Britain has 12 days to save bioethanol industry, says AB Foods
LONDON, June 3 (Reuters) - One of Britain's biggest bioethanol producers warned the government on Tuesday that unless it steps in with a support package for the industry within the next 12 days it will have to start closure processes at its plant.
ABF Sugar, part of Associated British Foods (ABF.L), opens new tab, and Ensus together account for nearly all of the UK's bioethanol production capacity.
"We have 12 days to save this industry," Paul Kenward, CEO of ABF Sugar, told lawmakers on parliament's Business and Trade Committee.
Bioethanol is produced from crops such as wheat and is used to make petrol greener and sustainable aviation fuel. Byproducts include animal feed and carbon dioxide, the latter of which faced severe shortages in 2022.
ABF Sugar and Ensus have warned that last month's U.S.-UK trade deal, which will see the UK's 19% tariffs on U.S. ethanol fall to zero, on top of existing regulations giving overseas producers an advantage in the British market, have made the operating environment impossible.
They have said their plants at Hull and Teesside in northern England face closure.
Along with supply chain partners, the plants support thousands of jobs.
Kenward told lawmakers that by June 15 he needed to tell farmers whether he could sign new contracts for wheat supply.
"Why would I do that unless I have some confidence that the government's going to step in?" he said.
Kenward called on the government to urgently level the regulatory playing field, increase the amount of ethanol in UK petrol from 10% to 15% and support the development of sustainable aviation fuel.
He also wants the industry to have access to short-term financial aid of up to 150 million pounds ($203 million).
Kenward said AB Foods had invested 700 million pounds in the Hull site.
'Once it goes, it goes. Think what that does to future investors in green industries," he said.
A government spokesperson said business minister Jonathan Reynolds had met members of the bioethanol sector and senior officials "continue to consider what options may be available to support the impacted companies".
($1 = 0.7396 pounds)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Rhyl Journal
23 minutes ago
- Rhyl Journal
Faro Airport to let Brits use passport e-gates for first time
Faro Airport in Portugal will start this rollout ahead of the peak summer season in the Algarve. This announcement comes after a UK-EU deal where the government shared that British passport holders will be able to use e-gates at more European airports. Since Brexit, British travellers arriving at EU airports have generally been forced to queue for manned desks to have their passports stamped. 📍Faro airport. Horrendous This is instead of using automated gates with facial recognition technology, which has led to long waits in peak periods, The Daily Mail reports. British passports can currently be used at e-gates in the EU at only a limited number of airports in Spain and Portugal. Nick Thomas-Symonds, the minister for EU relations, told Parliament today (Thursday, June 5) that UK tourists arriving at Faro over the coming days will be able to use e-gates. He said: "The historic deal that we signed with the EU on May 19 is in our national interests. "Good for bills, borders and jobs. It slashes red tape and bureaucracy, boosts British exporters and makes life easier for holidaymakers. "Indeed, I'm delighted to confirm this morning that Faro Airport in Portugal will start the rollout of e-gate access to UK arrivals this week." The EU plans to introduce a new Entry/Exit system (EES) in October 2025, which will remove the need for people from non-member countries to have their passports stamped. The UK Government website says: "If you are travelling to a country in the Schengen area using a UK passport, you will be required to register your biometric details, such as fingerprints or a photo, when you arrive." It adds: "When EES is introduced, you will need to create a digital record on your first visit to the Schengen area at the port or airport on arrival. "You will be required to submit your fingerprints and have your photo taken at dedicated booths. You will not need to provide any information before travelling to a Schengen area country, and this data will be kept for three years. There are concerns this will cause queues at EU airports when first rolled out, as well as at the Port of Dover and Eurostar terminals. The countries that make up the Schengen area are: Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Italy, Latvia, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, and Switzerland. According to the UK Government website, you do not need a visa for short trips to the EU or countries in the Schengen area if both of the following apply: Other reasons include: Recommended reading: Why are passports different colours and what does each colour mean? How to claim compensation for flight delays and cancellations Does buying from duty free at the airport save you money and how does it work? You can travel to more than one country in a 180-day period, but how long you can stay in individual countries depends on their rules. The website adds: "Your total stay in the Schengen area must be no more than 90 days in every 180 days. "It does not matter how many countries you visit. The 180-day period keeps 'rolling'."
Reuters
37 minutes ago
- Reuters
Breakingviews - Wise's US listing switch lacks financial wisdom
LONDON, June 5 (Reuters Breakingviews) - Wise (WISEa.L), opens new tab helps customers exchange money more cheaply, transparently and, well, wisely. But the $15 billion firm's plan, opens new tab to shift its primary listing to New York from London seems less clever. CEO, co-founder and largest shareholder Kristo Käärmann wants to tap deeper pools of liquidity and attract more American investors. Yet for a company already trading at a premium valuation, the move raises more questions than it answers. Käärmann's case rests on two key points. Wise's shares are thinly traded in London, meaning investors risk moving the market by offloading stock in large volumes. Second, a U.S. listing would boost the company's appeal to American investors and even customers. There's truth to both. The total daily value of Wise's trading volume has averaged about half of $4 billion American peer Remitly Global over the past two years according to a Breakingviews analysis of LSEG data, even though the London-listed group is much bigger. And some domestic-focused U.S. investors prefer to hold stocks listed in their home market. Yet Wise needn't cross the Atlantic Ocean to boost liquidity. One possible obstacle to winning more investors at home is the company's quirky governance, where Class B owners have nine votes per share. The effect is that Käärmann has a tight grip on the company despite owning less than 20% of the tradable Class A stock, according to LSEG data. The alternative to hopping across the pond would be to get rid of some of the CEO's special rights, which could in turn smooth Wise's entry into Britain's main stock benchmark, the FTSE 100 Index (.FTSE), opens new tab. That would boost liquidity to U.S. levels: LSEG research, opens new tab found that, relative to the volume of companies' tradable shares, FTSE 100 trading levels were slightly higher than in the S&P 500 Index (.SPX), opens new tab in 2022. Nor is the United States Wise's biggest geography, as it was for other listing switchers like CRH and Ferguson Enterprises. For Käärmann's company, the American market comes third after Europe and Asia, making up 20% of group revenue. As for brand awareness, switching trading venue seems like a strange way to gain publicity compared with a marketing campaign. Moving the listing also brings possible downside. Wise trades at 29 times consensus 2027 earnings – beating Remitly, Block, PayPal and others. Other metrics tell the same story: there's no evidence of a valuation penalty because of the company's UK trading venue. That means Käärmann has much to lose if the company ends up as one of the many 'orphaned' pond-hoppers, which switch listing but never quite catch fire in the U.S. market. Research by think tank New Financial earlier this year found that just 44% of the 16 European companies that had moved across the Atlantic subsequently beat the performance of their home continent. The one consolidation is that this doesn't seem to be about extra CEO pay: Käärmann, as a major shareholder, has taken a roughly 200,000-pound ($270,000) cash salary in recent years, which is tiny compared to most bosses. There are no plans to raise that, according to a person familiar with the matter. But for investors, Wise's shift looks like a poor financial trade-off. Follow Karen Kwok on LinkedIn, opens new tab and X, opens new tab.
Telegraph
44 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Illegal immigrant can stay in UK for daughter he does not speak to
An asylum judge allowed an illegal immigrant stay in Britain despite ' contradictory findings ' that his relationship with his daughter was good – but had also broken down. Andrew Kung'u Gichuhi, from Kenya, won his appeal to remain in the country, with a new hearing pending, after an immigration judge said Mr Gichuhi could stay in the UK because he had a 'genuine and subsisting' relationship with his daughter, and it would not be right to expect her to leave Britain. But, later on in her judgment, she appeared to contradict her earlier comments, saying there had been a breakdown in the father-daughter relationship. After the Home Office argued that her findings were 'irrational', an upper tribunal judge has now ruled that Mr Gichuhi's claim should be heard again. The case, disclosed in court papers, is the latest example uncovered by The Telegraph in which illegal migrants or convicted foreign criminals have been able to remain in the UK or halt their deportations on human rights grounds. 'Irrational' ruling Yvette Cooper, the Home Secretary, has announced plans to kerb judges' powers to block deportations with new 'common sense' rules to clarify how they interpret the Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) article eight, which provides the right to a family life. The Home Secretary's rules are also intended to strengthen the public interest test, in which courts need to be hold themselves accountable and only grant exceptions to laws with justified reasons. Mr Gichuhi was living in the UK illegally as an unmarried partner of a British national when he applied for citizenship. The Home Office rejected his application, arguing that there were 'no insurmountable obstacles to family life with his partner continuing in Kenya'. The Home Office said he did not have a 'genuine and subsisting' relationship with his daughter, from a previous marriage. Mr Gichuhi appealed the decision to a lower-tier tribunal. The unnamed judge found that there was a 'genuine and subsisting' parental relationship between Gichuhi and his daughter, who 'could not reasonably be expected to leave the United Kingdom'. But later in the judgment, she said the relationship was 'broken down' and that there was 'no contact' between the Mr Gichuhi and his daughter. In the appeal against the 'irrational' finding, the Home Office said 'a relationship could not be both genuine and subsisting and broken down'. It added the judge had also been 'speculating about the possibility of future contact'. Those representing Mr Gichuhi argued that the judge had been 'entitled' to find that the relationship was subsisting, because he sent £100 a month to his daughter's bank account. They said he sent the money on an 'entirely voluntary basis', and his daughter had not returned the money. However, while they argued that a relationship could be 'genuine and subsisting' in 'the absence of contact', they accepted that 'subsisting was the antithesis of broken down'. For this reason, Mr Gichuhi's lawyers accepted that the judge's position was 'at least contradictory' and she had not explained how 'the contradictory positions were reconciled'. Upper Tribunal Judges Adrian Seelhoff and Sean O'Brien concluded: 'Consequently, the judge's finding at that [Mr Gichuhi's] relationship with his daughter had 'broken down' is inconsistent with her finding later in that paragraph that it was 'subsisting'. 'No attempt had been made to reconcile these contradictory findings. It follows that the judge's decision involved the making of an error of law.' They ruled that the case must be reheard afresh by another judge.
