logo
North Korea eyes more warships after 5,000-tonne naval destroyer relaunched

North Korea eyes more warships after 5,000-tonne naval destroyer relaunched

Independent20 hours ago

North Korea has reportedly repaired and relaunched its second naval destroyer, just weeks after it capsized during an initial launch ceremony.
According to the Korean Central News Agency, Kim Jong Un attended a lavish ceremony on Thursday, boarding the warship and declaring that no obstacle could impede North Korea's naval ambitions amid ongoing "hostilities" led by the US.
The secretive nature of North Korea makes independent verification of the ship's repair virtually impossible.
There are doubts among outside observers regarding the functionality of the ship's engine, weapons systems, and electronic equipment, given that parts of the warship were submerged for approximately two weeks.
The initial failed launch on May 21 reportedly triggered fury from Kim, who has pledged to strengthen the nation's navy in response to what he perceives as escalating threats from the US and its allies.
Kim attributed the incident to criminal negligence and instructed officials to repair the warship before a Workers' Party meeting in late June.
Subsequently, North Korean authorities detained four officials, including the vice director of the Workers' Party's munitions industry department, in connection with the botched launch.
In his Thursday speech, Kim said the country's two destroyers will play a big role in improving the navy's operational capabilities, according to KCNA.
Kim reiterated previous claims that his naval buildup is a justified response to perceived threats posed by the US and South Korea, which in recent years have expanded their combined military exercises and updated their deterrence strategies to counter Kim's advancing nuclear program.
He said the North will respond to such external threats with 'overwhelming military action."
'It will not be long before the enemy nations themselves experience just how provoking and unpleasant it is to sit back and watch as our warships freely move near the edges of their sovereign waters,' Kim said.
Kim said a North Korean shipyard worker died during the repairs and offered his 'deepest condolences' to his family, including his wife and son who were present at the launch event.
Outside experts earlier said it remained unclear how severely the 5,000-tonne -class destroyer was damaged and questioned North Korea's claim it needed 10 days to pump out the seawater, set the ship upright and fix its damages it described as 'not serious.'
Previous satellite photos showed the North Korean destroyer lying on its side at the northeastern port of Chongjin, with its stern partly underwater. Last week, North Korea said it had righted the warship and would move it to the Rajin port, which is further north of Chongjin and close to the border with Russia, for the next stage of its restoration works.
'Considering the time they needed to raise the vessel, they would have had less than two weeks to carry out the real repair work,' said Yang Uk, an analyst at Seoul 's Asan Institute for Policy Studies. 'Would that have been enough time to completely fix everything and bring the vessel to a state where it's operationally capable? I think that's highly unlikely.'
Lee Illwoo, an expert with the Korea Defense Network in South Korea, said what was likely flooded in the North Korean ship were its engine room, missile launch tubes and anti-air weapons systems, which all involve electronic systems that are highly vulnerable to damages if exposed to seawater.
Lee said the ship's move to Rajin implies Russian experts have likely been assisting North Korea with repairs.
Military cooperation between North Korea and Russia has been flourishing significantly in recent years, with the North supplying troops and ammunitions to support Russia's war against Ukraine.
The damaged warship was in the same class as the country's first destroyer unveiled in April, which experts assessed as the North's largest and most advanced warship to date. Experts say the North's two destroyers were both likely built with Russian help.
Kim Jong Un said the ruling Workers' Party has confirmed plans to build two more 5,000-tonne -class destroyers next year, according to Friday's KCNA dispatch.
Satellite imagery indicated North Korea had attempted to launch the second destroyer sideways, a method it had never used for warships.
Many observers said it would be more difficult to maintain the balance of a big warship because it carries heavy weapons systems. But they said North Korea won't likely repeat the same mistake when it launches its third and fourth destroyers.
According to North Korea's timetable, its first two destroyers are to be deployed next year.
Despite its growing nuclear arsenal and huge 1.2 million-member standing army, North Korea's naval and aerial forces have been considered inferior to those of South Korea's.
But North Korea's planned deployment of a series of 5,000-tonne -class destroyers would pose 'really a serious threat" to South Korea, whose navy hasn't still prepared itself to deal with such big, advanced enemy warships, according to Lee, the expert.
North Korea hasn't responded formally to the measure.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The Documentary Podcast  Female influencers
The Documentary Podcast  Female influencers

BBC News

time5 hours ago

  • BBC News

The Documentary Podcast Female influencers

After the fatal shooting in Pakistan of a teenage social media influencer, Sana Yousaf, we bring together female influencers around the world to share their experiences. Sana's death has ignited a fierce debate about women on social media and the safety of influencers. We hear from three women in Pakistan. Between them, they have hundreds of thousands of followers on Instagram, TikTok and YouTube but face abuse every day. Zenith Irfan is the first woman to ride a motorbike solo across Pakistan, Mahnoor Rahim is a fashion influencer, and Sabah Malik is a comedian and cultural commentator in the country. We speak to female influencers in the US, Mexico City and Peru who share advice on how they stay safe. This episode of The Documentary, comes to you from BBC OS Conversations, bringing together people from around the world to discuss how major news stories are affecting their lives

Israel's blitz was years in the planning: Mossad agents smuggled drones into Iran desert, army chiefs and nuclear scientists were killed and Tehran's radar and missile bases eliminated in most devastating attack on Iranian soil for nearly half a century
Israel's blitz was years in the planning: Mossad agents smuggled drones into Iran desert, army chiefs and nuclear scientists were killed and Tehran's radar and missile bases eliminated in most devastating attack on Iranian soil for nearly half a century

Daily Mail​

time6 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

Israel's blitz was years in the planning: Mossad agents smuggled drones into Iran desert, army chiefs and nuclear scientists were killed and Tehran's radar and missile bases eliminated in most devastating attack on Iranian soil for nearly half a century

Months, if not years in the planning, it was the most devastating attack on Iranian soil for nearly half a century. A perfect fusion of high-grade conventional capabilities, human ingenuity and the latest advances in military technologies. Outcome: Iran 's nuclear-enrichment programme set back, dozens of air-defence systems wiped out and leading nuclear scientists and military commanders killed. Israel 's primary aim was to degrade Iran's nuclear-enrichment capabilities. But a political agenda was also emerging yesterday, as regime change in Tehran appeared a distinct possibility. At around 1am UK time about 200 Israeli military aircraft took off from bases inside the country. But by then much of the painstaking work had already been done, entirely in secret. The ground had been laid some time ago by Mossad agents and Israeli special forces who infiltrated Iran, smuggled weapons into the country and prepared drones ahead of what Israel named Operation Rising Lion. With only hours to go, the Israeli government informed the White House that the mission was going ahead, despite US and Iranian officials having arranged to hold talks on Sunday about descaling Iran's nuclear-enrichment programme. This warning allowed US diplomats and their families posted to the region to take additional security precautions. Donald Trump had previously indicated that while he was not prepared to assist Israel militarily, he would not stand in the country's way either. Israel's hand was also strengthened by the announcement, only days earlier, by the United Nations' nuclear watchdog that, for the first time in two decades, Iran was refusing to work with inspectors from the International Atomic Energy Agency. Iran's dismissive response to their pronouncement was to indicate it would establish a third nuclear-enrichment site and install more advanced centrifuges – a move which appeared to have sealed the country's fate. First reports of Israeli airstrikes emerged in northern Tehran: an explosion in the residential area of Nobonyad. Details remained scant yesterday, but some reports indicated this may have been where some of the country's leading nuclear scientists lived. Subsequently, the Iranian government confirmed the deaths of a number of academics: Fereydoun Abbasi, former head of Iran's Atomic Energy Organisation, Dr Mohammed Mehdi Tehranchi, president of the Islamic Azad University of Tehran, and Abdolhamid Minouchehr, Ahmad Zolfaghari and Amirhossein Feqhi, from Tehran's Shahid Behesti University. Meanwhile, deep in the deserts of central and western Iran, Israeli special forces troops released swarms of drones which targeted radar facilities and surface-to-air missile capabilities – the military hardware an Iranian response to Israel's attacks would rely on. Israel is expert in such clandestine operations. Even so, the methodology represented a 'hat-tip' to Ukraine, which is understood to secretly exchange 'tactics, techniques and procedures' (TTPs), in military vernacular, with Israel. The rationale for that cooperation from Israel's perspective is it supports Ukraine – though it does not publicise that support – because Iran supplies Russia with thousands of drones. With so many layers of Iran's defences destroyed, Israeli jets focused on their main target, the centrepiece of Iran's nuclear-enrichment programme, the Natanz atomic facility in Ishfahan province, 140 miles south of Tehran. The IDF (Israel Defence Forces) and the International Atomic Energy Authority confirmed damage to the multi-storey enrichment hall where the nuclear centrifuges are housed. Natanz has tens of thousands of centrifuges and significantly contributes towards Iran's highly enriched uranium stockpile. The IDF also targeted infrastructure at the site which, in its words, 'enables the continuous functioning and the continued advancement of the Iranian regime's project to obtain nuclear weapons'. IDF spokesman Effie Defrin said its forces had 'significantly harmed' the site, which he added was used by the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) to 'advance their military nuclear programme'. Crucially, the Bushehr nuclear power plant was left unscathed. This ensured there was no increase in radiation levels. This was by no means the first Israeli strike on Natanz. It was the target of a major cyber attack in 2010 and a guerrilla-warfare style attack in 2020, when explosives were hidden inside one of the buildings. As many as ten strikes were reported at Tabriz airport and a nearby oil refinery in north-west Iran. A long column of black smoke was seen rising from the airport. Three people were reported dead in the city itself. Israel also struck dozens of radar installations in western Iran, probably by means of special forces troops approaching the sites on foot, assembling miniature kamikaze drones and setting them off towards these military facilities. Operating at such short range, these drones evaded Iran's limited surveillance capabilities. Explosions were also reported at the Nojeh airbase in Hamedan, western Iran. A number of senior Iranian military officers were also said to have been killed when they convened for what they thought was a secret meeting to plan pre-emptive strikes on Israel. The venue was chosen for its protection, a bunker deep underground. But, according to reports, the bunker was not deep enough, as an Israeli warhead penetrated the basement. A damaged high-rise building that was hit by Israeli air strikes, north of Tehran, Iran, 13 June 2025 HOSSEIN SALAMI Salami was commander-in-chief of Iran's elite Revolutionary Guards Corps, or IRGC. Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei appointed Salami, who was born in 1960, in 2019. MOHAMMAD BAGHERI A former IRGC commander, Major General Bagheri was chief of staff of Iran's armed forces from 2016. Born in 1960, he joined the Guards during the Iran-Iraq war that raged in the 1980s. AMIR ALI HAJIZADEH Hajizadeh was head of the Revolutionary Guards' aerospace force. Israel named him as the central figure in directing aerial attacks against it. In 2020, he accepted responsibility for the downing of a Ukrainian passenger jet, which occurred shortly after Iran launched missile strikes on U.S. targets in Iraq to retaliate for a U.S. drone strike that killed top Iranian commander Qassem Soleimani. GHOLAM ALI RASHID Major General Rashid was head of the IRGC's Khatem-al-Anbiya HQ. He previously served as deputy chief of staff of the Iranian Armed Forces. FEREYDOUN ABBASI Abbasi, a nuclear scientist, was head of Iran's atomic energy organization from 2011 to 2013. A hardliner, he was a member of parliament from 2020 to 2024. MOHAMMAD MEHDI TEHRANCHI Nuclear scientist was head of Tehran's Islamic Azad University. OTHER SCIENTISTS Abdolhamid Minouchehr, Ahmad Reza Zolfaghari, Amirhossein Feqhi and Motalibizadeh. Iran later confirmed the deaths of Major General Gholam Ali Rashid, Major General Hossein Salami, commander of the IRGC, Amir Ali Hajizadeh, the commander of the UAV (unmanned aerial vehicles) force, aerial commander Davoud Shaykhian and Mohammad Bagheri, the Iranian Army's Chief of Staff. As precautionary measures, Israel closed its airspace and its diplomatic missions overseas. It also suspended gas production at sites in the Mediterranean. Meanwhile its attacks across Iran lasted for at least five hours – possibly much longer as reports last night suggested that, having secured aerial supremacy, Israeli jets were returning to some of the targets to inflict further damage. By way of response, Iran is said to have launched at least 100 drones towards Israel. Its officials also declared the attacks 'declaration of war'. Iranian drones were found on the ground in Syria after being intercepted by the Israelis. The IDF also released footage of the country's navy shooting down an Iranian drone using Barak-8 surface-to-air missile. That no Iranian ordnance seemingly struck any Israeli targets may have convinced its state news agency Fars to deny it had launched any drones at all, claiming Iran's revenge will 'take place in the near future'. Iranian media also reported at least 78 deaths and 329 casualties from the Israeli attacks, including women and children. Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said Israel should 'anticipate a severe punishment', adding the country's armed forces would defend Iran's sovereignty. To the surprise of Western observers, Iran's most loyal proxy group in the region, Hezbollah, which is based in Lebanon and armed and financed by Iran, said it would not respond. Iran halted all domestic and international flights from its airspace. US Secretary of State Mark Rubio suggested Israel's actions were 'unilateral'. While the US did not take part in the military action it was fully aware of Israel's intention. Sir Keir Starmer, sidelined by Israel after condemnation of its continuing campaign in Gaza, called for de-escalation. A No 10 spokesman said: 'Our priority is to prevent further escalation in the Middle East, that's in no one's interest... we're working closely with all our allies to press for that diplomatic solution'. Russia, which recently signed a military cooperation pact with Iran, condemned Israel's 'unprovoked attack on a sovereign state'. While China expressed 'concern'. So did Saudi Arabia and Qatar. Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu was last night due to speak to Vladimir Putin. UN secretary general Antonio Guterres asked both sides to 'show maximum restraint, avoiding at all costs a deeper conflict'. Mr Trump advised Iran to 'make a deal' while it still has the opportunity. He described Israel's attack as 'excellent'. Israel has claimed it was 'just the beginning'. The UN Security Council was meeting yesterday to discuss the continuing crisis. Mr Netanyahu was expected to speak to Sir Keir. The Prime Minister has also discussed the Middle East security crisis with German chancellor Friedrich Merz and French president Emmanuel Macron.

DAILY MAIL COMMENT: Israel's enemies are Britain's enemies
DAILY MAIL COMMENT: Israel's enemies are Britain's enemies

Daily Mail​

time7 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

DAILY MAIL COMMENT: Israel's enemies are Britain's enemies

Having sown the wind, Iran is reaping the whirlwind. A day after the International Atomic Energy Agency warned that the rogue state has enough enriched uranium to make nine nuclear bombs, Israel struck at the head of its military command and the heart of its weapons programme. In a stunning series of air strikes, its forces attacked nuclear facilities and missile sites. They also took out three of Iran's most senior security chiefs and several of its top atomic scientists. It was swift and it was surgical – a triumph of intelligence and planning, as well as sheer military power. And it is far from over. The Israeli Defence Forces made it clear yesterday there was nothing they will not do to prevent Tehran developing the bomb. And who can blame them? Iran is dedicated to Israel's destruction. Over many decades it has backed the Jewish state's sworn enemies, from Hezbollah to Hamas. Supreme Leader the Ayatollah Khomeini believes there can be no Middle East solution without 'the annihilation of the Zionist state'. This is hardly the basis for measured negotiation. We should not forget either that Tehran's mullahs also loathe Western liberal values and scorn democracy, so if they managed to acquire nuclear weapons, the whole world would be at risk. In that regard, Israel's enemy is our enemy. No one wants to see an escalation in hostilities in this already benighted region, but Israel believes it has no option but to act pre-emptively. We should acknowledge and support it in that. This is a people who suffered the Holocaust. Why should they stand idly by while a new generation of anti-Semites plots their extermination? And what is our own great leader Sir Keir Starmer's response to this unfolding crisis? As usual, a load of flannel – calling for calm… engaging partners to de-escalate … committed to diplomacy. The Israeli Defence Forces made it clear yesterday there was nothing they will not do to prevent Tehran developing the bomb Isn't it a bit late for that? Hostilities are well under way. So, whose side is he on? Does he back an oppressive theocracy that hates the West, spies on Britain and has had a malign hand in every Middle Eastern conflict of the modern era, or a parliamentary democracy engaged in a fight for survival? Having professed 'ironclad' support for Israel immediately after the October 7 massacre when still in opposition, he and his ministers have been rowing back ever since – not least because many Labour MPs and voters are rabidly anti-Zionist. The Government has scaled back arms supplies, criticised operations in Gaza and Israeli politicians, and there are signs Sir Keir is about to recognise Palestine as a state. The Left constantly bangs on about a 'two-state solution' but how would it be achieved? Who would draw the boundaries? Israel rightly sees the UN as a bad actor in this drama and will not be bound by its prejudices. And it certainly wouldn't co-operate with the international courts, which it views as similarly pro-Palestinian. Who would live where? And how could the two states live in harmony when one is committed to the obliteration of the other? Hamas and Iran don't want a two-state solution for the Holy Land, they want a one-state solution – without Jews. Sir Keir fancies himself as a statesman as he parades around the world gladhanding leaders and looking earnest. But statesmanship is more than photo-opportunities. It sometimes requires hard choices. When it comes to choosing between backing Iran or Israel, there should be no hesitation.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store