logo
‘It's a mess': Northern Ireland traders battling Brexit red tape hopeful about new EU-UK deal

‘It's a mess': Northern Ireland traders battling Brexit red tape hopeful about new EU-UK deal

Irish Times22-05-2025

For businessman Dermot Johnson,
Brexit
has meant fewer goods but a lot more paperwork.
Take organic products, he says: 'We brought in – we still do bring in – some organic goods, but there's a whole form-filling and paperwork you have to do now to send organic goods across the sea [from Britain to Northern Ireland].
'So, if we're working for a company that maybe does 30 or 40 goods, but they have got a couple of organic lines, some of them just go, we're not doing that any more, even though we could sell them.'
This is a typical occurrence since Brexit, he says.
READ MORE
'We would probably get organic goods from about half the people we did, pre Brexit, so about half of them have given up on it,' he says.
Johnson is the managing director of Johnson Bros, a sales, marketing, warehousing and distribution business based in Lisburn, Co Antrim. His firm imports food and consumer products from Britain for sale in Ireland, mainly in the North but also south of the Border.
[
The Irish Times view on the EU/UK agreement and Northern Ireland: grab the advantages
Opens in new window
]
The frustration is evident in his voice as he describes the years since the UK left the European Union in January 2020. He describes it as 'distraction and uncertainty and paperwork for paperwork's sake'.
'What it's cost us is, it's taken time, and management time, away from doing things that we should be doing,' he says.
'I probably spend more time – as opposed to trying to increase and improve the business – filling in forms, looking after regulatory [issues], trying to understand it.'
Dermot Johnson of Johnson Bros food wholesaler in Lisburn. Photograph: Arthur Allison/Pacemaker Press
From his point of view, the announcement by the EU and UK on Monday that they would work towards a deal to remove most checks and paperwork on agri-food products moving from Britain to Northern Ireland 'can only be a good thing'.
Such requirements have been among the consequences of Brexit for Northern Ireland which, because of its unique position both geographically and politically, remains in the UK customs territory but applies EU customs rules.
This week's commitment represents potentially the most significant easement of post-Brexit trading rules since the UK left the EU.
[
Explainer: what is Keir Starmer's Brexit reset deal?
Opens in new window
]
Both sides have agreed to work towards a deal on sanitary and phytosanitary (SPS) products – agrifood and plant produce.
This would 'result in the vast majority of movements of animals, animal products, plants and plant products between Britain and the European Union being undertaken without the certificates or controls that are currently required by the rules', both sides said in the agreement.
'This is huge,' says Stuart Anderson, director of public affairs with the NI Chamber, which represents more than 1,000 businesses.
Though he emphasises the caveat that this is a statement of intent, rather than a signed-off deal, 'what's really interesting is how wide-ranging the SPS deal is.
'It looks all-encompassing,' he says.
Two figures underline the importance of this for the North. Two out of every three of its goods, retail or wholesale, move between Britain and Northern Ireland, while the main markets for its agri-food industry – which produces food for 10 million people with a population of two million – are Ireland and Britain.
'So, it's hugely important that the same rules are applied,' says Anderson, 'and effectively those barriers to trade have been removed for farmers, for retailers and for those at every end of that agri-food supply chain, and that seems to be the direction of travel.'
'Whether it's 'not for EU' labelling no longer being required, or effectively supporting the movement of things like seed potatoes ... they should be able to move freely, and that's hugely encouraging.'
However, the devil will be in the detail. The next step will be to draw up, and reach agreement on, the text of a deal, which will then require some time to implement, meaning existing arrangements will remain in place until then.
'What we really need to know now is: how quickly they will get it done, and how quickly will they implement it?' says Anderson.
UK prime minister Keir Starmer and president of the European Commission Ursula von der Leyen. Photograph: Carl Court/Getty
Many other issues also remain to be addressed.
'There's nothing on customs, and customs is universal, they affect every business moving goods between GB and Northern Ireland ... so that's certainly something we were hoping to see some movement on,' says Anderson.
He also raises veterinary medicines – 'The grace period expires at the end of the year, so that's one to watch' – and the implications of the last phase of 'not for EU' labelling, which is due to come into force in July.
Dermot Johnson is working through the consequences. Another characteristic of the new rules in the years since Brexit is that 'it changes so quickly, and what it says and what it does is ... sometimes, you wonder.'
He lists many anomalies – 'It's sort of Alice in Wonderland stuff, really' – that he is dealing with on a day-to-day basis, from the thousands of commodity codes to inconsistencies around tariffs, as well as concerns, including that the trusted trader scheme set up by the UK government as a support for businesses such as Johnson's to smooth the import for goods will be withdrawn.
'We, like lots of people, do our best, but it's a mess.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Taoiseach labelling Israel's actions in Gaza ‘genocide' won't stop Central Bank approving ‘war bonds', governor tells TDs
Taoiseach labelling Israel's actions in Gaza ‘genocide' won't stop Central Bank approving ‘war bonds', governor tells TDs

Irish Independent

time2 hours ago

  • Irish Independent

Taoiseach labelling Israel's actions in Gaza ‘genocide' won't stop Central Bank approving ‘war bonds', governor tells TDs

So-called 'war bonds', which it is claimed are being used to fund the killing of innocent children and civilians in Gaza, are under intense scrutiny as a second Dáil motion was tabled to ban them. The Central Bank faced sustained questioning from TDs and senators at the Oireachtas Finance Committee, but insisted it is legally required to approve the legal document, or prospectus, required for the sale of the bonds. To be sold in the EU, bonds from non-EU countries must have their bond prospectus approved by an EU country. Israel traditionally had its European bond prospectuses approved in the UK, but turned to the Central Bank in Ireland for authorisations after Brexit. The Governor of the Central Bank, Gabriel Makhlouf, said it was 'incorrect' to claim it can impose sanctions on the processing of the bonds on the basis of international court rulings. He said it is up to international bodies including the UN and the EU to respond to breaches of international law by Israel, and to determine if sanctions are necessary. 'The Central Bank cannot impose sanctions on Israel – for example by refusing to approve the Israeli bond prospectus – in circumstances where the EU has not imposed any such sanctions itself,' he told TDs and senators. The Central Bank said its approval for Israel trading bonds in the EU is due for renewal in September. 'We will look extremely carefully at the facts that pertain at that time and will make a judgment on it,' said the Central Bank governor. A number of TDs, including Sinn Féin's Pearse Doherty and Cian O'Callaghan of the Social Democrats, said Ireland was a signatory to the Genocide Convention and this would enable the Central Bank to reject Israel's bond prospectuses. But Mr Makhlouf said the body is not bound by the Genocide Convention, but rather EU financial regulations, when deciding whether to facilitate the sale of bonds. ADVERTISEMENT The current prospectus is due for renewal again in September. 'If, when the state of Israel looks to renew its prospectus we will look extremely carefully at the facts that pertain at the time and we will make a judgment on it,' he said. But this will be based on the requirements of the financial regulations. 'The fact that the Taoiseach made the statement at the time, that is not going to change the judgement we come to,' he said, referring to Micheál Martin's comments last month that Israel is committing genocide in Gaza. Ahead of last night's Dáil vote on a Bill enabling the Central Bank to stop facilitating Israeli bonds. Sinn Féin urged government TDs to 'have a backbone'. Deputy Doherty said: 'We have to ensure the State has no hand, act or part in facilitating the sale of Israeli war bonds. These aren't just financial instruments, this is the money that is raised that pays for the bombs that pays for the bullets that pays for the destruction of the lives of men, women and children across Palestine as we speak.' Deputy O'Callaghan said while Independent TDs backing the Government had a free vote on the motion, Fianna Fáil and Fine Gael TDs had to vote along with the party whip. 'That is utterly unjust and unfair,' he said. 'If there was a free vote, this motion would pass and that would put the Central Bank under severe pressure to stop facilitating the sale of these bonds and would cut off a source of finance for the genocide that is taking place.' Labour's Conor Sheehan said: 'It is not enough to just call this a genocide. We need to make Israel an international pariah.'

Q&A: What is the pension payment error all about and can the money be recouped?
Q&A: What is the pension payment error all about and can the money be recouped?

Irish Times

time3 hours ago

  • Irish Times

Q&A: What is the pension payment error all about and can the money be recouped?

Unions and representatives of retired civil servants say they are awaiting detail of the errors made in relation to the pensions of their current or former members . However, there is concern that some of the issues could require legislation and that senior politicians could be impacted by any changes to the law. What has happened? On Tuesday the Minister for Public Expenditure Jack Chambers said 'serious and systemic operational issues' had been identified at the National Shared Services Office (NSSO), which employs about 850 people and handles payroll administration for all government departments. The belief is these errors have resulted in some retired civil servants being underpaid in their pensions; incorrect pension contributions having been deducted from current and previous ministers; and the wrong amount of tax being deducted from the lump sums paid to about 30 senior civil servants upon retirement. With a review of 13,000 retirees' positions under way, however, and an external audit of the NSSO to be undertaken, it is uncertain how the situation will develop. READ MORE What will happen in respect of people who owe or are owed money? Mr Chambers said he was committed to ensuring 'all monies owed to the State are fully recouped and monies owed to individuals are refunded'. The former is likely to create issues, however, especially in relation to the larger amounts, with one retiree said to owe €280,000. With Mr Chambers suggesting some ministers may be asked to repay more than €30,000, the tax issue could be considerable. Details of the time frame have not been clarified, but Ciaran Rohan of the Association of Higher Civil and Public Servants says recouping overpayments stretching back more than four years could leave retirees, or potentially some politicians, substantially out of pocket. This is because current legislation would only allow the reclaiming of the extra tax paid as a result of receiving the extra money for the past four years, even if the overpayments stretched further back. Could that be changed? Only by legislation, says employment lawyer Barry Kenny, who says the issue means 'the original error has financial implications beyond a simple repayment issue'. It also has the potential to make it a political one. How could the money be recouped? A government circular in 2018 sets out the various ways in which overpayments can be reclaimed but there is no provision for anything like a liability of €280,000. The intention should be to recoup all the money and ideally within a year, it suggests, usually by deductions from pay or pensions of up to 8 per cent of the gross amount the person is receiving. But these people can afford to repay, no? The largest figures relate to people who had pension funds on retirement worth more than €2 million. That would certainly suggest they are well off but coming up with the funds to repay a six-figure sum is likely to be regarded as an issue. Cloda Ryan of the Retired Civil and Public Servants Association (RCPSA), which has some 7,000 members, says the vast majority of amounts involved are likely to be far smaller but still have the potential to cause problems for the pensioners concerned. 'Contrary to public perception, the majority of Civil Service pensioners have moderate pensions, in many cases lower than they would receive under the social welfare State pension for which, in general, civil servants recruited before April 6th, 1995 do not qualify.' The organisation is seeking assurances 'that no recovery of pension overpayments would take place without consultation and agreement with each pensioner affected'. And if an agreement can't be reached? 'Any civil servant faced with a request to refund money, large or small, should take legal advice to clarify the legal basis for the demand to repay and whether the figures are accurate,' says Mr Kenny. He says where the validity is established, 'reasonable' deductions or instalments would need to be agreed.

The Irish Times view on AI and Ireland: the future will not  wait
The Irish Times view on AI and Ireland: the future will not  wait

Irish Times

time3 hours ago

  • Irish Times

The Irish Times view on AI and Ireland: the future will not wait

Artificial intelligence is no longer a distant concept confined to Silicon Valley or science fiction. It is here, now, reshaping economies, transforming industries and prompting governments to rethink everything from education and employment to ethics and regulation. The question Ireland must urgently confront is whether it is truly prepared for the scale and speed of change AI is set to unleash. There are reasons both for cautious optimism and concern. Ireland has long positioned itself as a European technology hub, hosting the headquarters of many of the world's leading tech firms. Government agencies are actively courting AI investment. Research centres in Irish universities are leaders in developing cutting-edge AI applications. The recent launch of an AI Skills programme by the Department of Enterprise, Trade and Employment signals a growing recognition of the need to upskill the workforce. But the evidence of the last decade also suggests that Irish regulators struggle to come to terms with the challenges posed by US tech companies which are not slow to wield their considerable political influence. The establishment of an Oireachtas Committee on Artificial Intelligence, which met for the first time this week, marks a step in deepening political and legislative engagement with the issue. The committee has the potential to initiate a broader public and legislative debate on AI policy that balances innovation with the safeguarding of democratic values and public interest. But for this to succeed, it will need to act in constructive coordination with education, enterprise and civil society. Because readiness is about more than strategy documents, it must reach into the heart of how we educate, train, and govern. Schools, for example, are already grappling with how to prepare students for a new world in which traditional educational metrics are no longer credible. The reformed Leaving Certificate, with its increased emphasis on project work, now faces an unexpected challenge: how to assess students fairly in a world where generative AI can produce plausible essays and design projects at the click of a button. READ MORE Equally urgent are the labour market implications. AI is set to displace roles in sectors ranging from transport and customer support to software development and legal services. Without a serious, joined-up national response, Ireland could face widening inequality, social dislocation and a growing digital divide. Nimble policymaking and innovative thinking are imperative. But this moment also requires political will and public investment. AI is not just a technological leap. It is a societal transformation. If Ireland is to thrive in this new age, it must act with speed, coherence and purpose. The future will not wait.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store