclear scientists. It is also home to three Chinese research reactors and laboratories associated with the country's atomic programme. Israel had told the Trump administration that the large-scale attacks were coming, officials in the US and Israel said. On Wednesday the US pulled some American diplomats from Iraq's capital and offered voluntary evacuations for the families of US troops in the wider Middle East. The United States is shifting military resources, including ships, in the Middle East in response to Israel's strikes on Iran and a possible retaliatory attack by Tehran, two US officials said. Countries in the region condemned Israel's attack, while leaders around the globe called for immediate de-escalation from both sides. Iran asked for an emergency meeting of the UN Security Council. Israel's military said about 200 aircraft were involved in the initial attack on about 100 targets. Its Mossad spy agency positioned explosive drones and precision weapons inside Iran ahead of time, and used them to target Iranian air defences and missile launchers near Tehran, according to two security officials. Among the key sites Israel attacked was Iran's main nuclear enrichment facility at Natanz, where black smoke could be seen rising into the air. It also appeared to strike a second, smaller nuclear enrichment facility in Fordo, about 60 miles from Tehran, according to an Iranian news outlet close to the government that reported hearing explosions nearby. Israel also said it destroyed dozens of radar installations and surface-to-air missile launchers in western Iran. Israel military spokesman Effie Defrin said the Natanz facility was 'significantly damaged' and that the operation was 'still in the beginning'. Among those killed were three of Iran's top military leaders: one who oversaw the entire armed forces, General Mohammad Bagheri; one who led the paramilitary Revolutionary Guard, General Hossein Salami; and the head of the Guard's ballistic missile programme, General Amir Ali Hajizadeh. Iran confirmed all three deaths, significant blows to its governing theocracy that will complicate efforts to retaliate. Khamenei said other top military officials and scientists were also killed. In its first response, Iran fired more than 100 drones at Israel. Israel said the drones were being intercepted outside its airspace, and it was not immediately clear whether any got through. Mr Trump urged Iran to reach a deal with Washington on its nuclear programme, warning on his Truth Social platform that Israel's attacks 'will only get worse'. 'Iran must make a deal, before there is nothing left, and save what was once known as the Iranian Empire,' he wrote. 'No more death, no more destruction, JUST DO IT, BEFORE IT IS TOO LATE.' Israeli leaders cast the attack as necessary to head off an imminent threat that Iran would build nuclear bombs, though it remains unclear how close the country is to achieving that or whether Iran had actually been planning a strike. Iran maintains its nuclear programme is for civilian purposes only. 'This is a clear and present danger to Israel's very survival,' Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu claimed as he vowed to pursue the attack for as long as necessary to 'remove this threat'. Israel is widely believed to be the only nuclear-armed state in the Middle East but has never acknowledged having such weapons. On Friday, Israelis rushed to supermarkets in Tel Aviv, Jerusalem and elsewhere to buy bottled water and other supplies. But, otherwise, streets and parks were mostly deserted. For Mr Netanyahu, the operation distracts attention from Israel's ongoing and increasingly devastating war in Gaza, which is now more than 20 months old. Khamenei said in a statement that Israel 'opened its wicked and blood-stained hand to a crime in our beloved country, revealing its malicious nature more than ever by striking residential centres'. Mr Netanyahu expressed hope the attacks would trigger the downfall of Iran's theocracy, saying his message to the Iranian people was that the fight was not with them, but with the 'brutal dictatorship that has oppressed you for 46 years'. 'I believe that the day of your liberation is near,' he said. US secretary of state Marco Rubio said Israel took 'unilateral action against Iran' and that it believed the strikes were necessary for its self-defence.

PSNI given emergency Stormont cash to tackle anti-immigration riots
PSNI given emergency Stormont cash to tackle anti-immigration riots

Irish Times

time7 hours ago

  • Irish Times

PSNI given emergency Stormont cash to tackle anti-immigration riots

The Police Service of Northern Ireland is to get emergency Stormont funding to cope with anti-immigration riots across Northern Ireland, First Minister Michelle O'Neill has said. Saying that a proposal for a £5 million payment will be brought quickly to the Northern Ireland Executive, Ms O'Neill said the heavily-understaffed police service was 'really under pressure and really under financial strain'. 'Keeping the public safe is an absolute priority, not just for the PSNI but for us,' she said, speaking after a meeting of the British-Irish Council in Newcastle, Co Down, that included Taoiseach Micheál Martin and Northern Ireland Secretary of State Hilary Benn. However, the First Minister and her Democratic Unionist Party counterpart, Deputy First Minister Emma Little-Pengelly insisted that divisions over Communities Minister Gordon Lyons would not threaten the existence, or the operation of the Executive. READ MORE Mr Lyons has been heavily criticised for a social media message about the use of Larne Leisure Centre to house Roma who were forced to flee their Ballymena homes after riots erupted this week. [ The DUP couldn't have chosen a worse moment to get tough on immigration Opens in new window ] Saying that the Executive's parties are 'all on the same page', Ms O'Neill said: 'This violent racism that we have seen on our streets has to be called out for what it is. It's absolutely wrong and it must stop.' 'What we've seen over the course of the last few days has been devastation and has been horrific for those people that have been targeted,' said Ms O'Neill, who said on Wednesday that Mr Lyons should resign. 'This is about women and children; this is about families. They have been at the front of racist, violent attacks and it is wrong on every level. I think the whole of the Executive is united on that front,' she went on. Defending Mr Lyons, Ms Little-Pengelly said her DUP colleague had been 'unambiguous' in trying to prevent violence, adding that the controversy about his remarks had been 'a distraction throughout' Thursday 'from our very clear and unified message'. Violence for four nights in a row is 'totally unacceptable', she said, adding that Mr Lyons's intention had been 'to defuse tensions' locally due to a significant amount of rumour' that had been circulating in Larne in the hours before. The calls for Mr Lyons's resignation shared by Sinn Féin, Alliance and by Stormont's only opposition party, the SDLP, hold little weight under Stormont rules, since each party controls the choice of their own ministers at the Executive table. Rioting in Larne and Portadown was 'a source of great shame for Northern Ireland', Church of Ireland Primate and Archbishop of Armagh John McDowell said. Portadown is in his diocese. 'Hiding behind the figment of `legitimate concerns' but in fact motivated by crude racism, groups of young men (and the shadowy and unaccountable people who control them) planned and carried out attacks on civil society and on democracy,' he said. With Drumcree Sunday looming on July 6th, rioting in nearby Portadown over recent nights is of particular concern. A total 22 officers were injured with two arrests made there following violence on Thursday night. The annual Orange march from Portadown to the Church of Ireland's Church of the Ascension at Drumcree became a focus for violence, particularly in the years from 1995 to 2000, when it was prevented from going through the nationalist Garvaghy Road area en route back to Portadown. The last Orange march allowed back to Portadown by that route was in 1997.

Kilmar Abrego Garcia pleads not guilty to migrant smuggling charges after wrongful deportation
Kilmar Abrego Garcia pleads not guilty to migrant smuggling charges after wrongful deportation

Irish Times

time8 hours ago

  • Irish Times

Kilmar Abrego Garcia pleads not guilty to migrant smuggling charges after wrongful deportation

Kilmar Abrego Garcia, the migrant returned to the US last week after being wrongfully deported to his native El Salvador, pleaded not guilty on Friday to criminal charges of taking part in a conspiracy to smuggle migrants into the United States . Mr Abrego Garcia's lawyer, William Allensworth, entered the not guilty plea on his behalf at a hearing in Nashville, Tennessee, before US magistrate judge Barbara Holmes. At the hearing, Mr Abrego Garcia (29) is also expected to contest a bid by federal prosecutors to have him detained pending trial. US president Donald Trump's administration has portrayed the indictment of Mr Abrego Garcia as vindication of its aggressive crackdown on illegal immigration. Before Mr Abrego Garcia's indictment was unsealed on June 5th, officials alleged he was a member of the MS-13 gang and said they would not bring him back. The justice department's decision to return him to the US to face criminal charges is a potential off-ramp for the Trump administration from its escalating confrontation with the judiciary over whether it complied with a court order to facilitate Mr Abrego Garcia's return. READ MORE The Republican president's critics say his swift removal without a hearing showed the administration prioritised increased deportations over due process – the bedrock principle that people in the US, whether citizens or not, can contest governmental actions against them in the courts. 'You are presumed innocent, and it is the government's burden to prove at trial that you are guilty beyond a reasonable doubt,' Ms Holmes said, addressing Mr Abrego Garcia. The criminal proceeding will provide Mr Abrego Garcia with due process by giving him the right to contest the charges contained in a grand jury indictment returned in secret on May 21st. Still, his lawyers say his return to face criminal charges does not absolve the Trump administration of responsibility for wrongfully deporting him. In the indictment, Mr Abrego Garcia was charged with working with at least five co-conspirators as part of a smuggling ring to bring immigrants to the US illegally, then transport them from the US-Mexico border to destinations across the country. The indictment alleges that Mr Abrego Garcia often picked up migrants in Houston, making more than 100 trips between Texas and Maryland between 2016 and 2025. Mr Abrego Garcia is also accused of transporting firearms and drugs. Jennifer Vasquez Sura, wife of Kilmar Abrego Garcia, speaks to the media before a hearing for Mr Abrego Garcia in Nashville, Tennessee, on Friday. Photograph: EPA Prosecutors say Mr Abrego Garcia, a Maryland resident whose wife and young child are US citizens, could face 10 years in prison for each migrant he smuggled. That means he could spend the rest of his life in jail if convicted, according to prosecutors. They are urging he be detained, saying the potentially hefty sentence means he may try to flee. They also say detention is warranted because he allegedly murdered a rival gang member's mother in El Salvador and solicited child pornography, though those accusations are not part of his indictment. Mr Abrego Garcia's lawyers have called the charges 'fantastical' and deny he is a flight risk. —Reuters (c) Copyright Thomson Reuters 2025

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store