Opposition To Gold Mining More Than At Risk Frogs
Press Release – Coromandel Watchdog of Hauraki
Watchdog and other groups will continue to oppose gold mining given the fact that gold is plentiful above ground and easily reusable. The real resources of infinite value are clean water and the treasured species that are now being called a threat.
Coromandel Watchdog of Hauraki say the amendments to the Wildlife Act this week and Shane Jones comments that Oceana Gold mining issue is just about vibration affecting 'mating frogs' are frivolous, wrong, and uninformed.
'The labelling of at-risk species like kiwi, some frogs, native bats and more as 'threats to development' could be a world first in terms of the deliberate promotion of extinction. The changes to the Wildlife Act this week, which were motivated to limit the courts from ruling in favour of protecting at risk species , are a bizarre leap backwards into deliberate disregard for the environment.
'Shane Jones is also wrong that our opposition to the Wharekirauponga gold mine project in the forest behind Whangamata is only about risks to Archeys frogs. We have consistently stated that creating more mountains of toxic waste from this proposed gold mine, dewatering the forest and risking acid mine leachate affecting underground water, are all reasons why we oppose this mine. Blasting under the habitat of the 200 million year old at risk frog is also a terrible idea. Thanks to the Fast Track law we have no right to participate in hearings so that these issues can be publicly scrutinised. Now the changes to the Wildlife Act presumably mean that even the expert panels cannot give due weight to protecting wildlife,' said Catherine Delahunty Chairperson of Watchdog.
Oceana Gold's Waihi North Project application to the Fast Track process was accepted this week and includes a new open pit in Waihi plus more underground mining there as well as the large underground mine at Wharekirauponga forests.
'When the Government becomes the enemy of at risk species so that multinationals companies can dig up gold for their profit, we all lose the hard work over many years to value and protect what is unique in these lands. It is a reputational risk but also an attack on our values and relationships with the rest of natural world. Shame on this Government.'
Watchdog and other groups will continue to oppose gold mining given the fact that gold is plentiful above ground and easily reusable. The real resources of infinite value are clean water and the treasured species that are now being called 'a threat'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
6 hours ago
- RNZ News
Aquaculture animal welfare code 'anti-Kiwi', Oceans and Fisheries Minister Shane Jones says
Oceans and Fisheries Minister Shane Jones. Photo: RNZ / Samuel Rillstone Oceans and Fisheries Minister Shane Jones is ruling out an animal welfare code for aquaculture, saying it is "anti-Kiwi" and an "indulgence". The SPCA has called for a code to protect farmed fish, following a government plan to grow the industry's revenue to $3 billion annually by 2035. Scientific officer Marie McAninch said a code would also help give the aquaculture sector access to the sorts of international markets that land-based farmers benefit from, thanks to their animal welfare codes. "New Zealanders care about how farmed animals are treated - and so do people overseas who buy our products. They'll expect that farmed fish in aquaculture are treated well and that their welfare meets our animal welfare laws. "A code of welfare for aquaculture would help make that happen. But right now, New Zealand's Aquaculture Strategy - and the Aquaculture Development Strategy that Shane Jones announced in March - are both completely silent on the welfare of the animals being farmed." Jones said he would not be considering an animal welfare code. "Most certainly not. I think these impositions are anti-Kiwi. We are in the midst of a set of economic challenges where we must expand and grow the footprint of aquaculture. It's all going to end up [as food for] human consumption or pet consumption." Jones said existing fish farmers already did "a very good job" of looking after their stock. "All of these animal husbandry businesses, there's always scope for improvement. But regulatory codes ... only represent red tape and at a deeper level where does all this end? We're a small economy and a lot of these impositions are, in my view, indulgences. They're vanity projects and these debates need a clear set of contrasting views." But McAninch said New Zealanders cared about how farmed animals were treated - and so did people overseas who bought products from New Zealand fish farms. Fish were legally recognised as sentient beings, which meant they were capable of feeling pain, stress and positive emotional states, she said. The SPCA was not against aquaculture, McAninch said. "But we do believe it's crucial to make sure all farmed animals - and any wild animals affected by these systems - are properly protected. Our land-based farming sectors take pride in their animal welfare codes, and it's helped them with access to international markets. If the aquaculture sector doesn't plan for this now, they risk falling behind in a global environment where factory farming is increasingly under scrutiny." Jones said he was "the first to admit some of my views might be a bit difficult to stomach". But animal advocates were "on a trajectory of mission creep, and I kind of feel it's anti-Kiwi," he said. "I can understand that little kittens and dogs that bite children and other welfare considerations [are] an established part of rural life and our ethos, but suggesting that people growing salmon, new fish species and indeed shellfish ... we already have a system through the Resource Management Act that deals with the effects of such activity." Jones described a recent outcry by animal lovers about farming octopuses , which are sentient beings, as "the height of this folly". "We need to grow industry, we don't want to impose these urban based vanity beliefs of basic industrial growth prospects." Octopus farming was banned in the United States in Washington and California due to animal welfare concerns, and consideration of a ban is also underway in three more states. But Jones said New Zealand could not afford such "luxury indulgences". "It's not something that I'm going to encourage, it's certainly not something I'm going to push forward, or agree with, at a time we have large competing objectives and other goals that I think society should set its mind upon." The SPCA would welcome talks with the minister about how a welfare code could help ensure the aquaculture sector was sustainable and resilient, McAninch said. There is currently no code of welfare for farmed fish species, although the New Zealand Salmon Farmers Association has developed a voluntary welfare standard for farmed salmon in New Zealand. The Animal Welfare Act 1999 (the AWA) and the Code of Welfare for Commercial Slaughter applies to farmed fish and for any fish that are intended to be held or transported live. The National Animal Welfare Advisory Committee (NAWAC) has identified development of a code of welfare for farmed fish for consideration as a future priority. The Minister in charge of Animal Welfare, Associate Minister of Agriculture Andrew Hoggard said NAWAC set its own work programme and schedule for code reviews, but he had asked it to prioritise production livestock codes, and the rodeo code. "Several of these codes have been under review for some time and the industries concerned need certainty. I expect NAWAC to deliver on those codes before turning their attention to other animal species." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
16 hours ago
- RNZ News
Climate change coverage in a changed media climate
TVNZ's Miriama Kamo, Newsroom's Marc Daalder and RNZ's Eloise Gibson at the AUT's climate change journalism event 'Framing the Emergency.' Photo: Hayden Donnell In 2021 climate change minister James Shaw talked up the government's commitment to the Paris Agreement on Facebook . "We need to cut global emissions by 45 percent, below 2010 levels, by 2030," he said. "Now is the time we must decisively choose the future we want for our children." The tenor of political discourse has changed a little since then. Our current crop of ministers are less bullish about the transition to a low-carbon economy. "We're not going to be guilt-tripped by these fanciful accounts that the planet is boiling. We need NZ's natural resources!" Resources Minister Shane Jones said Facebook last year, in a post set against a backdrop of clipart flames. Resources Minister Shane Jones nails his colours to the mast on Facebook. Photo: Facebook Jones is following in the footsteps of politicians overseas. Donald Trump came to office in the US with the catchy mantra "Drill Baby Drill" in his inauguration and State of the Nation speeches. In some respects, the media environment has followed a similar trajectory to the political one. Back when James Shaw was issuing those optimistic pronouncements, several of our major media companies were making their own commitments to climate action. Stuff had launched two long-term climate coverage projects. Quick! Save The Planet was launched in 2018. The site's editor, Patrick Crewdson, said it wouldn't give space to what he called "debunked denialism". "We just want to really pound away at climate change coverage on a regular basis. Increase the intensity of it. And to make the problems of climate change feel urgent and tangible and unignorable," he told Mediawatch at the time. That morphed into The Forever Project , launched in March 2020 just as Covid-19 locked the country down. It was devoted to in-depth climate coverage from science journalists like Eloise Gibson and Olivia Wannan. The New Zealand Herald and other media organisations also got in on the act, signing up to the global Covering Climate Now initiative and creating their own climate projects. Fast forward to today, and the Forever Project still exists, but doesn't have any dedicated reporters. Gibson and Wannan have both left Stuff, the former for RNZ and the latter to do communications for the Carbon Removal Research project at the University of Canterbury. Jamie Morton, who did in-depth climate reporting as a science reporter at the Herald, is now freelancing. Climate change has dropped down the news agenda, and Gibson is now the only dedicated climate reporter at a mainstream news media outlet. Who cares about climate change? poster for the AUT debate about climate change journalism. Photo: RNZ Mediawatch This week's Framing the Emergency event at AUT came at a fraught time for the industry. A panel of Newsroom's Marc Daalder, TVNZ Marae presenter Miriama Kamo and Eloise Gibson told the gathering she got her hopes up when she saw other countries' media teams at the COP 15 Copenhagen climate summit back in 2009. "They would have ten people in the media room working in shifts around the clock to cover different angles on this crisis. I was so jealous, and I thought: 'Is New Zealand ever going to do this?' "Spoiler alert: it really did not," she added. Why not? The panel pondered the parlous state of the media's finances and climate change being dragged into the culture wars. They also said despite the dearth of dedicated climate reporters, climate denial is now uncommon - and many journalists increasingly refer to the crisis in stories about subjects from weather to power prices. Marc Daalder - Newsroom's senior political reporter who covers health, energy and extremism as well as climate change - said climate change getting caught up in partisan battles between the right and left made it more challenging for journalists to state the "very basic facts" at the heart of the issue. He pointed to outgoing deputy prime minister Winston Peters casting doubt on NIWA's data last year about carbon levels in the atmosphere. He made similar claims during the 2023 election campaign . "When they're covering the statements of politicians, it gets really difficult," Daalder told Mediawatch at the AUT this week. "I don't think the media has figured out how to - while maintaining the trust of our audience - say 'that's culture war BS. That's just not a thing'." Gibson pointed out that some media organisations did fact-check Peters' claim . But while doing so can prompt accusations of bias and sometimes online abuse, she saw them as bread and butter for news organisations. "I don't think you can tailor your reporting to what a small group of people are going to say. You need to tailor your reporting to what you know to be accurate, what you know to be representative, and what you know most people in New Zealand want to know. They just want to know as close as you can get to the facts," she said. "I don't actually think that's a partisan or political thing to do. It's just doing your job." Stating the facts about climate change may not be biased, but that doesn't mean it's not political, Gibson said. "I don't think you can separate covering climate change from politics because policy and economic decisions are intrinsically tied up in climate change action," she said. "You can't not tackle politics in that. But that's not the same as being partisan." Both Gibson and Daalder pointed to media cutbacks as the true existential threat to climate coverage. Gibson was worried that low salaries and a lack of opportunity were driving young reporters out of the industry. This wasn't just a hypothetical concern. One former young reporter who'd recently left the industry for a climate advocacy agency was in the crowd listening to the media panel. "I would find it hard to look that person in the eye and say: 'My job is going to be here for you in 10 years'. I hope there'll be 10 of my jobs, 20 of my jobs - but it's hard." Daalder said that as newsrooms have slimmed down, specialist climate coverage has been sacrificed in favour of what editorial leaders perceive to be 'core news' coverage. Rather than resisting that, Gibson saw a path forward for reporting that shows how climate change impacts immediate concerns like the cost of living. She cited the cost of gas, changes to the transport system, or the price of solar panels and batteries as matters where the slow-moving climate crisis intersects with the everyday. "It's not that people are not concerned about climate change, it's that they have got immediate and pressing concerns that are pushing that out of their mind, and they don't have the bandwidth. And it's so obvious now that those two things are compatible and connected. So you don't have to make it relevant. It is relevant." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
3 days ago
- RNZ News
Government goes for gas stake
Photo: 123rf What will the Government achieve by setting aside $200 million to try and get a small stake in a new offshore gas field? Associate Energy Minister Shane Jones announced the move in the budget last week saying the Crown would take a 10 to 15 per cent stake in a new gas field to help feed the domestic market. While electricity generators have purchased gas from the country's biggest user, Methanex, for domestic supply, other gas users such as schools and hospitals are unable to get supply contracts of more than a year, and prices are going up for everyone. But new gas fields are a huge investment, and the sector has struggled to meet demand. Mac Beggs has worked on oil and gas exploration for decades in New Zealand - he says there are two, maybe three wells that have potential.
