Trump DOJ pushes for Google-Chrome breakup amid heightened Big Tech scrutiny
The Department of Justice (DOJ) argued Monday that a federal judge should force Google to divest from its Chrome browser, suggesting it could send a message to other 'monopolists' amid the government's multiple antitrust battles with Big Tech.
The DOJ and Google offered their opening salvos in court, as they kicked off a three-week trial to determine remedies after Google was found to have an illegal monopoly over online search.
'We're at an inflection point,' David Dahlquist, the DOJ's lead attorney, said Monday. 'This is the time for the court to tell Google and all other monopolists that there are consequences when you break antitrust laws.'
U.S. District Judge Amit Mehta ruled last August that Google had illegally maintained a monopoly over online search through a series of exclusive agreements with device manufacturers and browser developers that secured its search engine as the default.
The government has argued that splitting off the Chrome browser from Google is necessary, alongside a host of other remedies, to open up the search market and end the tech firm's monopoly.
Google contends that the DOJ's proposed remedies are 'fundamentally flawed' and 'completely untethered' from the conduct at issue in the case — Google's exclusive distribution agreements.
'It is a wish list from competitors looking to get the benefits of Google's extraordinary innovation,' John Schmidtlein, Google's lead attorney, said Monday in his opening arguments.
Beyond the Chrome divestiture, the government also seeks to bar Google from entering into the exclusive agreements at the heart of the case, as well as require the company to share search and advertising data with competitors.
If these remedies fail to rein in Google's monopoly or the company circumvents them, the DOJ has included a contingency — requiring Google to split from its operating system Android.
Dahlquist argued Monday that these various proposals will 'reinforce each other to encourage competition.'
He slammed Google's proposal, by contrast, as a 'superficial Band-Aid approach that does nothing,' dismissing its enforcement provision as 'toothless.'
The company's proposal seeks more limited restrictions on its agreements with device manufacturers and browsers, removing the exclusive nature of such agreements while still allowing for deals.
Schmidtlein argued that Google's remedies respond directly to the court's findings in the case, while the DOJ's proposal goes well beyond them.
'Google won its place in the market fair and square,' he said. 'Divesting Google of its hard-earned innovations so that lesser rivals can use them will not promote competition.'
Chrome and Android are both deeply tied to Google's infrastructure, Schmidtlein contended, which could create problems if they are divested. He also argued that the government's data sharing requirements would boost Google's rivals, while posing privacy and security risks.
Assistant Attorney General Gail Slater, who leads the DOJ's antitrust division, suggested Monday that the Google case was a unifying force in an increasingly polarized political climate.
'In a time of political division in our nation, this case against Google brings everyone together. This case was filed during President Trump's first term and litigated across three administrations. It has unified our nation,' Slater said in a statement.
She emphasized that the government has been joined by 49 states, two territories and Washington, D.C., in bringing the search case.
'If Google's conduct is not remedied, it will control much of the internet for the next decade and not just in internet search, but in new technologies like artificial intelligence,' she added.
The trial comes at a crucial moment for Google, as its future appears increasingly uncertain in the wake of a second antitrust loss last week.
U.S. District Judge Leonie Brinkema ruled Thursday that the company had illegally acquired and maintained a monopoly over advertising technology, which helps connect advertisers and publishers to fill ad space online.
The decision represents another major blow for Google, although it claimed partial victory, emphasizing the parts of the case where the judge sided with the company. It has vowed to appeal the 'other half' of the ruling.
Meta is also currently on trial at the same courthouse in Washington, D.C., seeking to fend off allegations from the Federal Trade Commission that the social media giant entrenched its monopoly over social networking with its acquisitions of Instagram and WhatsApp.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
TechCrunch
an hour ago
- TechCrunch
Google delays rollout of its ‘Ask Photos' AI search feature
In Brief Google is delaying the rollout of its 'Ask Photos' feature for about two weeks, Google Photos product manager Jamie Aspinall wrote on X. According to Aspinall, the product isn't up to par when it comes to latency, quality, and user experience. While some users have access to the feature now, he said that a new version will be shipped in about two weeks, which will aim to correct these issues. Google first announced the Ask Photos feature last year at its annual Google I/O developer conference. With the help of Google's Gemini AI model, Ask Photos allows users to search their Google Photos libraries using natural language prompts. A user could ask, for example, for a sample of one great photo from each of their visits to a National Park. one of my favorite examples of Ask Photos@googlephotos — Jamieasp (@jamieasp) May 14, 2024 Google did not respond to a request for comment before publication.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Trump DOJ takes 'unprecedented' step admonishing foreign judge in free speech case centered on Rumble
The Department of Justice (DOJ) sent an unprecedented letter to a Brazilian Supreme Court justice in May, admonishing the judge for ordering American-based video platform Rumble to restrict the free speech of a user on U.S. soil, describing the orders as international overreach that lack enforceability. Rumble, a popular U.S.-based video-sharing platform that bucks censorship efforts frequently found on other video and social media platforms, is at the center of an international battle to protect free speech that has been ongoing for months. Brazilian Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes ordered the suspension of Rumble in the South American country back in February over claims the U.S. company did not comply with court orders, including removing the accounts of a Brazilian man living in the U.S. and seeking political asylum. "If you look at what's happening around the world, it's clear we're living through a perilous moment for anyone who believes in freedom of expression — a fundamental human right enshrined in the U.S. Constitution and recognized globally, even by the United Nations," Rumble CEO Chris Pavlovski exclusively told Fox News Digital Tuesday following the DOJ's May letter. Rumble, Trump Media Declare 'Complete Victory For Free Speech' In Win Against Brazilian Judge "The fact that Rumble has become a central player in this global fight for free speech is a powerful validation of our mission. We're proud to stand at the front lines of this effort and grateful that President Trump and his administration have made this battle a foreign policy priority." Read On The Fox News App Moraes is now in the U.S. government's crosshairs after the DOJ sent a letter to him in May outlining his reported international overreach into U.S. law affecting the First Amendment, as well as Secretary of State Marco Rubio revealing in a congressional hearing that the Brazilian judge could face U.S. sanctions. Moraes had ordered Rumble to remove a user from its platform as he stands accused of spreading false information online and is considered a fugitive in Brazil. Rumble refused and was threatened with financial penalties for the lack of cooperation. Trump-backed Media Company Sues Brazilian Supreme Court Justice, Claims He's Illegally Censoring Free Speech The DOJ letter, dated May 7 and made public Thursday, argued that Moraes' orders are not enforceable in the U.S. "These purported directives to Rumble are made under threat of monetary and other penalties," the letter, signed by DOJ official Ada E. Bosque, reads. "We take no position on the enforceability of the various orders and other judicial documents directing Rumble to act within the territory of Brazil, which is a matter of Brazilian law. However, to the extent that these documents direct Rumble to undertake specific actions in the United States, we respectfully advise that such directives are not enforceable judicial orders in the United States." The DOJ did not have additional comment to provide when approached about the letter Tuesday. Pavlovski described to Fox Digital that the letter is "unprecedented" and draws a clear line to foreign nations that they cannot attempt to thwart U.S. laws and the First Amendment. "The letter from the U.S. Department of Justice to a foreign judge over censorship orders is unprecedented," Pavlovski said. "It draws a bright red line: foreign officials cannot issue censorship orders that violate the First Amendment or bypass U.S. law. That kind of extraterritorial overreach is incompatible with American sovereignty. And that's good news, not just for Americans, but for free societies everywhere." Rumble Reveals Censorship Demands From Surprising List Of Countries As Ceo To Testify On Free Speech Threats The letter continued that there are established channels for international legal proceedings, which the DOJ said the judge bypassed, and directed the Brazilian judge to various proper procedures he could take regarding the court orders. Rumble facing restrictions in foreign nations is hardly new, with the platform currently disabled in China, Russia and France, as well as Brazil. It has also previously received censorship demands in nations such as the U.K., Australia and New Zealand, but has maintained its free speech objective. The DOJ's letter comes as Rubio revealed in a House Committee on Foreign Affairs hearing in May that the State Department is considering sanctions against Moraes under the Magnitsky Act. The Global Magnitsky Human Rights Accountability Act authorizes the U.S. government to sanction individuals overseas if determined responsible for human rights abuses or corruption. "We've seen pervasive censorship, political persecution targeting the entire opposition, including journalists and ordinary citizens," Republican Florida Rep. Cory Mills asked Rubio at the hearing in May. "What they're now doing is imminent, politically motivated imprisonment of former President Bolsonaro. This crackdown has extended beyond Brazil's borders, impacting individuals on U.S. soil., the 2023 Financial Times article actually talked about this. What do you intend to do? And would you be looking at Supreme Court justice sanctioning of Alexandre de Moraes under the Global Magnitsky Act?" Brazilian Ex-president Bolsonaro Ordered To Stand Trial Over Alleged Coup Plan Rubio responded, "That's under review right now, and it's a great, great possibility that will happen." Days later, Rubio posted to X that the State Department will roll out visa restrictions on foreigners found "complicit" in censoring Americans. "For too long, Americans have been fined, harassed, and even charged by foreign authorities for exercising their free speech rights," Rubio wrote on X. "Today, I am announcing a new visa restriction policy that will apply to foreign officials and persons who are complicit in censoring Americans. Free speech is essential to the American way of life — a birthright over which foreign governments have no authority." "Foreigners who work to undermine the rights of Americans should not enjoy the privilege of traveling to our country," Rubio added, not naming specific individuals responsible for such actions. "Whether in Latin America, Europe, or elsewhere, the days of passive treatment for those who work to undermine the rights of Americans are over." Moraes is also overseeing the upcoming trial of former Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro, who is accused of allegedly attempting to overturn his 2022 election results. Brazil President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva slammed the U.S. for threatening sanctions against Moraes in comment this week. "It is unacceptable for the president of any country in the world to comment on the decision of the Supreme Court of another country," da Silva said Tuesday, according to Reuters. The Brazilian president added that the U.S. should understand the importance of "respecting the integrity of institutions in other countries." Fox News Digital reached out to Moraes' office Tuesday but did not immediately receive a article source: Trump DOJ takes 'unprecedented' step admonishing foreign judge in free speech case centered on Rumble
CNN
an hour ago
- CNN
Hackers are using a modified Salesforce app to trick employees and extort companies, Google says
Hackers are tricking employees at companies in Europe and the Americas into installing a modified version of a Salesforce-related app, allowing the hackers to steal reams of data, gain access to other corporate cloud services and extort those companies, Google said on Wednesday. The hackers – tracked by the Google Threat Intelligence Group as UNC6040 – have 'proven particularly effective at tricking employees' into installing a modified version of Salesforce's Data Loader, a proprietary tool used to bulk import data into Salesforce environments, the researchers said. The hackers use voice calls to trick employees into visiting a purported Salesforce connected app setup page to approve the unauthorized, modified version of the app, created by the hackers to emulate Data Loader. If the employee installs the app, the hackers gain 'significant capabilities to access, query, and exfiltrate sensitive information directly from the compromised Salesforce customer environments,' the researchers said. The access also frequently gives the hackers the ability to move throughout a customer's network, enabling attacks on other cloud services and internal corporate networks. Technical infrastructure tied to the campaign shares characteristics with suspected ties to the broader and loosely organized ecosystem known as 'The Com,' known for small, disparate groups engaging in cybercriminal and sometimes violent activity, the researchers said. A Google spokesperson told Reuters that roughly 20 organizations have been affected by the UNC6040 campaign, which has been observed over the past several months. A subset of those organizations had data successfully exfiltrated, the spokesperson said. A Salesforce spokesperson told Reuters in an email that 'there's no indication the issue described stems from any vulnerability inherent in our platform.' The spokesperson said the voice calls used to trick employees 'are targeted social engineering scams designed to exploit gaps in individual users' cybersecurity awareness and best practices.' The spokesperson declined to share the specific number of affected customers, but said that Salesforce was 'aware of only a small subset of affected customers,' and said it was 'not a widespread issue.' Salesforce warned customers of voice phishing, or 'vishing,' attacks and of hackers abusing malicious, modified versions of Data Loader in a March 2025 blog post.
