logo
With news media in crisis, ‘Becoming Katharine Graham' reminds us there is only one way forward

With news media in crisis, ‘Becoming Katharine Graham' reminds us there is only one way forward

George and Teddy Kunhardt made the documentary 'Becoming Katharine Graham' for the same reason most people make documentaries: to tell a story they thought people should know.
As publisher of the Washington Post and CEO of the Washington Post Co. Katharine Graham became the first woman to run a major media organization and a key player in the paper's rise to prominence in the 1970s, first with its role in the publication of the Pentagon Papers and then with its famous investigation of the Watergate break-in.
But, as the Kunhardts wrote in their directors' statement, her role in these and other cultural milestones has been too often overlooked. Reporters Carl Bernstein and Bob Woodward and executive editor Ben Bradlee became, and remain, household names. But in the revered 1976 film 'All the President's Men,' Graham never appears and is only mentioned via the infamous threat — 'Katie Graham's gonna get her tit caught in a big fat wringer if that's published' — delivered by then-attorney general John Mitchell.
With this film, they hoped to set the record straight.
It does that, and quite a bit more. At a time when journalism is in crisis, both financially and existentially, 'Becoming Katherine Graham,' which debuted on Prime Video last week, serves as a reminder of how important good management, and ownership, can be for any outlet. Yes, the film harks back to the predigital age of family-owned newspapers, which were often self-supporting and even profitable (though when Graham assumed her position, the Post was in large part supported by the company's TV stations).
But her story makes it abundantly clear that the risks journalists must take in demanding truth of power are only possible when owners have their backs.
Last year's presidential election exposed tensions between owners and newsrooms at several outlets (including this one), but most especially the venerable Post, where changes to the opinion section have led many to question the motivations of current owner Jeff Bezos, founder of Amazon. In a recent dressing-down of Bezos in the Atlantic, former Post executive editor Martin Baron, once a fan, wrote: 'Now we know Bezos is no Katharine Graham.'
Indeed, when 'Becoming Katharine Graham' premiered at the Kennedy Center on Sunday, Bezos, chief executive Will Lewis and executive editor Matt Murray were notably absent. (Bezos was at the Oscars.)
During her tenure, Graham, who died in 2001, faced plenty of criticism, and more than a few direct threats, from both outside and inside her organization. Members of her board most certainly did not support publishing portions of the Pentagon Papers. In retribution for the paper's Watergate coverage, then-President Nixon tried to destroy the Post by withholding the licenses of the company's profitable TV stations. And during a violent 1975 pressman's strike, seen in the opening of the film, workers burned Graham in effigy.
Having come of age during a time when it was common for publishers and editors to socialize with presidents and first ladies, Graham had personal relationships with many Washington power brokers, not to mention financial interests that could be affected by government approval. But, as she says in the film: 'You can be friends with people in the government, but you remember, and they remember, that the paper comes first.'
A cri de coeur then, from beyond the grave.
More than most biodocs, 'Becoming Katharine Graham' is guided by Graham's voice from the many interviews and speeches she gave before her death in 1991 and from her memoir, 'Personal History.' Though built out with the customary combination of contemporary interviews from those who knew her and archival footage — including chilling portions of the Nixon White House tapes — Graham essentially tells her own story, from her privileged youth — her father, financier Eugene Meyer, became chairman of the Federal Reserve — to her retirement and decision to write the memoir that informs much of the film.
She emerges as an accidental hero, a self-described 'door-mat wife' who worked briefly at the Post after her father bought it in 1933 (at a bankruptcy auction) until assuming the duties of wife, mother and gracious society hostess. She was happy to see her husband, Phil Graham, named publisher in 1946. Two years later, Meyer transferred control over the company's then privately owned stock to the couple, with Phil receiving 70% to Graham's 30%.
After Phil's death by suicide in 1963, Graham inherited both the company, which owned three television stations, two radio stations and Newsweek magazine, and the position of Washington Post publisher. Many thought she would sell the company, or relinquish the publisher position, but instead she dug in. Painfully shy and inevitably the only woman in any meeting, she learned by listening — it took her a year before she summoned the courage to ask a question in an editorial board meeting.
But summon it she did, despite being made very aware that, as she says, 'A lot of men don't like working for a woman.'
Bradlee, whom Graham hired from Newsweek to run the Post's newsroom, was, mercifully, not one of them. 'She was very quick to figure out who he was,' says Don Graham, who succeeded his mother as publisher and CEO (and later sold the Post to Bezos), 'and he was very quick to figure out who she was.' Together Bradlee and Graham turned a small, local newsroom into a larger, hugely influential powerhouse.
An early portion of the documentary is framed around the inevitable gender stereotypes she faced, including those she had internalized. Graham had never dreamed of running a company she deeply associated with her father and her husband, nor had anyone expected her to. As the 20th century women's movement began, she was already the head of a media company, and though she never identified as a feminist, she supported equal rights for women, which often put her at odds not only with the men around her but with her own position. When women at Newsweek, who were not allowed to advance beyond researcher, filed a discrimination suit in 1970, they gave Graham a heads up. Her response: 'Which side am I supposed to be on?' (The women won their suit and the right to become writers, a significant victory for female journalists everywhere.)
In an anecdote that feels especially meaningful given the current tensions over editorials, Gloria Steinem remembers being asked to address an editorial board meeting because Graham wanted them 'to support the Equal Rights Amendment editorially and they were not doing so. She felt she couldn't order them to, so she asked me to come …'
A large chunk of the film deals with Graham's courage during the Nixon administration. By agreeing to publish portions of the Pentagon Papers after a federal court had ordered the New York Times to stop, she risked criminal prosecution, the loss of the company's television stations and potentially the whole enterprise, which had just gone public in an attempt to shore up financing. (After being ignored in 'All the President's Men,' her bravery is central to Steven Spielberg's 2017 film 'The Post.' )
The following year, she consistently supported her paper's investigation into the Watergate break-in even when no other outlet followed the story; for months, that reporting caused many to question the Post's intentions and Graham's judgment. Famously vindictive, Nixon won reelection and his personal hatred of Graham, whom he called at one point 'a miserable bitch,' drove his efforts to put the Post out of business. When he threatened to withhold the TV licenses of its stations, the company's stock plummeted.
Enter journalism's first billionaire savior, Warren Buffett, who bought a significant amount of low-priced nonvoting shares. As she says in the film, Graham had never met him, knew nothing about him and 'worried that he wasn't benevolent.' Many around her advised keeping him at a distance. Instead, Graham traveled to California to meet with Buffett (who, according to his daughter, ran out and bought swim trunks in order to burnish his Golden State mystique). The two hit it off (the trunks were not involved) and Buffett became her key financial advisor, as the paper's finances teetered, and for long after.
As Bernstein and Woodward continued their investigation, threats and pressure from the Nixon White House increased. Graham began taking the reporters' notes and research to her own home at night to keep them safe. In a contemporary interview, Bernstein remembers getting a call from the guard at the paper's front desk alerting him to a subpoena that demanded his notes. He told Bradlee, who called Graham, returning to tell Bernstein, ''They're not your notes. Katharine says they're her notes and if anyone is going to go to jail for withholding their notes … it's going to be her.'
'You need nerve, you need to be able to withstand stuff,' says Courtland Milloy, former columnist and reporter for the Post. 'Kay Graham set the standard, a high bar, for having nerve.'
That nerve paid off; a year of reporting finally cracked open Nixon's involvement in the Watergate break-in, which was just one part of his reelection campaign's use of political spying, sabotage and illegal funding. During the Watergate hearings, the existence of the White House tapes was revealed. When portions of the tapes made it clear that, among other things, he had been involved in covering up the break-in, he was threatened with impeachment. With virtually no public or political support, he became the first U.S. president ever to resign.
Graham found herself suddenly being touted as the most powerful woman in the country. But, she said, 'I didn't take any personal pleasure in this. We were pleased to have our reporting vindicated, but I don't think that anybody … thought that the president of the United States having to resign because he would be impeached was a great event for the country.'
A year later, Graham faced another test. The Post's pressmen went on strike, destroying the paper's printing presses and staging a massive picket line in which one sign taunted her with her husband's suicide: 'Phil shot the wrong Graham.'
Graham's first concern was getting the paper out. Plates were taken to the printing presses of nearby papers by helicopter. When the union refused to accept management's final offer, she began to hire outside workers, in part, says her son, because she couldn't imagine rehiring the people who destroyed the presses and set fire to the building.
'She empathized enormously with the families of the strikers,' says Buffett, 'but with Kay, the newspaper totally came first, it was a sacred trust.'
Picketing continued, and extended to the world premiere of 'All the President's Men,' which was characterized as 'the most eagerly awaited picture since 'Jaws.'' Graham calls the strike, in which management eventually emerged victorious, the hardest thing she faced during her working life. 'In many ways,' she said, 'the strike broke my heart.'
Covered in the film almost entirely from management's point of view, the strike was also the last big conflict Graham faced as a publisher. In 1979, Don took over, though Graham continued as CEO of the Washington Post Co. until 1991. She began working on her memoir, which came out in 1997 and won a Pulitzer Prize in 1998.
There are many reasons to watch 'Becoming Katharine Graham.' As a woman, she was a trailblazer, a unique combination of privilege and humility, grace and grit, who overcame great personal trauma and natural reticence to help guide the country through political and cultural turmoil.
But at this moment, there's an even more important message.
'The press in this country under a constitutional democracy is set up to be a critic of the government,' she says in the wake of Nixon's resignation, 'and it's important that they do that, with a lot of responsibility.'
Many journalists, and the people who pay and manage them, will say the same. 'Becoming Katharine Graham' provides the rare chance to see what it looks like when someone like Kay Graham repeatedly risks everything to do it.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Parents of Parkland shooting victim use AI to "bring him back"
Parents of Parkland shooting victim use AI to "bring him back"

Axios

time16 minutes ago

  • Axios

Parents of Parkland shooting victim use AI to "bring him back"

It's been over seven years since Joaquin Oliver was gunned down at his Parkland high school, one of 17 victims killed at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High in 2018. With the use of artificial intelligence, he just did his first press interview. Why it matters: Joaquin's parents are using AI to give their son a new voice, which they plan to use in their yearslong campaign against gun violence. In an interview Monday on " The Jim Acosta Show," an AI rendering of Joaquin's face advocated for "stronger gun control laws, mental health support and community engagement." "I was taken from this world too soon due to gun violence while at school. It's important to talk about these issues so we can create a safer future for everyone." What they're saying: Joaquin's father, Manuel Oliver, told Acosta that the "AI Joaquin" uses the 17-year-old's voice and his past social media posts and other writings to mimic his personality. The AI clone is also trained on "knowledge that is out there through artificial intelligence," Oliver added. What's next: Oliver, who co-founded the gun violence advocacy organization Change the Ref with his wife Patricia, said on the show that they want AI Joaquin to have his own social media presence and eventually address audiences in person. "Now Joaquin is going to start having followers. It's not Manny, it's not Patricia. He's going to start uploading videos." "Moving forward, we will have Joaquin on stage in the middle of a debate." On a personal level, Oliver said he and his wife cherish being able to hear Joaquin's voice again. "Patricia will spend hours asking questions. Like any other mother, she loves to hear Joaquin say, 'I love you, Mami.'" Yes, but: Oliver added, "I understand that this is AI. I don't want anyone to think that I am in some way trying to bring my son back. Sadly, I can't." Friction point: A Washington Post story said the interview sparked an "intense backlash" online, as critics took issue with using AI to reanimate the dead. "This sort of interview style can't possibly represent what that child wants to say in any reasonable way," Hany Farid, a professor at the University of California, Berkeley, who specializes in digital forensics, told the Post. "There are plenty of opportunities to talk to real victims and have a serious conversation about this epidemic that's happening in our country without resorting to this sort of stunt." This isn't the first time the Olivers have backed the use of AI to send a political message using Joaquin's likeness. In a 2020 video promoting voter registration efforts, an AI version of Joaquin talks about not being able to vote in the presidential election and his frustration with the lack of action to prevent more shootings. The other side: Oliver responded to critics in an Instagram video saying Joaquin "has a lot of things to say" and "thanks to AI, we can bring him back." "If the problem that you have is with the AI, then you have the wrong problem. The real problem is that my son was shot eight years ago. So if you believe that is not the problem, you are part of the problem."

'Considering all options': Netanyahu to rule on Gaza occupation, hostages in cabinet meeting
'Considering all options': Netanyahu to rule on Gaza occupation, hostages in cabinet meeting

Yahoo

time43 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

'Considering all options': Netanyahu to rule on Gaza occupation, hostages in cabinet meeting

Witkoff and Netanyahu agreed on a "broad consensus that a deal must include all the hostages" during the former's recent visit to Israel, one Israeli official told the 'Post.' Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu will convene an extensive cabinet meeting on Gaza and a hostage deal, an Israeli official told The Jerusalem Post on Tuesday, noting that "the prime minister is considering all available options regarding the next steps." The Israeli official told the Post that a "broad consensus that a deal must include all the hostages" was found after US President Donald Trump's Special Envoy Steve Witkoff returned to the US, following his visit to Israel. Netanyahu reached decision to fully reoccupy Gaza, PMO sources say On Monday evening, sources told the Post that Netanyahu reached a decision for the full occupation of the Gaza Strip, including operations in areas where hostages are held. Hamas responded to the reports about the intent to conquer Gaza, saying, "Israel's threats are repetitive, worthless, and have no influence on our decisions." The cabinet meeting follows months of talks in Doha between Hamas, Israel, and mediators to reach a ceasefire and hostage deal. This is a developing story.

Leonardo DiCaprio Was Spotted Boarding Jeff Bezos's Mega Yacht, And Everyone's Saying The Same Thing
Leonardo DiCaprio Was Spotted Boarding Jeff Bezos's Mega Yacht, And Everyone's Saying The Same Thing

Yahoo

time5 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Leonardo DiCaprio Was Spotted Boarding Jeff Bezos's Mega Yacht, And Everyone's Saying The Same Thing

It's no secret that Leonardo DiCaprio has long used his platform to educate people on the climate crisis and environmental conservation. However, people have raised their eyebrows over Leo's 'activism' in recent years given his lifestyle, which involves excessive private jet usage and boarding superyachts that generate thousands of metric tons of carbon emissions per year. Perhaps most notably, the actor was called out in 2016 for flying from France to New York and back in a private jet to — ironically — accept an award for his work around climate change. Related: A few weeks ago, Leo — like several other celebrities — faced backlash for attending the multimillion-dollar Bezos wedding, which was protested by numerous residents in Venice because of the fact that climate change has, in part, caused the city to slowly start sinking. According to multiple outlets, more than 90 private jets flew in for the celebrations, while other guests attended via yachts. Interestingly, Leo memorably hid his face with a baseball cap when he was photographed at the wedding, promoting heavy speculation that he didn't want to be seen in attendance. Well, now, Leo is at the center of public discourse again after he was pictured boarding Jeff's mega yacht over the weekend. Related: In the photos, Leo and his girlfriend, Vittoria Ceretti, can be seen greeting Jeff and his wife, Lauren Sánchez, as they step onto the luxury yacht, which is reportedly worth an estimated $500 million. Reacting to the photos online, several people called out Leo's 'hypocrisy.' 'I feel like so many celebrities are just going full mask-off right now. On one hand, it's nice (?) they are no longer pretending to be righteous do-gooders, but it also feels so dystopian for someone like him to just fully embrace cozying up to MAGA billionaires after so many years of pretending to care about progressive causes. He at least felt enough shame to try and hide from the paps when he attended the Bezos wedding, now he is greeting Bezos arm-in-arm on his yacht,' one person wrote. Related: 'Seriously all-time great acting job convincing people he's an environmentalist while flying around in private jets the past 20 years,' another said, while someone else added, 'The cognitive disconnect it takes to star in Don't Look Up and then align yourself with and behave like the very people/hypocrisy the movie was critiquing/satirizing is really…something.' 'Leo is constantly on yachts and takes private jets everywhere. His environmental activism has always been something he doesn't practice himself,' one comment read, while another person said, 'It's so disturbing how the 1% have gone full mask-off in the past seven months.' 'Remember in his little climate documentary when a woman he was interviewing called his ass out on him being a hypocrite? This is exactly why,' someone wrote, referring to a clip from Leo's 2016 documentary, Before the Flood. In the film, environmentalist and political activist Sunita Narain told Leo directly, 'Your consumption is really going to put a hole in the fact is that we need to put the issue of lifestyle and consumption at the center of climate negotiations.' Related: While Leo said he undoubtedly agreed that "we have to practice what we preach," he added, 'it's a very difficult argument to present to Americans that we need to change our lifestyle.' Let us know what you think in the comments. More on this Protesters Of Jeff Bezos And Lauren Sánchez's Wedding Just Took Things To A Whole New Level, And The Photos Are Going Mega ViralLeyla Mohammed · June 27, 2025 Here's How Bad Taylor Swift's And Other Celebs' Private Jet Emissions Really Are For The EnvironmentLeslie Finlay · Aug. 16, 2022 Also in Celebrity: Also in Celebrity: Also in Celebrity: Solve the daily Crossword

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store