Wellington City Council considers spend on Khandallah Pool, Begonia House, water infrastructure and cycleways
A Wellington City Council meeting on Thursday will decide the fate of beloved community assets, including Begonia House.
Photo:
RNZ / Samuel Rillstone
A major Wellington City Council meeting, partially born from its failed airport share sale, will decide the fate of Begonia House, the Karori events centre and water reform in the capital.
In October last year the council voted not to sell its 34 percent stake in the Wellington International Airport as part of its 10-year budget - the long term plan.
The sale meant the plan needed to be amended.
The changes saw then Local Government Minister Simeon Brown install Lindsay McKenzie on the council as a
crown observer
.
Due to the lack of the airport share sale the council has had to look at setting up a small investment fund via
ground leases and cutting back funding for projects
and assets.
That has led to Thursday's council meeting, where, following a round of consultation which saw over 3000 submissions, councillors will vote on the amended long term budget.
The council's decision not to sell its 34 percent stake in Wellington International Airport has meant its long term plan needs to be amended.
Photo:
RNZ / Angus Dreaver
As part of this process, council officers had recommended the demolition of Begonia House - a popular greenhouse built in 1960 to house exotic plants at the city's botanic gardens.
It sparked a fierce
public campaign to "save Begonia House"
which council agreed to do in principle following public consultation.
Council officers have recommended to do the minimum required work to keep the building open at a cost between $9.9 and $11 million, but it would not address all safety and environmental concerns.
A petition will be presented at the meeting by the Save Begonia House campaign which had 5357 signatures.
Like Begonia House, Khandallah Pool, which has been in operation for 100 years, has had an axe hovering over it due to its aging pool tank which sparked a similar campaign amongst locals.
It also faces flood risks with its proximity to Tyers Stream.
In May last year a report found it would be possible to keep the pool open within a budget of $7.5m.
But council officers have still recommended that the facility be demolished due to the need to create debt headroom and the fact the pool accounted for less than one percent of the overall usage of Wellington's pools.
It would cost $4.5m to demolish the pool and landscape the site.
Councillor Diane Calvert had been a strong advocate to save the facility.
It was understood by RNZ that an amendment will be brought forward by Wellington Mayor Tory Whanau to fund a fix for it.
Calvert said she appreciated the support of the mayor.
"I'm pretty confident that the council will reaffirm its commitment to refurbish the pool within the budget we set three years ago."
Councillor Diane Calvert has been a strong advocate to save Khandallah Pool.
Photo:
twitter.com/dianecalvertnz
The Karori Events Centre is a project that was born from a lack of community halls in the suburb. $2.2m was raised by the locals to build the facility with the shell of the building having been completed in 2018.
It was gifted to the council in December 2022 with the intention of them funding the rest of the fit-out of the building, which the council agreed to at a maximum cost of $1.9m.
The council said it would now cost $3.3m to do that work, and its staff recommended it be sold.
Consultation on the plan overwhelmingly rejected the council's preferred option, with 62 percent of submitters having indicated a preference to invest more money in the project to finish it.
Chair of the Karori Event Centre trust Heather Baldwin told RNZ she was pleased with the number of submissions that shared their support for the facility.
"We were just flabbergasted when we saw that the recommendation is that they sell the building.
"We just think that is such a breach of bad faith."
Baldwin said that it did not make sense to go through a consultation process if the community was then going to be ignored.
Paneke Pōneke is Wellington's cycle network plan which was adopted in March 2022 and was an update of a cycle masterplan which was created 10 years ago.
It aimed to deliver a comprehensive bike network for the capital by 2031.
But due to a reduction in funding from NZTA Waka Kotahi that plan has been derailed and the council will now vote on finishing the bike network over a 20-year period rather than a 10-year period.
The council will vote on whether to delay finishing Wellington's cycle network plan.
Photo:
RNZ / Bill Hickman
That change would reduce its budget from $115.2m to $66.9m in the long term plan.
Cycling Network volunteer Patrick Morgan said that the slowdown of building bike lanes would be a mistake but understood that a reduction in central government funding put pressure on the council.
"I understand that some may think let's slow down the rate of moving bike lanes, advocates think that would be a mistake because of the huge benefits of building protected bike lanes."
Councillors will also vote on what water service model to use as a replacement for Wellington Water.
Under the government's Local Water Done Well reform councils have to decide on how they can set up sustainable organisations to manage water and its related stormwater, sewage and drinking water pipes.
Councils must come up with a water service delivery plan by 3 September 2025.
Wellington City Council consulted a status quo option, setting up council organisation that solely controls Wellington's pipes and a multi-council water organisation co-owned by Wellington City, Upper Hutt City, Hutt City, Porirua City and Greater Wellington Regional councils.
The multi-council options have been recommended by council officers due a range of benefits such as its access to additional borrowing for investment and its size which would allow the organisation to enter better contracts.
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero
,
a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
37 minutes ago
- RNZ News
Funding cuts for Pacific and Maori polytech students
Pacific education 20 minutes ago Education advocates have said a government decision to remove special funding for Pacific and Maori students in vocational courses harks back to the days of a one-size-fits all education model. The funding cut applies to a per-student subsidy for Pacific and Maori enrolments at poytechnics and private training institutions. It is used to help fund dedicated support services for these students. Teuila Fuatai reports.
RNZ News
38 minutes ago
- RNZ News
Concern Mark Lundy parole board condition impinges on freedom of speech
Mark Lundy Photo: RNZ Mark Lundy hasn't said or written a word publicly since he was released from prison early last month. That's because the man twice convicted of murdering his wife Christine and daughter Amber in Palmerston North in August 2000 cannot speak to the media, post on social media or blog about his case. Given he proclaims his innocence, there is concern this Parole Board condition impinges on his right to freedom of speech. He's on a life sentence, so potentially could be subjected to conditions for decades. When the Parole Board raised the possibility of banning Lundy from giving media interviews , his response was clear: "I'd welcome it with open arms," he told board members. Mark Lundy was released from prison last month. Photo: RNZ / Daniel Jones He said when he was on bail ahead of his 2015 retrial, reporters swarmed his street and accosted him. Private investigator Tim McKinnel said the parole condition not to speak publicly took away a person's most important tool - their own voice. "I think these conditions that gag or muzzle prisoners who come out of prison, who are maintaining their innocence, are really problematic," he said. "I think there is a real risk that comes from preventing people from speaking out on their own behalf." Such conditions might be well intentioned, but they were a breach of freedom of expression, McKinnel said. That it was the board raising the matter with Lundy, rather than something he brought up, was concerning. "I think that's quite different than having that question put to them by the parole board: 'We are contemplating a condition where you cannot speak publicly about your case, what do you think about that?' "In the context of a parole hearing, you're going to be a pretty brave prisoner to push back on the Parole Board against those types of questions or scenarios." Gail Maney was acquitted for her role in Deane Fuller-Sandys' death. Photo: Jason Dorday / Stuff In some wrongful conviction cases, such as Gail Maney , her public advocacy played a huge role in proving she was not involved in killing Deane Fuller-Sandys in the late 1980s, McKinnel said. "Look at the history of wrongful conviction cases in New Zealand. There is scarcely a case when the media haven't played a fundamentally important role in exposing those miscarriages of justice. "If you take away the voice of the prisoner in arguing for themselves, I think you're at risk of preventing some of these cases emerging." McKinnel is known for his work in helping expose Teina Pora 's wrongful conviction for killing Susan Burdett. Such conditions might be well intentioned, but they were a breach of freedom of expression, McKinnel said. Photo: RNZ / Cole Eastham-Farrelly Pora was also banned from talking to media when on parole before his conviction was quashed. A progress parole hearing heard he was grateful to live without media intrusion. In a statement, the Parole Board said it had on rare occasions imposed media restrictions when granting parole. It did so in Lundy's case to protect him, after he expressed concerns about media interest in him, and to take into account victims' concerns about news reports from when he was on bail awaiting retrial. Media law expert Steven Price said the restriction on Lundy was wide ranging. "It's not just that he can't speak to the media, he can't go on social media either, and he can't go on webpages his parole officer says he can't go on. "They're pretty wide restrictions and they certainly affect his freedom of speech." The Parole Board could impose restrictions for reasons such as reducing the chance of reoffending, but it couldn't be more restrictive than necessary. Photo: Supplied Price agreed with McKinnel that people up for parole, such as Lundy, were likely to agree with any condition the board suggested. "[Lundy's] been convicted twice of murder in extremely controversial circumstances and he can't talk about that to the media. We can't ask him about that. "We can't ask him about his experiences in prison. He can't even go on social media and join a Facebook group to support social media or the All Blacks." Price said the board should have tailored restrictions on Lundy's speech to limit what would genuinely be harmful, but he acknowledged it's a difficult situation. Koi Tū research fellow Dr Gavin Ellis said he hoped the Parole Board would review Lundy's restriction at some point, given its implications for free speech. "It's the wider principle that I think as a society we need to safeguard. The rights under the Bill of Rights Act were hard won, hard fought for, and need to be protected." Media had a right to be concerned at such conditions, Ellis said. The Parole Board noted that in its decision, it said the following: "On balance, this board is satisfied that Mr Lundy will not pose an undue risk to the safety of the community if released on parole on strict conditions designed to address his risk as well as assist in his reintegration and address victim concerns." Although Lundy's parole conditions were imposed for life, he could apply to have his restrictions varied at any time, and he would have a monitoring hearing to check on his progress in October. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
an hour ago
- RNZ News
Social media videos promoting ways to game the KiwiSaver system
Inland revenue figures show a record number of hardship withdrawals from KiwSaver is the past year. Between July 2024 and April 2025, more than $389 million's been taken out of KiwiSaver for financial hardship reasons. That's up from $300m on the year before. People can access KiwiSaver retirement funds in significant financial hardship, including for example to pay for food, power or palliative care. However a fund manager told Checkpoint there is a multitude of social media videos full of workarounds to help people qualify for a hardship withdrawls and effectively game the system. General Manager for Kiwisaver Fisher Funds, David Boyle spoke to Lisa Owen.
