logo
UN marks Holocaust Remembrance Day by redefining the Holocaust, comparing Israelis to Nazis

UN marks Holocaust Remembrance Day by redefining the Holocaust, comparing Israelis to Nazis

Fox News22-04-2025

On Thursday, April 24th, the State of Israel and Jews around the world mark Yom HaShoah, or Holocaust Remembrance Day. At the very same time, to paraphrase U.S. U.N. Ambassador Daniel Patrick Moynihan, the United Nations has unleashed a great evil upon the world: Holocaust revisionism.
To begin with, there is a concerted campaign to sever any connection between the Holocaust and Israel.
Yom HaShoah was created by the State of Israel in April 1955. But on April 21, 2025, the United Nations commemorated Yom HaShoah by holding an event at United Nations headquarters in New York City without any input or invitation to participate by anyone from Israel. Organized and hosted by the U.N. Department of Global Communications, Israel was never mentioned.
Moreover, now hanging on the wall of U.N. Headquarters outside the Security Council chamber is a "Holocaust" exhibit that has wiped any reference to Israel, even in sections on "after the Holocaust," "the Aftermath," and "remembrance."
The Holocaust was the fate of the Jews in the absence of Israel. The majority of survivors returned to their ancient homeland. As the embodiment of Jewish self-determination, Israel is the ultimate hope and commitment to "never again."
The U.N.'s omission of Israel is not an oversight. It is part of a much broader, and insidious, agenda.
The U.N. has strategically placed its Holocaust exhibit in consecutive sequence to an exhibit entitled "The United Nations and the Question of Palestine." Onlookers are encouraged to make the obscene analogy of the experience of the Jews in the Holocaust to the experience of Palestinian Arabs. The message is that the creation of the Jewish state was a great wrong ("violated the provisions of the U.N. Charter"), and was foisted upon peaceful Arabs without agency.
The current U.N. Holocaust exhibit has also eliminated key features of the original display from 2008. It no longer includes the infamous photograph of naked skeletal Jewish men crammed into wooden barracks in the Buchenwald concentration camp – one of whom was Nobel Prize winner Elie Wiesel.
Also gone is the notorious photograph of a terrified little boy with his hands up in the air, as a Nazi points a rifle at him for the crime of being Jewish.
They have been replaced by slide shows that include dozens of happy faces doing ordinary things before, during and after the war. No crematoria, open pits of the dead, humans cataloged by numbered tattoos, or emaciated Jews in striped uniforms behind barbed wire.
Even the title of the current exhibit now reads, generically: "A warning to all people of the dangers of hatred, bigotry, racism and prejudice." In the same vein in 2024, U.N. Secretary-General António Guterres opened the U.N.'s "International Day" to commemorate the Holocaust by talking about "antisemitism and anti-Muslim bigotry around the world."
Perhaps most important, is the U.N. exhibit's audacious redefinition of the word "Holocaust." The move marks the culmination of a long public campaign at the U.N. to deny Jews recognition even in death, and to impede our understanding of the Holocaust and antisemitism then and now.
A Roma speaker invited to address the General Assembly in 2020 on International Holocaust Remembrance Day, put it this way: "It is time now, 75 years since the ending of the Second World War…that the very definition of the Holocaust is corrected."
"Corrected" for the one million visitors – including tens of thousands of American students – who visit U.N. headquarters every year.
Thus, according to the U.N. permanent exhibit: "the Holocaust was the state-sponsored, ideologically-driven persecution and murder of six million Jews across Europe and half a million Romas and Sinti by Nazi Germany (1933-1945) and other racist states. Nazi ideology built upon preexisting antisemitism and antigypsyism."
By contrast, according to Yad Vashem, the World Holocaust Remembrance Center located in Jerusalem, Israel, "the Holocaust was unprecedented genocide, total and systematic, perpetrated by Nazi Germany and its collaborators, with the aim of annihilating the Jewish people."
And according to the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum located in Washington, D.C., "The Holocaust was the systematic, state-sponsored persecution and murder of six million Jews by the Nazi regime and its allies and collaborators."
The redefinition comes after the U.N. mounted temporary exhibitions with such titles as "Holocaust of the Roma People."
Acknowledging other atrocities, crimes or genocides is entirely appropriate. Appropriating the Holocaust and Jewish history is not. The first does not, and should not, require the second. Instances of special U.N. focus on specific populations abound, including for people of African descent, Muslims, and indigenous peoples.
Beyond U.N. exhibits are decades of U.N. authority figures who have equated Israelis to Nazis, likened Hamas to Second World War resistance fighters, and boasted talk of a "Palestinian Holocaust" on their resumé. Twenty years ago, U.N. sources alleged "Gaza is a huge concentration camp." After October 7, 2023, U.N. officials claimed Israel was conducting "a new holocaust," "extermination fields," and "death marches."
As the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) rightly points out: "comparisons of contemporary Israeli policy to that of the Nazis" is not only a lie, but also antisemitism. Indeed, the very same U.N. actors defend or deny Palestinian terrorism.
We are witnessing a calculated effort by the United Nations to thwart the essential conditions of "never again," namely: comprehending the depravity of Nazi treatment of the Jews, the unique evil of Jew hatred, and the devastation that antisemitism wreaks on human civilization.
On this Holocaust Remembrance Day, it is painfully clear that the institution built on the ashes of the Jewish people deserves to be relegated to the ash heap of history.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Prime Minister Mark Carney names former United Nations ambassador as chief of staff
Prime Minister Mark Carney names former United Nations ambassador as chief of staff

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Prime Minister Mark Carney names former United Nations ambassador as chief of staff

TORONTO — Prime Minister Mark Carney has named Canada's former ambassador to the United Nations as his chief of staff. Carney announced on Sunday that Marc-André Blanchard would begin his post in July, taking over from Marco Mendicino, the former Liberal cabinet minister who had been doing the job on an interim basis. 'Marc-André has a long and distinguished career as one of Canada's most accomplished builders, legal experts, executives, public servants, and diplomats serving as Canada's ambassador and permanent representative to the United Nations,' Carney wrote on X. Blanchard currently serves as an executive at CDPQ Global, a Quebec-based investment firm responsible for managing pension funds and insurance plans. In his post on X, Carney confirmed that Mendicino would remain his interim chief of staff into 'early summer.' He said Mendicino would be in the job as the Liberal government prepared to introduce its first legislation of the new session of Parliament and host G7 leaders when they meet in Alberta later this month, including U.S. President Donald Trump. Carney has named growing Canada's economy in the face of the president's trade war by knocking down interprovincial trade barriers and fast-tracking approvals for new energy and infrastructure projects as his top priorities. Carney announced Blanchard as his chief of staff as he was set to meet with energy leaders in Calgary on Sunday and then travel to Saskatoon, where he will spend Monday meeting with the premiers for a First Ministers' Meeting. More to come .. staylor@ National Post Get more deep-dive National Post political coverage and analysis in your inbox with the Political Hack newsletter, where Ottawa bureau chief Stuart Thomson and political analyst Tasha Kheiriddin get at what's really going on behind the scenes on Parliament Hill every Wednesday and Friday, exclusively for subscribers. Sign up here. From Nova Scotia's 'Wind West' to Alberta's pipeline dream, here are the national projects premiers are pitching Carney John Ivison: The first Carney spending numbers are out, and they're as bad as Trudeau's Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark and sign up for our politics newsletter, First Reading, here.

Former UN ambassador Marc-André Blanchard named chief of staff to Mark Carney
Former UN ambassador Marc-André Blanchard named chief of staff to Mark Carney

Hamilton Spectator

timean hour ago

  • Hamilton Spectator

Former UN ambassador Marc-André Blanchard named chief of staff to Mark Carney

Former Canadian ambassador to the United Nations Marc-André Blanchard will serve as Prime Minister Mark Carney's chief of staff starting next month, Carney announced Sunday. 'Marc-André has a long and distinguished career,' Carney said in a post on X on Sunday afternoon, pointing to Blanchard's experience in law, diplomacy and the public service. Carney had earlier stated that he asked former Liberal cabinet minister Marco Mendicino to remain as chief of staff 'into the summer.' He described Mendicino's role as critical during the 'intense period' following Carney's March victory in the Liberal leadership race and his succession of Justin Trudeau as prime minister. Carney expressed his 'continued appreciation' for Mendicino's service in the announcement of Blanchard's appointment. In recent weeks, speculation about Mendicino's replacement has swirled in Liberal circles . The Star confirmed that former Trudeau adviser Mathieu Bouchard had conversations about the job. Blanchard had previously denied a report that he was approached for the job. More to come With files from Alex Ballingall and Robert Benzie

British FM says Morocco's autonomy plan for W. Sahara 'most credible' solution
British FM says Morocco's autonomy plan for W. Sahara 'most credible' solution

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

British FM says Morocco's autonomy plan for W. Sahara 'most credible' solution

British foreign minister David Lammy said on Sunday that Morocco's autonomy plan for the territory of Western Sahara was the "most credible" solution to the decades-long dispute, reversing London's long-standing position. Western Sahara, a mineral-rich former Spanish colony, is largely controlled by Morocco but has been claimed in its entirety for decades by the pro-independence Polisario Front, which is backed by Algeria. Morocco has been campaigning for broad support for its autonomy plan after obtaining US recognition of Morocco's sovereignty over the disputed territory in 2020, in exchange for the normalisation of diplomatic relations with Israel. "The United Kingdom considers Morocco's autonomy proposal submitted in 2007 as the most credible, viable and pragmatic basis for a lasting resolution of the dispute," Lammy told reporters in Rabat. Britain previously backed self-determination for the disputed territory, which Morocco claims as an integral part of its kingdom. Moroccan foreign minister Nasser Bourita welcomed the shift, saying the new British position contributed "greatly to advancing this momentum and promoting the UN path towards a definitive and mutually acceptable solution based on the autonomy initiative." Rabat's push for support for its autonomy plan has seen success. Spain and Germany now officially back the Moroccan autonomy plan, while France last summer recognised Morocco's sovereignty over the territory. "This year is a vital window of opportunity to secure a resolution before we reach 50 years of the dispute in November," said Lammy. The foreign minister also said it encouraged "relevant parties to engage urgently and positively with the United Nations-led political process". The United Nations considers Western Sahara a "non-self-governing territory" and has had a peacekeeping mission there since 1991, whose stated aim is to organise a referendum on the territory's future. But Rabat has repeatedly ruled out any vote where independence is an option, instead proposing an autonomy plan. The ceasefire collapsed in mid-November 2020 after Moroccan troops were deployed to the far south of the territory to remove separatists blocking the only route to Mauritania — a route they claimed was illegal, as it did not exist in 1991. The UN Security Council is calling for negotiations without preconditions, while Morocco insists they focus solely on its autonomy plan. "The only viable and durable solution will be one that is mutually acceptable to the relevant parties and is arrived at through compromise," added Lammy. In a joint statement, the United Kingdom noted that its export credit agency, UK Export Finance, may consider supporting projects in the Sahara as part of its commitment to mobilise 5 billion British pounds (approximately 5.9 billion euros) for new economic initiatives in Morocco. isb-anr/fka/ysm/dcp

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store