FaceTime has become a public nuisance
The other day, I was waiting for the subway, standing next to a woman in her pajamas making breakfast. She wasn't actually next to me but on the screen of another rider's iPhone. The flashes of movement on the screen and their loud conversation caught my attention. I wasn't trying to be nosy, but I (and several other commuters around me) was suddenly involved in what would have been a private, intimate moment.
I'm not the only one getting annoyed. Social media posts abound with people districted and flustered by the prevalence of public video calls. "Am I insane for thinking it's extremely rude to FaceTime without headphones in a public space?" one Threads poster asked last year. "I find this to be so inconsiderate, entitled and obnoxious, honestly. I will never understand." The more than 350 comments that followed revealed a divide about whether we should be turning the whole world into our living room. Some questioned how FaceTiming was any different from chatting with a friend in person. Others deemed public FaceTimers "arrogant individuals with no care for others."
This isn't a new phenomenon. FaceTime debuted with the iPhone 4 in 2010, but it took a few more years for enough people to get iPhones and grow accustomed to — and eventually feel entitled to — constant connection. The feature became available not just through WiFi but also via cellular data in 2012. People began to complain to etiquette experts, who gave their takes on the nuisance in newspaper columns. Video calls became even more normalized in 2020, when many of us started working remotely and stacking our calendars with Zoom meetings from 9-to-5, followed by virtual happy hours. Now, many have taken our comfort with chatting on camera into the real world. Our smartphones have blurred the space between what we do at home and what we do in public, and the digital world now has a tangible place in the public sphere.
Pamela Rutledge, the director of the Media Psychology Research Center, says FaceTiming and talking on speakerphone in public are symptoms of broader shifts in social norms over the past two decades. It's common to check your phone at the dinner table or seclude yourself from public interactions with headphones. When people start a video call with someone, even in a crowded area, "our brains create that sense of social presence, which takes us someplace else," she says. We're taken out of the environment and are less likely to be aware of the annoyed people around us. Despite the ire, people continue to take these video calls because the benefits, like reading social cues from the person they're calling, "are greater than the violation of privacy that they apparently are not feeling," she says.
For the people on the call, FaceTiming may be screen time that sits apart from "bad" screen time. Video calls make it easier to read social cues, which can help us avoid communication breakdowns that can happen over texts. One case study conducted during the pandemic lockdowns found that FaceTiming with family improved an Alzheimer's patient's behavior; he was less anxious and agitated after the calls and ate better than in the earliest days of lockdown. Even parents who keep young kids away from screens may give in for a video call with grandma and grandpa. A study from 2016 found that children under the age of 2 can learn words and patterns from interactive screen time like FaceTime calls, and even start to recognize people they repeatedly speak to, like a grandparent. But they don't absorb as much from prerecorded videos.
FaceTime calls feel like hanging out, while phone calls can feel like work.
But for all the benefits of FaceTime, any tech we use to communicate "can also detract from in-person interaction experiences," Juliana Schroeder, a professor at the University of California, Berkeley's Haas School of Business, tells me in an email. Loud public calls can negatively affect the in-person interactions of other people around them — be it their fellow commuters, restaurant diners, or the people working out next to them at the gym.
Gen Z hates phone calls, but they grew up on video calls. FaceTime calls feel like hanging out, while phone calls can feel like work. Boomers, meanwhile, didn't grow up talking on the phone in public, but they're likely to rush to answer (remembering the pre-voicemail days), and may happily pick up video calls from family, even in crowded spaces without headphones at the ready. Smartphones have increased the pressure for us to be always available, and we've become more comfortable disrupting public spaces or texting during meetings and conversations to meet that demand.
Of course, we don't know the reasons behind any individual FaceTime or speakerphone call, and so may be quick to judge. Caroline Lidz, a 23-year-old in Boston working in tech public relations, admits she's operated with a double standard. She's irritated when she encounters a person on a video call in public with no headphones, but she'll answer any time her twin sister calls, which is usually on FaceTime (though she says she does use headphones). Lidz realized in speaking to me for this story that she tended to think, "It's OK if I do it, because I know my reasons," she says. But when she doesn't know someone else's reasons, "I'm less forgiving with other people." The FaceTime calls are more engaging — she can't be distractedly scrolling through her phone or on her laptop, but Lidz also says she thinks a lot about what the frenzy of public FaceTime calls means for privacy. Generally, Lidz says, to avoid being rude, people should do their best to respect the privacy of the person who's calling you, so they know they may be broadcast to the public, and try not to show too much of the people around you on the call.
Part of the public-call shaming likely arises from the fear that we're too connected and even addicted to our phones. The average American spends almost seven hours a day staring at screens. Three in four US adults who use FaceTime make calls at least once a week, with 14% of people using it multiple times a day, a 2023 survey from the University of Southern California's Neely Center Social Media Index found. A lot of that screen time happens in public spaces, and it's changing our social etiquette; the more people film TikToks or FaceTime in public, the more we let down our guard and accept the behavior as normal.
I'm guilty of FaceTiming my best friend in public when I need her advice on an outfit or gift I'm looking to buy. I try to be quick, feeling justified that I need to be on a video call because I've got something I need to show her. I answered a FaceTime call on a train once and screeched as quietly as possible — a friend had just gotten engaged, and I jumped on the call expecting to see the ring held up to the camera. My grandpa always puts his iPhone on speaker (he says it's hard to hear through the phone's tiny ear speaker) and will take these calls anywhere. We've all learned that if we call him, we could be on the line with anyone in the living room.
It's as easy to justify these loud calls as it is to condemn them. We've gotten used to connecting to one another anytime and anywhere, leaving unpleasant places like airport terminals in favor of chatting with friends. That's not necessarily bad. But please, for all of our sanity, put some headphones in.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Your iPhone might not get iOS 26 – here are the models affected
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. Quick Summary iOS 26 is coming as part of WWDC – but your iPhone may not be supported. And it's not just the phones being affected, either. With WWDC taking place next week, all eyes will be firmly on Apple as it debuts a range of new products and services. The show is normally used to showcase its next generation of software and operating systems for various devices. Naturally, the new iPhone operating system is set to be one of the most popular. With more and more people using one variant or another, there will be millions waiting to see what's on offer. Still, while some are excited about the new features coming to their handset, others will be waiting with baited breath to see if their device is still supported. Apple often makes certain models obsolete with new OS releases, though there's no real rhyme or reason to it. Now, a new report suggests that three iPhones could miss out on the iOS 26 software. Those are the iPhone XS, the iPhone XS Max and the iPhone XR. Those handsets were released back in 2018, so it shouldn't come as too much of a surprise. It's not just the iPhone range which looks set to lose some supported devices, either. The iPad range is also trimming some fat – though it's only the 7th Gen iPad expected to go there. MacOS 26 is rumoured to involve the most casualties, with the 2020 Intel-powered MacBook Air models, 2018 MacBook Pro's, the 2018 Mac Mini and the 2017 iMac Pro all set to face the chopping block. Three of those four shouldn't come as much surprise, but the inclusion of the Intel-powered 2020 MacBook Air models will likely raise some eyebrows. Of course, just because a device is supported also doesn't guarantee it will be feature-filled. We've already seen a number of iPhones launched in the not-too-distant past which support the broader iOS, but can't get features like Apple Intelligence. Still, for those who have kept their devices up to date, this should provide an interesting suite of options.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Tensions between the US and China have delayed Apple's AI rollout in China, FT reports
The Financial Times claims that the Cyberspace Administration of China (CAC) is delaying the introduction of AI services by Apple Inc. (NASDAQ:AAPL) and Alibaba in China. A wide view of an Apple store, showing the range of products the company offers. Their February deal to incorporate AI technologies into iPhones in China is on hold due to geopolitical tensions resulting from U.S. President Donald Trump's trade war. Consumer-facing AI technologies need regulatory permission, and the CAC has not yet given its approval to these applications. The business is facing diminishing iPhone sales in China due to increased local competition, particularly from Huawei, which has integrated DeepSeek's AI models into its handsets. The firm is at a disadvantage to its AI-enabled Android rivals due to its lack of sophisticated AI technologies, such as ChatGPT-powered features and Apple Inc. (NASDAQ:AAPL)'s postponed "Apple Intelligence." More pressure is added by Trump's recent pronouncement of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US that are not produced locally. New software improvements are anticipated during Apple Inc. (NASDAQ:AAPL)'s WWDC event, which takes place from June 9–13. While we acknowledge the potential of AAPL as an investment, our conviction lies in the belief that some AI stocks hold greater promise for delivering higher returns and have limited downside risk. If you are looking for an extremely cheap AI stock that is also a major beneficiary of Trump tariffs and onshoring, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: 10 High-Growth EV Stocks to Invest In and 13 Best Car Stocks to Buy in 2025. Disclosure. None. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
The only ‘Made in America' smartphone maker has a message for Apple about manufacturing in the Trump tariff era
Todd Weaver has an important message for Apple as it faces growing demands by President Donald Trump to reshore some of its smartphone production: Don't listen to the conventional wisdom. Experts have long said that manufacturing iPhones in the U.S., rather than Asia, as Apple does, would be logistically impossible and ridiculously expensive. But Weaver argues companies can indeed do it successfully, and at a similar or only slightly higher cost—if given several years to navigate the inevitable complications. Weaver should know: His startup, Purism, is among the few, if not the only business, that assembles smartphones in the U.S. In fact, the U.S. pedigree is the main selling point of his company's Made in America device, the Liberty Phone. 'It is challenging to do this in the U.S.,' Weaver acknowledges. 'It's probably the reason I'm the only one.' And yet, he says his company has managed to make it work and has been profitable for the last two years—a real world example of what's possible on a hot-button topic in which political talking points and vested interests often dominate the debate. President Donald Trump recently put U.S. smartphone production in the spotlight as part of his global trade war. On May 23, he used social network Truth Social to publicly attack Apple for importing iPhones into the U.S., rather than making them domestically, and then threatened the company with a 25% tariff if it continued to do so. Whether any of the import taxes will become permanent is unclear given Trump's whiplash decision-making and court challenges by third parties. Still, Apple has long assembled its iPhones overseas, mainly in China, and has resisted relocating any of that production to the U.S. In April, when Trump announced his tariffs, Apple went so far as to shift the sourcing of most U.S.-bound iPhones to India, which faced lower import taxes. U.S. assembly was never publicly mentioned as a possibility. In the past, Apple CEO Cook explained the reluctance by saying the abundance of skilled labor and top-notch suppliers overseas would be difficult to reproduce at home. Weaver's company, of course, is no Apple, which has sold more than 2 billion iPhones globally since introducing the first models in 2007. The devices unleashed a new era in the tech industry in which mobile devices became the prime focus. Purism, in contrast, has sold just tens of thousands of phones since debuting its first model in 2018, according to Weaver. And the company is barely-known outside the world of tech nerds. Its Liberty Phone, manufactured near San Diego, comes with U.S.-made electronics installed on a metal chassis from China. It retails for $1,999. Another phone, the Librem 5, is mostly the same design, except it's made in China with Chinese parts, and costs $799. The company also produces tablet computers, laptops, and servers. Purism pitches its Made in America device as more secure and privacy friendly than those from major manufactures like Apple. Because all the critical parts and assembly are domestic, it's easy to verify that they haven't been tampered with by a foreign adversary that wants to snoop or stuff them with explosives. The phones also run on a Linux-based open source operating system. Anyone with technical know-how who is worried about the security can review the code—unlike with more popular phones, which come with operating systems that can't be easily inspected. Additionally, Purism's phones come with three kill switches that lets users physically disconnect their device from cell service, Wi-Fi and Bluetooth, along with its microphone and camera. When turned on, the switches sever the electrical circuit to the features they control and make it impossible for them to be accessed by hackers, Weaver said. Toggling on Airplane Mode, as users often do on more mainstream phones, is less secure, he said, because it's a purely software feature that doesn't cut power to the device's chips. Customers who are especially security conscious can pay extra to have their devices shipped with 'tamper evident tape' on the packaging, among other options, to flag any monkey business during transit. Purism's biggest customers are government agencies, many of which require high security, and individual consumers. The company's clients, Weaver said, include the FBI and the House Select Committee on Intelligence. Weaver said the cost of manufacturing the Purism's two phones is largely the same, despite one being made overseas and the other domestically. The phone that's made in China costs around $600 for parts, manufacturing, and assembly while the U.S.-made one comes in at $650. 'Producing goods in China vs. the U.S. is the same plus or minus 10%,' said Weaver, based mostly on automation. The difference between what Purism charges customers for its two phones is partly due to the higher profit margin the company collects for its U.S.-made device. People who want stronger security are often willing to pay extra for it, Weaver said. It also covers the extra overhead from some customers wanting to verify that Purism's supply chain is secure and the small additional cost of U.S. manufacturing. Purism's assembly line is in Carlsbad, Calif., where up to a dozen workers put together devices. The area is home to a pool of skilled labor thanks to the local defense industry and manufacturing for other mobile carriers. That relatively modest assembly line is a major contrast to the factories that make iPhones, operated by contract manufacturers, mostly in China. Those facilities can be the size of several football fields and employ over 100,000 people who work around-the-clock shifts. Weaver said the U.S. is at a huge disadvantage to China when it comes to skilled workers, who make up a significant part of the workforce in smartphone factories. The only way to reverse the shortage and lay the groundwork for companies to reshore their production is to encourage more people to learn skills that are useful in the manufacturing process, he said. 'If you go over to China you can find buildings and buildings of thousands of electronics engineers. If you look here, you can find maybe five total,' Weaver said. Apple, for example, would risk a catastrophe if it suddenly, in 2026, needed to ramp up staffing in the U.S. to produce millions of iPhones, he said. Training enough people for such a massive undertaking would take years. Weaver said Purism, founded in 2014, took several years to develop its domestic supply chain. The company's small size means it only needs limited quantities of components, which makes it impossible to achieve the economies of scale that come from producing huge numbers of devices. Manufacturing in the U.S. also comes with higher labor costs than in China. But with the help of automation, those extra costs can be kept to a minimum by reserving human labor for tasks performed after production is complete, such as soldering, assembly, repairs, and testing. Apple, on the other hand, would need vast amounts of components to keep its assembly line humming. While the company would likely be able to cut deals with domestic suppliers for most iPhone parts, some, such as high-quality cameras, may be impossible to quickly source in the U.S. and it would therefore have to import them, Weaver said. One analyst has said iPhones could end up costing $3,500 if made in the U.S., to account for the extra costs and hassles. Weaver agrees that it would cost Apple substantially more to produce iPhones in the U.S., if it had to move production quickly. But given enough time, Apple could substantially reduce the cost after developing a new supply chain, finding enough workers, and by relying on extensive automation. For Apple, opening a domestic manufacturing plant would therefore need to be a years' long process, Weaver said. That's why he criticized Trump's tariffs for taking effect almost immediately. Yes, many of those tariffs have since been delayed. But the takeaway for businesses is that they can't plan ahead. And yet, that's exactly what's required for something as complex as shifting manufacturing to the U.S. Trump's tariffs would be far more effective if phased in over many years, Weaver said. In that scenario, companies would have a clear and increasing incentive to reshore production—without being punished right off the bat. Weaver argues his U.S. manufacturing effort is already paying off and that it will gain momentum over time. He hopes the recent scandal involving U.S. officials using the chat app Signal to discuss a military strike against Yemen, and then accidentally inviting a journalist to join them, will help lift sales by encouraging the federal government to focus more on security. Weaver wouldn't get into the specifics of Purism's financials other than to say it has millions in annual revenue and turned profitable in 2023. The Liberty Phone is its biggest seller. Wayne Lam, an analyst with market research firm TechInsights, gave a mixed take on Purism's prospect. In an email, he said: 'They can be a successful niche player, but the odds of success are lower thanks to the bigger brands. They won't be able to compete in the consumer market but government/enterprise/military are all niche markets they can address.' To fund the expansion of his business, Weaver is trying to raise additional investment after taking in $16 million in funding over the years. Some of that money would go to fixing a shortcoming with his phones. Because they don't use Apple's iOS or Google's Android operating systems, they are incompatible with many of the most popular mobile apps like Uber. To get such apps work on its devices, Purism must make technical tweaks for each one. Purism can at least claim one small advantage over the giant companies that dominate the smartphone industry. If Trump's tariffs become permanent, it won't feel much impact from its U.S.-made phone, while the big players and their foreign-made devices could be hammered. This story was originally featured on Sign in to access your portfolio