Florida sheriffs move quickly on immigration enforcement
All of the state's 67 counties have entered agreements with federal immigration authorities to detain undocumented immigrant criminals in jails, the Florida Sheriffs Association announced on Monday as the state rushes to assist mass deportation efforts.
Compliance with state law
The agreements bring counties into compliance with part of a state law (SB 2-C) passed during a special legislative session this month aimed at boosting enforcement of illegal immigration.
Under the agreements, sheriffs' deputies with special training can process immigration "detainers" issued by federal authorities to keep inmates in jail.
The inmates can be kept up to 48 hours before being picked up by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers.
"Warrant service officer" program
The "warrant service officer" program is a key part of the administration's crackdown on illegal immigration and focuses on undocumented immigrants who have committed crimes or been ordered to be deported by judges, according to Pinellas County Sheriff Bob Gualtieri.
Focus on criminal and public safety threats
"Their priority is apprehending and deporting as quickly as possible those who are criminally illegal, public safety threats, national security threats, those who have been previously deported and come back again," Gualtieri said Monday at a news conference in Winter Haven.
"The most pressing need they have is people who are booked into our jails … so these people are not released back into our community to commit more crimes."
Training and implementation
Training for deputies to participate in the program, which Gualtieri said was halted throughout the previous administration's tenure, is expected to ramp up quickly.
"Implementing the process under which all jails will be able to hold these criminals is well underway, and we hope to have it fully operational within the next 15 to 30 days," Gualtieri said.
"This is a big deal because it means criminals like these, people who kill, people who steal, people who break into people's houses, people who rape kids, will be deported directly from jail and not released back to the street. … It just makes sense, from the jail out of here, as opposed to, (from) the jail back to the street."
Capacity concerns and federal beds
As state and local efforts accelerate, sheriffs warned that the administration needs to quickly increase the number of beds available for undocumented immigrants waiting to be processed and deported.
Federal immigration authorities have about 2,000 beds in Florida "and they're full," Gualtieri said.
Local jails and overwhelming capacity
The Pinellas County sheriff said he is holding 150 undocumented immigrants on detainers at his jail, which has 3,000 inmates. Polk County Sheriff Grady Judd said bed capacity is the "number one" issue for federal immigration authorities.
Florida sheriffs are conducting an inventory of available beds, but the anticipated ramp-up of county enforcement efforts could "overwhelm the current ability to house people in days," according to Judd.
"There's not capacity in the Florida sheriffs or the county jails to make any negligible difference," Judd said.
"We will overwhelm this system very rapidly and we intend to work very aggressively but that's why we're here making this statement today. They have to create capacity."
Complexity of immigration laws
Charlotte County Sheriff Bill Prummell, who serves as president of the sheriffs association, said sheriffs are getting educated about "very, very complex" immigration laws as the federal government revamps enforcement programs.
"It's all very fluid," Prummell said. "We're all trying to catch on and learn how this works. … There's a lot of chaos up there in D.C. still, so sometimes the right hand doesn't know what the left hand is doing up there. So we're trying to get a whole handle on what's going on up there so we can start implementing policies, procedures and what we need to do to get the job done, to keep our citizens safe here."
State Board of Immigration Enforcement
The new Florida immigration law also created a State Board of Immigration Enforcement, which is made up of officials. Decisions made by the board must be unanimous.
The board met for the first time last week and named as its executive director Larry Keefe, a former North Florida federal prosecutor who served in a public safety capacity.
State crime for illegal entry
Lawmakers during the special session also approved a measure (SB 4-C) that makes it a state crime for undocumented immigrants to enter or attempt to enter Florida.
People who violate the law face a mandatory nine-month jail sentence.
ACLU concerns about racial profiling
Kara Gross, legislative director and senior policy counsel at the American Civil Liberties Union of Florida, told reporters Monday that the law is "overly broad and vague" and will "lead to rampant racial profiling" of people who are perceived to be immigrants.
"This law and the rhetoric surrounding it create an environment that will inevitably lead to racial and ethnic profiling of anyone perceived to be an immigrant based on the color of their skin, the accent in their voice, the neighborhoods they live in, or the restaurants and businesses they frequent," Gross said.
Sheriffs deny racial profiling
But the sheriffs pushed back when asked if the new laws would result in racial profiling.
"We're tired of hearing that crap. That's BS," Judd said. Local and federal officials are targeting undocumented immigrants who have committed crimes or those who have been ordered to leave the country, he argued.
"Take a deep breath. Save that crazy talk for somebody else. … We've got a plate full of illegal immigrants committing crimes and warrants to deport those that have flaunted the system, and all this crazy talk just scares people that don't need to be scared. Just follow what the federal government tells you to do when they tell you to do it," Judd said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
'Stand up for immigrants': Iowans gather in solidarity with LA protests, rally against ICE
More than 100 people gathered in downtown Des Moines to show support for immigrants' rights as protesters more than 1,600 miles away in Los Angeles continue to rally against U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement's efforts to deport people without legal status. As protests in California entered their fifth day on Tuesday, June 10, demonstrations have sprung up in major cities around the country in at least a dozen cities that included San Francisco, New York, Washington, Boston, Dallas, Chicago and Atlanta. The Iowa chapter of the Party for Socialism and Liberation held a small protest at Cowles Commons to show solidarity for immigrants and rally against President Donald Trump's deployment of the National Guard and U.S. Marines to quell protesters. "We're here to stand up for members of our community. For immigrants. For migrants. For refugees. For people with disabilities. For people on Medicaid. For seniors. For all the working class, because we are all under attack right now," said Jake Grobe, a community organizer who led the protest. "And Trump is trying to scapegoat immigrants and make them the enemy, calling them criminals." Immigration raids in Los Angeles on the afternoon of June 6 sparked a small protest. The next day, larger protests began in the town of Paramount, south of Los Angeles, linked to rumors of a possible immigration raid. Toward the evening on June 7, Trump ordered 2,000 National Guard members to the area. That night, protesters threw rocks, bottles, and fireworks at officers. Local police declared a small part of downtown Los Angeles an unlawful assembly area, and large numbers of protesters were cleared from the site. More: Curfew enacted for parts of downtown LA; Newsom seeks to limit Marine deployment: Updates Mayor Karen Bass issued a curfew for parts of downtown Los Angeles on June 10 following intense days of protests. Demonstrators allege the Trump administration's immigration enforcement has violated civil and human rights. The sweeping immigration efforts, a hallmark of Trump's second term, has also caught up people legally residing in the country and led to legal challenges. Protesters nationwide are expected to hold 'No Kings' rallies June 14, which coincide with Trump's 79th birthday and come one week after the president mobilized the National Guard in Los Angeles. Rallies, including in Des Moines, Ames and Iowa City, will precede a large-scale military parade in Washington, D.C., celebrating the 250th anniversary of the U.S. Army. Back in Des Moines, Paulina Ocegueda drove with a friend from Ottumwa to the capital city to lend their support. For Ocegueda, the fight was personal. She said it took years for her parents, who originally came from Mexico, to become U.S. citizens. She said she is proud to be Mexican-American but that it is tough to "represent the American side right now." "I want to make sure that all of the immigrants, not just Mexicans but people from Colombia, people from Haiti, people from Burmese communities, be represented here today," she said. Des Moines resident Wendy Espinoza felt similarly. Espinoza, who attended the event with her two sisters, said they came to represent their parents, who came to the U.S. from Mexico for a better future. They wanted to "stick up for them" and for the many others "who don't have a voice," the 23-year-old said. The group chanted "Power to the people. No one is illegal," and "No justice, no peace. We want ICE off our streets." Des Moines police were present but the rally stayed peaceful. In the far back of the crowd, Julius De La Cruz, 24, stood next to his pregnant wife and listened to the speakers. De La Cruz of Des Moines said he is frustrated. "You got families that work their a-- off, and all they do is just work their a-- off for their family, for a better life, a future here, and then you get them taken away like that in the blink of an eye," he said, referring to masked ICE agents who have been seen on video arresting migrants outside of court hearings and at businesses. He hopes better for his child. "I don't want my kid to grow up and see all the hate," he said. "I grew up around people who just showed nothing but love and positivity, who never judge people, never judge a book by its cover. I don't want my kid to grow up around nothing but hate." USA Today and the Iowa City Press-Citizen contributed to this report. F. Amanda Tugade covers social justice issues for the Des Moines Register. Email her at ftugade@ or follow her on X @writefelissa. This article originally appeared on Des Moines Register: Anti-ICE rally comes to Des Moines in solidarity with LA protests
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
What is No Kings day? See map of protests planned in Connecticut. What you should know
About 30 protests are set to take place across Connecticut on June 14 in response to the Trump administration's policies, including one in Norwich. The 'No Kings National Day of Mobilization' comes as protests against U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement in Los Angeles have escalated after President Donald Trump deployed federal troops to the state. Thousands of communities across the country have No Kings demonstrations scheduled for June 14, which is also the same day as the Trump administration has planned a pomp-filled military parade in Washington, D.C. In Norwich, the protest will take place from 4 to 5 p.m. in Franklin Square Roundabout, Main Street. The demonstrations are organized by Indivisible, a nonprofit coalition of progressive political action groups. Indivisible said that they're organizing 'to reject corrupt, authoritarian politics.' 'They've defied our courts, deported citizens, disappeared people off the streets, attacked our civil rights, slashed essential services, and handed billions to their allies,' reads a press release. 'Enough is enough.' The date is significant: June 14 is the day that President Donald Trump is getting a long-dreamt-of military parade — marking the Army's 250th anniversary on a date that coincides with his own birthday. The protests are a retaliation to the parade, and meant to draw attention away from it. Organizers say action is being taken to reject the notion the country is ruled by a "king" and to show what democracy looks like: "people, united, refusing to be ruled." 'This country doesn't belong to a king — and we're not letting him throw himself a parade funded by tens of millions of our taxpayer dollars while stealing from us and stripping away our rights, our freedoms, and the programs our families rely on,' says the release. Indivisible said that the protests are meant to be nonviolent and discouraged bringing weapons of any kind. About 30 communities in Connecticut are holding No Kings protests on June 14. Here's a list as of June 11. ➤ Bethel Bridgeport Brookfield Canton Cornwall Dayville Durham East Haddam East Lyme Ensfield Glastonbury Guilford Hartford Litchfield Manchester Middletown New Haven New London Newton Norwich Salisbury Southbury Stamford Torrington Trumbell Warren Waterbury Westport Willimantic Windsor To see a map of registered No Kings protests across the U.S., go to Trump has promised retaliation for protesters at the military parade. 'For those people that want to protest, they're going to be met with very big force,' Trump said in a statement at the Oval Office on June 10. 'This is people that hate our country, but they will be met with very heavy force.' Contributing: Dan Medeiros This article originally appeared on The Bulletin: No Kings day protests planned June 14. See locations of CT events
Time Magazine
2 hours ago
- Time Magazine
A Look Back at the Last Major U.S. National Military Parade in 1991
To mark the 250th anniversary of the United States Army, Washington D.C. will play host to a national military parade on Saturday, June 14. The date also falls in line with President Donald Trump 's 79th birthday, but the U.S. Army has said it has no plans to mark the occasion alongside the parade. Either way, the President is still expected to play a significant role in the celebrations. But the event comes at a highly precarious time, amid nationwide protests which started in Los Angeles when people rallied against raids conducted by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). After some of the protests descended into violence, Trump controversially deployed the National Guard and active-duty Marines to L.A. to quell the demonstrations. The move was made without a request from California Gov. Gavin Newsom, who has taken legal action against the Trump Administration. Amid backlash, the 'No Kings' movement is expected to hold nationwide protests against Trump on Saturday, including in Arlington, Virginia, across the Potomac River from Washington, D.C. Speaking at the Oval Office on Tuesday, Trump warned against people who planned to protest at the upcoming parade, telling reporters:"For those who want to protest, they're going to be met with very big force." Even prior to the recent escalated tension over immigration efforts, Trump's decision to hold the parade received criticism, especially from some Democratic lawmakers. Sen. Tammy Duckworth of Illinois, who is an Iraq War veteran, has called it an 'egotistical, nonsensical birthday parade.' While Sen. Adam Schiff of California described it as a ' dictator-style military parade ' and accused Trump of spending millions of tax dollars to throw himself a 'birthday party.' The upcoming parade is expected to cost around $45 million, including $16 million in damages to roads after tanks and other heavy vehicles tour the streets of Washington. It's set to be a grand affair, involving an estimated 6,500 U.S. troops, 150 vehicles, and 50 aircraft. This is the first major national military parade in the U.S. since 1991. President George H. W. Bush held the event on June 8 that year, after the U.S. led a successful coalition in the Gulf War. As the U.S. gets ready for Trump's much-discussed June 14 military parade, here's everything you need to know about the last one that took place 34 years ago. Why exactly was the 1991 military parade held? The parade was held to celebrate the military success of the U.S.-led coalition in the Gulf War, which came to a conclusion in late February. The first phase of the war, named Operation Desert Shield, involved a military and personnel coalition in Saudi Arabia from August 1990 to January 1991, hashed out on the border with Kuwait which had been invaded by Iraq, under the eye of Saddam Hussein. On Jan. 17, 1991, the war entered its second phase, Operation Desert Storm, in which the U.S-led coalition orchestrated an aerial and naval bombardment of Iraqi forces in Kuwait. This was followed by a ground operation, which lasted for five days, concluding on Feb. 28, with Kuwait liberated and Iraqi forces expelled. On the evening that Desert Storm began, President Bush addressed the nation in a speech from the Oval Office, saying: 'I've told the American people before that this will not be another Vietnam, and I repeat this here tonight. Our troops will have the best possible support in the entire world, and they will not be asked to fight with one hand tied behind their back.' He added: 'This is an historic moment. We have in this past year made great progress in ending the long era of conflict and cold war. We have before us the opportunity to forge for ourselves and for future generations a new world order.' But it wasn't only the Gulf War occupying the minds of Americans during the 1991 military parade. Bill Allison, a professor of history at Georgia Southern University, says that the legacy of the Vietnam War, which ended in April 1975, was still very much felt. 'Vietnam was looming large in that rear-view mirror. Vietnam veterans didn't get a parade and the war was a hot mess,' he says. "[For symbolic reasons], there was also a group of Vietnam veterans invited to march in the 1991 parade and as Bush said, ' We've kicked the Vietnam syndrome.'' Connor Williams, a professor of history at Yale, says that this campaign changed the American mindset on the military. 'Desert Shield and Desert Storm provided a relationship with the military that had not been seen in a generation… The incredible swiftness and completeness of that victory left a lot to celebrate,' he notes. The Gulf War was also the first major conflict in which the U.S. deployed a fully voluntary military force after conscriptions in both World Wars, the Korean War, and the Vietnam War. 'For the United States, [the parade] was a testament to the volunteer work force and that had been a very risky move at the time,' says Allison. How much did the 1991 military parade cost? The parade is estimated to have cost around $12 million, which adjusted for inflation, translates to roughly £28 million today. An estimated $5 million dollars in 1991 was raised by the volunteer Homecoming Foundation, established to support military personnel returning from the Gulf and to help coordinate the parade. Around 700 foundation volunteers were also present to help the clean-up operation. Although, with roughly 8,000 troops marching through the streets of the nation's capital, the show of military might attracted a far smaller crowd than expected. Only 200,000 showed up to the parade early in the day, with numbers peaking later in the evening, when around 800,000 were present for the glittering fireworks display. Was there criticism of the 1991 military parade? Whilst there were some, such as anti-war protesters and people concerned about the cost, who voiced disapproval over the parade, there didn't appear to be too much criticism from lawmakers, according to historians. "One thing that will always unite politicians is supporting the troops, [even though] there's different opinions on how the troops should be supported," Williams says, adding that this sentiment can change if there is no notable military success to honor. 'In 1991, it was very much a campaign event for everybody. The salute Bush exchanged with Norman Schwarzkopf [a U.S. Army General during the Gulf War] was highly photographed. There was a [presidential] election the next year and there was a lot of B-roll happening because Bush and Democratic leaders wanted to be seen shaking hands and supporting the troops,' Williams says. The only significant demonstration was a group of anti-war activists delivering speeches in Lafayette Park, on the opposite side of the White House to the parade, which went down Constitution Avenue. In January 1991, during the conflict in Kuwait, thousands of protestors attended multiple anti-war demonstrations, centered around humanitarian worries. What was the message being sent at the 1991 military parade? Experts tell TIME that, generally speaking, there are three key reasons behind military parades, including the one held in 1991: Celebrating the troops Rallying the public Sending a message to other countries 'In 1991, it was more about rallying the people and celebrating the troops. To some extent, the U.S. didn't need to display power like the Soviets did. The power had already been displayed. People had been watching the capability of the U.S. military on the nightly news,' says Williams. 'Not everyone [tanks and personnel] rolled down Pennsylvania avenue to give off that effect. It was more a way for people to celebrate what they thought was emerging, a unipolar world.' As for Trump's upcoming parade on June 14, Williams says that it 'will be interesting' to see how U.S. strength is displayed anew. 'Will it be demonstrated in a peaceful way or in attack mode? How will the people respond?' That remains to be seen.
