India slaps five-year anti-dumping duties on aluminium foil, Pretilachlor & Acetonitrile from China, Taiwan and Russia
The Indian government has implemented anti-dumping duties for five years on aluminium foil, Pretilachlor, and Acetonitrile imports from China, Taiwan, and Russia. This action follows investigations by the Directorate General of Trade Remedies, which revealed that these countries were engaging in unfair trade practices by selling these goods at significantly lower prices, thereby harming domestic industries.
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
The Centre on Thursday imposed five-year anti-dumping duties on imports of aluminium foil Pretilachlor , and Acetonitrile from China, Taiwan, and Russia, following findings of unfair trade practices that hurt domestic industries.The anti-dumping duty on aluminium foil (5.5 to 80 microns in thickness) has been extended from an earlier six-month period to five years on imports from China.The government has also imposed a five-year duty on Pretilachlor, a widely used herbicide in rice and paddy farming, imported from China.Further, imports of Acetonitrile, an essential chemical used in pharmaceuticals and agrochemicals, will face anti-dumping duty if sourced from China, Taiwan, or Russia.The duties are based on recommendations from the Directorate General of Trade Remedies (DGTR), which concluded that the domestic industry suffered material injury due to dumping of these goods at unfairly low prices.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Economic Times
9 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Long live cash! Even as cashless is in
Even if no more the king it once was, demand for cash remains strong, despite the strides taken in digital payments. The inherent contradiction should not be difficult to resolve, given the rate of economic growth that fuels demand for both cash and cashless transactions. Inflation has an impact on demand for cash by affecting the opportunity cost of holding it. Demographics, too, plays a role. Older people prefer to deal in cash over tech-enabled payment mechanisms. Degree of formalisation of the economy also has a bearing, with financial exclusion acting as a constraint to cashless transactions. Concentration of demand for cash among populous Indian states can be traced back to reverse migration during the pandemic, and the consequent surge of currency in circulation. The event has had a long tail, with rural incomes taking much longer to recover to pre-pandemic levels. This affects cash-holding behaviour, as does spending patterns that spike with festivals. Consolidation among state-owned banks has contributed to the need for bigger cash holdings by regulating the numbers of ATMs in remote locations. India also experiences a rise in currency demand during elections. Since these are spread out over the year, this acts as a prop for cash. Economic factors for currency demand are persistent forces, with behavioural effects being less significant. By this yardstick, cash transactions will eventually decrease as a share of the nominal GDP. There may, however, be scope for policy to address the behavioural motives for holding cash. A young population with access to technology should influence the cultural preference for dealing in cash, as will progressive urbanisation. India is part of a global phenomenon of rising demand for cash, including in advanced economies with almost universal access to banking services. Further integration into the global economy will create demand for Indian currency outside the country, even as current domestic factors lose some of their significance.
NDTV
20 minutes ago
- NDTV
Trump Repeats Claim That He "Stopped" India-Pak Conflict
New York: US President Donald Trump on Wednesday repeated his claim that he stopped the conflict between India and Pakistan and told the two countries that America would not do trade with them if continued with the fighting. India and Pakistan reached an understanding on May 10 to end the conflict after four days of intense cross-border drone and missile strikes. "Maybe the most important of all, India and Pakistan, and that wasn't whether or not they may someday have nukes, like we're talking about in the Middle East, like we're talking about with Israel and Iran," Trump said during a press briefing after the NATO summit in The Hague, Netherlands. He said that India and Pakistan have nuclear weapons. Trump said he had a series of phone calls on trade with both India and Pakistan. "I said, 'Look, if you're going to go fighting each other... it was getting very bad, you know how bad that last attack was. It was really bad," Trump said. "If you're going to go fighting each other, we're not doing any trade deal," Trump said. He claimed that when the countries said, "'no, you have to do a trade deal', Trump responded by saying "We're not doing any trade deal." He also said that Pakistan Chief of Army Staff Asim Munir was in the White House this month. "And in fact, I had the general, who was very impressive. The general from Pakistan was in my office last week," he said. "Prime Minister Modi is a great friend of mine. He's a great gentleman. He's a great man. And I got them to reason. I said, we're not doing a trade deal if you're going to fight and if you're going to fight each other, we're not doing a trade deal. And you know what they said. No, I want to do the trade deal. We stopped the nuclear war," Trump claimed. Trump has repeated the claim several times that he "helped settle" the tensions between India and Pakistan. However, India has been consistently maintaining that the understanding on cessation of hostilities with Pakistan was reached following direct talks between the Directors General of Military Operations (DGMOs) of the two militaries. In a nearly 35-minute phone call with Trump last week, PM Modi firmly stated that India does not and will "never accept" mediation and that the discussions between Indian and Pakistani militaries on cessation of military actions were initiated at Islamabad's request
India Today
31 minutes ago
- India Today
IPL: Rajasthan Royals owner accuses former co-owner of blackmail in UK court
Indian Premier League cricket franchise Rajasthan Royals' majority owner on Wednesday accused his former co-owner of trying to blackmail him by alleging he was defrauded out of his minority stake in the venture capitalist Manoj Badale and his company Emerging Media Ventures are suing businessman Raj Kundra at London's High Court for allegedly breaching a 2019 confidential settlement case centres on Kundra's former shares in Rajasthan Royals, winner of 2008's inaugural IPL which is now cricket's richest tournament with a brand value of $12 billion. Badale's lawyer Adam Speker said Kundra, who is married to Bollywood star Shilpa Shetty, had threatened to report serious allegations to Indian authorities in a "blackmail attempt".Kundra, however, says he has been told information about the claimants and his lawyer William McCormick that, if that is not true, "in due course it will be exposed".Kundra had to forfeit his 11.7% stake after being found guilty in 2015 of betting on IPL games in a scandal which led to the Rajasthan Royals being suspended for two years, Speker added in court filings that Kundra emailed Badale "out of the blue" last month, alleging he had been "misled and defrauded of the rightful value of my 11.7% stake".advertisementThe email to Badale said Kundra had filed a complaint with Indian authorities and threatened to make a report to India's Cricket Board (BCCI).Kundra added, however, that he was willing to discuss a deal involving "the restoration of my original equity or compensation reflecting the true and current valuation of the Rajasthan Royals franchise".Speker said Kundra also messaged disgraced IPL founder Lalit Modi this month, saying Badale "did not realise cheating me of the true value would cost him dearly".Badale and his Emerging Media Ventures, which holds a 65% stake in Rajasthan Royals, obtained an interim injunction against Kundra on May 30, preventing Kundra from breaching the settlement agreement by making disparaging lawyer McCormick said Kundra accepted the injunction should continue until a full trial of the lawsuit."It is not an admission that anything improper has been done or is being threatened," McCormick said.- EndsYou May Also Like
