Assam CM replies to Pak threat over Brahmaputra river
Guwahati, June 3 (UNI) Assam Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma on Tuesday gave a stern reply to Pakistan over its threat of China stopping water flow of the Brahmaputra, saying China contributes only about 35 per cent of the river water, and that it is a river that grows and flows in India only.
Taking to his X handle, the Chief Minister said the Brahmaputra expands in India with rainwaters from Arunachal Pradesh, Assam, Meghalaya and Nagaland — the waters of tributaries like Subansiri, Kameng, Lohit, Dhansiri, Manas and many others.
He said that it is the rainfall in these Indian states and the tributaries that contribute to 70 per cent waters of Brahmaputra. 'After India suspended the Indus water treaty with Pakistan, the country now wants to create a new imaginary threat -- what will happen if China holds Brahmaputra's water?' said Sarma on his X handle on Tuesday.
'Nothing will happen to India. We are going to dispel these myths based on truth and data,' he said while China contributes only 30-35 per cent of waters of Brahmaputra, which are basically glacial melts, the Brahmaputra grows to its vastness only inside India by the massive rainfall in Assam, Arunachal Pradesh, Nagaland and Meghalaya and by the waters of its tributaries in different parts of this region.
'The flow of Brahmaputra in Tuting along the India-China border is 2000 to 3000 cubic meters per second. However, this flow increases to 15,000 to 20,000 cubic meter per second in the Brahmaputra Valley in Guwahati during the rainy season. The Brahmaputra does not depend on the Himalayas for its flow, it is enriched by the massive rainfall in Indian states,' he said while giving data.
'I just want to remind one thing briefly — the Brahmaputra cannot be controlled by controlling just one of its sources. It is ever flowing due to its geographic location, It is a blessing for us,' he added.
UNI ANP PRS
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Today
23 minutes ago
- India Today
How Tharoor hit Trump, Rahul Gandhi with a single stone on ceasefire
Diplomacy is like the proverbial tip of the iceberg. What is visible to the public is just 10% of what takes place behind closed doors. And US President Donald Trump, with his bull-in-a-China-shop approach, is a diplomat's nightmare. There is a big reason why the Indian government hasn't vociferously junked Trump's claims of having mediated a ceasefire between India and Pakistan after the mini-war in May. Congress MP Shashi Tharoor made that public, albeit with the skills of a former diplomat that he most American presidents, Trump has been big on claims and short on action. This has led to him being mocked as Taco -- Trump always chickens out. However, the flying taco leaves an imprint wherever it claim of having brokered a ceasefire was lapped up by Congress MP Rahul Gandhi, who used it to attack Prime Minister Narendra Modi. "Trump made one gesture from there (the US), picked up the call and said 'Modiji, what are you doing? Narender surrender'. And Modiji said 'yes sir' and followed Trump's instructions," Rahul said in Bhopal on June was less than a month ago that India launched Operation Sindoor to target terror camps inside Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (POK). The May 7 strike saw Pakistan attack military and civilian areas in India with missiles and swarm of drones. India retaliated by targeting military infra deep inside Pakistan and left its forces May 10, as Trump made a surprise announcement on Truth Social -- the US had mediated a ceasefire between the two announced that the pause to the war came about after the Pakistani DGMO called up his Indian counterpart, raising the white Rahul Gandhi and his Congress have chosen to go with Trump, who also spoke about trade in the same has repeatedly, but prudently, stated that Trump didn't play any role in the ceasefire and that the pause came about with discussions between the two warring question is, why hasn't India vociferously rejected Trump's claims?The short answer is -- diplomacy happens behind closed doors and isn't a shouting ties are bigger than a property dealer-turned-politician's ego. Similarly, messaging for the nation, in which Shashi Tharoor is currently engaged, is not about the ego-massaging of a political is leading a multi-party team to the US to put forth India's stance on Operation Sindoor and the compulsion that forced it to suspend the Indus Waters Treaty with Pakistan."Do you think India has been firm enough to the constant mediation claim by Trump? It is the same question that your party continues to ask back home," Tharoor was asked in the yesterday, the leader of your party, Rahul Gandhi, said Modi surrendered to President Trump," the person asking made the backdrop with a loud laugh, Tharoor strongly reiterated India's stand -- India didn't ask anyone for mediation."All I can say is that I have enormous respect for the American Presidency and the American President. All we can say for ourselves is that we have never particularly wanted to ask anyone to mediate," Tharoor who has seen all shades of global diplomacy during his stint in the United Nations, including as the Under-Secretary-General of the UN, made clear India had clear priorities and didn't want to "jeopardise" ongoing India-US talks by countering Trump on a "matter of detail"."We have enormous respect for the US, and we have a much more important, valuable, and strategic partnership with Washington that we would not want to jeopardize over a matter of detail. We are cooperating in a number of areas and are interested in enhancing all of that. Small matters can be set aside so we can focus on tomorrow," said is amid ongoing India-US talks, where a trade deal could be finalised between the two countries soon. advertisementThe former diplomat killed two birds with one stone by calling Trump's ceasefire claims, and thereby Rahul Gandhi's political rhetoric, by trashing the issue as "small matter".Like Asaduddin Owaisi, who has been ferocious against Pakistan after the Pahalgam attack and used terms unlike anyone else to expose it, the suave Tharoor performed his national duty even as his own party tried to pull him Congress and Rahul Gandhi have been an exception in attacking the government at a time when the entire country stood united and bipartisan teams are representing Tharoor diplomatically sidestepped the political question, his colleague and Rajya Sabha MP Milind Deora, addressed it."As far as the political question is concerned, I would like to extend my admiration for Dr Tharoor, whom I have known for a long time. He always puts country before party," said Deora, who is among the leaders in Rahul Gandhi's inner circle to have moved out of the Tharoor explained was a growing India's treading the line in not antagonising Trump, for Trump is like Jaykant Shikre of Singham, the bhi karne ka, Jaykant Shikre ke ego nahi hurt karne ka," is his pet statement in the is the Jaykant Shikre in the White House -- a mass of bloated ego -- and India, like Tharoor outlined, doesn't believe in a diplomatic hack is no denying that the government is answerable, and will be held accountable, but this might not be the right time. It isn't the time to bolster voices against the country that might be amped up by forces inimical to India's interests. This is the time to speak up in one voice as a nation. And Shashi Tharoor is one of the millions of such voices, stating the InMust Watch
Time of India
29 minutes ago
- Time of India
'Sindoor ka badla khoon': Shashi Tharoor on Operation Sindoor's symbolism in US; watch video
Shashi Tharoor NEW DELHI: Congress MP and former diplomat Shashi Tharoor , who is leading an all-party delegation to the United States, on Wednesday described Operation Sindoor as a deeply symbolic and culturally resonant response to the April 22 Pahalgam terror attack , saying that the mission was India's way of delivering "sindoor ka badla khoon", blood in return for the sindoor wiped from the foreheads of widowed Indian women in J&K's Pahalgam. Speaking in a presser, Tharoor said the name "Operation Sindoor" was deliberately chosen to convey both cultural meaning and national resolve. "Operation Sindoor, actually, I thought was a brilliantly chosen name. Sindoor, in case some Americans obviously don't know about this, is a vermilion mark that is applied to the centre of the forehead of married women in the Hindu tradition," he said. Detailing the brutal nature of the Pahalgam attack, Tharoor added, "We were very conscious of these brutal terrorists who, by the way, shot men in front of their wives and children but spared the women, and when one wife screamed out, 'Kill me too,' she was told, 'No, you go back and tell them what we've done.'" "That sindoor had essentially been wiped off the foreheads of 26 Indian women… so we wanted first of all, to avenge that act of wiping off the sindoor. But, secondly, it's no accident that the colour of the sindoor is bright vermilion red, which is not far from the colour of blood, and in many ways there is a Hindi expression that 'khoon ka badla khoon'; here it was 'sindoor ka badla khoon' hoga," he said. On the operational front, Tharoor highlighted the precision and scale of India's military strikes. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning For Working Professionals. BITS Pilani WILP Apply Now Undo 'There've been craters on the runway, operational command centers have been busted by these Indian bombs. Just yesterday, the Pakistanis publicly admitted that Indian strikes were so wide-ranging and effective they struck from as far as Hyderabad in South Pakistan to Peshawar in the northwest,' he said. Tharoor emphasised that the delegation's visit is aimed at presenting a united Indian stand against terrorism and educating the international community on the motivations behind India's counterterror action. 'This is not about party politics. We are here to speak for a united India, to explain clearly what Operation Sindoor stands for and why the country responded the way it did,' he said.
Economic Times
31 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Pakistan's defence minister calls Simla Agreement a ‘dead document', says LoC now a ceasefire line
Pakistan's Defence Minister Khawaja Asif has declared the 1972 Simla Agreement a "dead document," asserting a return to the 1948 position on Kashmir and questioning the relevance of other bilateral agreements. This statement follows escalating tensions after a terror attack in Pahalgam, prompting retaliatory strikes by Indian forces across the Line of Control. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Simla Agreement is 'dead', says Asif Past rhetoric on Simla Agreement and growing tensions Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Recent escalation after Pahalgam attack India's retaliatory strike In a provocative statement against India, Pakistan's Defence Minister, Khawaja Asif, has called the 1972 Simla Agreement a 'dead document' that is no longer relevant. Speaking in a televised interview on Wednesday, Asif stated that Pakistan has effectively returned to the 1948 position on Kashmir, and the Line of Control (LoC) is now a ceasefire line, not a formal his remarks, Asif said the bilateral framework between India and Pakistan has collapsed. 'The Simla Agreement is now a dead document. We are back to the 1948 position, when the United Nations declared the LoC a ceasefire line following the ceasefire and resolutions,' he said. He added, 'Going forward, these disputes will be dealt with multilaterally or internationally.'The Defence Minister also questioned the status of other India-Pakistan agreements. 'Whether the Indus Waters Treaty is suspended or not, Simla is already over,' Asif is not the first time Pakistani leaders have made remarks about the Simla Agreement. Over the past few years, Islamabad has signaled discomfort with the bilateral framework. Last month, it announced the suspension of Shimla agreement and also threatened to suspend it after India's decision to abrogate Article 370 in August 2019, which removed the special status of Jammu and Kashmir. Pakistan has repeatedly raised the issue in international forums, even as India has maintained that all matters concerning Jammu and Kashmir are strictly Simla Agreement, signed in 1972 after the Indo-Pak war of 1971, binds both countries to resolve their disputes through bilateral means. India has consistently reiterated that Kashmir is a bilateral issue, rejecting any third-party between the two countries escalated recently following a deadly terror attack in Pahalgam, Jammu and Kashmir, in which several Indian tourists were killed. India blamed Pakistan-based terror outfits for the Pahalgam response to the Pahalgam attack, the Indian armed forces conducted precision strikes across the LoC, targeting terror launchpads.
