logo
Post Office scandal survivors have faced deep trauma, study finds

Post Office scandal survivors have faced deep trauma, study finds

Yahoo13-05-2025

Survivors of the Post Office Horizon scandal have experienced deep trauma and can be left feeling re-victimised, a study has found.
Academics have shown how deeply lives have and continue to be affected by the scandal, which hit the public consciousness following the broadcast of the Bafta-winning ITV drama Mr Bates Vs The Post Office.
The study reveals how the trauma of the Post Office's misconduct has rippled out through victims families' lives and how many have been re-victimised at each stage of their fight for justice.
The research from the University of Exeter and UCL lays bare how the stigma of false accusation and financial ruin devastated the lives of subpostmasters and those close to them.
It also shows how having to engage with an adversarial legal system to fight for justice, and bureaucratic and slow redress schemes, have often caused secondary re-victimisation.
Their experiences highlight that there is a need to reform the legal system so it better serves victims, the experts say.
The research report outlines how delays to justice, and legalistic and adversarial procedures have caused and exacerbated psychological and emotional harm.
This has left many subpostmasters feeling retraumatised over the years.
They are distrustful of the institutions of government and mechanisms of justice, as well as the Post Office, and whilst many have drawn positives from the inquiry, some do not yet feel they have the full truth about what happened.
The report, by Dr Sally Day, Professor Richard Moorhead and Professor Rebecca Helm, from the University of Exeter, and Dr Karen Nokes, from UCL, was carried out as part of their Post Office project.
They interviewed 26 former subpostmasters, six partners, two children and one sibling.
Dr Day said: 'We would like to express our deepest and heartfelt thanks to all those who agreed to help us in this project.
'What is clear from our interviews is the complex harms experienced by those affected and their loved ones.
'We found adversity and sacrifice but also stories of determination, hope and solidarity.'
Professor Moorhead said: 'The thing that stands out from this work is the way an unjust accusation by the Post Office has spread through the lives of those accused and their families.
'With the exception of the ongoing inquiry, formal responses have tended to be cold and adversarial, which has been harmful to victims.'
Dr Nokes said: 'Many subpostmasters went from being highly respected and central to their local community to being publicly vilified, and labelled a thief, for something they hadn't done.
'Some experienced aggressive and distressing harassment and victimisation, including being spat at, and receiving abusive letters, phone calls and emails.
'There were clear 'ripple effects' – the reputational damage often extended to their families and people affected couldn't get away from the stigma.'
This work builds on two previous studies conducted by this project team.
One documented high levels of PTSD and depression among victims and survivors.
A follow-up survey in 2024 examined the ripple effect of harms from the scandal on 'secondary victims' such as partners and children, who had similar, extraordinary levels of PTSD and depression.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Chef Renee Erickson closes 4 Seattle restaurants, cafés
Chef Renee Erickson closes 4 Seattle restaurants, cafés

Yahoo

time9 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Chef Renee Erickson closes 4 Seattle restaurants, cafés

The Brief 2 restaurants and 2 doughnut cafés will be closing later this month. Bateau and Boat Bar will be temporarily closing starting June 19 for a restaurant refresh. General Porpoise doughnuts will be permanently shutting down its Capitol Hill location on June 19, and its Laurelhurst location on June 24. SEATTLE - Two Seattle restaurants will be temporarily closing for a refresh and two cafés under the same ownership will be permanently closing later this month. Bateau and Boat Bar, members of a family of Seattle restaurants owned and operated by James Beard Foundation Award-winning chef Renee Erickson, will be temporarily closing on June 19 after 10 years of operations. What we know General Porpoise, a donut and café chain under the same ownership, will also be permanently closing its Capitol Hill and Laurelhurst locations. The Capitol Hill location is a next-door neighbor to Bateau and will close with it on June 19. The Laurelhurst café will close on June 24. Bateau, a steakhouse, and Boat Bar, the bar at Bateau, are expected to stay closed for three to six months, as the Capitol Hill restaurants look to refresh their concepts and incorporate the space from the closing General Porpoise café. The Laurelhurst café has been serving customers since 2018, but has decided to close its doors due to rising operating costs. The remaining staff plan to be relocated to the other General Porpoise locations. The Pioneer Square and Amazon Spheres cafés will remain open. The Source Information in this article is from Bateau and General Porpoise social media accounts. Travis Decker manhunt: 'Remote' areas of 5 WA counties told to lock doors Former Army squadmate shares insight into Travis Decker's military past Miles Hudson found guilty on 2 counts of reckless driving in Seattle Key figures from Bryan Kohberger's youth summoned to Idaho for student murders trial Rochester dog training facility owner accused of killing employee during video shoot To get the best local news, weather and sports in Seattle for free, sign up for the daily FOX Seattle Newsletter. Download the free FOX LOCAL app for mobile in the Apple App Store or Google Play Store for live Seattle news, top stories, weather updates and more local and national news.

Judge denies Harvey Weinstein's bid for mistrial after juror complains
Judge denies Harvey Weinstein's bid for mistrial after juror complains

Yahoo

time15 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Judge denies Harvey Weinstein's bid for mistrial after juror complains

NEW YORK (AP) — A juror in Harvey Weinstein's sex crimes trial asked to be removed from the case Friday because he felt his fellow jurors were treating a member of their panel in an 'unfair and unjust' way, but the judge told him he had to keep deliberating. Judge Curtis Farber later denied a defense request for a mistrial, saying he believed the juror was simply expressing discomfort in the deliberation process, noting that he's the youngest on the 12-person panel. 'This is nothing other than normal tensions during heated deliberations,' Farber told the lawyers after the juror rejoined his peers. 'Perhaps his youth makes him uncomfortable with conflict.' The juror said he wanted to be excused from the trial because he was uncomfortable with how some jurors were acting toward another juror. But Farber denied the request, saying there were no more alternate jurors to replace him and, in any case, his concerns did not warrant being dismissed. The juror insisted, calling the treatment 'unfair and unjust' even as he described the tension as 'playground stuff' with jurors shunning another juror and talking behind their back. Weinstein's lawyer Arthur Aidala argued that the jury should be told to stop deliberating while the court found out more about the concerns. He criticized the judge's questions to the concerned juror as 'anemic at best.' 'You didn't ask him one follow-up question,' Aidala said. Manhattan prosecutor Nicole Blumberg said the judge acted appropriately by reminding jurors about the expectations for them — including that they not speak to anyone about the case unless all members of the jury are deliberating. Whatever the dispute is, she added, it does not appear to be hindering the jury's work, as the panel requested an additional readout of testimony, this time from the third accuser in the case. The Manhattan jury ended its first day of deliberations Thursday without reaching a verdict. Sexual misconduct allegations against Weinstein propelled the #MeToo movement in 2017. The panel has reheard some testimony and viewed medical records and emails. The jury of seven women and five men is considering two counts of criminal sex act and one count of rape against the 73-year-old Oscar-winning movie producer, with the criminal sex act charges the higher-degree felonies. Weinstein has pleaded not guilty. Weinstein was convicted of sex crimes in New York and California, but the New York conviction was overturned last year, leading to the retrial before a new jury and a different judge. Jurors heard more than five weeks of testimony, including lengthy testimony from three accusers. ___ Follow Philip Marcelo at Philip Marcelo, The Associated Press

Judge says Weinstein juror complaining about jury strife cannot be excused
Judge says Weinstein juror complaining about jury strife cannot be excused

Yahoo

time16 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Judge says Weinstein juror complaining about jury strife cannot be excused

By Jody Godoy NEW YORK (Reuters) -The judge overseeing former Hollywood mogul Harvey Weinstein's rape and sexual assault trial refused on Friday to dismiss a juror who said some jurors were treating others on the 12-person panel unfairly. "I just don't think it's fair and just," the juror told New York Supreme Court Justice Curtis Farber in court, referring to things other jurors were saying and doing behind another juror's back. "There is a bit of a shunning happening," the juror said. The juror asked to be dismissed but Farber said there was no legal basis to do so after the juror confirmed that no one on the jury panel was pressuring him to change his view of the case. "If any other juror feels they need to talk to me, they can," the judge said. Weinstein's lawyers said they would make a proposal on how to address the matter later on Friday. Friday was the second day of jury deliberations. No other jurors were present during the exchange. Farber dismissed alternates from the jury on Thursday. Weinstein, 73, was convicted of rape by a Manhattan jury in February 2020, but the New York Court of Appeals threw out the conviction and ordered a new trial, citing errors by the trial judge. Prosecutors say the Academy Award-winning producer raped aspiring actress Jessica Mann in 2013 and assaulted two other women in 2006 and 2002. Weinstein, who has denied ever having non-consensual sex or assaulting anyone, has pleaded not guilty. He faces up to 25 years in prison for two counts of criminal sexual acts and up to four years for one count of rape. Weinstein is already serving a 16-year prison sentence after being found guilty in December 2022 of rape in a separate California case. Prosecutors with the office of Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg have portrayed Weinstein as a serial predator who promised career advancement in Hollywood to women, only to then coax them into private settings where he attacked them. Weinstein's defense lawyers have said his encounters with the women were consensual and accused them of lying about being raped after failing to make it big in Hollywood by sleeping with him.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store