
They don't need 30 dolls. They need hundreds! Thousands!
Looking at all those Barbies 'gives me a lot of joy', he says. 'It's fun to have people come over, and I get to show them. I feel like a curator from a museum. I get to explain, 'This is the Peaches and Cream Barbie. Oh, here's the Barbie and the Rockers that were my first dolls.'' (Mansour asked this reporter about her childhood Barbies, and the interview diverged to a five-minute tangent about Animal Lovin' Barbie, circa 1989 – which, yes, he has.) He even has a President Barbie, who he says 'probably would make better decisions right now' than the current US officeholder.
Mansour is not a beautiful baby girl who's 11 years old. Nor are many other members of the very real, very passionate doll-collecting communities of America. But some took note of the President calling out voluminous doll collections in his austerity message. And they did not like the idea of Trump toying with their hobby.
'He tells American consumers to pay more and buy less but wants to spend millions on a military parade for his birthday,' Mansour says.
'He's asking others to sacrifice, and he's not willing to sacrifice himself,' says Sherry Groom, the Guinness World Records titleholder for the world's largest collection of Troll dolls – those chubby little imps with whimsical coiffeurs. (She has more than 8130 unique trolls, but if you include duplicates, her collection numbers more than 41,000). 'Is he going to get rid of any of his toys?' Groom continued, referring to the president's homes, golf courses and other precious possessions.
'Where does he come off telling people how many of anything they can buy?' says Birdie Dapples, president of the Heritage Doll Guild of the Yellowstone, a doll collectors club in Billings, Montana. 'I beg to differ with him there. I need 200 dolls.'
The Trump administration this week lowered its tariffs on Chinese goods from 145% to about 30% for 90 days – a temporary reprieve while talks between the two nations continue. 'It looks like Christmas for doll-loving American children isn't canceled, after all,' quipped Politico's Playbook after the news broke. Still, the long-term impact of Trump's trade war on doll prices remains to be seen.
Doll collectors understand that not everyone appreciates their unconventional hobby. 'When my kids left home and I had some money that I could spend on myself, I wanted to buy some dolls,' says Dapples, 82. 'Now, I've kind of gone overboard, maybe a little bit.'
But even if troves of Cabbage Patch Kids or spooky Victorian baby dolls aren't everyone's idea of a necessary indulgence, the collectors say they are doing their part to support the economy by making sure their disposable income keeps the gears of capitalism churning, with domestic purchases of vintage dolls and ordering of new dolls from overseas.
Groom's collection has become the Troll Hole, a museum in Alliance, Ohio – it draws curious visitors to her town, who spend their money at coffee shops and other small businesses. She also sells Troll dolls, including one in the president's likeness. ('NOT A TOY, NOT INTENDED FOR CHILDREN.') It's a top-seller. But most Trolls are made outside the United States, Groom says, so when she orders new inventory from China and other countries for her museum store, she will have to start marking up her prices by 30% to offset the cost of tariffs.
Dapples focuses on vintage and antique dolls – she has Ginnys and Tonis from the 1950s, and many fragile dolls made of bisque, a type of porcelain popular in the mid- to late 1800s that is 'supposed to look more like flesh', she says. She even has a Reborn Doll, a type of hyper-realistic newborn baby doll that cost her around $700.
A Reborn Doll collector and seller responded to an interview request, replying in an email saying she was 'not one for the lefts propaganda. My sells of dolls have never been better my collectors own more than two dolls.'
The reasons adult collectors might want to own two, or 200, or 2000 dolls are the same that beautiful 11-year-old baby girls might want them too: because they make them feel good.
'No one can tell you that you cannot express yourself creatively through the things that you love,' says Groom. Though, yes, her children are 'seriously embarrassed' by it, she says.
Kathy Dilgarde, 64, of Casper, Wyoming, finds joy and comfort in her hobby.
'I'm reliving the past that was wonderful and simple, and things aren't so simple anymore,' says Dilgarde, who collects Barbies, Liddle Kiddles, and 1960s-era Heidi and Jan dolls. She's preserving a piece of women's history. And she feels a sense of satisfaction and fulfilment when she completes a grouping of dolls, or finds all the components for an outfit.
'It is a small thing that we can control,' Dilgarde says, 'when the rest of our existence feels out of control.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Scoop
12 hours ago
- Scoop
The Inevitable Souring: Elon Musk Falls Out With Donald Trump
Trumps response to Musks latest gobbet of accusation proved almost melancholic. I dont mind Elon turning against me, but he should have done so months ago. He went on to praise one of the Greatest Bills ever presented to Congress. Sandpit politics is rarely edifying and grown toddlers taking their fists to each other is unlikely to interest. But when they feature US President Donald Trump and the world's wealthiest man, the picture alters. Disputes are bound to be on scale, rippling in their consequences. No crystal ball was required regarding the eventual sundering of the relationship between Trump and Elon Musk. Here were noisy, brash egos who had formed a rancid union in American politics, with Musk lending his resources and public machinery to The Donald knowing he could also have sway in the Trump administration as a 'special government employee'. That sway took the form of DOGE (Department of Government Efficiency), a crude attempt to right the wrongs of misspending in government while politicising the public service. Awaking from a narcotised daze, Musk decided to focus on his floundering companies, notably Tesla, and step back from the inferno. In doing so, he expected 'to remain a friend and adviser, and if there's anything the president wants me to do, I'm at this service.' Gazing at the raging inferno that is Trumpian policy, that convivial attitude has all but evaporated. For one thing, Trump's proposed tax breaks and increases in defence spending, espoused in his One Big Beautiful Bill Act, seemed to undermine the very premise of DOGE and its zealous mission of reducing government spending. The legislation promises to slash $1.5 trillion in government spending but increase the debt limit by $4 trillion. 'I was disappointed to see the massive spending bill, frankly,' Musk said in an interview with CBS Sunday Morning last month. Such a plan merely inflated, not reduced, the budget deficit. 'I think a bill can be big or beautiful. I don't know if it can be both.' This month, Musk got even tetchier. His temper had frayed. 'I'm sorry, I just can't stand it anymore,' he barked on his X platform on June 3. 'This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination.' He continued to heap shame on members of Congress 'who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it.' On June 5, Trump expressed his disappointment 'because Elon knew the inner workings of this bill', leaving open the possibility that the billionaire might be suffering from 'Trump derangement syndrome.' Musk had 'only developed the problem when he found out that we're going to have to cut the [electric vehicle] mandate.' A blow was in the offing, coming in the form of a post on Truth Social: 'The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts. I was always surprised Biden didn't do it!' Musk's embittered retort: 'Such an obvious lie. So sad.' He also proposed, in light of the President's announcement, the decommissioning of Space X's Dragon spacecraft, vehicles used by NASA to transport astronauts to and from the International Space Station. The ripples were finally getting violent. Musk then decided to do what he called dropping 'the really big bomb'. Trump, he revealed, 'is in the Epstein files. This is the real reason they have not been made public.' Given Musk's estranged relationship with reality and its facets, this can only be taken at face value. It's a matter of record that Trump, along with a fat who's who of power, knew the late Jeffrey Epstein, financier and convicted sex offender, for many years. The trove of government documents known as The Epstein Files has offered the easily titillated some manna but, thus far, few bombs. On February 27, US Attorney General Pamela Bondi released what were described as the 'first phase' of files relating to the financier and 'his exploitation of over 250 underage girls at his homes in New York and Florida, among other locations.' In an interview with Fox News on February 21, Bondi revealed that Epstein's client list lay 'on my desk right now.' Trump's response to Musk's latest gobbet of accusation proved almost melancholic. 'I don't mind Elon turning against me, but he should have done so months ago.' He went on to praise 'one of the Greatest Bills ever presented to Congress.' In characteristically bratty fashion, Musk went on to share a post agreeing with the proposition that Trump be impeached and replaced by the Vice President, J.D. Vance, advocate 'a new political party in America that actually represents the 80% in the middle' (a touching billionaire's wish), and predict 'a recession in the second half of this year' caused by Trump's global tariff regime. In the scheme of things, Trump has survived impeachments, prosecutions, litigation, crowned by a divided US electorate that gave him a majority in both the Electoral College and the popular vote. Like a Teflon coated mafia don, he has made compromising people a minor art. Musk, compromised in his support and having second thoughts, can only go noisily into the confused night.


NZ Herald
13 hours ago
- NZ Herald
The Epstein files obsession, explained
In a spat with President Trump, Elon Musk invokes the Epstein files, a source of endless speculation and conspiracy. For months, Trump administration officials have faced mounting pressure from the far right and online influencers to release the so-called Epstein files, the remaining investigative documents of the sex-trafficking investigation into


Scoop
14 hours ago
- Scoop
Gaza's 'Humanitarian' Façade: A Deceptive Ploy Unravels
Just one day before the so-called Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) began operating officially inside the Gaza Strip, its executive director, Jake Wood, resigned. The text of his resignation statement underscored what many had already suspected: GHF is not a humanitarian endeavor, but the latest scam by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to control the Gaza Strip, after 600 days of war and genocide. "It is clear that it is not possible to implement this plan while also strictly adhering to the humanitarian principles of humanity, neutrality, impartiality, and independence," Wood said in the statement, which was cited by CNN and other media. This begs the question: why had that realization become 'clear' to Wood, even though the aid operation was not yet in effect? The rest of the statement offers some explanation, suggesting that the American contractor may not have known the extent of the Israeli ploy until later, but knew that a disaster was unfolding – the kind that would surely require investigating and, possibly, accountability. In fact, an investigation by Swiss authorities had already begun. The US news network, CBS, looked into the matter, reporting on May 29 that GHF originally applied for registration in Geneva on January 31 and was officially registered on February 12. However, in no time, Swiss authorities began noticing repeated violations, including that the Swiss branch of GHF is "currently not fulfilling various legal obligations". In its original application, GHF "pursues exclusively charitable philanthropic objectives for the benefit of the people." Strangely, the entity that promised to provide "material, psychological or health" services to famine-stricken Gazans, found it necessary to employ 300 "heavily armed" American contractors, with "as much ammunition as they can carry," CBS reported. The 'psychological' support in particular was the most ironic, as desperate Gazans were corralled, on May 27, into cages under extremely high temperatures, only to be given tiny amounts of food that, according to Rami Abdu, head of the Geneva-based Euro-Med Monitor, were in fact stolen from a US-based charitable organization known as Rahma Worldwide. Following the CBS news report, among others, and following several days of chaos and violence in Gaza, where at least 49 Palestinians were killed and over 300 wounded by those who promised to give aid and comfort, the Israeli newspaper Haaretz revealed that the funding for the operation is coming directly from Israel. Prominent Israeli politician and Knesset member Avigdor Lieberman went even further, claiming that the money, estimated by the Washington Post to be $100 million, 'is coming from the Mossad and the Defense Ministry.' But why would Israel go through all of this trouble while it can, at no financial cost, simply allow the massive shipments of aid, reportedly rotting on the Egyptian side of the border, to enter Gaza and to stave off the famine? In Netanyahu's mind, the aid mechanism is part of the war. In a video message, reported by The Jerusalem Post on May 19, he described the new aid distributing points, manned jointly by GHF and the Israeli army, as "parallel to the enormous pressure" Israel is putting on the Palestinians – exemplified in Israel's "massive (military) entrance (into Gaza)" – with the aim of "taking control of all of the Gaza" Strip. In Netanyahu's own words, all of this, the military-arranged aid and ongoing genocide, is "the war and victory plan." Of course, Palestinians and international aid groups operating in Gaza, including UN-linked aid apparatuses, were fully aware that the secretive Israel-US scheme was predicated on bad intentions. This is why they wanted to have nothing to do with it. In Israel's thinking, any aid mechanism that would sustain the status quo that existed prior to the war and genocide starting on October 7, 2023, would be equivalent to an admission of defeat. This is precisely why Israel labored to associate the UN Palestinian refugee agency, UNRWA, with Hamas. This included the launching of a virulent campaign against the UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres himself, and other top officials and rapporteurs. On July 22, the Israeli Knesset went as far as to designate UNRWA a 'terrorist organization'. Still, it may seem to be a contradiction that the likes of extremist Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich would agree to such an 'aid' scheme just days after declaring that Israel's intention is to "entirely destroy" Gaza. However, there is no contradiction. Having failed to conquer Gaza through military force, Israel is trying to use its latest aid scheme to capitalize on the famine it has purposely engineered over the course of months. Luring people to 'distribution points', the Israeli army is trying to concentrate the population of Gaza in areas that can be easily controlled through leveraging food, with the ultimate aim of pushing Palestinians out, in the words of Smotrich, "in great numbers to third countries." The latest scheme is likely to fail, of course, like other such stratagems in the last 600 days. However, the inhumane and degrading treatment of Palestinians further illustrates Israel's rejection of the growing international push to end the genocide. For Israel to stop scheming, the international community must translate its strong words into strong action and hold, not just Israel, but its own citizens involved in the GHF and other ploys, accountable for being part of the ongoing war crimes in Gaza. - Dr. Ramzy Baroud is a journalist, author and the Editor of The Palestine Chronicle. He is the author of six books. His latest book, co-edited with Ilan Pappé, is ' Our Vision for Liberation: Engaged Palestinian Leaders and Intellectuals Speak Out'. His other books include 'My Father was a Freedom Fighter' and 'The Last Earth'. Baroud is a Non-resident Senior Research Fellow at the Center for Islam and Global Affairs (CIGA). His website is