
EXCLUSIVE We bought our dream three-bed home with a swimming pool in Bulgaria for £54,000 - it's insanely cheap, but this is what people DON'T realise about living in the ex-Communist state
At the turn of the 2010s, Stephen Yarrow decided he'd had enough of London. In fact, he'd had enough of Britain altogether.
Growing up in Willesden, Finchley and Edgware in the 1960s, the north London the one-time Thames TV film editor called home was no longer one he recognised.
As a Jewish man living in an area with one of the highest concentrations of Jews in the capital, he felt rising hatred towards his kin would only get worse.
'I was seeing more and more antisemitism, more and more Jewish schools being attacked, more and more synagogues being attacked,' he said.
Despairing at the cost of his mortgage in Edgware and unhappy at the state of Britain, he began plotting his life abroad in retirement and with Barbara made a move popular with an increasing number of Brits, to the furthest reaches of Europe: Bulgaria.
The pair, both 67, snapped up a three-bed, two-bathroom bungalow with air conditioning and a swimming pool for £54,000, paying £5,000 to a professional moving company to shift the furniture from each of their homes.
Moving to a village near the city of Dobrich in north-east Bulgaria was 'frightening' at first, he tells MailOnline - with huge cultural differences, occasional power cuts and sweeping changes to everyday life to digest in the former Communist state.
But watching crime rates spiral and antisemitism ferment in his home city from 1,400 miles away, and with the beach just a few miles away, the Jewish retiree says he couldn't be happier - and says he will never live in the UK again.
'It's so much better here', he says, speaking from his home on a video call, wearing a red t-shirt that reads 'Keep Calm and Move To Bulgaria'.
'It's quieter, there's hardly any traffic, there's no light pollution at night. I can sit by my pool in the afternoon, have a gin and tonic, and not worry about anything.
'I very rarely go to synagogue (in Bulgaria), only on the high days and holidays.
'But when we do go, outside the synagogue there's a police car with two police officers with firearms. British police don't supply that kind of service.
'It's like it was when I grew up in the 60s, when there were policemen pounding the beat morning, noon and night, and it was safe. I feel very, very safe.
'I would never come back. If I won £20million on the lottery, I would not come back to the UK.'
The couple plan to spend the rest of their days enjoying everything the Black Sea has to offer, from its sprawling beaches and dirt-cheap restaurants to the comforts of their own swimming pool, complete with poolside bar.
These days, if Stephen heads into the city of Varna - a seaside resort with a population equivalent to Nottingham - he isn't even afraid to walk the streets at night.
Stephen and Barbara's move to Bulgaria came about following extensive research into the country's infrastructure, lifestyle and cost of living - trumping France, Germany, Italy, Spain and even neighbouring Romania.
They eventually settled on their spot close to the Black Sea coast for its quiet location and convenience after driving around the region for two weeks in a hire car with an estate agent in tow.
They're far enough out from the major city of Varna - where several direct flights to London are available should they ever fancy a trip home - to enjoy their enviable surroundings without feeling completely removed.
A major supermarket is only a short drive away, where a 12-pack of beer is 11.99 Bulgarian lev - around £5 - and a loaf of bread is 99 stotinki, Bulgaria's answer to pennies, or about 40p.
For those brave enough, chilled rabbit meat - still eaten in the country - is available for £6.50 a kilogram.
'We eat it in the winter,' he says. 'I like rabbit - we cook it in Guinness.'
And even now, more than 13 years later, his bills remain almost insultingly low in comparison to typical British living costs.
'My council tax is around £30 a year, which is less than I was paying for a week when I lived in London,' he says. He's not wrong: council tax on a Band C property in Edgware is £1,809.34 a year as of April - or just under £35 a week.
He runs off a list of more, barely believable prices: £13 a month for water, 98 pence a litre for petrol, £40 a year in car tax, £100 a year for car insurance, £100 a year for 90Mb internet, £45 a month for mobile phones, landlines and a 5G internet backup.
Healthcare is subsidised via National Insurance contributions he paid as a working man in Britain - with appointments and blood tests costing a pound or two at a time.
Stephen's tips for Brits retiring in Bulgaria
Work out a budget. It is likely to be much easier to buy a house in cash than it is to get a mortgage, especially if you are just arriving
Make sure you have your DWP state pension and NI contributions up to date to keep you in good stead
Visit the country first to ensure you like it - do you want to be by the sea, in a city, in a village?
Spend a weekend in the area you're thinking of moving to - will it be noisy on Fridays and Saturdays?
Consider the risks of buying an isolated property - will you feel safe?
A 20-pack of cigarettes that would cost £14 in Britain is just £2.50.
Living with COPD, Stephen says smoking isn't for him. A cheeky tipple is another matter.
A litre of vodka? £10. Gordon's Gin? £11. And if they run out of that, there's always rakia, the potent fruit brandy that sits at the heart of many a Bulgarian social.
Home brewing of rakia is common but for those without the means, it's easy to find a still in which to make your own for, in Stephen's words, 'a couple of quid'.
'It's quite normal to walk around sometimes and see men quite drunk at 11 o'clock in the morning. As long as they don't cause any problems, don't come up and say "hey, give me some money", I'm not bothered.'
The only bigger bill to worry about is electricity: £45 a month in the summer, and £130 for heating in the winter after they gave up burning wood on a stove.
Life, then, is laidback, and it is cheap. But not without its pitfalls.
'The roads,' Stephen says, frankly, 'are crap.'
He's even less kind about the drivers, and not without cause: the country has the second-highest road fatality rate in the EU, just behind neighbouring Romania.
Many Romanians earn less than 1,000 Euros a month, and some still use donkeys and carts to get around. Road signs warning of animal-drawn carriages are common close to where he lives.
As for those who drive, the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office even warns Brits to beware of 'aggressive' driving, particularly on motorways - where the speed limit is 140kmh (87mph).
It doesn't help that minor speeding fines incur a fine of just 20 Bulgarian lev - or about £9 - though penalties get tougher depending on how much a driver exceeds the limit.
Driving is even more hazardous in winter, when the already dilapidated roads become death traps and businesses choose to close for months, deprived of the dependable trade of summer tourists.
'They (Bulgarians) drive like idiots. I've driven in the snow, driven in the fog - and they'll overtake you on blind bends. They're crazy,' he says.
His preference in the winter? Stay off the roads, and shut yourself away.
'You just pull the shutters down and stick a DVD on,' he says, adding with a grin: 'A decent bottle of French rose wine is three pounds.'
The water and electricity might be cheap - but that is offset by reliability issues with supplies because the infrastructure is 'crumbling', he says. There's also the matter of drainage, or rather the lack of it: a septic tank is a must.
But some things have changed since he moved there. Relocating isn't easy post-Brexit. Beforehand, Brits could live, work and study there without a visa - but no longer.
And property costs have spiralled: his £54,000 home is now likely worth almost four times that.
Some Brits are now snapping up the most dilapidated of homes and apartments to do-up as a long-term investment, as the Mail has explored.
And for those hoping to find a Spanish-style little Britain, a home from home where everyone speaks English and the comforts of Britain are at hand, think again: refusing to integrate into the community is a no-no.
Stephen admits he has struggled with learning Bulgarian as he has neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1), a genetic condition that affects his ability to learn the language - and means he will never be able to apply for citizenship.
However, he and Barbara mix with their neighbours - among them native Bulgarians, Russians, Ukrainians, Norwegians and Swedes, so help with translation when visiting the tax office or the mechanic is never far away.
'The problems people have are with the Brits that don't integrate,' he adds.
'They all go to the same bar every week, they only drink with Brits, they only socialise with Brits, and they get nowhere pleasant.'
The one thing he finds is lacking in his corner of Europe's furthest reaches is children - not that he's bothered.
'I'm not very keen on small children, to be honest. And I certainly wouldn't have them in my pool, because they tend to wee in it,' he says.
Speaking from experience? 'Unfortunately.'
On the subject of squabbling children, he finds himself watching helplessly as the main Bulgarian parties fail to agree how to govern after no less than three elections in the last year.
Plans to abandon the lev and join the Euro - potentially without a referendum - have sparked fury among nationalist parties.
Despite supporting the centre-right GERB party, one of three currently in charge of the country, he is voiceless amidst the chaos, deprived of the right to vote in Bulgaria post-Brexit following a court ruling that may yet be reversed.
While unable to vote, he successfully supported his neighbours in convincing the local mayor to cancel plans to permit the construction of a German wind farm close to his home.
As a whole, he still insists he'd rather be in Dobrich than London.
'I was very upset when Labour got in, because I think they're just going to tax everything to the hilt, and people will just get more and more poor,' he says.
'If I'm ever in the UK now, I tend to use Ubers. Black taxis are just ridiculously expensive and I wouldn't go on the Tube now. No, too dangerous. I do not feel safe.'
Safety remains a consideration in Bulgaria, and one of Stephen's less desirable monthly outgoings is the £30 he forks out for private, armed on-call security to protect the house from what he deemed more 'jealous' locals.
'Without being rude, the cheaper villages are full of gypsies, and that can be a problem,' he says.
Around 10 per cent of the country's population are Romani travellers, who largely live in poor quality housing.
Local authorities have been demolishing Roma settlements, sparking international condemnation, while the EU and the Council of Europe spend millions on ROMACT, a programme meant to support their integration into Bulgarian and Romanian society.
Nevertheless, Stephen claims they can be opportunistic: 'If you've got money and a nice car, and they haven't, they might turn you over if you're away for a long time.
'It's quite common for people to have that level of security. Most Brits have it, we've got shutters as well and CCTV, and an alarm.'
He's also wary of stray dogs who 'get hungry, and if they get hungry they get aggressive'.
He carries pepper spray - legal in Bulgaria under the country's vague weapon laws - just in case he meets a particularly peckish one, but says he has never had to use it.
The issue of safety also occasionally extends to what he says remains a 'male-dominated' culture still remains from the country's Communist era.
He tells of a friend who was followed home by a drunk Bulgarian man who tried to molest her, the situation ultimately defused by a neighbour.
But he insists: 'It can happen absolutely anywhere. Even in Mayfair, even in Beverly Hills. It's relatively safe here.'
Stephen and Barbara were among part of what might considered a second wave of Brit expats to have relocated to Bulgaria.
In 2011, there were 2,605 British citizens living there while retaining their UK citizenship. That shot up to 4,484 in the space of a decade - at an average rate of four a week.
Some estimates run far higher, but he reckons some left in the wake of Brexit, or when their other halves died. He, of course, has no plans to leave at all.
'It is a gamble, it is a huge gamble,' he says of moving out there.
'It was frightening because it could have not worked out. One of my friends said to me, "You'll be back in three months, you'll be bored."
'Am I? Not a chance.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Post Office compensation chief steps down after Sir Alan Bates raised 'serious concerns' about schemes
A Post Office boss who backed compensation for Horizon IT scandal victims has left his position as Sir Alan Bates raised 'serious concerns' about schemes. Leader of the Post Office's Remediation Unit, Simon Recaldin, is believed to have opted for voluntary redundancy and left his post this week. It comes as the first part of a public inquiry report into the controversy, analysing the compensation process as well as the affect on victims, is anticipated to be released in the coming weeks. More than 900 sub-postmasters were prosecuted between 1999 and 2015 after faulty accounting software made it look as though money was missing from their accounts. Hundreds are still waiting for payouts despite the previous government announcing that those who have had convictions quashed are eligible for £600,000. A Post Office spokesperson said yesterday Mr Recaldin's departure was a part of an 'organisational design exercise' across the firm. Now Joanne Hanley, who was previously a managing director and global head of client servicing, data and operations for Lloyds', is understood to have taken up a large portion of the former Post Office chief, according to The Telegraph. It comes as Post Office hero Sir Alan Bates accused the government of running a 'quasi kangaroo court' payout system for the scandal's victims last month. More recently, Sir Alan said he would prefer to see the compensation schemes thrown out rather the people working on them. 'We have got serious concerns about the transparency and the parity across the schemes,' he told The Telegraph. Last November, Mr Recaldin giving evidence to the inquiry, apologised after it was unearthed staff who were managing compensation claims had also been embroiled in prosecutions relating to the scandal. When queried about ex Post Office investigators he said: 'So my regret – and it is a genuine regret – is that when I came in, in January 2022, that I didn't do that conflicts check, check back on my inherited team, and challenge that.' It comes as the Sir Alan, who famously won his High Court battle with the Post Office in 2019 revealed that he had been handed a 'take it or leave it' compensation offer of less than half his original claim. Mr Bates, 70, said the first offer, made in January last year, was just one sixth of what he was asking for, adding that it rose to a third in the second offer. He has now been given a 'final take it or leave it offer' - which he said amounts to 49.2 per cent of his original claim. He, alongside 500 other sub-postmasters, will now have to lodge their bid for compensation via the Group Litigation order, managed by the Government. Bates, who led the sub-postmasters' campaign for justice, attacked the government for reneging on assurances given when the compensation schemes were set up The Post Office currently manages the Horizon Shortfall Scheme, which is seperate to the aforementioned. This scheme was organised for victims who have not been compensated but believe they experienced financial loses due to the IT scandal. A Post Office spokesman said: 'As part of the Post Office's commitment to deliver a 'new deal for postmasters', we have undertaken a review of our operating model to ensure we have the right structure in place. 'We have been in consultation with a number of colleagues from across the business, including the Remediation Unit. As a result of this Post Office-wide organisational design exercise, Simon Recaldin has left the business.'


BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
What in the World How to hack your flight luggage allowance
Baggage fees have become part and parcel of international travel, with charges taking off in recent years. Globally, passengers spent $150 billion USD last year on added 'extras' such as seat selection and baggage fees - that's 25% more than they spent in 2023. There's also a growing number of 'packing hacks' videos on social media, with more people looking for ways to avoid paying fees for their bags. BBC reporter Sam Gruet explains why airlines started charging for luggage in the first place and how it varies around the world. And travel expert and content creator Chelsea Dickenson shares her tips on how to cut costs when travelling. Instagram: @bbcwhatintheworld Email: whatintheworld@ WhatsApp: +44 330 12 33 22 6 Presenter: Hannah Gelbart Producers: Chelsea Coates, Benita Barden and Josh Jenkins Editor: Julia Ross-Roy


BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
Government struggles to cut foreign aid spent on asylum hotels
The government is struggling to cut the amount of foreign aid it spends on hotel bills for asylum seekers in the UK, the BBC has figures released quietly by ministers in recent days show the Home Office plans to spend £2.2bn of overseas development assistance (ODA) this financial year - that is only marginally less than the £2.3bn it spent in 2024/ money is largely used to cover the accommodation costs of thousands of asylum seekers who have recently arrived in the Home Office said it was committed to ending asylum hotels and was speeding up asylum decisions to save taxpayers' money. The figures were published on the Home Office website with no accompanying notification to aid is supposed to be spent alleviating poverty by providing humanitarian and development assistance under international rules, governments can spend some of their foreign aid budgets at home to support asylum seekers during the first year after their to the most recent Home Office figures, there are about 32,000 asylum seekers in hotels in the promised in its manifesto to "end asylum hotels, saving the taxpayer billions of pounds". Contracts signed by the Conservative government in 2019 were expected to see £4.5bn of public cash paid to three companies to accommodate asylum seekers over a 10-year a report by spending watchdog the National Audit Office (NAO) in May said that number was expected to be £15.3bn. On June 3, Home Secretary Yvette Cooper told the Home Affairs Committee she was "concerned about the level of money" being spent on asylum seekers' accommodation and added: "We need to end asylum hotels altogether."The Home Office said it was trying to bear down on the numbers by reducing the time asylum seekers can appeal against decisions. It is also planning to introduce tighter financial eligibility checks to ensure only those without means are Whitehall officials and international charities have said the Home Office has no incentive to reduce ODA spending because the money does not come out of its scale of government aid spending on asylum hotels has meant huge cuts in UK support for humanitarian and development priorities across the cuts have been exacerbated by the government's reductions to the overall ODA budget. In February, Sir Keir Starmer said he would cut aid spending from 0.5% of gross national income to 0.3% by 2027 - a fall in absolute terms of about £14bn to some £ was the scale of aid spending on asylum hotels in recent years that the previous Conservative government gave the Foreign Office an extra £2bn to shore up its humanitarian commitments overseas. But Labour has refused to match that commitment. 'Poor value for money' Gideon Rabinowitz, director of policy at the Bond network of development organisations, said: "Cutting the UK aid budget while using it to prop up Home Office costs is a reckless repeat of decisions taken by the previous Conservative government. "Diverting £2.2bn of UK aid to cover asylum accommodation in the UK is unsustainable, poor value for money, and comes at the expense of vital development and humanitarian programmes tackling the root causes of poverty, conflict and displacement. "It is essential that we support refugees and asylum seekers in the UK, but the government should not be robbing Peter to pay Paul."Sarah Champion, chair of the International Development Committee, said the government was introducing "savage cuts" to its ODA spending, risking the UK's development priorities and international reputation, while "Home Office raids on the aid budget" had barely reduced."Aid is meant to help the poorest and most vulnerable across the world: to alleviate poverty, improve life chances and reduce the risk of conflict," she said. "Allowing the Home Office to spend it in the UK makes this task even harder.""The government must get a grip on spending aid in the UK," she said. "The Spending Review needs to finally draw a line under this perverse use of taxpayer money designed to keep everyone safe and prosperous in their own homes, not funding inappropriate, expensive accommodation here." Shadow home secretary Chris Philp said: "Labour promised in their manifesto to end the use of asylum hotels for illegal immigrants. But the truth is there are now thousands more illegal migrants being housed in hotels under Labour. "Now these documents reveal that Labour are using foreign aid to pay for asylum hotel accommodation – yet another promise broken."A Home Office spokesperson said: "We inherited an asylum system under exceptional pressure, and continue to take action, restoring order, and reduce costs. This will ultimately reduce the amount of Official Development Assistance spent to support asylum seekers and refugees in the UK."We are immediately speeding up decisions and increasing returns so that we can end the use of hotels and save the taxpayer £4bn by 2026."