Pacific Northwest broadcaster braces for cuts as Trump aims to defund NPR, PBS
PORTLAND, Ore. (KOIN) – Amid efforts by the Trump administration to defund public media, one broadcasting organization in the Pacific Northwest is facing an uncertain future.
For more than 100 years, Northwest Public Broadcasting has delivered news to the Pacific Northwest. Today, NWPB reaches more than three million people across 44 counties in Washington and parts of Oregon, Idaho and British Columbia.
NWPB offers a variety of television and radio programs including local news and PBS shows from 'This Old House,' to 'Sesame Street.' They also provide emergency alerts, informing communities of wildfires and earthquakes.
Access to those programs could be at risk in the future after President Trump signed an executive order on May 1, directing the Corporation for Public Broadcasting to defund PBS and NPR. The president has also proposed cutting funds for CFB — a private, nonprofit corporation authorized by Congress in 1967. Their mission is to provide universal access to public media, and they offer critical grants to organizations such as NWPB.
The president is aiming to slash federal funding for PBS and NPR, citing 'bias' in their reporting. The White House has also posted on social media that the outlets 'receive millions from taxpayers to spread radical, woke propaganda disguised as 'news.''
'My reaction was sadness,' NWPB Director of Audience Sueann Ramella said when she found out about the executive order. 'This is a service created for and by the American people, and I believe that the American people have a voice and the power to save it.'Part of NWPB's funding model relies on grants from the CFB.
'Each taxpayer pays about $1.60 for PBS and NPR material, but it's also for local station programming,' Ramella told KOIN 6 News. 'Some of that funding is used for what we call the operational and programming costs of the overall station, but the single largest source of our income is still from viewers like you and also local business support.'
In the last fiscal year, 20% of NWPB's funding came from the Corporation of Public Broadcasting.
'To somebody thinking 20% is not that big of a deal for your operational costs – it actually is,' Ramella said. 'We're looking to raise an additional $2 million a year for the next three years because of the potential hit our station alone is going to have.'
Fred Meyer employee stole $60K for gambling
Grants aren't the only way CFB supports organizations like Northwest Public Broadcasting, Ramella explained.
'The other important thing for people to recognize is the Corporation for Public Broadcasting negotiates music broadcasting rights, meaning my station is able to afford to play the music that we have — the classical music, the jazz, the contemporary music — because it's already been negotiated for us. We don't pay a huge amount that you have to for those rights,' Ramella said.
Without CFB's help negotiating those rights, Ramella added, 'It's a daunting task to think about trying to call Sony and BMI and Columbia (Records) individually and try to negotiate those rights when we are a rural station and we're talking hundreds of thousands of dollars. I don't think we're going to have the ability to pay to play the music.'
On top of negotiating music rights, CFB also works with the Department of Education to develop children's programming for stations.
'I don't think the American people realize it's not just about the federal funding. It's everything the Corporation for Public Broadcasting does on behalf of every station in the nation, everything from creating children's educational programs, and paying those producers, to working with the Department of Education to make sure that those educational programs are up to speed with the latest research and understanding of the way children learn and read,' she added.
'If this funding is rescinded, I believe NWPB will exist in some form,' Ramella hypothesized. 'But it isn't going to be as strong as it is right now. It's going to take us a while to build back up.'
Ramella is calling on community members to reach out to their representatives to ensure support for public media.
'Public media was created because when we had this new thing called TV and the radio spectrum, everybody knew in a capitalist society you could make money off those signals, but what doesn't make money is educational programs, programs and documentaries about really difficult things in our history for us to understand,' Ramella explained. 'It's not like you go to the movie theater to see Ken Burns' documentary on the Civil War for eight hours. It has a home on PBS precisely because we are a non-commercial, nonprofit station.'
'If public media across the whole nation is defunded the way that it is, if the executive order to defund public media goes through, if the rescission package is completed by Congress, it means that folks in rural areas will not have access to high quality shows, because we simply cannot afford to pay for them,' Ramella warned. 'What is not understood is the depth at which it takes to bring you that type of programming. It's not magic. It's a lot of bills, it's a lot of paperwork and a lot of staff time and energy to make it happen. All of that will be hurt at the least and devastated at the most, if we have this federal funding rescinded.'
Despite efforts to defund public media, Ramella is optimistic.
'I want to believe in the American people that they will call and protect what they value, that they'll call their representatives and express they value public media, and they want to see it continue,' Ramella said.
Shuttered Oregon chateau named among America's 'most endangered' historic sites
The audience director continued, 'But it's not just us on the table. It's AmeriCorps, it's humanities Washington, it's all these cultural programs that you have valued all your life that are at risk. So it's maybe asking a lot, but what we would love is for the American people to call their representatives daily and tell them to protect these important programs, and I hope to God, public media is one of them, because we work collaboratively with a lot of organizations and schools and libraries to enhance the lives of people who can't afford internet connection or cable connection, and that's the whole mission.'
The Trump administration's efforts to defund public media also poses a risk of creating news deserts, or places with limited access to news, in NWPB's coverage area, Ramella said.
'I'm very concerned these areas will become news deserts. I'm one of the people on the staff who looks at the big budget and picks what shows we can afford to air and I have a map above my office that shows me where our signals are in the towns. One of those places is the (Goldendale, Washington and The Dalles, Oregon) area. We just built a new transmitter there to bring a stronger signal and that signal is going to reach even further into that highway, where you don't always get a clear radio signal, of news and information,' Ramella explained.
'I would love to keep the news there. The funding matters. It allows us to afford to do these things. So, when you look at places that no longer have a local newspaper or people are only getting their news from social media, the news desert problem is real. It means your neighbors, your grandparents, even your young kids are not getting trusted information that they need in order to understand their world and what's happening in their region,' she continued.
The Corporation for Public Broadcasting is aiming to protect that mission, filing a lawsuit challenging President Trump's efforts to fire three of CFB's five board members — arguing the president does not have the authority to remove the members, as reported by NPR in late April.
'I think it's important for people to understand that while a lot of young folks are moving into the internet realm, there are so many millions of people who don't and they still get their news from the radio in their car and on old fashioned bunny ear TV and public media is not going to leave them behind,' Ramella said. 'That's also why we need to continue this funding, because your little two-year-old niece to your 88-year-old grandma need trusted cultural information, and that's where they get it. They get it from public media, and it deserves to be protected for them.'
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
6 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Factbox-Breakdown of U.S. tariffs on China since Trump's first term
BEIJING (Reuters) -Billions of dollars of Chinese goods have been impacted by additional U.S. tariffs since 2018, initially under the first Donald Trump presidency and later under the Biden administration. Returning to the White House this year, Trump has imposed even more duties on China. The U.S. tariffs range from those imposed under Section 301 of its trade act due to what Washington claims are unfair Chinese trade practices, to duties under Section 232 levied for national security reasons. This year, Trump has imposed another 20% levies on all Chinese goods, saying Beijing has not done enough to stop the flow of fentanyl into the United States. So-called reciprocal tariffs, under which the U.S. will match duties imposed by other countries, have also been levied in a bid to rebalance trade flows. Below are the U.S. tariffs on China effective as of June 12, 2025: Tariff Rate Products Effective date Reciprocal 10% All Paused for 90 days until Aug 10, 2025 Fentanyl 20% All Mar 4, 2025 Section Up to List 1: Pharmaceuticals, July 6, 2018 301 25% iron and steel, aluminium, vehicles and aircraft, medical or surgical instruments and apparatus and more. List 2: Vehicles, Aug 23, 2018 railway or tramway locomotives, aircraft and their parts, medical or surgical instruments and apparatus and more. List 3: Prepared May 10, 2019 foodstuffs, beverages, mineral products, fertilizers, wood products, textiles, precious and base metals, vehicles, aircraft, vessels, machinery and mechanical appliances and more. List 4A: Prepared Feb 14, 2020 foodstuffs, beverages, mineral products, fertilizers, footwear, wood products, ceramic products, glass, textiles, precious and base metals, machinery and mechanical appliances, vehicles, aircraft, vessels, art, antiques and more. In September 2019, the U.S. imposed 15% tariffs on more than $120 billion of Chinese goods under Section 301, which it then halved to 7.5% less than six months later. The 25% U.S. tariffs on $250 billion of Chinese goods under the earlier List 1-3 remain unchanged. In September 2024, the U.S. Trade Representative under the Biden administration announced additional tariffs of 25-100% on 14 product groups following a four-year review of the Section 301 tariff actions. The levies were imposed on strategic Chinese sectors or sectors where the United States has made significant domestic investments. Additional tariffs on goods under Section 301: Effective date EVs 100% Sep 27, 2024 Solar cells, syringes and 50% needles Non-lithium-ion battery parts, 25% lithium-ion electrical vehicle batteries, other critical minerals, ship-to-shore cranes, steel and aluminium products, facemasks Semiconductors 50% Jan 1, 2025 Lithium-ion non-electrical 25% Jan 1, 2026 vehicle batteries, medical gloves, natural graphite, permanent magnets In addition to the above duties, the first Trump administration in 2018 imposed a range of tariffs under Section 232 aimed at restricting goods deemed a threat to national security, including all aluminium and steel imports, shutting most Chinese suppliers out of the U.S. market. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


Newsweek
7 minutes ago
- Newsweek
How Project 2025 Compares With Trump's Los Angeles Response
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. President Donald Trump's response to protests in Los Angeles is in keeping with suggestions put forth in Project 2025, a political commentator has said. Allison Gill, who worked at the United States Department of Veterans Affairs, said on Wajahat Ali's the Left Hook Substack that the president's military response was "spelled out in Project 2025," a conservative policy dossier. She did not specify how. Newsweek has contacted the Heritage Foundation and Gill for comment by email. The Context Protests against immigration enforcement began in Los Angeles on Friday and have continued, with some isolated incidents of violence and looting. In response, Trump announced the deployment of 4,000 National Guard troops and 700 Marines to restore order, without California Governor Gavin Newsom's consent. While the president has said the move was necessary to prevent the city from "burning to the ground" amid protests and riots, officials in California have accused Trump of exacerbating the situation in an "unprecedented power grab." A police officer firing a soft round near the Metropolitan Detention Center in downtown Los Angeles on June 8. A police officer firing a soft round near the Metropolitan Detention Center in downtown Los Angeles on June 8. AP Photo/Eric Thayer What To Know Gill, who served Trump a lawsuit in 2023 accusing him of conspiring to fire her from the Veterans Affairs Department during his first presidency, said sending in the Marines was "propaganda" because the protests were not severe enough to require them. Though she said Project 2025 predicted the president's response to the protests, she did not elaborate on how. Project 2025 is a 900-page document of policy proposals published by the Heritage Foundation think tank. It advocates limited government, border security and tough immigration laws among other conservative measures. The policy proposals have proved divisive, and the president's critics and supporters alike have debated their influence on him. While Project 2025 does not mention the Insurrection Act, a November 2023 report from The Washington Post, citing internal communications and a person involved in the conversations, said the Project 2025 group had drafted executive orders that would use the Insurrection Act to deploy the military domestically. Gill told Ali that she warned people of Trump's potential use of the military to curb protests before the presidential election. "We did everything that we could in leading up to the election in 2024 to tell everyone as loud as we can, they are planning to do this," she said, adding: "Saying he's going to call this an invasion. He's going to call this an insurrection. And he's going to use that to invoke emergency powers so that he can unleash the military on United States citizens and perhaps even suspend habeas corpus so that he can detain his political enemies without due process." "This is scary," Gill, who hosts the Mueller, She Wrote podcast, continued. "This is full-on fascism, full-on authoritarianism." "This is a test case for authoritarianism," Ali added. Before the 2024 presidential election, Democrats accused Trump of planning to implement Project 2025 if he won. While Trump initially called parts of the plan "ridiculous and abysmal," he told Time after his electoral victory that he disagreed with parts of it, but not all of it. He has since appointed a number of people linked to Project 2025 to White House positions. In an October interview with Fox News' Sunday Morning Futures, Trump indicated that he would use the National Guard or the military if there were disruptions from "radical left lunatics" on Election Day. What Does Project 2025 Say? Project 2025 advocates for improved defense infrastructure and for the Department of Homeland Security to "thoroughly enforce immigration laws." The document added that DHS should "provide states and localities with a limited federal emergency response and preparedness." However, it did not say whether this would occur in the context of protests. What Trump's Advisers Have Said Trump's advisers have previously spoken about the use of National Guard troops in other contexts. According to a February 2024 report in The Atlantic, Stephen Miller, now the White House deputy chief of staff, said that Trump—if returned to office—would take National Guard troops from sympathetic Republican-controlled states and use them in Democratic-run states whose governors refused to cooperate with their mass deportation policy. What People Are Saying President Donald Trump wrote on Truth Social on Saturday: "If Governor Gavin Newscum, of California, and Mayor Karen Bass, of Los Angeles, can't do their jobs, which everyone knows they can't, then the Federal Government will step in and solve the problem, RIOTS & LOOTERS, the way it should be solved!!!" Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass wrote on X, formerly Twitter, on Sunday: "We will always protect the constitutional right for Angelenos to peacefully protest. However, violence, destruction and vandalism will not be tolerated in our city and those responsible will be held fully accountable." What Happens Next The anti-ICE protests, which have spread to other cities, are likely to continue. Newsom has called on the Trump administration to remove federal troops from Los Angeles.
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
China affirms trade deal with US, says it always keeps its word
BEIJING (Reuters) -China on Thursday affirmed a trade deal announced by U.S. President Donald Trump, saying both sides needed to abide by the consensus and adding China always kept its word. The deal, reached after Trump and China's President Xi Jinping spoke on the telephone last week, brings a delicate truce in a trade war between the world's two largest economies. "China has always kept its word and delivered results," Lin Jian, a foreign ministry spokesperson, said at a regular news conference. "Now that a consensus has been reached, both sides should abide by it." The Trump-Xi telephone call broke a standoff that had flared just weeks after a preliminary deal was reached in Geneva. The call was quickly followed by more talks in London that Washington said had put "meat on the bones" of the Geneva agreement to ease bilateral retaliatory tariffs. The Geneva deal had faltered over China's continued curbs on minerals exports, prompting the Trump administration to respond with export controls preventing shipments of semiconductor design software, jet engines for Chinese-made planes and other goods to China. Trump on Wednesday said he was very happy with the trade deal. "Our deal with China is done, subject to final approval with President Xi and me," Trump said on Truth Social. "Full magnets, and any necessary rare earths, will be supplied, up front, by China. Likewise, we will provide to China what was agreed to, including Chinese students using our colleges and universities (which has always been good with me!). We are getting a total of 55% tariffs, China is getting 10%." Still, specifics of the latest deal and details on how it will be implemented remain unclear. A White House official said the 55% represents the sum of a baseline 10% "reciprocal" tariff Trump has imposed on goods imported from nearly all U.S. trading partners, 20% on all Chinese imports associated with his accusation that China had not done enough to stem the flow of fentanyl into the U.S., and pre-existing 25% levies on imports from China put in place during Trump's first presidential term. Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data