logo
Why Flying Indians Out Of Iran Isn't As Simple As It Was In Ukraine

Why Flying Indians Out Of Iran Isn't As Simple As It Was In Ukraine

News183 hours ago

Last Updated:
Unlike the large-scale evacuation from Ukraine in 2022, India's efforts in Iran face tougher geography, closed airspace, and fewer viable exit routes
When war broke out in Ukraine in 2022, India moved swiftly. Within weeks, over 22,000 Indian students and citizens were flown out under Operation Ganga, a massive government-led airlift that became a model for crisis evacuations. More than 90 flights, including 14 Indian Air Force sorties, operated from neighbouring countries like Poland, Hungary, and Romania. At that time, Europe's airspace remained open, and these nations actively cooperated to ease the evacuation.
Fast forward to 2025, and a new crisis is brewing, this time in Iran, where Israeli airstrikes and fears of regional escalation have placed thousands of Indian nationals at risk. But replicating the Ukraine playbook here is proving next to impossible. The geography is tougher, the diplomatic landscape more complicated, and the nature of the threat is far more unpredictable.
Iran Is No Ukraine: A Tougher Neighbourhood, A Tighter Exit
One of the biggest reasons India could evacuate so many people from Ukraine was geography. Ukraine borders several friendly nations, and most of its western regions were not targeted in the early stages of the war. Students and workers could simply board buses or trains and reach border checkpoints, where Indian officials helped them cross into safer countries. From there, evacuation flights were quick and coordinated.
Iran, however, offers no such luxury. Its neighbours include Pakistan and Afghanistan to the east, both diplomatically difficult, and neither viable for a safe civilian crossing. Pakistan's airspace has remained closed to Indian aircraft since Operation Sindoor, and Afghanistan is still considered logistically unviable.
Azerbaijan, another neighbour, has openly backed Pakistan in diplomatic forums, further narrowing India's options. Armenia and Turkmenistan remain the only realistic corridors. Armenia, in particular, has emerged as the preferred route due to its stable ties with India, geographic proximity to northern Iran, and relative neutrality in the conflict. But even these routes require long, overland journeys through potentially dangerous areas.
Meanwhile, cities such as Arak, Khorramabad, Kermanshah, Isfahan, and Tabriz are effectively off-limits for evacuation planning due to their proximity to Iranian military or nuclear installations.
No Flights, No Name: Why India's Operation In Iran Is Under The Radar
In Ukraine, evacuation flights began within days. More than 90 flights—many operated by the Indian Air Force—brought students and citizens home. Prime Minister Narendra Modi publicly thanked partner nations, and the government ran a visible, high-profile operation with constant updates.
Iran tells a different story. The airspace remains shut due to the threat of missile strikes, and there has been no public declaration of a named evacuation mission. As per reports, this is a deliberate decision. A quiet, low-profile operation is seen as the safer path in an already volatile region.
So far, around 110 Indian students have crossed into Armenia by road. Another 600 to 700 people have been moved from Tehran to safer locations within Iran, such as Qom, which is currently seen as a low-risk city. But there are no planes waiting on tarmacs. No big announcements. Just a cautious, ground-level operation.
Evacuation By Land, Not Air, And Not All Can Leave
What makes things harder is that Iran's internal infrastructure isn't built for large-scale movement during a crisis. In Ukraine, trains and roads stayed operational for much of the war. In Iran, many roads are dotted with military checkpoints. Fuel is hard to find. Reports have emerged of Indians travelling over 1,000 kilometres by road, often in unsafe conditions, just to reach a neighbouring country's border.
Adding to this is the scattered nature of the Indian population in Iran. Unlike Ukraine, where students were concentrated in specific cities, Indian nationals in Iran are spread across multiple regions—Tehran, Qom, Urmia, Isfahan, Kerman, and Tabriz—some of which are dangerously close to nuclear or military installations. Many simply cannot be moved quickly or safely, especially when air travel is off the table.
As of now, around 1,500 Indian students are still in high-risk zones and await further evacuation arrangements.
Indian Diplomacy At Work
India is not sitting idle. Behind the scenes, New Delhi is in touch with multiple governments, including Armenia, Turkmenistan, the UAE, and Azerbaijan, to explore safe passage for Indian nationals. The Indian embassy in Tehran has issued multiple advisories urging citizens—especially those in the capital—to leave using their own transport wherever possible, due to limited evacuation infrastructure. Emergency helplines are active, and a 24×7 control room has been set up to monitor developments and coordinate responses.
But unlike Europe, where cooperation was seamless and the political cost was low, West Asia is a different battlefield, both literally and diplomatically. Every movement has to be negotiated, every step calculated.
What Happens Next?
India's evacuation efforts from Iran are expected to continue in phases, with a focus on land-based movement through countries like Armenia and possibly Turkmenistan. Additional groups of Indian nationals, including students still in cities like Tehran, Isfahan, and Tabriz, are likely to be relocated to safer zones or moved toward exit points as and when security conditions allow.
While there is currently no indication of an airlift operation on the scale of Operation Ganga, officials are closely monitoring the situation and coordinating with neighbouring governments to keep evacuation channels open.
For now, the priority remains the safe and steady movement of citizens, without attracting unnecessary attention or triggering regional complications. More groups are expected to be evacuated in the coming days, depending on how the security and diplomatic equations evolve.
About the Author
News Desk
The News Desk is a team of passionate editors and writers who break and analyse the most important events unfolding in India and abroad. From live updates to exclusive reports to in-depth explainers, the Desk d...Read More
Get breaking news, in-depth analysis, and expert perspectives on everything from politics to crime and society. Stay informed with the latest India news only on News18. Download the News18 App to stay updated!
tags :
evacuations Indian students in Ukraine Israel-Iran tensions
Location :
New Delhi, India, India
First Published:
June 18, 2025, 13:07 IST
News india Why Flying Indians Out Of Iran Isn't As Simple As It Was In Ukraine

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump's Maga camp divided as he weighs options to join Israel's war on Iran
Trump's Maga camp divided as he weighs options to join Israel's war on Iran

First Post

time22 minutes ago

  • First Post

Trump's Maga camp divided as he weighs options to join Israel's war on Iran

US President Donald Trump's Maga movement stands divided into two. While the hardliner ideological wing is slamming the idea of involvement in the war on Iran, those holding loyalty above ideology have supported preparations for war and are urging the president to attack Iran's nuclear sites with Israel. read more As US President Donald Trump appears to be preparing to join Israel in attacking Iran, his supporters in the Maga movement are split over the US involvement in the conflict. While ideological hardliners of the Make America Great Again (Maga) movement are criticising Trump's inclination to join the war, those loyal to Trump or those who have come to the folds of Maga from a traditional Republican background have put their weight behind Trump. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Among the most prominent Maga figures, those opposing an intervention in the Israel-Iran war include Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene and far-right commentators Tucker Carlson and Charlie Kirk. Those standing behind Trump and slamming his critics include Vice President JD Vance, far-right activist Laura Loomer, podcaster Ben Shapiro, and Fox News host Mark Levin. As the Israel's war on Iran has entered the sixth day, it has become clear that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu cannot achieve the main objective of the war of destroying Iranian capabilities without US help. As Firstpost's Madhur Sharma previously noted, one of the most important nuclear sites, Fordow, is located deep underground and can only be struck by 'bunker buster' bomb that the United States has. There are indications that Trump is giving Iran one last chance to make a deal before he decides to join Israel in the war. He has already moved warplanes, aerial refuelling tankers, and an entire carrier strike group to West Asia for potential operations. Trump faces revolt from Maga stalwarts Trump came to power on an anti-interventionist platform. He said that he would end or curtain US involvement in fighting wars abroad and focus resources to domestic affairs. He said he would end the wars in Gaza and Ukraine — he blamed Nato's expansionism under his predecessor, Joe Biden, for the latter war. In his first term, Trump had withdrawn US personnel from Syria, reduced the supports to Kurds in the country, and signed the deal with the Taliban for withdrawal from Afghanistan. In the second term, he has aligned himself with Russia and withdrawn from security commitments in Europe. With such a record, Trump pushing the United States into a fresh war that poses no direct, immediate threat to the United States would mean putting 'America last, kill innocent people, are making us broke, and will ultimately lead to our destruction', according to Rep. Greene, the far-right Congresswoman who has been a leading Trump cheerleader. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD In a post on X, Greene joined ranks with Carlson, who has gone from being a traditional conservative to a pro-Russia, pro-Iran far-right figure in recent years. Tucker Carlson is one of my favorite people. He fiercely loves his wife, children, and our country. Since being fired by the neocon network Fox News, he has more popularity and viewers than ever before. He unapologetically believes the same things I do. That if we don't fight… — Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene🇺🇸 (@RepMTG) June 17, 2025 The issue of US involvement in the Israel-Iran war is so divisive that it will kill the core of the Maga movement, said Steve Bannon, the far-right media figure who led Trump's first presidential campaign and served at White House in the first term. 'It's going to not just blow up the coalition. It's also going to thwart what we're doing with the most important thing, which is the deportation,' said Bannon. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Carlson refused to acknowledge Iran as the enemy and framed the Israeli war as one against the people of Iran — not Ayatollah Khamenei's regime. 'You're not going to convince me that the Iranian people are my enemy. 'It's Orwell, man. I'm a free man. You're not telling me who I have to hate,' said Carlson. Kirk said that the reason young Americans supported Trump was that 'he was the first president in my lifetime to not start a new war'. 'The last thing America needs right now is a new war. Our number one desire must be peace, as quickly as possible,' Kirk further said. Trump's loyalists strike back Trump's loyalists, led by Vice President Vance, struck back at critics. While some of them explained that Trump's position had remained consistent regarding over the years and that any attack would not be a deviation, some discredited the critics and said they were compromised by their ties to Iran and Iran's partners. Vance said on X that Trump 'has been amazingly consistent, over 10 years, that Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon'. He pointed out that Iran has continued to enrich uranium to near-weapons grade level and has violated its non-proliferation obligations. He further said that Iran has also rejected US offers that allow it to have a civilian nuclear programme without uranium enrichment. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD In such a case, Vance said that the method other than talks to prevent Iran from developing a nuclear weapon comes into picture. 'The president has made clear that Iran cannot have uranium enrichment. And he said repeatedly that this would happen one of two ways–the easy way or the 'other' way,' said Vance. Far-right activist Loomer flagged Carlson's ties to Iran and Qatar and said that he was compromised with such ties. She furnished government records to show that Carlson had taken $200,000 this year to conduct an interview with a Qatari official. She further said that he was 'controlled by Muslims' and that a partner in his media company was a person with Pakistani roots. 'Tucker Carlson wants you to think his thoughts on Iran are based and original, but he's literally participating in paid for interviews by the Qataris, who are funding and providing pent houses and luxury lifestyles to the leaders of Hamas in Doha. Tucker should just be honest that he's a mouthpiece for genocidal Muslims. His media company was literally funded by a MUSLIM investor who is half Pakistani and half Iranian and who spends a lot of time in Qatar,' said Loomer. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Here's the screenshot from the FARA documents filled out this year that prove Qatar paid hundreds of thousands of dollars for an interview between @TuckerCarlson and the Prime Minister of Qatar (the same Qatar which funds HAMAS) regarding the 'war with Iran'. This was a paid… — Laura Loomer (@LauraLoomer) June 18, 2025 Senator Lindsey Graham, a Trump ally, urged the president to 'go all-in' in supporting Israel and destroying the Iranian nuclear programme. 'If that means providing bombs, provide bombs. If that means flying with Israel, fly with Israel,' said Graham. Fox News host Levin said that Trump was 'truly historic and iconic figure' for his support of Israel. Senator Mitch McConnell, who has supported Trump over the years but distanced lately, said that 'isolationist movement led by Tucker Carlson and Steve Bannon are distressed we may be helping the Israelis defeat the Iranians'. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD

Hindi will not be allowed to be imposed in Maharashtra: Raj Thackeray
Hindi will not be allowed to be imposed in Maharashtra: Raj Thackeray

Hans India

time23 minutes ago

  • Hans India

Hindi will not be allowed to be imposed in Maharashtra: Raj Thackeray

Mumbai: The Maharashtra Navnirman Sena (MNS) chief Raj Thackeray dared the Maharashtra government to implement its decision to make Hindi a third language in Marathi and Hindi medium schools for classes 1 to 5, saying that "the imposition of Hindi will not be tolerated." In a sharp reaction, Raj Thackeray said, 'Do not try to impose a third language on Maharashtra. Is all this being done to divert attention from important issues in the state? I request journalists and writers of the state to speak out strongly against this decision. "If this decision is imposed on us today, these people (government) will not allow Marathi language to exist in the near future. Our literature will end, our culture will end. Maharashtra will be crushed under the yoke of the Union government. "Therefore, I request the citizens of Maharashtra to oppose this decision. Every school should oppose the government's decision. If the government feels this is a challenge, they should take it as a challenge. However, Hindi will not be allowed to be imposed in the state.' Raj Thackeray's comment came after the Mahayuti government in its resolution said that Hindi would not be a third compulsory language, but if students want to opt for any other Indian language, the class strength should be at least 20 and those students would be taught the language they selected, either in school by appointing a teacher or through online mode. The MNS chief has taken strong objection to the Mahayuti government's move and questioned, 'Why is the government trying to impose Hindi language and Hindiize Maharashtra? We should oppose this Hindi imposition as much as possible." "We will see how the schools teach Hindi language in Maharashtra,' said Raj Thackeray. He told reporters that Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis had assured him that the government would not make Hindi as third compulsory language. 'Which third language will be taught in Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh or Bihar? The Centre has said that the state government has to decide the policy, so why is Hindi being made compulsory? There is a website of Gujarat on which they have clearly written that three subjects, Gujarati, Mathematics and English, have been kept from the first. Then why is it compulsory in Maharashtra?' he asked. 'If Hindi is not compulsory in Gujarat while Amit Shah and Narendra Modi are sitting at the Centre, then why is Hindi language compulsory in Maharashtra? There is an option of Hindi from Class 6, so why is it being introduced from Class 1? Are there any policies to make it easy for IAS officers to speak Hindi? If the government in Maharashtra is Marathi, they should think about this. I want to see which schools are teaching Hindi,' he said. Meanwhile, Raj Thackeray in a letter to principals of schools across Maharashtra appealed to them to thwart the government's effort to impose Hindi on children, saying it is not only damaging to the children but also for the Marathi language. 'The government just blindly follows orders from above, but you need not fall prey to it. And if you are forced by the government, we are here to support you. To become well-educated, model citizens who can make the nation and Maharashtra proud, you need to know one state language and one world language. Why learn more of them? "We must understand the political motive behind this! The people of the North want to capture a civilised Maharashtra and the easy way to do that is to impose their language directly or indirectly. Do not fall prey to their politics,' he stated. Raj Thackeray further said, 'When the children grow up tomorrow, they can learn any language they want according to their needs, but why burden them from now on? If you stay firm and thwart the government's plans, we will stand behind you like a rock. But if you willingly support the government's hidden agenda by imposing the burden of a language, that is immaterial if they learn it or not, my Maharashtra Sainiks will surely visit you (for discussion).' He called upon the principals of schools to keep in mind that there is growing discontent in Maharashtra regarding this imposition of languages and said, 'Word to the wise! What more can I say?

India has never and will not accept third party mediation in resolving POK issue, PM tells Trump
India has never and will not accept third party mediation in resolving POK issue, PM tells Trump

United News of India

time27 minutes ago

  • United News of India

India has never and will not accept third party mediation in resolving POK issue, PM tells Trump

New Delhi, June 18 (UNI) Prime Minister Narendra Modi held a telephonic talk with US President Donald Trump on Wednesday and told him in unequivocal terms that India has neither allowed nor will allow third party mediation in resolving the issue of illegal occupation of Jammu and Kashmir by Pakistan (Pakistan Occupied Kashmir). "PM Modi stressed India has never accepted mediation, and does not accept and will never accept it. There is complete political unanimity in India on this," Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri said. The statement follows President Trump claiming credit for negotiating Operation Sindoor ceasefire and offering to mediate between India and Pakistan. During the 35-minute conversation, the Prime Minister discussed Operation Sindoor and the issue of terrorism and said India had conveyed to the entire world its determination to act against terrorism. Modi said terrorism is now viewed as a war and not proxy war and would respond to Pakistan's bullet with a bullet. He was hinting at strikes at terrorist camps in Pakistan and Pakistan Occupied Kashmir (POK). Talks on halting military action were held directly between India and Pakistan, through the existing channels at the request of Pakistan, Modi said. Pointing out that Operation Sindoor had not concluded, Prime Minister Modi said that at no time were issues like mediation by the US to broker peace between India and Pakistan discussed. India has never accepted mediation and will never do so. The telephone conversation between the two leaders took place while Prime Minister Modi is in Canada for the G7 Summit. The Prime Minister told President Trump that India's response to the Pahalgam terror attack was "measured" and only terrorist camps in Pakistan and POK were targeted. He said cessation of hostilities had been at the request of Pakistan. The phone conversation took place because President Trump left the G7 Summit early and Prime Minister Modi and President Trump were likely to meet on the sidelines of the summit. UNI RB PRS

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store